VUCA Faktörlerinden Etkileniyor Musunuz? “Algılanan VUCA Maruziyeti” Ölçeği Geliştirme

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 28 - 53, 31.12.2023

Erkan Döner , İbrahim Efe Efeoğlu

Öz

Çağdaş iş ortamlarının hızla gelişen ve sıklıkla öngörülemez doğası, Oynaklık, Belirsizlik, Karmaşıklık ve Muğlaklık (VUCA) ile nitelendirilerek, hem kuruluşlar hem de bireyler için önemli zorluklar oluşturmaktadır. Bu VUCA faktörlerinin nasıl algılandığı ve deneyimlendiğine dair detaylı bir anlayışın gerekliliğini fark eden bu çalışma, bireylerin profesyonel ortamlarındaki VUCA algılarını nicel olarak değerlendirmek için tasarlanmış yeni bir araç olan "Algılanan VUCA Maruziyeti" ölçeğini tanıtmaktadır. Madde oluşturma, uzman görüşleri pilot analizler, ve faktör yapısına yönelik gözlemler içeren titiz bir metodolojik yaklaşım aracılığıyla geliştirilen bu ölçek, çeşitli istatistiki doğrulayıcılar tarafından doğrulanmıştır. Ölçeğin yapısal geçerliliğini belirlemek için açıklayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizleri kullanılırken, güvenilirlik iç tutarlık ve test-tekrar test yöntemleriyle sağlanmıştır. Yapılan analizler sonucu ölçek, literatürde aktarıldığı gibi VUCA'nın her bir yönüne karşılık gelen dört faktör içermektedir (Oynaklık, Belirsizlik, Karmaşıklık ve Muğlaklık). Bulgular, ölçeğin güçlü psikometrik özellikler sergilediğini, algılanan VUCA maruziyetini değerlendirmede güvenilir ve geçerli bir araç olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Ayrıca, çalışma birey ve organizasyon boyutunda deneyimlenen VUCA boyutlarının farklı ancak birbiriyle bağlantılı doğasına dair ampirik kanıtlar sağlamaktadır. “Algılanan VUCA Maruziyeti” ölçeği, organizasyon boyutunda araştırma ve uygulama için önemli sonuçlar taşımaktadır. VUCA faktörlerinin çalışanlar üzerindeki etkisini daha derinlemesine anlamayı sağlar, değişken ortamlarda direnç ve uyum yeteneğini artırmaya yönelik çözümleri yönlendirir. Ayrıca, kuruluşların iş gücü üzerinde en derin etkisi olan VUCA alanlarını belirlemeleri için bir gözlem aracı olarak hizmet eder, böylece olumsuz etkileri hafifletmek ve VUCA dünyasının sunduğu potansiyel fırsatlardan yararlanmak için hedeflenmiş stratejiler geliştirmelerini sağlar.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Algı, Algılanan VUCA, Bireysel, Çalışan, VUCA, VUCA Maruziyeti

Being Affected By VUCA Factors? Developing The “Perceived VUCA Exposure” Scale

Öz

The rapidly evolving and often unpredictable nature of contemporary business environments, characterized by Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity, and Ambiguity (VUCA), poses significant challenges for organizations and individuals alike. Recognizing the need for a nuanced understanding of how these VUCA factors are perceived and experienced, this study introduces the "Perceived VUCA Exposure" scale, a novel instrument designed to quantitatively assess individuals' subjective perceptions of VUCA in their professional milieu. Through a rigorous methodological approach, involving item generation, expert reviews, and pilot-test, the scale was developed and subsequently validated across diverse samples. The study employed exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses to establish the scale’s structural validity, while reliability was ascertained through internal consistency and test-retest methods. The final scale comprises four subscales, each corresponding to one aspect of VUCA (Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity, and Ambiguity). The findings reveal that the scale exhibits robust psychometric properties, making it a reliable and valid tool for assessing perceived VUCA exposure. Additionally, the study provides empirical evidence on the distinct yet interconnected nature of the VUCA dimensions as experienced by individuals in organizational settings. The “PVE” scale holds significant implications for organizational research and practice. It facilitates a deeper understanding of how VUCA factors impact employees, guiding interventions to enhance resilience and adaptability in fluctuating environments. Furthermore, it serves as a diagnostic tool for organizations to identify areas of VUCA that most profoundly affect their workforce, enabling targeted strategies to mitigate adverse effects and capitalize on potential opportunities presented by the VUCA world.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Individual, Employee, Perception, Perceived VUCA, VUCA, VUCA Exposure

