Young Adults' Accessible and Affordable Housing Challenge in Istanbul

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 6, 9 - 25, 30.06.2025

Ömer Faruk Ertürk , Ilkim Markoc

https://izlik.org/JA87EX93AZ

Öz

The purpose of this study is to explore the current housing challenges faced by young adults. For this purpose, the housing challenge around the world, in Turkey and Istanbul, has been presented. Based on the fact that housing accessibility is at the root of the housing challenge, the problem of housing accessibility is discussed in the context of changing demographic structure, affordability, and accessibility to qualified housing. This study highlights the incompatibility of the existing housing supply with changing household structures, income distributions, and lifestyles and demonstrates the growing demand for smaller housing units. Demographic changes such as the decrease in household size, the increase in the number of individuals living alone, and the aging population, as well as the increase in the number of divorces and the desire of young adults in the early stages of their careers to live in the city center, highlight the need for small, affordable, and functional housing. However, the existing housing stock is far from meeting these changing needs. Therefore, it is critical that housing policies take into account the economic and social needs of young adults and create more accessible and affordable solutions. As a result, the challenges young adults face in the housing market affect not only their individual well-being but also the economic and social dynamics of cities. The study found that smaller dwelling size can offer an important solution that supports not only the physical need for shelter but also the social and economic cohesion of young adults in metropolitan areas. The original contribution of this study to the literature is that it reveals the negative effects of the lack of planning of housing provision in accordance with current demographic and economic conditions on housing accessibility and, in this context, offers solutions for the development of user-oriented, inclusive, and sustainable housing policies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Housing Challenge , Accessible Housing , Changing Demographic Structure , Affordable Housing , Qualified Housing

İstanbul'da Genç Yetişkinlerin Erişilebilir ve Uygun Fiyatlı Konut Sorunu

https://izlik.org/JA87EX93AZ

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı İstanbul’daki genç yetişkinlerin konut sorununu güncel boyutlarıyla tartışmaktır. Bunun için öncelikle Dünya’da, Türkiye’de ve İstanbul’da konut sorunu ortaya konulmuştur. Konut sorununun temelinde konuta erişilebilirlik sorunu olmasından yola çıkarak konuta erişilebilirlik sorunu değişen demografik yapı, ekonomik erişilebilirlik ve nitelikli konuta erişilebilirlik bağlamında tartışılmıştır.
Çalışma, mevcut konut arzının değişen hane halkı yapıları, gelir dağılımı ve yaşam tarzları ile uyumsuzluğunu vurgulayarak özellikle küçük konutlara olan talebin giderek arttığını ortaya koymaktadır. Hane halkı büyüklüğündeki azalma, yalnız yaşayan bireylerin artışı ve yaşlanan nüfus gibi demografik değişimler ile birlikte boşanma sayısında meydana gelen artış ve henüz kariyerlerinin başlarında olan genç yetişkinlerin kent merkezinde yaşama isteği, küçük, ekonomik ve işlevsel konutların gerekliliğini ön plana çıkarmaktadır. Ancak, mevcut konut stoku bu değişen ihtiyaçları karşılamaktan uzaktır. Bu sebeple konut politikalarının, genç yetişkinlerin ekonomik ve sosyal ihtiyaçlarını göz önünde bulundurarak daha erişilebilir ve uygun fiyatlı çözümler üretmesi kritik bir gereklilik olarak ortaya çıkmaktadır.
Sonuç olarak genç yetişkinlerin konut piyasasında karşılaştığı zorluklar, yalnızca bireysel refahlarını değil, aynı zamanda kentlerin ekonomik ve sosyal dinamiklerini de etkilemektedir.
Çalışma, küçük konutların sadece fiziksel barınma ihtiyacını değil, aynı zamanda modern kent yaşamında bireylerin sosyal ve ekonomik uyumunu destekleyen önemli bir çözüm sunabileceğini ortaya çıkarmıştır.
