Toplam Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımların ve Sektörel Yabancı Yatırımların İşsizlik Oranı Üzerindeki Etkisi: Türkiye’den Kanıt

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 27 - 42, 30.06.2023

Emre Gökçeli

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, Türkiye'de 1992-2020 döneminde DYY girişlerinin işsizlik oranı üzerindeki etkisini Vektör Otoregresyon (VAR) yöntemi kullanarak araştırmaktır. Bulgular, DYY girişlerinin istihdam üzerinde önemli bir etkisinin olmadığını ortaya koymaktadır; bunun nedeni, farklı sektörlerdeki DYY'nin istihdam oranları üzerindeki farklı değişken etkisi olabilir. Çünkü DYY'nin ekonominin geri kalanıyla, özellikle de işgücü piyasasıyla bağlantısının farklı sektörlerde değişen etkiler gösterebilir. Bu durumun üstesinden gelmek için, bu çalışma DYY'nin Türkiye'deki işsizlik oranları üzerindeki etkisini çeşitli sektörlerde incelemeye çalışmaktadır. Sonuçlar, imalat sanayiindeki DYY'nin işsizlik oranındaki azalma ile ilişkili olduğunu, fakat birincil ve hizmet sektörlerindeki DYY'nin önemli bir etkisinin bulunmadığını göstermektedir. Çalışmanın bulguları baz alınarak, bu çalışma gelecekteki araştırmalar için çıkarımlar ve öneriler sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Türkiye, Foreign Direct Investment, Unemployment Rate, Vector Autoregression

Effect of Aggregate FDI and Sectoral FDI on the Unemployment Rate: Evidence from Türkiye

Öz

The objective of this research is to investigate the effect of FDI inflows on the unemployment rate by employing the Vector Autoregression (VAR) method during the period of 1992-2020 in Türkiye. The findings reveal that FDI inflows have no significant effect on employment, which may be due to the varying impact of FDI on employment rates across different sectors. Given that the linkage of FDI with the rest of economy, particularly the labour market may exhibit varying effect across different sectors. To address this issue, this research endeavours to examine the impact of FDI on unemployment rates in Türkiye across various sectors. The results demonstrate that FDI in the manufacturing industry is associated with a reduction in the unemployment rate, whereas FDI in the primary and service sectors is not found to have a significant effect. Based on the results, the study offers implications and recommendations for future research.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Foreign direct investment, VAR, Unemployment rate

Kaynakça

• Abor, J., & Harvey, S. K. (2008). Foreign direct investment and employment: host country experience. Macroeconomics and finance in emerging market economies, 1(2), 213-225.
• Abor, J., & Harvey, S. K. (2008). Foreign direct investment and employment: host country experience. Macroeconomics and finance in emerging market economies, 1(2), 213-225.
• Akcoraoglu, A., & Acikgoz, S. (2011). Employment, international trade and foreign direct investment: Time series evidence from Türkiye. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 76(11), 89-101.
• Alfaro, L. (2003). Foreign direct investment and growth: Does the sector matter. Harvard Business School, 2003, 1-31.
• Aykut, D., & Sayek, S. (2007). The role of the sectoral composition of foreign direct investment on growth. In Do multinationals feed local development and growth? (pp. 35-59). Elsevier.
• Çaliş, N., & Gökçeli, E. The Relationship Between Financial Inclusion and Income Inequality; Evidence From Türkiye. Journal of Management and Economics Research, 20(4), 401-414.
• De Backer, K., & Sleuwaegen, L. (2003). Does foreign direct investment crowd out domestic entrepreneurship?. Review of industrial organization, 22, 67-84.
• Gokceli, E. (2022). The Effect of Foreign Direct Investment on Environmental Degradation: Evidence from Türkiye. Düzce Economics Journal, 3(2), 149-163.
• Golejewska, A. (2001). Foreign direct investment and employment in a host country: the case of polish manufacturing. Yearbook of Polish European Studies, 5, 97-114.
• Javed, K., Sial, M. H., Awan, R. U., & Sher, F. (2011). Foreign direct investment, economic growth and employment: Evidence from Pakistan. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(3), 1399-1409.
• Liu, L. (2012). FDI and employment by industry: A co-integration study. Modern Economy, 3(1), 16-22.
• Nordin, S. (2017). Does FDI influence employment in Malaysia?. Journal of advanced research in business and management studies, 8(1), 85-94.
• Nyen Wong, K., & Cheong Tang, T. (2011). Foreign direct investment and employment in manufacturing and services sectors: Fresh empirical evidence from Singapore. Journal of Economic Studies, 38(3), 313-330.
• Onimisi, A. T. (2014). Foreign direct investments and employment generation nexus in Nigeria. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 4(5), 119.
• Pinn, S. L. S., Ching, K. S., Kogid, M., Mulok, D., Mansur, K., & Loganathan, N. (2011). Empirical analysis of employment and foreign direct investment in Malaysia: An ARDL bounds testing approach to cointegration. Advances in Management and Applied Economics, 1(3), 77-91.
• Salami, A. O., & Oyewale, I. O. (2013). Impact of foreign direct investment on employment generation in Nigeria. International Journal of Economic Development Research and Investment, 4(1), 64-75.
• Sarwar, N., & Mubarik, M. S. (2014). Foreign direct investment (FDI) and employment: A case of province of Punjab, Pakistan. The Economics and Finance Letters, 1(4), 59-65.
• Sinkala, M., & Zhou, W. (2014). Chinese FDI and employment creation in Zambia. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 5(23), 39-43.