Kaynakça

• Abidi, S., & Joshi, M. (2015). The VUCA company. Jaico Publishing House.
• Adler, T. R., Isaacs, G. D., & Steiner, R. L. (2006). Distrust and Dominance in Managing Alternative Work
• Arrangements: A Micro-Analytic Test of Transaction Cost Theory. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 22(3).
• Aldridge, V. K., Dovey, T. M., & Wade, A. (2017). Assessing test-retest reliability of psychological measures. European Psychologist.
• Allen, C. D., & Coates, B. E. (2009). The engagement of military voice. The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters, 39(4), 2.,
• Ayre, C., & Scally, A. J. (2014). Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio: revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and evaluation in counseling and development, 47(1), 79-86.
• Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16, 74-94.
• Baran, B. E., & Woznyj, H. M. (2020). Managing VUCA: The human dynamics of agility. Organizational dynamics.
• Bawany, S. (2016). Leading in a VUCA business environment. Leadership Excellence Essentials, 7, 39-40.
• Bennett, N., & Lemoine, G. J. (2014). What a difference a word makes: Understanding threats to performance in a VUCA world. Business Horizons, 57(3), 311-317.
• Bennett, N., & Lemoine, J. (2014). What VUCA really means for you. Harvard business review, 92(1/2).
• Bernstein, L. E. (2014). The perceived importance of vuca-driven skills for 21st century leader success and the extent of integration of those skills into leadership development programs (Doctoral dissertation, Drake University).
• Bodenhausen, G. V., & Peery, D. (2009). Social categorization and stereotyping in vivo: The VUCA challenge. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(2), 133-151.
• Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.
• Canzittu, D. (2022). A framework to think of school and career guidance in a VUCA world. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 50(2), 248-259.
• Carleton, R. N., Norton, M. P. J., & Asmundson, G. J. (2007). Fearing the unknown: A short version of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale. Journal of anxiety disorders, 21(1), 105-117.
• Carson, S. J., Madhok, A., & Wu, T. (2006). Uncertainty, opportunism, and governance: The effects of volatility and ambiguity on formal and relational contracting. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 1058-1077.
• Chakraborty, D. (2019). Versatile performance in Vuca world: A case study. Ushus Journal of Business Management, 18(4), 1-8.
• Chatterjee, M., & Mohanty, M. (2019). Relationship between Leadership Behavior and Perceived Leadership Effectiveness of Transformational, Transactional and Laissez-faire Corporate Leaders in Kolkata, India in VUCA World—A Comparative Study. Pac. Bus. Rev. Int, 11, 14-28.
• Chiang, W. C., Sun, L., & Walkup, B. R. (2018). Business volatility and employee performance. American Journal of Business, 33(3), 96-119.
• Codreanu, A. (2016). A VUCA action framework for a VUCA environment. Leadership challenges and solutions. Journal of Defense Resources Management (JoDRM), 7(2), 31-38.
• Cohen R.J., Swerdlik M.E. (2010). Psychological testing and assessment. Boston: McGraw-Hill Companies.
• Cousins, B. (2018). Design thinking: Organizational learning in VUCA environments. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 17(2), 1-18.
• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
• Cullen, K. L., Edwards, B. D., Casper, W. C., & Gue, K. R. (2014). Employees’ adaptability and perceptions of change-related uncertainty: Implications for perceived organizational support, job satisfaction, and performance. Journal of business and psychology, 29, 269-280.
• Das, K. K., & Ara, A. (2014). Leadership in VUCA world: A case of Lenovo. International Journal of Current Research, 6(4), 6410-6419.
• Dasborough, M. T. (2006). Cognitive asymmetry in employee emotional reactions to leadership behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(2), 163-178.
• De Martino, B., Kumaran, D., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. science, 313(5787), 684-687.
• DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale Development: Theory and Applications (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Dima, G., Meseșan Schmitz, L., & Șimon, M. C. (2021). Job stress and burnout among social workers in the VUCA world of COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 13(13), 7109.
• Doner, E. (2020). Investigating the Effects of the “VUCA” Factors on Product Innovation Performance at Turkish Bus & Coach Industry, p.40. [Master Thesis, Alparslan Türkeş University]Eapen, G. (2009). Flexibility: flexible companies for the uncertain world. CRC Press.
• Égré, P., & Bonnay, D. (2010). Vagueness, uncertainty, and degrees of clarity. Synthese, 174, 47-78.
• Fridgeirsson, T. V., Kristjansdottir, B. H., & Ingason, H. T. (2021). An Alternative Risk Assessment Routine for Decision Making; Towards a VUCA Meter to Assess the Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity, and Ambiguity of Complex Projects. In Research on Project, Programme and Portfolio Management (pp. 41-54). Springer, Cham.