Bu çalışmanın literatüre orijinal katkısı, günümüzde konut sunumunun güncel demografik ve ekonomik koşullara uygun şekilde planlanmamasının, konut erişilebilirliği üzerindeki olumsuz etkilerini ortaya koyması ve bu bağlamda, kullanıcı odaklı, kapsayıcı ve sürdürülebilir konut politikalarının geliştirilmesine yönelik çözüm önerileri sunmasıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Konut Sorunu , Konuta Erişilebilirlik , Değişen Demografik Yapı , Ekonomik Erişilebilirlik , Nitelikli Konut

Kaynakça

• Abaç, S. (1972), Sosyalist Ülkelerde Konut, Mimarlık Dergisi, (9), 31-41.
• AFAD. (2018). Türkiye’de afet yönetimi ve doğa kaynaklı afet istatistikleri.
• Alkan, L., & Uğurlar, A. (2015). Türkiye’de konut sorunu ve konut politikaları. Kent Araştırmaları Enstitüsü.
• Araman, S. (2024). Neoliberalizm ve finansallaşma bağlamında derinleşen konut krizini anlamak: 2008 krizi ve küresel barınma sorunu. International Journal of Economics, Politics, Humanities & Social Sciences, 7(4), 291-315. https://doi.org/10.59445/ijephss.1495527.
• Arslan, H. (2014). Türkiye’nin kentleşme sürecinde konut politikalarının evrimi. Akademik Bakış Dergisi, (40).
• Bajari, P., Chan, P., Krueger, D., & Miller, D. (2013). A dynamic model of housing demand: Estimation and policy implications. International Economic Review, 54(2), 409-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12001.
• Bartkowiak, P., & Strączkowski, Ł. (2023). Changes in dwelling size preferences in the Poznań housing market. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology Organization and Management Series, 2023(168). https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2023.168.2.
• Beamish, J. O., Goss, R. C., & Emmel, J. (2001). Lifestyle influences on housing preferences. Housing and Society, 28(1-2), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/08882746.2001.11430459.
• Caliskan, B., Yazar, H. A. Ö., & Keskin, A. (2024). Understanding sociodemographic characteristics shaping the choice of large homes: Lessons from Turkish metropolises. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHMA-07-2024-0090.
• Carliner, G. (1973). Income elasticity of housing demand. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 55(4), 528-532. https://doi.org/10.2307/1925683.
• Clinton, E. (2018). Micro-living: Why occupants choose to live in very small dwellings? Australian Planner, 55(3-4), 189-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2019.1632363.
• Clune, S., Morrissey, J., & Moore, T. (2012). Size matters: House size and thermal efficiency as policy strategies to reduce net emissions of new developments. Energy Policy, 48, 657-667.
• DePaulo, B. 2015. How We Live Now: Redefining Home and Family in the 21st Century. New York: Atria Books.
• Donner, C. (2000). Housing Policies in The European Union - Theory and Practice, Wiena published bc C. Donner.
• Dowling, R., & Power, E. (2012). Sizing home, doing family in Sydney, Australia. Housing Studies, 27(5), 605-619. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2012.697552.
• Doğan, N., Süleymanoğlu-Kürüm, R., Bekaroğlu, E. A., & Cin, M. (2021). İstanbul göç araştırması. İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi. https://www.ibb.istanbul/Uploads/2021/3/goc-arastirmalari-24.03.2021.pdf
• Egsgaard, A. (2024). Home after widowhood: A longitudinal study of residential mobility and housing preferences following a partner’s death. Housing Studies, 39(7), 1581-1606. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2022.2135169.
• Erçetin, C. (2022). Konut sorununa geçmişten bir bakış: Yerel yönetimler ve konut sunumu. İdealkent, 13(37), 1410-1429. https://doi.org/10.31198/idealkent.1177401.
