Farklı Polimerlerle Modifiye Edilmiş Asfalt Bağlayıcıların MSCR Testi Kullanarak Yüksek Sıcaklık Performanslarının Değerlendirilmesi

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 36 Sayı: 1, 471 - 479, 28.03.2024

Erkut Yalçın , Mehmet Yilmaz

https://doi.org/10.35234/fumbd.1424871

Öz

Bu çalışmada çoklu gerilme uygulaması sonrası sünme-elastik geri dönme (MSCR) deneyleri kullanılarak farklı katkı maddelerinin asfalt bağlayıcıların gerilme kaynaklı davranışı üzerindeki etkileri araştırılmıştır. Saf asfalt bağlayıcı farklı oranlarda SBS, 611 ve 701 polimerleri ile modifiye edilmiştir. Deney 6 farklı sıcaklıkta gerçekleştirilmiş ve her döngüde sünme geri dönme uyumu (Jnr) ve geri kazanım yüzdesi (R) hesaplanmıştır. Ortalama Jnr ve ortalama R değerleri de farklı gerilme seviyelerinde hesaplanmıştır. Bulgular, tüm modifiye bağlayıcılar için daha yüksek gerilme seviyelerinin daha belirgin doğrusal olmayan davranışla ilişkili olduğunu göstermiştir. Özellikle modifiye bağlayıcılar hem düşük hem de yüksek gerilme seviyelerinde artan sıcaklıklara karşı esnek özellik sergilemiştir. Ayrıca, elastic geri dönme değerleri farklı sıcaklıklarda her üç bağlayıcıda da katkı maddesinin artmasıyla artmıştır. Saf bağlayıcının elastic geri dönme özelliklerini geliştirme noktasında en iyi katkı maddesi 611 olarak belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Polimer, modifikasyon, MSCR, katkı ilavesi

Etik Beyan

Yazarlar, bu makalede rapor edilen çalışmayı etkiliyor gibi görünebilecek, birbiriyle rekabet eden herhangi bir finansal çıkar veya kişisel ilişkinin bulunmadığını beyan ederler.

Destekleyen Kurum

Fırat Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Koordinasyon Birimi (FÜBAP)

Proje Numarası

MF.20.33

Teşekkür

Bu çalışma Fırat Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Koordinasyon Birimi (FÜBAP) kapsamında gerçekleştirilmiştir. FÜBAP'ın MF.20.33 Araştırma Projesi'ne sağladığı mali destek için teşekkür ederiz. E.Y. ve M.Y. fikir sahibi ve deneyleri gerçekleştirdi. E.Y. ve M.Y. sonuçları yorumladı ve makaleyi yazdı.

Evaluation of High Temperature Performance of Asphalt Binders Modified with Different Polymers Using MSCR Test

Öz

In this study, the effects of different additives on the stress-induced behaviour of asphalt binders were investigated using multiple stress creep recovery test (MSCR) experiments. Pure asphalt binder was modified with different proportions of SBS, 611 and 701 polymers. The experiment was carried out at 6 different temperatures and the creep recovery compliance (Jnr) and recovery percentage (R) were calculated for each cycle. Average Jnr and average R values were also calculated at different stress levels. The results showed that higher stress levels were associated with more pronounced nonlinear behaviour for all modified binders. In particular, the modified binders exhibited resilient behaviour against increasing temperatures at both low and high stress levels. Furthermore, the elastic return values increased with increasing additive in all three binders at different temperatures. The best additive for improving the elastic return properties of the pure binder was determined as 611.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Polymer, modification, MSCR, additive addition.

