THE MECHANICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF CARBON BASED NANOPARTICLE REINFORCED EPOXY COMPOSITES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Fatih Turan

doi:10.18038/estubtda.1381745

TR EN

THE MECHANICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF CARBON BASED NANOPARTICLE REINFORCED EPOXY COMPOSITES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Abstract

This comparative study experimentally investigates the effect of both the type and content of carbon based nanoparticles on the mechanical properties of epoxy composites. For this purpose, carbon nanotubes (CNTs), expanded graphite (EG), and carbon black (CB) were used as reinforcing nanoparticles at various concentrations within the epoxy polymer. The nanoparticles were dispersed by ultrasonication method. CNTs incorporated up to 0.4% by weight (wt.) while EG and CB nanoparticles were employed at 4%, 8%, 10%, and 12% concentrations by weight. Tensile tests of the nanocomposites were conducted according to ASTM D680 to determine the mechanical properties of nanocomposites including ultimate tensile strength and modulus. The results revealed that all types of nanoparticles have a strong reinforcing effect on the mechanical properties depending on their concentrations. When carbon nanotubes (CNTs) were used, the highest improvement in strength, by 84.7% at 0.1% wt., and in modulus, by 32.1% at 0.2% wt. content, was observed. EG nanoparticles exhibited improvement in both strength and modulus at all contents. The highest improvement in strength, by 109.6% at 4% wt., and in modulus, by 95.6% at 10% wt. concentration, was observed. In the case of carbon black (CB), improvement in strength was observed only at 4% wt. concentration, by 44.9%. On the other hand, enhancement in modulus was seen at all CB contents, with the greatest improvement at 10% wt., reaching 58.2%.

Keywords

Nanocomposites, Mechanical properties, Carbon nanotube, Expanded graphite, Carbon black

Project Number

122M232

THE MECHANICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF CARBON BASED NANOPARTICLE REINFORCED EPOXY COMPOSITES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Abstract

This comparative study experimentally investigates the effect of both the type and content of carbon based nanoparticles on the mechanical properties of epoxy composites. For this purpose, carbon nanotubes (CNTs), expanded graphite (EG), and carbon black (CB) were used as reinforcing nanoparticles at various concentrations within the epoxy polymer. The nanoparticles were dispersed by ultrasonication method. CNTs incorporated up to 0.4% by weight (wt.) while EG and CB nanoparticles were employed at 4%, 8%, 10%, and 12% concentrations by weight. Tensile tests of the nanocomposites were conducted according to ASTM D680 to determine the mechanical properties of nanocomposites including ultimate tensile strength and modulus. The results revealed that all types of nanoparticles have a strong reinforcing effect on the mechanical properties depending on their concentrations. When carbon nanotubes (CNTs) were used, the highest improvement in strength, by 84.7% at 0.1% wt., and in modulus, by 32.1% at 0.2% wt. content, was observed. EG nanoparticles exhibited improvement in both strength and modulus at all contents. The highest improvement in strength, by 109.6% at 4% wt., and in modulus, by 95.6% at 10% wt. concentration, was observed. In the case of carbon black (CB), improvement in strength was observed only at 4% wt. concentration, by 44.9%. On the other hand, enhancement in modulus was seen at all CB contents, with the greatest improvement at 10% wt., reaching 58.2%.

Keywords

Nanocomposites, Mechanical properties, Carbon nanotube, Expanded graphite, Carbon black

Supporting Institution

TUBITAK

Project Number

122M232

Thanks

The author would like to thank TUBITAK (The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey) for the financial support via 1002 - Fast Support Program under grant number: 122M232.