• Fildiș, B. (2019). Contributions of Gerhard Kessler to the urban sociology studies in Turkey. Motif Akademi Halkbilimi Dergisi, 12(25), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.12981/mahder.526567.
• Frenkel, A., & Kaplan, S. (2015). The joint choice of tenure, dwelling type, size and location: The effect of home-oriented versus culture-oriented lifestyle. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 8(3), 233-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12076-014-0131-1.
• Göç İdaresi Daire Başkanlığı. (2024). İkamet izinleri. https://www.goc.gov.tr/ikamet-izinleri
• Güler, M., & Parlıyan, B. S. (2022). Türkiye’de toprak ve konut rantı: Ruşen Keleş okumaları üzerinden değerlendirme. İdealkent, 13(37), 1269-1301.
• Gür, E. A., & Dülgeroğlu Yüksel, Y. (2019). Analytical investigation of urban housing typologies in twentieth-century Istanbul. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 13(1), 93-111. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-12-2018-0047.
• Gürsoy, Ö., & Akıncı, N. F. (2024). Examining housing quality in Turkey through resident preferences and their housing conditions: A survey study. Property Management, 42(2), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1108/PM-06-2021-0039.
• Habib, M. A., & Miller, E. J. (2009). Reference-dependent residential location choice model within a relocation context. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2133(1), 92-99. https://doi.org/10.3141/2133-10.
• Hague, C. (2004). Konut alanlarında dönüşüm ve konut alanları yenileme projelerinin başarılması. Uluslararası Kentsel Dönüşüm Sempozyumu (s. 74-95). İstanbul.
• Haque, I., Rana, J., & Patel, P. (2020). Location matters: Unravelling the spatial dimensions of neighbourhood level housing quality in Kolkata, India. Habitat International, 99, 1-10.
• Harvey, D. (2013). Sosyal adalet ve şehir (M. Moralı, Çev.; 4. Baskı). İstanbul: Metis Yayınevi.
• Hei, C. P., & Dastane, O. (2017). Buying a dream home: Considerations of residential property consumers in Malaysia. Singaporean Journal of Business Economics and Management Studies, 5(9), 19-35.
• Hoshino, T. (2011). Estimation and analysis of preference heterogeneity in residential choice behaviour. Urban Studies, 48(2), 363-382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010363498.
• Huang, Y., Lieske, S. N., Wang, S., & Liu, Y. (2023). How does heterogeneity in dwelling type preferences relate to housing and built environment characteristics? International Journal of Digital Earth, 16(1), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2022.2163713.
• Huebner, G. M., & Shipworth, D. (2017). All about size? The potential of downsizing in reducing energy demand. Applied Energy, 186, 226-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.066.
• Hwang, S., Park, M., Lee, H., Lee, S., & Kim, H. (2012). Durgunluk konut arz stratejilerinin dinamik fizibilite analizi: Kore konut piyasası. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(2), 1-10.
• İBB (İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi). (2021). Mekansal Adrese Dayalı Kayıt Sistemi (MAKS) verileri. Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemi Müdürlüğü.
• İstanbul Planlama Ajansı – İPA Enstitü. (2021). Konut sorunu araştırması: İstanbul’da mevcut durum ve öneriler. İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi, Kültür A.Ş. Yayını. ISBN: 978-625-7288-83-5
• Jiesheng, M., Rozlin, Z., & Indera Syahrul, M. R. (2018). Influence of location attributes on home buyers' purchase decision. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 7(3), 94-100.
• Kara, M. (2011). Türkiye’deki gecekondu dönüşüm projelerinin konut sorununun çözümündeki rolü: Ankara ili Gültepe ve Yatıkmusluk örneği. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 5(2), 171-204.
• Kara, M., & Palabıyık, H. (2009, Eylül). 1980 sonrası Türkiye’de konut politikaları: Toplu Konut İdaresi Başkanlığı (TOKİ) gecekondu dönüşüm uygulamaları. Uluslararası Davraz Kongresi. Isparta.
