Nahçıvan Toplumunun Sosyal ve Siyasi Hayatında Camilerin ve Kutsal Alanların Rolü

Öz

Araştırmalar, cami ve kutsal mekanları inceleyen bilim insanlarının dikkatlerini ağırlıklı olarak mimari anıtların hacimsel yapısı ve mimari yapıların çözümüne odakladığını ortaya koymuştur. Cami ve kutsal mekanların toplumun sosyo-politik yaşamındaki rolü ise yeterince incelenmemiştir. Araştırmalar, cami ve kutsal mekânların yalnızca ibadet yerleri olmadığını, aynı zamanda sosyal ve ekonomik sorunların çözülmesinde önemli bir rol oynadığını göstermektedir. Evlilikler camilerde kaydedilmiş, adli, kültürel ve eğitimsel etkinlikler düzenlenmiştir. Bazı camiler, Elinceçay Hanegahı örneğinde olduğu gibi, kutsal mekanların çevresinde ortaya çıkan yabancı işgalcilere karşı mücadelede önemli siyasi merkezler olmuştur. Yapılan araştırmalar sonucunda, Orta Çağ’ın önemli sosyo-politik ve ideolojik merkezleri olan cami ve kutsal mekânların, yerleşimlerin oluşumu ve gelişiminde önemli rol oynadığı tespit edilmiştir. Julfa bölgesinde bulunan Elinceçay Hanegahı ve Babek bölgesindeki Astabad kutsal mekanının şehir tipi yerleşime dönüştüğü, Asabi-Kehf kutsal mekanının çevresinde ise Kaçaparag yerleşimi de dahil olmak üzere birçok köyün ortaya çıktığı belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Mimari
• Nahçivan
• anıt
• cami
• kutsal mekan
• şehir
• yerleşim.

The Role of Mosques and Sanctuaries in the Social and Political Life of Nakhchivan Society

Öz

Research has revealed that scientists studying mosques and sanctuaries have focused their attention mainly on solving the volumetric structure of architectural monuments and their architectural structures. The role of mosques and sanctuaries in the socio-political life of society has not been sufficiently studied. Research shows that mosques and sanctuaries were no only places of worship, but also played an important role in solving social and economic issues. Marriages were also registered in mosques, and judicial and cultural and educational events were held. Some mosques were also important political centers in the fight against foreign invaders that emerged around the sanctuaries, as in the case of Alinjachay Khanaga. In the course of our research, it was established that mosques and sanctuaries, which were important socio-political and ideological centers of the Middle Ages, played an important role in the formation and development of settlements. We have established that the Alinjachay Khanaga sanctuary, located in the Julfa region, and the Astabad sanctuary in the Babek region turned into an urban-type settlement, and many villages appeared around the Asabi-Kahf sanctuary, including the settlement of Khachaparag.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Architecture
• Nakhchivan
• monument
• mosque
• sanctuary
• city
• settlement.

Kaynakça

1. Azimbekov, I. (1929). Muslim inscriptions of Tiflis, Erivan and Nakh. SSR. Vyr. 4. Notebook 2 (pp. 295–311). Baku.
2. Bretansky, L. S. (1966). Architecture of Azerbaijan XII–XV centuries, and its place in the architecture of the Near East. Moscow: Nauka.
3. Bayramov, R. (2013). Typological classification of monuments of Azerbaijani architecture of the XI–XVIII centuries. Baku: Sharg-Gharb.
4. Bakhshaliyev, V. (2008). Archaeological monuments of Nakhchivan. Baku: Elm.
5. Giyasi, J. (1991). Architectural monuments of the Nizami period. Baku: Ishyk.
6. Neymat, M. (2001). Corpus of epigraphic monuments of Azerbaijan (Vol. III). Baku: House of New Publications.
7. Salamzade, A. V. (1976). Ajami Abubakr oglu and architectural monuments of Nakhchivan. Baku: Ishyk.
8. Salamzade, A. V. (1952). Architecture of the mausoleums of Azerbaijan XII–XV centuries. In Architecture of Azerbaijan. Essays (pp. 229–336). News of the Academy of Sciences of Azerbaijan. SSR. Baku.

9. Smirnov, K. N. (1999). Materials on the history and ethnography of the Nakhichivan region. Baku: Ozan.
10. Sysoev, V. M. (1927). Nakhichivan on the Araks and the antiquity of Nakh. ASSR (report on a trip in the summer of 1926). News of Azkomstaris, 4(2), 87–121.
11. Sysoev, V. M. (1927). Nakhichivan region Nakh. ASSR (report on a trip in the summer of 1926). News of Azkomstaris, 4(2), 123–215.
12. Pashaev, A. M. (1998). The city of Ordubad in the 19th and early 20th centuries. Baku: Elm.
13. Chelebi, O. (1989). Notes of a traveler. In Sources on the history of Azerbaijan (pp. 230–238). Baku: Azerbaijan University.
14. Jerrahogly, I. (1994). Mosques. Diyanet, 46, 8–11.
15. Bakirer, Ö. (1920). A study on the use of brickbonds in Anatolian Seljuk architecture. Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 6(2), 143–182.
16. Khanykoff, M. N. (1862). Memoire sur les inscriptions musulmanes du Caucase. Journal Asiatique, XX (Aout, V série), p.100.
17. Nematova, M. (1990). Inscriptions turn into history. Elm and Hayat, № 11–12, p. 19–22. Salamzade, A., & Mammadzade, K. (1985). Monuments of the Nakhchivan school of Azerbaijani architecture. Baku: Elm.
18. Seferli, H. F. (2002). Epigraphic monuments of the Julfa region. Baku: Elm.
19. Seferli, H. F. (2021). Epigraphic monuments of the Ordubad region. Nakhchivan: Ajami.
20. Seferli, H. F. (2003). Nakhchivan: Social-political and ideological centers. Baku: Elm.
21. Əmənzadə, R. (2013). Architecture of Azerbaijan in the early XV–XIX centuries. Baku: Şərq-Qərb.