Proje Numarası

MF.20.33

Kaynakça

• Atul Narayan SP, Murali Krishnan J, Little DN, Rajagopal KR. Mechanical behaviour of asphalt binders at high temperatures and specification for rutting. Int J Pavement Eng 2017; 18 (10): 916–927.
• Delgadillo R, Cho DW, Bahia H. Nonlinearity of repeated creep and recovery binder test and relationship with mixture permanent deformation. Transp Res Rec 2006; 1962 (1): 2–11.
• AASHTO. Standard specification for performance-graded asphalt binder. AASHTO 2021; AASHTO M 320–21.
• Delgadillo R, Nam K, Bahia H. Why do we need to change G*/sinδ and how?. Road Mater. Pavement Design 2006; 7 (1): 7–27.
• D’Angelo J. Current status of superpave binder specification. Road Mater Pavement Design 2009; 10 (sup1): 13–24.
• D’Angelo JA. The relationship of the MSCR test to rutting. Road Mater Pavement Design 2009; 10 (sup1): 61–80.
• AASHTO. Standard method of test for multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer (DSR) 2013; AASHTO: AASHTO TP 70.
• Wasage TLJ, Stastna J, Zanzotto L, Rheological analysis of multi-stress creep recovery (MSCR) test. Int Pavement Eng 2011; 12 (6): 561–568.
• Radhakrishnan V, Ramya Sri M, Sudhakar Reddy K. Evaluation of asphalt binder rutting parameters. Constr Build Mater 2018; 173: 298–307.
• Walubita LF, Ling M, Pianeta LMR, Fuentes L, Komba JJ, Mabrouk GM. Correlating the asphalt-binder mscr test results to the hma hwtt and field rutting performance. J Trans Eng Part B: Pavements 2022; 148 (3).
• Skronka G, Blascik M, Vacin O, Jasso M, Impact of shear stress levels on validity of MSCR tests. Road Mater Pavement Design 2022; 24 (7):1820–1836.
• Domingos MDI, Faxina AL. Literature review of the multiple stress creep and recovery, performance-related test. J Trans Eng Part B: Pavements 2021; 147 (1): 03121001.
• Wang D, Zhu J, Porot L, Cannone Falchetto A, Damen S. Multiple stress creep and recovery test for bituminous binders – influence of several key experimental parameters. Road Mater Pavement Design 20123; 24 (sup1): 290–308.
• Zhou Z, Gu X, Jiang J, Ni F, Jiang Y. Nonrecoverable behavior of polymer modified and reclaimed asphalt pavement modified binder under different multiple stress creep recovery tests. Transp Res Rec 2018; 2672 (28): 324–336.
• Sun Y, Wang W, Chen J. Investigating impacts of warm-mix asphalt Technologies and high reclaimed asphalt pavement binder content on rutting and fatigue performance of asphalt binder through MSCR and LAS tests. J Clean Prod 2019; 219: 879–893.
• AASHTO. Standard Specification for Performance-Graded Asphalt Binder Using Multiple Stress Creep Recovery (MSCR). AASHTO 2021; Test AASHTO M: 332–21.
• Delgadillo R, Bahia HU, Lakes R. A nonlinear constitutive relationship for asphalt binders. Mater Struct 2011; 45 (3): 457–473.
• Saboo N, Kumar P. A study on creep and recovery behavior of asphalt binders. Constr Build Mater 2015; 96: 632–640.
• Masad EA, Huang CW, D’Angelo J, Little DN. Characterization of asphalt binder resistance to permanent deformation based on nonlinear viscoelastic analysis of multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test. J Assoc Asphalt Paving Technol 2009; 78: 535–566.
• Schapery RA. On the characterization of nonlinear viscoelastic materials. Polym Eng Sci 1969; 9 (4): 295–310.
• Sadeq M, Masad E, Al-Khalid H, Sirin O, Mehrez L. Linear and nonlinear viscoelastic and viscoplastic analysis of asphalt binders with warm mix asphalt additives. Int J Pavement Eng 2016; 19 (10): 857–864.
• Liu H, Zeiada W, Al-Khateeb GG, Ezzet H, Shanableh A, Samarai M. Analysis of MSCR test results for asphalt binders with improved accuracy. Mater Struct 20121; 54 (2).
• Luo X, Ling J, Li H, Zhang Y, Li Y. Nonlinear viscoelastoplastic kinetics for high-temperature performance of modified asphalt binders. Mech Mater 2023; 180: 104612.
• Zhang L, Xing C, Gao F, Li T, Tan Y. Using DSR and MSCR tests to characterize high temperature performance of different rubber modified asphalt. Constr and Build Mater. 2016; 127: 466-474.
• Zhengda W, Dongdong G, Zihao J, Yanhua X. The performance evaluation of extracted asphalt binder from dry process produced rubber modified asphalt mixture. Constr and Build Mater. 2023; 401: 131864.
• Yalcin E, Demirbag A. Effects of modified binders obtained from different polymers on conventional and rheological properties. Constr and Build Mater. 2022; 357: 129366.