• Karatseyeva, T., & Akhmedova, A. (2023). Modern tendency of development of architectural typology on the example of micro-apartment for Almaty city. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(10), 4846-4866. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2022-0080.
• Karasu, M. A. (2005). Türkiye’de konut sorununun çözümünde farklı bir yaklaşım; belediye-toplu konut idaresi-konut kooperatifleri işbirliği modeli. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1, 56-87.
• Karger, H. J., & Stoesz, D. (2014). American social welfare policy: A pluralist
• Karlen, C., Pagani, A., & Binder, C. R. (2021). Obstacles and opportunities for reducing dwelling size to shrink the environmental footprint of housing: Tenants' residential preferences and housing choice. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 37(3), 1-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-021-09884-3.
• Keleş, R. (2021). Kentleşme politikası. Ankara: İmge Kitabevi Yayınları.
• Kessler, Gerhard (1935b). Şehrin Tarihi ve Sosyal Fonksiyonu. İ.Ü. Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası, (Çev. R. Şükrü), 1(4), s. 524-534.
• Kutsal, S., & Polatoğlu, Ç. (2023). Türkiye’de artan konut ihtiyacı ve konut sorununun dinamikleri. Topkapı Journal of Social Sciences, 2(1).
• Kömürlü, R., & Önél, H. (2007). Türkiye'de konut üretimine yönelik kaynak oluşturma model yaklaşımları. Megaron, YTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi E-Dergisi, 2(2).
• Lau, M. H. M., & Wei, X. (2018). Housing size and housing market dynamics: The case of micro-flats in Hong Kong. Land Use Policy, 78, 278-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.039.
• Lauf, S., Haase, D., Seppelt, R., & Schwarz, N. (2012). Simulating demography and housing demand in an urban region under scenarios of growth and shrinkage. Environment and Plan ning B: Planning and Design, 39(2), 229-246. https://doi.org/10.1068/b36046t
• Lee, R., Mason, A., Amporfu, E., An, C.-B., Bixby, L. R., Bravo, J., Bucheli, M., Chen, Q., Come latto, P., Coy, D., D’Albis, H., Donehower, G., Dramani, L., Fürnkranz-Prskawetz, A., Gal, R. I., Holz, M., Huong, N. T. L., Kluge, F., Ladu singh, L., … Zhang, Q. (2014). Is low fertility really a problem? Population aging, dependency, and consumption. Science, 346(6206), 229- 234. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1250542
• Liao, F. H., Farber, S., & Ewing, R. (2015). Compact development and preference heterogeneity in residential location choice behaviour: A latent class analysis. Urban Studies, 52(2), 314-337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014527138.
• Long, H., & Pham, T.-K. (2024). Does urbanization drive up housing prices? Novel evidence from remote sensing and dynamic panel quantile regression. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHMA-06-2024-0081.
• Markoç, İ. (2012). Bursa’nın Kentsel Gelişimi ve Konut Üretimi, Ph.D. Thesis, Uludağ University, Bursa, Turkey.
• Markoç, İ. (2017). Konut Kullanıcısı Hareketliliğinde Kalite ve Memnuniyet Değerlendirmesi: Sarıgöl Konut Dönüşüm Alanı. (Doctoral dissertation), Yıldız Technical University, Institute of Science, Istanbul, Turkey.
• Markoc, I. and Cizmeci, F. (2021), "Ethics in real estate: agency practices in Istanbul", International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 1145-1165. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHMA-10-2020-0119
• Markoc, I., & Cinar, C. (2017). Reading housing satisfaction parameters over housing mobility in the redevelopment process: Sarigol, Istanbul, Turkey. Cogent Social Sciences, 3(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2017.1412915
• Markoç, İ., & Çınar, C. (2018). Loss of Social Belonging, Displacement and Social Exclusion in the Neighborhood: Urban Redevelopment in Sarigol, Istanbul, Turkey. Megaron, 13(2), 169-181. https://doi.org/10.5505/megaron.2017.97658.