• Gaskin, C. J., & Happell, B. (2014). On exploratory factor analysis: A review of recent evidence, an assessment of current practice, and recommendations for future use. International journal of nursing studies, 51(3), 511-521.
• Hair Jr, J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107-123.
• Halamka, J. D. (2011). Facing down VUCA, and doing the right thing. Computerworld, 45(10), 30-30.
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to under parameterized model misspecification. Psychological methods, 3(4), 424.
• Inceoglu, I., Thomas, G., Chu, C., Plans, D., & Gerbasi, A. (2018). Leadership behavior and employee well-being: An integrated review and a future research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 179-202.
• Jacko, J. A., & Ward, K. G. (1996). Toward establishing a link between psychomotor task complexity and human information processing. Computers & industrial engineering, 31(1-2), 533-536.
• Jarratt, D., & Ceric, A. (2015). The complexity of trust in business collaborations. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 23(1), 2-12.
• Kail, E. G. (2010). Leading in a VUCA environment: C is for complexity. Harvard Business Review. December, 3.
• Kessler, V. (2019). How to Integrate Spirituality, Emotions and Rationality in (Group) Decision-Making. Leading in a VUCA World: Integrating Leadership, Discernment and Spirituality, 105-118.
• Khan, M. F., & Jan, A. (2019). A measure of social media marketing: Scale development and validation. Jindal Journal of Business Research, 8(2), 158-168.
• Kinsinger, P., & Walch, K. (2012). Living and leading in a VUCA world. Thunderbird University, 9.
• Kline, T. J. (2005). Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation. Sage publications.
• Kopp, Tobias, Marco Baumgartner, and Steffen Kinkel. "Success factors for introducing industrial human-robot interaction in practice: an empirically driven framework." The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 112 (2021): 685-704.
• Kraaijenbrink, J. (2018). What does VUCA really mean. Retrieved from Forbes: https://www. forbes. com/sites/jeroenkraaijenbrink/2018/12/19/what-does-vuca-really-mean.
• Krawczyńska-Zaucha, T. (2019). A new paradigm of management and leadership in the VUCA world. Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie/Politechnika Śląska, (141), 221-230.
• Krupp, S., & Schoemaker, P. J. (2014). Winning the long game: How strategic leaders shape the future. Hachette UK.
• Kumar, V., Lahiri, A., & Dogan, O. B. (2018). A strategic framework for a profitable business model in the sharing economy. Industrial Marketing Management, 69, 147-160.
• Lepeley, M. T. (2021). Management in the Global VUCA Environment. Soft Skills for Human Centered Management and Global Sustainability; Routledge: New York, NY, USA.
• Lerner, J. S., Li, Y., Valdesolo, P., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Emotion and decision making. Annual review of psychology, 66, 799-823.
• Liu, P., & Li, Z. (2012). Task complexity: A review and conceptualization framework. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 42(6), 553-568.
• Lowe, R. A., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2006). Overoptimism and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Management Science, 52(2), 173-186.
• Mack, O., & Khare, A. (2016). Perspectives on a VUCA World. Managing in a VUCA World, 3-19.
• MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2011). Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: Integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quarterly, 293-334.
• Maio, G. R., & Haddock, G. (2010). The psychology of attitudes and attitude change. SAGE Publications Ltd, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446214299.
• Martin, M. M., & Rubin, R. B. (1995). A new measure of cognitive flexibility. Psychological Reports, 76(2), 623-626.
• McLain, D. L. (2009). Evidence of the properties of an ambiguity tolerance measure: The multiple stimulus types ambiguity tolerance scale–II (MSTAT–II). Psychological reports, 105(3), 975-988.
• Millar, C. C., Groth, O., & Mahon, J. F. (2018). Management innovation in a VUCA world: Challenges and recommendations. California Management Review, 61(1), 5-14.
• Minciu, M., Berar, F. A., & Dima, C. (2019, October). The opportunities and threats in the context of the VUCA World. In Proceedings of the 13th International Management Conference on Management Strategies for High Performance (IMC), Bucharest, Romania (pp. 1142-1150).
• Molina, A., Martín‐Consuegra, D., & Esteban, A. (2007). Relational benefits and customer satisfaction in retail banking. International journal of bank marketing, 25(4), 253-271.
• Nandram, S. S., & Bindlish, P. K. (2017). Introduction to VUCA. Managing VUCA through integrative self-management: How to cope with volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity in organizational behavior, 3-14.
• Nicolaidis, C., & Katsaros, K. (2011). Tolerance of ambiguity and emotional attitudes in a changing business environment: A case of Greek IT CEOs. Journal of Strategy and Management, 4(1), 44-61.