References

[1] Karnati SR, Agbo P, Zhang L. Applications of silica nanoparticles in glass/carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy nanocomposite. Composites Communications 2020; 17: 32–41.
[2] Gao J, Patterson BA, Kashcooli Y, et al. Synergistic fracture toughness enhancement of epoxy-amine matrices via combination of network topology modification and silica nanoparticle reinforcement. Compos B Eng 2022; 238: 109857.
[3] Ren J, Li Q, Yan L, et al. Enhanced thermal conductivity of epoxy composites by introducing graphene@boron nitride nanosheets hybrid nanoparticles. Mater Des 2020; 191: 108663.
[4] Lin L, Wang Y, Lin Z, et al. A simplified reinforcement and fracture mechanism analysis model of epoxy nanocomposites based on finite element simulation. Polymer (Guildf) 2022; 250: 124879.
[5] Liu H-Y, Wang G-T, Mai Y-W, et al. On fracture toughness of nano-particle modified epoxy. Compos B Eng 2011; 42: 2170–2175.
[6] Turan F, Guclu M, Gurkan K, et al. The effect of carbon nanotubes loading and processing parameters on the electrical, mechanical, and viscoelastic properties of epoxy-based composites. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2022; 44: 93.
[7] Metin F, Avci A, Eskizeybek V. Compression and interlaminar shear properties of nanoparticle doped hybrid nanofiber interleaved glass/epoxy composites. Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering. Epub ahead of print 7 November 2021. DOI: 10.18038/estubtda.976016.
[8] Bannov AG, Brester AE, Shestakov AA, et al. Technological characteristics of epoxy/carbon black composites. Mater Today Proc 2020; 31: 496–498.
[9] ÖZTÜRKMEN MB, ÖZKUTLU DEMİREL M, ÖZ Y. INVESTIGATION OF MECHANICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF GRAPHENE WITH EPOXY MATRIX. Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering 2021; 22: 112–119.
[10] Wijerathne D, Gong Y, Afroj S, et al. Mechanical and thermal properties of graphene nanoplatelets-reinforced recycled polycarbonate composites. International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture 2023; 6: 117–128.

