Reasons of cone-beam computed tomography examination requests in a dental faculty

Öz

OBJECTIVE: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a radiographic technique that allows the three-dimensional visualization of the dental and maxillofacial tissues. In recent years, the use of this technique in our country has been increasing continuously. The aim of this study was to assess the reasons and distribution of the CBCT requests in a Dentomaxillofacial Radiology department of a dental faculty.

MATERIALS AND METHOD: CBCT request forms belonging to 1087 patients attending the Dentomaxillofacial Radiology department, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University were assessed. Information of the localization and reason of the request was recorded on a standard form prepared for the study.

RESULTS: The requested CBCT images were found to be for implant planning (42.04%), jaw lesions (18.31%), relationship of the mandibular canal to the roots of third molars (11.13%), localization and relationship of impacted teeth with anatomic structures (7.82%), temporomandibular joint pathologies (3.13%), sinus pathologies (3.13%), tooth and jaw fractures (2.94%), alveolar bone quality and quantity (1.93%), cleft lip-plate (1.20%) and other reasons (8.37%), in order.

CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that most of the CBCT examinations were requested for implant planning.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Cone-Beam Computed Tomography,Dental Implant,Radiography

Bir diş hekimliği fakültesindeki konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi incelemesi istenme nedenleri

Öz

AMAÇ: Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi (KIBT) dental ve maksillofasiyal dokuların üç boyutlu görüntülenmesini sağlayan bir radyografik tekniktir. Son yıllarda bu tekniğin ülkemizde kullanımı artarak devam etmektedir. Bu çalış- manın amacı bir diş hekimliği fakültesinin Ağız, Diş ve Çene Radyolojisi Anabilim Dalında KIBT istenme nedenleri ve bunların dağılımının belirlenmesidir.

GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Çalışmada Gazi Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Ağız, Diş ve Çene Radyolojisi Anabilim Dalında KIBT elde edilmesi için başvuran hastalara ait 1087 adet KIBT istek formu incelendi. İncelemenin bölgesi ve nedeni çalışma için hazırlanan standart formlara kaydedildi.

BULGULAR: KIBT isteklerinin sırasıyla: implant planlaması (%42.04), çene lezyonları (%18.31), üçüncü molar dişlerin köklerinin mandibular kanal ile olan ilişkisi (% 11.13), gö- mülü dişlerin lokalizasyonu ve komşu anatomik yapılarla olan ilişkisi (%7.82), temporomandibular eklem patolojileri (%3.13), sinüs patolojileri (%3.13), çene ve diş fraktürleri (%2.94), alveol kemiğinin kalite ve kantite değerlendirmesi (%1.93), dudak damak yarığı (%1.20) ve diğer nedenler (%8.37) için olduğu görüldü.

SONUÇ: Çalışmanın sonuçları KIBT incelemesinin en fazla implant planlaması için istendiğini gösterdi.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Diş İmplantı,Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi,Radyografi

Kaynakça

1. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998;8:1558-64.
2. Scarfe WC. Farman AG. Cone-beam computed tomography. White SC, Pharoah MJ, eds. Oral raiology principles and interpretation. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Elsevier; 2009. p.225-43.
3. Dawood A, Patel S, Brown J. Cone beam CT in dental practice. Br Dent J 2009;207:23-8.
4. Horner K. Cone-beam computed tomography: time for an evidencebased approach. Prim Dent J 2013;2:22-31.
5. Adibi S, Zhang W, Servos T, O'Neill PN. Cone beam computed tomography in dentistry: what dental educators and learners should know. J Dent Educ 2012;76:1437-42.
6. Cotton TP, Geisler TM, Holden DT, Schwartz SA, Schindler WG. Endodontic applications of cone-beam volumetric tomography. J Endod 2007;33:1121-32.
7. Patel S, Dawood A, Mannocci F, Wilson R, Pitt Ford T. Detection of periapical bone defects in human jaws using cone beam computed tomography and intraoral radiography. Int Endod J 2009;42:507-15.
8. Tyndall DA, Brooks SL. Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;89:630-7.

