THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN FOOD PREFERENCES, DARK TRIAD and PERSONALITY BELIEFS

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dark triad

THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN FOOD PREFERENCES, DARK TRIAD and PERSONALITY BELIEFS

Öz

The purpose of the presented study was to explore the relationships between the Dark Triad and the personality disorders classified in DSM-5 in regard with food preferences. The data collected via convenience sampling and online survey method. Dark Triad Dirty Dozen (DTDD-T) Scale, Personality Belief Questionnaire-Short Form (PBQ-S), Food Consumption Preferences Form and demographic form was used for handling data. Analysis revealed negative correlations between age and all dark triad scores besides with paranoid and borderline personality features. Positive correlations were determined among Machiavellianism, psychopathy, narcissism, and all personality disorders, except an insignificant correlation between Machiavellianism and avoidant personality disorder. Participants with omnivore food preference differed with higher means in terms of psychopathy and with lower scores regarding Machiavellianism and narcissism. Meat consumption associated positively and meat doneness negatively with psychopathy. Regression analysis revealed that %42,3 of the variance of psychopathy was explained by Machievellanism, and Schizoid personality features and, food related preferences as eggs, grains, meat, meat doneness, beside ice-cream, and sweets with milk variables. Results evaluated according to relevant literature. Since associations between dark triad personality traits, personality disorders and food preferences is a novel and emerging area of study, it is also obvious that it requires further investigation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dark triad
• personality beliefs
• food preferences
• food consumptions
• personality disorders.

Kaynakça

1. Barlett, C. P., & Barlett, N. D. (2015). The young and the restless: Examining the relationships between age, emerging adulthood variables, and the dark triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. paid.2015.05.024.
2. Beck, A.T., Davis, D.D., & Freeman, A. (2015). Cognitive Therapy of Personality Disorders (Third Edition). New York: Guilford Publications.
3. Butler, A.C., Beck, A.T. & Cohen, L.H. (2007). The Personality Belief Questionnaire-Short Form: Development and Preliminary Findings. Cogn Ther Res, 31, 357–370 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10608-006-9041-x
4. Bilge, Y., & Bilge, Y. (2018). A Study on the Validity and Reliability of the Personality Belief Questionnaire-Short Form in Turkish Community Sample. Journal of Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research, 8 (1), 7-15. doi:10.5455/jcbpr.299864
5. Bogg, T., & Roberts, B. W. (2004). Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: A meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 887–919. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/0033-2909.130.6.887
6. Booth-Kewley, S., & Vickers, R. R., Jr. (1994). Associations between major domains of personality and health behavior. Journal of Personality, 62, 281–298. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb0 0298.x
7. Carrillo, E., Prado-Gasco, V., Fiszman, S., & Varela, P. (2012). How personality traits and intrinsic personal characteristics influence the consumer’s choice of reduced-calorie food. Food Research International, 49, 792–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. foodres.2012.09.006
8. Dhont, K., & Hodson, G. (2014). Why do right-wing adherents engage in more animal exploitation and meat consumption? Pers Individ Diff, 64, 12-17.

9. Furnham, A., Richards, S.C., & Paulhus, D. (2013). The Dark Triad of Personality: A 10 Year Review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 199-216. Harpur, T. J., & Hare, R. D. (1994). Assessment of psychopathy as a function of age. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 604–609.
10. Johnson, T.P. (2014). Snowball sampling: Introduction. Wiley Stats Ref: Statistics Reference Online 2014.
11. Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2010). Differentiating the Dark Triad within the interpersonal circumplex. In L.M. Horowitz and S.N. Strack (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal theory and research (pp. 249-267). New York: Guilford.