[11] Xia T, Zeng D, Li Z, et al. Electrically conductive GNP/epoxy composites for out-of-autoclave thermoset curing through Joule heating. Compos Sci Technol 2018; 164: 304–312.
[12] Treacy MMJ, Ebbesen TW, Gibson JM. Exceptionally high Young’s modulus observed for individual carbon nanotubes. Nature 1996; 381: 678–680.
[13] Ma PC, Siddiqui NA, Marom G, et al. Dispersion and functionalization of carbon nanotubes for polymer-based nanocomposites: A review. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 2010; 41: 1345–1367.
[14] Chakraborty AK, Plyhm T, Barbezat M, et al. Carbon nanotube (CNT)–epoxy nanocomposites: a systematic investigation of CNT dispersion. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 2011; 13: 6493–6506.
[15] Thakur RK, Singh KK. Influence of fillers on polymeric composite during conventional machining processes: a review. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering; 43. Epub ahead of print 1 February 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s40430-021-02813-z.
[16] Nurazzi NM, Sabaruddin FA, Harussani MM, et al. Mechanical performance and applications of cnts reinforced polymer composites—a review. Nanomaterials; 11. Epub ahead of print 1 September 2021. DOI: 10.3390/nano11092186.
[17] Goudarzi R, Motlagh GH. The effect of graphite intercalated compound particle size and exfoliation temperature on porosity and macromolecular diffusion in expanded graphite. Heliyon 2019; 5: e02595.
[18] Yasmin A, Luo J-J, Daniel IM. Processing of expanded graphite reinforced polymer nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 2006; 66: 1182–1189.
[19] Wang L, Zhang L, Tian M. Effect of expanded graphite ( EG ) dispersion on the mechanical and tribological properties of nitrile rubber / EG composites. Wear 2012; 276–277: 85–93.
[20] Murariu M, Laure A, Bonnaud L, et al. The production and properties of polylactide composites fi lled with expanded graphite. Polym Degrad Stab 2010; 95: 889–900.
[21] Jia W, Tchoudakov R, Narkis M. Performance of Expanded Graphite and Expanded Milled-Graphite Fillers in Thermosetting Resins. Polym Compos 2005; 26: 526–533.
[22] Wei B, Yang S. Polymer composites with expanded graphite network with superior thermal conductivity and electromagnetic interference shielding performance. Chemical Engineering Journal 2021; 404: 126437.
[23] Mamunya YeP, Davydenko VV, Pissis P, et al. Electrical and thermal conductivity of polymers filled with metal powders. Eur Polym J 2002; 38: 1887–1897.
[24] Li Y, Wang S, Zhang Y, et al. Carbon black‐filled immiscible polypropylene/epoxy blends. J Appl Polym Sci 2006; 99: 461–471.
[25] Rafiee R, Pourazizi R. Influence of CNT functionalization on the interphase region between CNT and polymer. Comput Mater Sci 2015; 96: 573–578.
[26] Gojny FH, Wichmann MHG, Köpke U, et al. Carbon nanotube-reinforced epoxy-composites: enhanced stiffness and fracture toughness at low nanotube content. Compos Sci Technol 2004; 64: 2363–2371.
[27] Gojny F, Wichmann M, Fiedler B, et al. Influence of different carbon nanotubes on the mechanical properties of epoxy matrix composites – A comparative study. Compos Sci Technol 2005; 65: 2300–2313.
[28] Zhu J, Peng H, Rodriguez‐Macias F, et al. Reinforcing Epoxy Polymer Composites Through Covalent Integration of Functionalized Nanotubes. Adv Funct Mater 2004; 14: 643–648.
[29] Guo P, Chen X, Gao X, et al. Fabrication and mechanical properties of well-dispersed multiwalled carbon nanotubes/epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol 2007; 67: 3331–3337.
[30] Breton Y, Désarmot G, Salvetat JP, et al. Mechanical properties of multiwall carbon nanotubes/epoxy composites: influence of network morphology. Carbon N Y 2004; 42: 1027–1030.
[31] Nadler M, Werner J, Mahrholz T, et al. Effect of CNT surface functionalisation on the mechanical properties of multi-walled carbon nanotube/epoxy-composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 2009; 40: 932–937.
[32] Bera T, Acharya SK, Mishra P. Synthesis, mechanical and thermal properties of carbon black/epoxy composites. International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology 2018; 10: 12–20.
[33] Öner GA. Flexural strength and thermal properties of carbon black nanoparticle reinforced epoxy composites obtained from waste tires. Open Chem 2022; 20: 863–872.
[34] Abdul Khalil HPS, Jawaid M, Firoozian P, et al. Tensile, Electrical Conductivity, and Morphological Properties of Carbon Black–Filled Epoxy Composites. International Journal of Polymer Analysis and Characterization 2013; 18: 329–338.
[35] Krieg AS, King JA, Jaszczak DC, et al. Tensile and conductivity properties of epoxy composites containing carbon black and graphene nanoplatelets. J Compos Mater 2018; 52: 3909–3918.
[36] Gantayat S, Prusty G, Rout DR, et al. Expanded graphite as a filler for epoxy matrix composites to improve their thermal, mechanical and electrical properties. Xinxing Tan Cailiao/New Carbon Materials 2015; 30: 432–437.
[37] Yasmin A, Daniel IM. Mechanical and thermal properties of graphite platelet/epoxy composites. Polymer (Guildf) 2004; 45: 8211–8219.
[38] Kang W-S, Rhee KY, Park S-J. Thermal, impact and toughness behaviors of expanded graphite/graphite oxide-filled epoxy composites. Compos B Eng 2016; 94: 238–244.
[39] Sumfleth J, Buschhorn ST, Schulte K. Comparison of rheological and electrical percolation phenomena in carbon black and carbon nanotube filled epoxy polymers. J Mater Sci 2011; 46: 659–669.
[40] Ali Raza M, Westwood A, Stirling C, et al. Effect of nanosized carbon black on the morphology, transport, and mechanical properties of rubbery epoxy and silicone composites. J Appl Polym Sci 2012; 126: 641–652.
[41] Chakraborty AK, Plyhm T, Barbezat M, et al. Carbon nanotube (CNT)–epoxy nanocomposites: a systematic investigation of CNT dispersion. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 2011; 13: 6493–6506.
[42] Song YS, Youn JR. Influence of dispersion states of carbon nanotubes on physical properties of epoxy nanocomposites. Carbon N Y 2005; 43: 1378–1385.
[43] Mitchell CA, Bahr JL, Arepalli S, et al. Dispersion of Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes in Polystyrene. Macromolecules 2002; 35: 8825–8830.
[44] Martone A, Formicola C, Giordano M, et al. Reinforcement efficiency of multi-walled carbon nanotube / epoxy nano composites. Compos Sci Technol 2010; 70: 1154–1160.
[45] Lu KL, Lago RM, Chen YK, et al. Mechanical damage of carbon nanotubes by ultrasound. Carbon N Y 1996; 34: 814–816.
[46] Gao C, Guo M, Liu Y, et al. Surface modification methods and mechanisms in carbon nanotubes dispersion. Carbon N Y 2023; 212: 118133.
[47] Chen G-H, Wu D-J, Weng W-G, et al. Dispersion of graphite nanosheets in a polymer matrix and the conducting property of the nanocomposites. Polym Eng Sci 2001; 41: 2148–2154.
[48] Chen G, Wu D, Weng W, et al. Preparation of polystyrene–graphite conducting nanocomposites via intercalation polymerization. Polym Int 2001; 50: 980–985.
[49] Abdel-Aal N, El-Tantawy F, Al-Hajry A, et al. Epoxy resin/plasticized carbon black composites. Part I. Electrical and thermal properties and their applications. Polym Compos 2008; 29: 511–517.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Composite and Hybrid Materials

