Araştırma Makalesi
Yıl 2020,
Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 45 - 52, 18.12.2019
Öz
Kaynakça
- Referans 1 Alexandris, K. & Carroll, B. (1997). Demographic differences in the perception of constraints on recreational sport participation: Results from a study in Greece. Leisure Studies, 16, 107- 125.Referans 2 Alexandris, K., Tsorbatzoudis, C. & Grouios, G. (2002). Perceived constraints on recreational participation: Investigating their relationship with intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation and amotivation. Journal of Leisure Research,34: 233-252.Referans 3 Akın, A., & Taş, İ. (2015). Yaşam Anlamı Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Turkish Studies-International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 10(3), 27-36.Referans 4 Azevedo, M.R., Pavin Araújo, C. L., Reichert, F.F., Siqueira, F.N, Cozzensa da Silva, M. & Hallal, P.C. (2007). Gender Differences in Leisure-Time Physical Activity. International Journal of Public Health, 52: 8–15.Referans 5 Carruthers, C., & Hood, C. D. (2007). Building a Life of Meaning Through Therapeutic Recreation: The Leisure and Well-being Model, Part I. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 41(4), 276–297.Referans 6 Chun, S., & Lee, Y. (2010). The Role of Leisure in the Experience of Posttraumatic Growth for People with Spinal Cord Injury. Journal of Leisure Research, 42(3), 393–415. Referans 7 Crawford, D. & Godbey, G. (1987). Reconceptualizing barriers to family leisure. Leisure Sciences, 9, 119–127.Referans 8 Crawford, D. W., Jackson, E. L., & Godbey, G. (1991). A hierarchical model of leisure constraints. Leisure Sciences, 13(4), 309–320.Referans 9 Godbey, G., Crawford, D. W„ & Shen, X. S. (2010). Assessing hierarchical leisure constraints theory after two decades. Journal o f Leisure Research. 42(1), 111-134.Referans 10 Gomes, C.S., Matozinhos, F.P., Mendes, L.L., Pessoa, M.C. & Velasquez-Melendez, G. (2016). Physical and Social Environment Are Associated to Leisure Time Physical Activity in Adult of A Brazilian City: A Cross-Sectional Study. PLOS ONE, 11(2), 1-11.Referans 11 Gümüş, H., & Özgül, S. A. (2017). Development of scales for barriers to participation and preference factors in the use of recreation area. Journal of Human Sciences, 14(1), 865-882.Referans 12 Gürbüz, B. & Henderson K..A. (2014). Leisure Activity Preferences and Constraints: Perspectives from Turkey. World Leisure Journal, 56(4), 300-316.Referans 13 Hopkins, H. L., &Smith, H. D. (1993). Occupational therapy (8th ed.). Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.Referans 14 Hubbard, J. & Mannell, R.C. (2001). Testing competing models of the leisure constraints negotiation process ina corporate employee recreation setting. Leisure Sciences, 23: 145-163.Referans 15 Hutchinson, S. L., & Nimrod, G. (2012). Leisure as a Resource for Successful Aging by Older Adults with Chronic Health Conditions. The International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 74(1), 41–65.Referans 16 Iwasaki, Y. (2018). Leisure and Meaning-Making: The Pursuit of a Meaningful Life Through Leisure. In Global leisure and the struggle for a better world (pp. 287-302). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. Referans 17 Iwasaki, Y., Coyle, C., Shank, J., Messina, E., & Porter, H. (2013). Leisure-Generated Meanings and Active Living for Persons with Mental Illness. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 57(1), 46–56.Referans 18 Iwasaki, Y., MacKay, K., Mactavish, J., Ristock, J., & Bartlett, J. (2006). Voices from the margins: Stress, active living, and leisure as a contributor to coping with stress. Leisure Sciences, 28, 163–180.Referans 19 Jackson, E.L. (2000). Will research on leisure constraints still be relevant in the twenty-first century? Journal of Leisure Research, 32, 62–68.Referans 20 Jun, J. & Kyle, G.T. (2011). The Effect of Identiy Conflict/Facilitation on the Experience of Constraints to Leisure and Constraint Negotiation. Journal of Leisure Research, 43(2), 176-204.Referans 21 Kara, F.M. & Özdeoğlu, B. (2017). Examination of Relationship Between Leisure Boredom and Leisure Constraints, Sport Sciences,12(3),24-36.Referans 22 Kielhofner, G. (2002). A model of human occupation: Theory and application. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Referans 23 Kocak, F. (2017). The relationship between leisure constraints, constraint negotiation strategies and facilitators with recreational sport activity participation of college students. College Student Journal, 51(4), 491-497.Referans 24 Masmanidis, T., Gargalianos, D. & Kosta, G. (2009). Perceived Constrains of Greek University Students’ Participation in Campus Recreational Sport Programs. Recreational Sports Journal, 33, 150-166.Referans 25 Molina-García, J., Castillo, I., & Pablos, C. (2009). Determinants of leisure-time physical activity and future intention to practice in Spanish college students. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12(1), 128-137.Referans 26 Newman, D. B., Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2014). Leisure and Subjective Well-being: A Model of Psychological Mechanisms as Mediating Factors. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(3), 555–578.Referans 27 Öcal, K. (2012). Ölçek geliştirme: Serbest zaman fiziksel aktivite kısıtlayıcıları (SZFA-K). Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 23(2), 50-60.Referans 28 Sarol, H. (2017). Examination of the constraints and facilitators to physical activity participation of individuals Bireylerin fiziksel aktiviteye katılımını engelleyen ve kolaylaştıran faktörlerin belirlenmesi. Journal of Human Sciences, 14(4), 4354-4364.Referans 29 Son, J.S., Mowen, A.J., Kerstetter, D.L. (2008). Testing alternative leisure constraint negotiation models: An extension of Hubbard and Manned's study. Leisure Sciences, 30 (3), 198-216.Referans 30 T. C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Türkiye Halk Sağlığı Kurumu (2013). Türkiye Kronik Hastalıklar Ve Risk Faktörleri Sıklığı Çalışması. Sağlık Bakanlığı Yayın No: 909, Ankara.Referans 31 Turner, H., Chapman, S., McSherry, A., Krishnagiri, S., & Watts, J. (2000). Leisure assessment in occupational therapy: An exploratory study. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 12(2-3), 73-85.Referans 32 Watters, A. M., Pearce, C., Backman, C. L., & Suto, M. J. (2013). Occupational Engagement and Meaning: The Experience of Ikebana Practice. Journal of Occupational Science, 20(3), 262–277. Referans 33 White, D. D. (2008). A structural model of leisure constraints negotiation in outdoor recreation. Leisure sciences, 30(4), 342-359.Referans 34 World Health Organization (2018). Physical Activity. [Erişim tarihi: 25.02.2019]. Erişim adresi: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/physical-activity. Referans 35 World Health Organization (2014). Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. [Erişim tarihi: 20.02.2019]. Erişim adresi: http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/factsheet_inactivity/en/. Referans 36 Yerlisu Lapa T., Hazirlar H. (2016). The correlation of leisure constraints, constraint negotiation strategies and facilitators with leisure participation of university students. 14th International Sports Sciences Congress, pp. 717, October 1-4, Antalya, Turkey.
Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Serbest Zaman Fiziksel Aktivite Kısıtlayıcıları İle Yaşamın Anlamı Arasındaki İlişki
Öz
Amaç:
Bu çalışma üniversite öğrencilerinde serbest zaman fiziksel aktivite
kısıtlayıcıları ile yaşamın anlamı arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi amacıyla
planlandı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya
18-25 yaş arasında toplam 97 öğrenci dahil edildi. Öğrencilerin tanımlayıcı
özellikleri kaydedildi. Serbest zaman fiziksel aktivite kısıtlayıcılarını
belirlemek için Serbest Zaman Fiziksel Aktivite Kısıtlayıcıları (SZFA-K) Ölçeği
ve yaşamın anlamının belirlenmesi için Yaşamın Anlamı Ölçeği (YAÖ) kullanıldı. Sonuçlar: SZFA-K alt boyutlarından
irade ile YAÖ alt boyutlarından mevcut anlam arasında zayıf düzeyde negatif
yönde anlamlı korelasyon (r=-.206; p=.043) saptandı. Diğer alt boyutlar
arasında ise anlamlı korelasyon saptanmadı. Tartışma: Çalışmamızda, serbest zaman fiziksel aktivite
kısıtlayıcılarından irade faktörünün mevcut yaşamın anlamı ile ilişkisi
olabileceği belirlendi. Serbest zaman fiziksel aktivite katılımının
arttırılmasına yönelik programlar geliştirilirken; yapısal engeller kadar kişisel
faktörlerin de ayrıntılı incelenmesinin önemli olduğu düşünülmektedir.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Referans 1 Alexandris, K. & Carroll, B. (1997). Demographic differences in the perception of constraints on recreational sport participation: Results from a study in Greece. Leisure Studies, 16, 107- 125.Referans 2 Alexandris, K., Tsorbatzoudis, C. & Grouios, G. (2002). Perceived constraints on recreational participation: Investigating their relationship with intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation and amotivation. Journal of Leisure Research,34: 233-252.Referans 3 Akın, A., & Taş, İ. (2015). Yaşam Anlamı Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Turkish Studies-International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 10(3), 27-36.Referans 4 Azevedo, M.R., Pavin Araújo, C. L., Reichert, F.F., Siqueira, F.N, Cozzensa da Silva, M. & Hallal, P.C. (2007). Gender Differences in Leisure-Time Physical Activity. International Journal of Public Health, 52: 8–15.Referans 5 Carruthers, C., & Hood, C. D. (2007). Building a Life of Meaning Through Therapeutic Recreation: The Leisure and Well-being Model, Part I. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 41(4), 276–297.Referans 6 Chun, S., & Lee, Y. (2010). The Role of Leisure in the Experience of Posttraumatic Growth for People with Spinal Cord Injury. Journal of Leisure Research, 42(3), 393–415. Referans 7 Crawford, D. & Godbey, G. (1987). Reconceptualizing barriers to family leisure. Leisure Sciences, 9, 119–127.Referans 8 Crawford, D. W., Jackson, E. L., & Godbey, G. (1991). A hierarchical model of leisure constraints. Leisure Sciences, 13(4), 309–320.Referans 9 Godbey, G., Crawford, D. W„ & Shen, X. S. (2010). Assessing hierarchical leisure constraints theory after two decades. Journal o f Leisure Research. 42(1), 111-134.Referans 10 Gomes, C.S., Matozinhos, F.P., Mendes, L.L., Pessoa, M.C. & Velasquez-Melendez, G. (2016). Physical and Social Environment Are Associated to Leisure Time Physical Activity in Adult of A Brazilian City: A Cross-Sectional Study. PLOS ONE, 11(2), 1-11.Referans 11 Gümüş, H., & Özgül, S. A. (2017). Development of scales for barriers to participation and preference factors in the use of recreation area. Journal of Human Sciences, 14(1), 865-882.Referans 12 Gürbüz, B. & Henderson K..A. (2014). Leisure Activity Preferences and Constraints: Perspectives from Turkey. World Leisure Journal, 56(4), 300-316.Referans 13 Hopkins, H. L., &Smith, H. D. (1993). Occupational therapy (8th ed.). Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.Referans 14 Hubbard, J. & Mannell, R.C. (2001). Testing competing models of the leisure constraints negotiation process ina corporate employee recreation setting. Leisure Sciences, 23: 145-163.Referans 15 Hutchinson, S. L., & Nimrod, G. (2012). Leisure as a Resource for Successful Aging by Older Adults with Chronic Health Conditions. The International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 74(1), 41–65.Referans 16 Iwasaki, Y. (2018). Leisure and Meaning-Making: The Pursuit of a Meaningful Life Through Leisure. In Global leisure and the struggle for a better world (pp. 287-302). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. Referans 17 Iwasaki, Y., Coyle, C., Shank, J., Messina, E., & Porter, H. (2013). Leisure-Generated Meanings and Active Living for Persons with Mental Illness. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 57(1), 46–56.Referans 18 Iwasaki, Y., MacKay, K., Mactavish, J., Ristock, J., & Bartlett, J. (2006). Voices from the margins: Stress, active living, and leisure as a contributor to coping with stress. Leisure Sciences, 28, 163–180.Referans 19 Jackson, E.L. (2000). Will research on leisure constraints still be relevant in the twenty-first century? Journal of Leisure Research, 32, 62–68.Referans 20 Jun, J. & Kyle, G.T. (2011). The Effect of Identiy Conflict/Facilitation on the Experience of Constraints to Leisure and Constraint Negotiation. Journal of Leisure Research, 43(2), 176-204.Referans 21 Kara, F.M. & Özdeoğlu, B. (2017). Examination of Relationship Between Leisure Boredom and Leisure Constraints, Sport Sciences,12(3),24-36.Referans 22 Kielhofner, G. (2002). A model of human occupation: Theory and application. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Referans 23 Kocak, F. (2017). The relationship between leisure constraints, constraint negotiation strategies and facilitators with recreational sport activity participation of college students. College Student Journal, 51(4), 491-497.Referans 24 Masmanidis, T., Gargalianos, D. & Kosta, G. (2009). Perceived Constrains of Greek University Students’ Participation in Campus Recreational Sport Programs. Recreational Sports Journal, 33, 150-166.Referans 25 Molina-García, J., Castillo, I., & Pablos, C. (2009). Determinants of leisure-time physical activity and future intention to practice in Spanish college students. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12(1), 128-137.Referans 26 Newman, D. B., Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2014). Leisure and Subjective Well-being: A Model of Psychological Mechanisms as Mediating Factors. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(3), 555–578.Referans 27 Öcal, K. (2012). Ölçek geliştirme: Serbest zaman fiziksel aktivite kısıtlayıcıları (SZFA-K). Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 23(2), 50-60.Referans 28 Sarol, H. (2017). Examination of the constraints and facilitators to physical activity participation of individuals Bireylerin fiziksel aktiviteye katılımını engelleyen ve kolaylaştıran faktörlerin belirlenmesi. Journal of Human Sciences, 14(4), 4354-4364.Referans 29 Son, J.S., Mowen, A.J., Kerstetter, D.L. (2008). Testing alternative leisure constraint negotiation models: An extension of Hubbard and Manned's study. Leisure Sciences, 30 (3), 198-216.Referans 30 T. C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Türkiye Halk Sağlığı Kurumu (2013). Türkiye Kronik Hastalıklar Ve Risk Faktörleri Sıklığı Çalışması. Sağlık Bakanlığı Yayın No: 909, Ankara.Referans 31 Turner, H., Chapman, S., McSherry, A., Krishnagiri, S., & Watts, J. (2000). Leisure assessment in occupational therapy: An exploratory study. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 12(2-3), 73-85.Referans 32 Watters, A. M., Pearce, C., Backman, C. L., & Suto, M. J. (2013). Occupational Engagement and Meaning: The Experience of Ikebana Practice. Journal of Occupational Science, 20(3), 262–277. Referans 33 White, D. D. (2008). A structural model of leisure constraints negotiation in outdoor recreation. Leisure sciences, 30(4), 342-359.Referans 34 World Health Organization (2018). Physical Activity. [Erişim tarihi: 25.02.2019]. Erişim adresi: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/physical-activity. Referans 35 World Health Organization (2014). Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. [Erişim tarihi: 20.02.2019]. Erişim adresi: http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/factsheet_inactivity/en/. Referans 36 Yerlisu Lapa T., Hazirlar H. (2016). The correlation of leisure constraints, constraint negotiation strategies and facilitators with leisure participation of university students. 14th International Sports Sciences Congress, pp. 717, October 1-4, Antalya, Turkey.
Toplam 1 adet kaynakça vardır.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | Türkçe |
|---|---|
| Konular | Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi |
| Bölüm | Araştırma Makalesi |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 18 Aralık 2019 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2020 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1 |
Kaynak Göster
Cited By
Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Serbest Zaman Fiziksel Aktiviteleri İle Yaşam Kalitesi Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi (Bilecik İli Örneği)
Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.37989/gumussagbil.1320545
Halkın Rekreasyonel Faaliyetlere Katılımını Engelleyen Faktörlerin İncelenmesi: Muğla İli Örneği
CBÜ Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.33459/cbubesbd.1241238
ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN KİLO YÖNETİMİNDE ALGILADIĞI ENGELLER
İnönü Üniversitesi Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksek Okulu Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.33715/inonusaglik.1032539
Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi by Hacettepe University, Faculty of Health Sciences is licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