• Oreg, S. (2006). Personality, context, and resistance to organizational change. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 15(1), 73-101.
• Piderit, S. K. (2000). Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 783-794.
• Ployhart, R. E., & Bliese, P. D. (2006). Individual adaptability (I-ADAPT) theory: Conceptualizing the antecedents, consequences, and measurement of individual differences in adaptability. In Understanding adaptability: A prerequisite for effective performance within complex environments (pp. 3-39). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
• Polites, G. L., Roberts, N., & Thatcher, J. (2012). Conceptualizing models using multidimensional constructs: a review and guidelines for their use. European Journal of Information Systems, 21, 22-48.
• Potsangbam, C. (2017). Adaptive performance in VUCA Era-Where is research going. International Journal of Management (IJM), 8(6), 99-108.
• Rafferty, A. E., & Griffin, M. A. (2006). Perceptions of organizational change: a stress and coping perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1154.
• Robinson, J., Sinclair, M., Tobias, J., & Choi, E. (2017). More dynamic than you think: Hidden aspects of decision-making. Administrative Sciences, 7(3), 23.
• Rodriguez, A., & Rodriguez, Y. (2015). Metaphors for today’s leadership: VUCA world, millennial and “Cloud Leaders”. Journal of Management Development, 34(7), 854-866.
• Rubio, D. M., Berg-Weger, M., Tebb, S. S., Lee, E. S., & Rauch, S. (2003). Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Social work research, 27(2), 94-104.
• Ruksana, S., & Ahmed, B. (2019). Developing leaders in VUCA: a case study. International Journal of Advanced and Innovative Research, 6(1), 16-18.
• Rush, M. C., Schoel, W. A., & Barnard, S. M. (1995). Psychological resiliency in the public sector:" Hardiness" and pressure for change. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 46(1), 17-39.
• Saksvik, I. B., & Hetland, H. (2009). Exploring dispositional resistance to change. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 16(2), 175-183.
• Saleh, A., & Watson, R. (2017). Business excellence in a volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous environment (BEVUCA). The TQM Journal, 29 (5), 705–724.
• Schick, A., Hobson, P. R., & Ibisch, P. L. (2017). Conservation and sustainable development in a VUCA world: the need for a systemic and ecosystem‐based approach. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 3(4), e01267
• Shaffer, L. S., & Zalewski, J. M. (2011). Career advising in a VUCA environment. NACADA Journal, 31(1), 64-74.
• Sinha, D., & Sinha, S. (2020). Managing in a VUCA world: Possibilities and pitfalls. Journal of Technology Management for Growing Economies, 11(1), 17-21.
• Stankevičiūtė, Ž., Sanchez-Hernandez, M. I., & Staniškienė, E. (2021). The negative effect of job insecurity in the virtuous cycle between trust in the organization, subjective well-being, and task performance in the current volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity context. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 6037.
• Stiehm, J. H. (2002). US Army War College: Military education in a democracy. Temple University Press.
• Straub, D., Boudreau, M. C., & Gefen, D. (2004). Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 13(1), 24.
• Sullivan, J. (2012). Talent strategies for a turbulent VUCA world—shifting to an adaptive approach. Ere. net, 22
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Experimental designs using ANOVA (Vol. 724). Belmont, CA: Thomson/Brooks/Cole.
• Taskan, B., Junça-Silva, A., & Caetano, A. (2022). Clarifying the conceptual map of VUCA: A systematic review. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(7), 196-217.
• Thomas, C. (2020). Decision-making during VUCA crises: Insights from the 2017 Northern California firestorm. Journal of Business Continuity & Emergency Planning, 14(1), 82-94.
• Thorén, K., & Vendel, M. (2019). Backcasting as a strategic management tool for meeting VUCA challenges. Journal of Strategy and Management, 12(2), 298-312.
• Tongco MDC. 2007. Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research & Applications 5:147-158.
• van Dam, K. (2018). Feelings about change: The role of emotions and emotion regulation for employee adaptation to organizational change. In Organizational Change (pp. 67-77). Routledge.
• Wanberg, C. R., & Banas, J. T. (2000). Predictors and outcomes of openness to changes in a reorganizing workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 132.
• Watt, S. R., Javidi, M., & Normore, A. H. (2016). Increasing darkness: combining toxic leadership and volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity (VUCA). In The dark side of leadership: Identifying and overcoming unethical practice in organizations (Vol. 26, pp. 195-206). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
• Wilkinson, D. (2006). The ambiguity advantage: What great leaders are great at. Springer.
• Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The counseling psychologist, 34(6), 806-838.