9. Perez LA, Brooks SL, Wang HL, Eber RM. Comparison of linear tomography and direct ridge mapping for the determination of edentulous ridge dimensions in human cadavers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;99:748-54.
10. Peker I, Alkurt MT, Michcioglu T. The use of 3 different imaging methods for the localization of the mandibular canal in dental implant planning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:463-70.
11. Kassebaum DK, Nummikoski PV, Triplett RG, Langlais RP. Crosssectional radiography for implant site assessment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990;70:674-8.
12. Tyndall DA, Price JB, Tetradis S, Ganz SD, Hildebolt C, Scarfe WC. Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012;113:817-26.
13. Hatcher DC, Dial C, Mayorga C. Cone beam CT for pre-surgical assessment of implant sites. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003;31:825-33.
14. Neves FS, Souza TC, Almeida SM, Haiter-Neto F, Freitas DQ, Bóscolo FN. Correlation of panoramic radiography and cone beam CT findings in the assessment of the relationship between impacted mandibular third molars and the mandibular canal. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012;41:553-7.
15. Ghaeminia H, Meijer GJ, Soehardi A, Borstlap WA, Mulder J, Bergé SJ. Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38:964-71.
16. Krishnamoorthy B, Mamatha N, Kumar VA. TMJ imaging by CBCT: Current scenario. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2013;3:80-3.
17. Kaeppler G. Applications of cone beam computed tomography in dental and oral medicine. Int J Comput Dent 2010;13:203-19.
18. Logan GM, Brocklebank LM. An audit of occipitomental radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999;28:158-61.
19. Brüllmann DD, Schmidtmann I, Hornstein S, Schulze RK. Correlation of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) findings in the maxillary sinus with dental diagnoses: a retrospective cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:1023-9.
20. Shahbazian M, Jacobs R. Diagnostic value of 2D and 3D imaging in odontogenic maxillary sinusitis: a review of literature. J Oral Rehabil 2012;39:294-300.
21. Scarfe WC. Imaging of maxillofacial trauma: evolutions and emerging revolutions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;100 Suppl 2:S75-96.
22. MacDonald-Jankowski DS, Orpe EC. Computed tomography for oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Part 2: Cone-beam computed tomography. Asian J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;18:85-92.
23. Mah JK, Huang JC, Choo H. Practical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontics. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141 Suppl 3:7S-13S.
24. Hodges RJ, Atchison KA, White SC. Impact of cone-beam computed tomography on orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;143:665-74.
25. Patel S. New dimensions in endodontic imaging: Part 2. Cone beam computed tomography. Int Endod J 2009;42:463-75.
26. Soğur E, Baksi BG, Gröndahl HG. Imaging of root canal fillings: a comparison of subjective image quality between limited cone-beam CT, storage phosphor and film radiography. Int Endod J 2007;40:179-85.
27. Patel S, Brady E, Wilson R, Brown J, Mannocci F. The detection of vertical root fractures in root filled teeth with periapical radiographs and CBCT scans. Int Endod J 2013;46:1140-52.
28. Vandenberghe B, Jacobs R, Yang J. Diagnostic validity (or acuity) of 2D CCD versus 3D CBCT-images for assessing periodontal breakdown. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104:395- 401.
29. Kayipmaz S, Sezgin ÖS, Saricaoğlu ST, Çan G. An in vitro comparison of diagnostic abilities of conventional radiography, storage phosphor, and cone beam computed tomography to determine occlusal and approximal caries. Eur J Radiol 2011;80:478-82.
30. Wenzel A, Hirsch E, Christensen J, Matzen LH, Scaf G, Frydenberg M. Detection of cavitated approximal surfaces using cone beam CT and intraoral receptors. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013;42:39458105.