• Markoç, İ. (2022). Feeling Like Home Again: After Divorce Processes from Different Family Perspective. Journal of Family Counseling and Education, 7(2), 55-72. https://doi.org/10.32568/jfce.1175330
• Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1995). The German ideology. In Central Compilation and Translation Bureau (Ed.), Makesi Engesi Xuanji [Marx and Engels Selected Works] (1st ed.). People’s Publishing House.
• Mayo, S. K., Malpezzi, S., & Gross, D. J. (1986). Shelter strategies for the urban poor in developing countries. The World Bank Research Observer, 1(2), 183-203. https://doi.org/10.1093/ wbro/1.2.183
• Millsap, A. (2018). Location choice in early adulthood: Millennials versus baby boomers. Papers in Regional Science, 97, 139-167. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12240.
• Minton, A., Pace, M., & Williams, H. (2016). The housing crisis. City, 20(2), 256-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2016.1143687.
• Morgan, S. P. (2003). Is low fertility a twenty-first-century demographic crisis? Demography, 40(4), 589-603. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2003.0037
• Mulder, C. H. (2006). Population and housing: A two-sided relationship. Demographic Research, 15(13), 401-412. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2006.15.13
• Murdie, R., Borgegârd, L., E. (1992). Social Differentiation in Public Rental Housing: A Case Study of Swedish Metropolitan Areas, Scandinavian Housing & Planning Research, 9 (1), 1-17.
• Mülteciler Derneği. (2024). Türkiye’deki Suriyeli sayısı. https://multeciler.org.tr/turkiyedeki-suriyeli-sayisi
• Muhammad Zamri, N. E. M., Yaacob, M. A., & Mohd Suki, N. (2022). Assessing housing preferences of young civil servants in Malaysia: Do location, financial capability and neighbourhood really matter? International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 15(3), 579–591. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHMA-02-2021-0012
• Nelson, A. 2013. Reshaping Metropolitan America: Development Trends and Opportunities to 2030. Washington, DC: Island Press.
• Okpala, D. C. I. (1992). Housing production systems and technologies in developing countries: A review of the experiences and possible future trends/prospects. Habitat International, 16(3), 9-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197 3975(92)90060-Cfre
• Olgun, H. (2017). “Fransa’da Konut Politikası: Tarihî Süreç ve Bugünkü Durum”, HAK-İŞ Uluslararası Emek ve Toplum Dergisi, 6 (14), 68-88.
• O’Connor, O., Saxe, S., Eidelman, G., & Essert, C. (2024). Adequate housing size as an element of the right to housing. International Journal of Housing Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2024.2417320
• Paris, C., & Frey, J. (2018). Demographic trends and changing housing systems in Northern Ireland. Housing Studies, 33(8), 1264-1285. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2018.142 4805.
• Preece, J., McKee, K., Flint, J., & Robinson, D. (2021). Living in a small home: Expectations, impression management, and compensatory practices. Housing Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2021.1988066.
• Rangel, G., Ng, J., Murugasu, T., & Poon, W. (2019). Measuring Malaysian housing affordability: The lifetime income approach. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 12(5), 966-984.
• Rao, C., & Ge, Y. (2015). Analysis of main influence factors for housing prices. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Engineering Management, Engineering Education and Information Technology, 552-555. https://doi. org/10.2991/emeeit-15.2015.107
• Sarıoğlu, G. P. (2007). Hollanda’da konut politikaları ve ipotekli kredi sistemi. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 2(4), 1-16.
• Sener, E., & Ozsoy, A. (2007). Housing development in Istanbul: The post-earthquake impact, the Black Sea region: Past, present and future. In G. Erkut & E. Mitchell (Eds.), Istanbul Technical University, British Academy of Archaeology at Ankara,London, (pp. 135-145).
• Opit, S., Witten, K., & Kearns, R. (2020). Housing pathways, aspirations and preferences of young adults within increasing urban density. Housing Studies, 35(1), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2019.1584662
• Önver, M., Ş. (2016). Konut ve Konut Politikası, İstanbul: IJOPEC Yayıncılık.
• Ören, K., & Yüksel, H. (2013). Türkiye’de konut sorunu ve temel dinamikleri. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2013(2), 18.
• Özden, K. (2010). Almanya’da Kentleşme Politikaları: Tarihsel Süreç ve Güncel Politikalar, Muhafazakâr Düşünce Dergisi, 6(3), 99-114.
• Öztürk, M. ve Yıldırım, K. (2023). Konut büyüklüğü ve oda sayısının kullanıcı tercihleri üzerindeki etkisi. Modular Journal, 6(1), 34-49. https://doi.org/10.59389/modular.1264268
• Sumka, H. J. (1987). Shelter policy and planning in developing countries: Introduction. Journal of the American Planning Association, 53(2), 171-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368708976649
• Hwang, S., Lee, J., Yi, J.-S., & Kim, M. (2019). Korean public rental housing for residential stability of the younger population: Analysis of policy impacts using system dynamics. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 18(3), 180-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2019.1615494
• Tekeli, İ. (2010). Konut sorununu konut sunum biçimleriyle düşünmek. Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları.
• Tikoudis, I., Dimitropoulos, A., & Oueslati, W. (2018). Causes and consequences of urban sprawl. In Rethinking urban sprawl: Moving towards sustainable cities (pp. 113-142). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264189881-en
• Samec, T. H., & Kubala, P. (2024). Dual responsibilization for housing in a housing crisis: Young adults in the Czech Republic. Housing Studies, 39(4), 857-876. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2022.2091115
• TÜİK. (2021). Survey on building and dwelling characteristics, 2021. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Survey-on-Building-and-Dwelling-Characteristics-2021-45870
• TÜİK. (2023a). Adrese dayalı nüfus kayıt sistemi sonuçları, 2023.
• TÜİK. (2023b). İstatistiklerle aile, 2023. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Istatistiklerle-Aile-2023-53784
• Uesugi, M., & Asami, Y. (2016). A block-level estimation of residential characteristics using survey and spatial microdata. Urban and Regional Planning Review, 3, 123-145. https://doi.org/10.14398/urpr.3.123.
• Uludağ, İ., & Arıcan, E. (2001). Finansal hizmetler ekonomisi (Piyasalar: Kurumsal- Araçlar) (2nd ed.). Beta Yayınları.
• UNHCR. (2024). UNHCR Türkiye istatistikleri. https://www.unhcr.org/tr/hakkimizda/unhcr-tuerkiye-istatistikleri
• Van Doorn, L., Arnold, A., & Rapoport, E. (2019). In the age of cities: The impact of urbanisation on house prices and affordability. In R. Nijskens, M. Lohuis, P. Hilbers, & W. Heeringa (Eds.), Hot property: The housing market in major cities (pp. 3-13). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11674-3_1
• Walker, J. L., & Li, J. (2007). Latent lifestyle preferences and household location decisions. Journal of Geographical Systems, 9(1), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-006-0030-0
• Wang, X. (2017) What the ‘housing problem’ shows about today’s China, Cultural Studies, 31:6, 837-856, DOI: 10.1080/09502386.2017.1375538
• Warnock, V. C., & Warnock, F. E. (2008). Markets and housing finance. Journal of Housing Economics, 17(3), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhe.2008.03.001
• Yuan, J., Zheng, X., You, J., & Skibniewski, M. J. (2017). Identifying critical factors influencing the rents of public rental housing delivery by PPPs: The case of Nanjing. Sustainability, 9(3), 345. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9030345
• Yılmaz Şimşek, Z. (2024). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de konut sorunu ve uygulanan konut politikaları. Uluslararası Akademik Birikim Dergisi, 7(2), 112-132. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10900383