Research Article

Construction waste management practices on-sites: A case study of Istanbul city

Volume: 3 Number: 2 June 30, 2020
EN

Construction waste management practices on-sites: A case study of Istanbul city

Abstract

Increasing construction activities put enormous stress on waste generation in Turkey. Therefore, to manage all these construction wastes by setting effective waste management strategies becomes more significant day by day. Although there is a rising interest in waste management issues, there are not enough studies in Turkey. The lack of data is a prominent obstacle for the researchers. Addressing this research gap, an explanatory multiple-case study was conducted to reveal the waste management practices (waste generation, collection-sorting, storage-disposal, and recovery) on-sites. Unstructured interviews were conducted with different 13 experts working at different construction sites in Istanbul. According to the qualitative study results, there is usually no waste management plan on-sites. Project revisions and cutting of materials for sizing, storage problems are the most emphasized causes of waste on-sites. Wastes are mostly collected and disposed of by the contractors and there is a tendency to collect wastes in mixed on-site and later partly sort. Collection-sorting and storage-disposal practices on-sites are affected by the quantity of waste, site facilities, storage opportunities, scale of the contractor and economic value of waste. The recovery facilities are mostly depending on the economic gain to be obtained from waste. In this context, the recycling and reusing of steel waste is given the best importance. There are not enough networks for recovery of cardboard/paper-plastic wastes on-sites. There is no illegal dumping among the cases included in this study. However, awareness on special treatment of hazardous wastes has not yet been developed enough on-sites in Turkey.

Keywords

References

  1. Y. Li, “Developing a sustainable construction waste estimation and management system,” PhD Thesis, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, April, 2013.
  2. C.J. Kibert, Sustainable construction: green building design and delivery. John Wiley & Sons, pp.1-15, 2016.
  3. S. Goodhew, Sustainable construction processes: A resource text. John Wiley & Sons, pp.144-173, 2016.
  4. European Commission, 2018, “EU Construction and Demolition Waste Protocol and Guidelines,” Available: https://ec.europa.eu/growth/content/euconstruction-and-demolition-waste-protocol0_en, (Accessed 18 March 2020).
  5. Eurostat Waste statistics, 2016, Available: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplaine d/index.php?title=File:Waste_generation_by_eco nomic_activities_and_households,_EU28,_2016_(%25).png, (accessed 08 May 2020).
  6. Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, “National Waste Management and Action Plan 2023,” 2017, Available: https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/cygm/haberler /ulusal_at-k_yonet-m--eylem_plan-- 20180328154824.pdf., (accessed 24 January 2020).
  7. Turkish Court of Accounts,“National Regulations and Waste Management in Turkey, Evaluation of Implementation Results Performance Audit Report,” 2007, Available: https://docplayer.biz.tr/29224-T-c-sayistaybaskanligi-turkiye-de-atik-yonetimi-ulusalduzenlemeler-ve-uygulama-sonuclarinindegerlendirilmesi-performans-denetimiraporu.html., (accessed 04 January 2020)
  8. T. Esin and N. Cosgun, “A study conducted to reduce construction waste generation in Turkey,” Building and Environment, Vol. 42(4), pp. 1667- 1674, 2007.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Environmental Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 30, 2020

Submission Date

April 19, 2020

Acceptance Date

May 24, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 3 Number: 2

APA
Aksel, H., & Cetıner, İ. (2020). Construction waste management practices on-sites: A case study of Istanbul city. Environmental Research and Technology, 3(2), 50-63. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.723002
AMA
1.Aksel H, Cetıner İ. Construction waste management practices on-sites: A case study of Istanbul city. ERT. 2020;3(2):50-63. doi:10.35208/ert.723002
Chicago
Aksel, Havva, and İkbal Cetıner. 2020. “Construction Waste Management Practices On-Sites: A Case Study of Istanbul City”. Environmental Research and Technology 3 (2): 50-63. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.723002.
EndNote
Aksel H, Cetıner İ (June 1, 2020) Construction waste management practices on-sites: A case study of Istanbul city. Environmental Research and Technology 3 2 50–63.
IEEE
[1]H. Aksel and İ. Cetıner, “Construction waste management practices on-sites: A case study of Istanbul city”, ERT, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 50–63, June 2020, doi: 10.35208/ert.723002.
ISNAD
Aksel, Havva - Cetıner, İkbal. “Construction Waste Management Practices On-Sites: A Case Study of Istanbul City”. Environmental Research and Technology 3/2 (June 1, 2020): 50-63. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.723002.
JAMA
1.Aksel H, Cetıner İ. Construction waste management practices on-sites: A case study of Istanbul city. ERT. 2020;3:50–63.
MLA
Aksel, Havva, and İkbal Cetıner. “Construction Waste Management Practices On-Sites: A Case Study of Istanbul City”. Environmental Research and Technology, vol. 3, no. 2, June 2020, pp. 50-63, doi:10.35208/ert.723002.
Vancouver
1.Havva Aksel, İkbal Cetıner. Construction waste management practices on-sites: A case study of Istanbul city. ERT. 2020 Jun. 1;3(2):50-63. doi:10.35208/ert.723002

Cited By