Araştırma Makalesi

A Comparison of Cognitive Function, Physical and Mental Fatigue, and Dual-Task Difficulties in Physically Active and Inactive Young Adults

Cilt: 14 Sayı: 3 17 Eylül 2026
PDF İndir
EN TR

A Comparison of Cognitive Function, Physical and Mental Fatigue, and Dual-Task Difficulties in Physically Active and Inactive Young Adults

Öz

Purpose: Physical activity is associated with cognitive function, fatigue, and dual-task difficulties; however, these variables have not been sufficiently examined together in young adults. This study aimed to compare cognitive status, physical and mental fatigue, and dual-task difficulties between physically active and inactive young adults. Material and Methods: A total of 181 young adults were included. Data were collected online using a sociodemographic form, the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ), the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), the Mental Fatigue Scale (MFS), and the Dual-Task Questionnaire (DTQ). Participants were divided into physically active (≥3 days/week) and inactive (<3 days/week) groups. Results: The study was completed with 174 participants (134 females, 40 males; mean age: 24.82 ± 5.59 years). Physically active individuals (n=81) had significantly better cognitive function and experienced fewer dual-task difficulties than inactive individuals (p<0.05). No significant differences were found between the groups in physical or mental fatigue (p>0.05). Discussion: Physically inactive young adults demonstrated poorer cognitive function and experienced more dual-task difficulties than their physically active counterparts. However, no significant differences were observed in physical or mental fatigue. These findings suggest that regular physical activity may be associated with better cognitive function and fewer dual-task difficulties in everyday life. The use of objective assessment methods is recommended in future studies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Destekleyen Kurum

There are no supporting organizations.

Proje Numarası

2025-038

Etik Beyan

Ethical approval was obtained from the Gülhane Scientific Research Ethics Committee of the University of Health Sciences (approval date: December 18, 2025; decision number: 2025-038) and was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration.

Teşekkür

The authors thank all participants for their contributions.

Kaynakça

  1. Ali, N., Tian, H., Thabane, L., Ma, J., Wu, H., Zhong, Q., et al. (2022). The effects of dual-task training on cognitive and physical functions in older adults with cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease, 9(2), 359–370. https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2022.16
  2. Aminirakan, D., Linnhoff, D., & Wollesen, B. (2026). Effects of different training characteristics in combined resistance and cognitive training on motor and cognitive performance in older adults: A systematic review. European Review of Aging and Physical Activity, 23(4), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-026-00403-3
  3. Armutlu, K., Korkmaz, N. C., Keser, I., Sumbuloglu, V., Akbiyik, D. I., Guney, Z., et al. (2007). The validity and reliability of the Fatigue Severity Scale in Turkish multiple sclerosis patients. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 30(1), 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0b013e3280146ec4
  4. Barakou, I., Sakalidis, K. E., Abonie, U. S., Finch, T., Hackett, K. L., & Hettinga, F. J. (2023). Effectiveness of physical activity interventions on reducing perceived fatigue among adults with chronic conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 14582. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41075-8
  5. Baran, E., & Yılmaz, A. (2025). The relationship between physical activity, fatigue, sleep quality, and anxiety levels of students during the university examination period. Northwestern Med J, 5(1), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.54307/2025.NWMJ.143
  6. Bonnie, R. J., Stroud, C., Breiner, H., Committee on Improving the Health, Safety, and Well-Being of Young Adults, Board on Children, Youth, and Families, Institute of Medicine, & National Research Council (Eds.). (2015). Investing in the Health and Well-Being of Young Adults. National Academies Press (US). doi:10.17226/18869
  7. Bull, F. C., Al-Ansari, S. S., Biddle, S., Borodulin, K., Buman, M. P., Cardon, G., et al. (2020). World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 54(24), 1451–1462. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955
  8. Broadbent, D. E., Cooper, P. F., FitzGerald, P., & Parkes, K. R. (1982). The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. The British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1982.tb01421.x

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Rehabilitasyon

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

17 Eylül 2026

Gönderilme Tarihi

2 Nisan 2026

Kabul Tarihi

11 Ağustos 2026

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2026 Cilt: 14 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA
Abrak, E., & İnal Özün, Ö. (2026). A Comparison of Cognitive Function, Physical and Mental Fatigue, and Dual-Task Difficulties in Physically Active and Inactive Young Adults. Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, 14(3), 199-207. https://doi.org/10.30720/ered.1921558
AMA
1.Abrak E, İnal Özün Ö. A Comparison of Cognitive Function, Physical and Mental Fatigue, and Dual-Task Difficulties in Physically Active and Inactive Young Adults. Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 2026;14(3):199-207. doi:10.30720/ered.1921558
Chicago
Abrak, Esma, ve Özgü İnal Özün. 2026. “A Comparison of Cognitive Function, Physical and Mental Fatigue, and Dual-Task Difficulties in Physically Active and Inactive Young Adults”. Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 14 (3): 199-207. https://doi.org/10.30720/ered.1921558.
EndNote
Abrak E, İnal Özün Ö (01 Eylül 2026) A Comparison of Cognitive Function, Physical and Mental Fatigue, and Dual-Task Difficulties in Physically Active and Inactive Young Adults. Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 14 3 199–207.
IEEE
[1]E. Abrak ve Ö. İnal Özün, “A Comparison of Cognitive Function, Physical and Mental Fatigue, and Dual-Task Difficulties in Physically Active and Inactive Young Adults”, Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, c. 14, sy 3, ss. 199–207, Eyl. 2026, doi: 10.30720/ered.1921558.
ISNAD
Abrak, Esma - İnal Özün, Özgü. “A Comparison of Cognitive Function, Physical and Mental Fatigue, and Dual-Task Difficulties in Physically Active and Inactive Young Adults”. Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 14/3 (01 Eylül 2026): 199-207. https://doi.org/10.30720/ered.1921558.
JAMA
1.Abrak E, İnal Özün Ö. A Comparison of Cognitive Function, Physical and Mental Fatigue, and Dual-Task Difficulties in Physically Active and Inactive Young Adults. Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 2026;14:199–207.
MLA
Abrak, Esma, ve Özgü İnal Özün. “A Comparison of Cognitive Function, Physical and Mental Fatigue, and Dual-Task Difficulties in Physically Active and Inactive Young Adults”. Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, c. 14, sy 3, Eylül 2026, ss. 199-07, doi:10.30720/ered.1921558.
Vancouver
1.Esma Abrak, Özgü İnal Özün. A Comparison of Cognitive Function, Physical and Mental Fatigue, and Dual-Task Difficulties in Physically Active and Inactive Young Adults. Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 01 Eylül 2026;14(3):199-207. doi:10.30720/ered.1921558

Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi by Hacettepe University, Faculty of Health Sciences is licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internationalcc.svg?ref=chooser-v1by.svg?ref=chooser-v1nc.svg?ref=chooser-v1