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Fatih Turan ^*
0000-0002-7197-3892
Türkiye

Publication Date

June 28, 2024

Submission Date

October 26, 2023

Acceptance Date

May 30, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 25 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.18038/estubtda.1381745

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA45FH69EC

APA

Turan, F. (2024). THE MECHANICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF CARBON BASED NANOPARTICLE REINFORCED EPOXY COMPOSITES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY. Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering, 25(2), 208-221. https://doi.org/10.18038/estubtda.1381745

AMA

1.Turan F. THE MECHANICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF CARBON BASED NANOPARTICLE REINFORCED EPOXY COMPOSITES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY. Estuscience - Se. 2024;25(2):208-221. doi:10.18038/estubtda.1381745

Chicago

Turan, Fatih. 2024. “THE MECHANICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF CARBON BASED NANOPARTICLE REINFORCED EPOXY COMPOSITES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY”. Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering 25 (2): 208-21. https://doi.org/10.18038/estubtda.1381745.

EndNote

Turan F (June 1, 2024) THE MECHANICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF CARBON BASED NANOPARTICLE REINFORCED EPOXY COMPOSITES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY. Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering 25 2 208–221.

IEEE

[1]F. Turan, “THE MECHANICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF CARBON BASED NANOPARTICLE REINFORCED EPOXY COMPOSITES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY”, Estuscience - Se, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 208–221, June 2024, doi: 10.18038/estubtda.1381745.

ISNAD

Turan, Fatih. “THE MECHANICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF CARBON BASED NANOPARTICLE REINFORCED EPOXY COMPOSITES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY”. Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering 25/2 (June 1, 2024): 208-221. https://doi.org/10.18038/estubtda.1381745.

JAMA

1.Turan F. THE MECHANICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF CARBON BASED NANOPARTICLE REINFORCED EPOXY COMPOSITES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY. Estuscience - Se. 2024;25:208–221.

MLA

Turan, Fatih. “THE MECHANICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF CARBON BASED NANOPARTICLE REINFORCED EPOXY COMPOSITES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY”. Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering, vol. 25, no. 2, June 2024, pp. 208-21, doi:10.18038/estubtda.1381745.

Vancouver

1.Fatih Turan. THE MECHANICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF CARBON BASED NANOPARTICLE REINFORCED EPOXY COMPOSITES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY. Estuscience - Se. 2024 Jun. 1;25(2):208-21. doi:10.18038/estubtda.1381745

THE MECHANICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF CARBON BASED NANOPARTICLE REINFORCED EPOXY COMPOSITES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Abstract

Keywords

Project Number

THE MECHANICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF CARBON BASED NANOPARTICLE REINFORCED EPOXY COMPOSITES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Abstract

Keywords

Supporting Institution

Project Number

Thanks

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite