Bibliometric Analysis of Teaching Methods Used in Physical Education and Sports

Abstract

The aim of this research is to determine the trends of the studies on the range of teaching methods used in physical education and sports teaching by bibliometric analysis. Bibliometric analysis, which is one of the quantitative research methods, constitutes the design of the research. By creating different word combinations through the Web of Science database, 42 studies scanned in the category of sports sciences were reached and these studies were exported in BibTeX format. For the study's statistical analysis, the biblio-metrix package of the R 4.2.2 (Core Team) programming language was preferred. According to the findings of the study, the author who published the most and received the most references on the subject area was Mark Byra; research is usually carried out in collaboration with three or more authors; the journal that accepts the most publications is the Journal of Teaching and Physical Education; It has been determined that words such as physical education, teachers, perceptions, students and knowledge are frequently preferred as keywords. In addition, it was concluded that more studies on motor skills are needed in the research area. This research provides important findings for the field of teaching methods spectrum and offers essential information for researchers and practitioners interested in the subject area. Researchers and field experts can review Mark Byra's work for research on the subject; evaluate the Journal of Teaching and Physical Education; use keywords such as education, teachers and students and explore the relationship between teaching methods and motor skills.

Keywords

• Teaching methods
• Physical education and sports teaching
• Bibliometric analysis

Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Alanında Kullanılan Öğretim Yöntemlerinin Bibliyometrik Analizi

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı, beden eğitimi ve spor öğretiminde kullanılan öğretim yöntemleri yelpazesi üzerine yapılan çalışmaların eğilimlerini bibliyometrik analiz ile belirlemektir. Nicel araştırma yöntemle-rinden olan bibliyometrik analiz araştırmanın desenini oluşturmaktadır. Web of Science veri tabanı aracılığıyla farklı kelime kombinasyonları oluşturularak, spor bilimleri kategorisinde taranan 42 çalış-maya ulaşılmış ve bu çalışmalar bibtex formatında dışa aktarılmıştır. Çalışmanın istatistiksel analizleri için R 4.2.2 (Core Team) programlama dilinin bibliometrix paketi tercih edilmiştir. Çalışmanın bulgularına göre, konu alanına yönelik en çok yayın yapan ve en çok atıf alan yazarın Mark Byra olduğu; araştırmaların genellikle üç veya daha fazla yazarın iş birliğiyle gerçekleştirildiği; en çok yayın kabul eden derginin Journal of Teaching and Physical Education olduğu; physical education, teachers, perceptions, students ve knowledge gibi kelimelerin anahtar kelime olarak sıklıkla tercih edildiği tespit edilmiştir. Ek olarak, araştırma alanında motor beceriler üzerine daha fazla çalışmaya ihtiyaç duyulduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Bu araştırma, öğretim yöntemleri yelpazesi alanına yönelik önemli bulgular sağlamakta ve konu alanına ilgi duyan araştırmacılar ve uygulayıcılar için önemli bilgiler sunmaktadır. Araştırmacılar ve alan uzmanları konu üzerine araştırma yapmak için Mark Byra'nın çalışmalarını inceleyebilir; Journal of Teaching and Physical Education dergisini değerlendirebilir; education, teachers ve students gibi anahtar kelimeleri kullanabilir ve öğretim yöntemleri ile motor beceriler arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırabilir.

Keywords

• Öğretim yöntemleri
• Beden eğitimi ve spor öğretimi
• Bibliyometrik analiz

References

1. 1. Barba, M. (2010). Differences between the cooperative learning and the practice style in rural school. Comparison of two studies of case in a didactic unit of acrosport in the second cycle of primary education. RETOS-Neuvas Tendencias en Educacion Fisica, Deporte y Recreacion, (18), 14-18.
2. 2. Beckett, K. D. (1991). The effects of two teaching styles on college students’ achievement of selected physical education outcomes. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 10(2), 153-169.
3. 3. Bidabadi, N. S., Isfahani, A. N., Rouhollahi, A. ve Khalili, R. (2016). Effective teaching methods in higher education: requirements and barriers. Journal of Advances in Medical Education ve Professionalism, 4(4), 170-178.
4. 4. Boyce, B. A. (1992). The effects of three styles of teaching on university students’ motor performance. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 11(4), 389-401.
5. 5. Byra, M. ve Jenkins, J. (1998). The thoughts and behaviors of learners in the inclusion style of teaching. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 18(1), 26-42.
6. 6. Byra, M., Sanchez, B. ve Wallhead, T. (2014). Behaviors of students and teachers in the command, practice, and inclusion styles of teaching: Instruction, feedback, and activity level. European Physical Education Review, 20(1), 3-19.
7. 7. Calabuig-Moreno, F., González-Serrano, M. H., Fombona, J. ve Garcia-Tascon, M. (2020). The emergence of technology in physical education: A general bibliometric analysis with a focus on virtual and augmented reality. Sustainability, 12(7), 2728.
8. 8. Chatoupis, C. ve Vagenas, G. (2018). Effectiveness of the practice style and reciprocal style of teaching: A meta analysis. Physical Educa-tor, 75(2), 175-194.

9. 9. Chatzipanteli, A., Digelidis, N. ve Papaioannou, A. G. (2015). Self-regulation, motivation and teaching styles in physical education classes: An intervention study. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 34(2), 333-344.
10. 10. Cothran, D. J., Kulinna, P. H., Banville, D., Choi, E., Amade-Escot, C., Macphail, A., Macdonald, D., Richard, J. F., Sarmento P. ve Kirk, D. (2005). A cross-cultural investigation of the use of teaching styles. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76(2), 193-201.
11. 11. Cothran, D., Kulinna, P. H. ve Ward, E. (1999). Students' experiences with and perceptions of Mosston's spectrum of teaching styles. In Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 70(1), A84-A85.
12. 12. Cuellar-Moreno, M. ve Caballero-Juliá, D. (2019). Student perceptions regarding the command and problem solving teaching styles in the dance teaching and learning process. Research in Dance Education, 20(3), 297-310.
13. 13. Dreyer, C. ve Van der Walt, J. L. (1996). Learning and teaching styles: Empowering diverse learners in tertiary classrooms. Koers-Bulletin for Christian Scholarship/Bulletin vir Christelike Wetenskap, 61(4), 469-482.
14. 14. Goldberger, M., Ashworth, S. ve Byra, M. (2012). Spectrum of teaching styles retrospective 2012. Quest, 64(4), 268-282.
15. 15. Harrison, J. M., Fellingham, G. W., Buck, M. M. ve Pellett, T. L. (1995). Effects of practice and command styles on rate of change in volleyball performance and self-efficacy of high, medium, and low skilled learners. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 14(3), 328-339.
16. 16. Jaakkola, T. ve Watt, A. (2011). Finnish physical education teachers’ self-reported use and perceptions of Mosston and Ashworth’s teaching styles. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 30(3), 248-262.
17. 17. Inayat, A. ve Ali, A. Z. (2020). Influence of teaching style on students’ engagement, curiosity and exploration in the classroom. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 7(1), 87-102.
18. 18. Kırpık, G. ve Dönbak, E. R. (2021). Turizm alanında yer alan liderlik araştırmalarının bibliyometrik analizi. Alanya Akademik Bakış, 5(2), 883-909.
19. 19. Kirby, S., Byra, M., Readdy, T. ve Wallhead, T. (2015). Effects of spectrum teaching styles on college students’ psychological needs satisfaction and self determined motivation. European Physical Education Review, 21(4), 521-540.
20. 20. Kulinna, P. H. ve Cothran, D. J. (2003). Physical education teachers’ self reported use and perceptions of various teaching styles. Learning and Instruction, 13(6), 597-609.
21. 21. Landøy, A., Popa, D. ve Repanovici, A. (2020). Teaching learning methods. Collaboration in Designing a Pedagogical Approach in Information Literacy, 137-161.
22. 22. Morgan, K., Kingston, K. ve Sproule, J. (2005). Effects of different teaching styles on the teacher behaviours that influence motivational climate and pupils' motivation in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 11(3), 257-285.
23. 23. Mosston, M. (1966). Teaching physical education. Columbus, OH: Merrill
24. 24. Mosston, M. ve Ashworth, S. (1990). The spectrum of teaching styles. From command to discovery. Longman, Inc., 95 Church St., White Plains, NY 10601-1505.
25. 25. Özgül, F., Atan, T. ve Kangalgil, M. (2019). Comparison of the command and inclusion styles of physical education lessons to teach volleyball in middle school. Physical Educator, 76(1), 182-196.
26. 26. Parsak, B. ve Saraç, L. (2019). Turkish physical education teachers’ use of teaching styles: self-reported versus observed. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 39(2), 137-146.
27. 27. Salar, R., Turgut, Ü., Aksakallı, A. ve Gürbüz, F. (2016). Bireysel farklıkların öğretim sürecine yansımasına dair öğretmen görüşlerinin incelenmesi: nitel bir araştırma. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(2), 431-444.
28. 28. Syafitri, N. (2018). The correlation between lecturers’ teaching styles and students’ reading habit towards reading comprehension. ELS-JISH, 1(1), 96-102.
29. 29. Syrmpas, I., Digelidis, N. ve Watt, A. (2016). An examination of Greek physical educators’ implementation and perceptions of Spectrum teaching styles. European Physical Education Review, 22(2), 201-214.
30. 30. Syrmpas, I., Papaioannou, A., Digelidis, N., Erturan, G., ve Byra, M. (2020). Higher order factors and measurement equivalence of the spectrum of teaching styles’ questionnaire across two cultures. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 40(2), 245-255.
31. 31. Şahin, A., Karakaya, Y. E. ve Dikmen, M. (2023). Mapping tendencies in curriculum research on physical education and sports: a bibliometric analysis. Participatory Educational Research, 10(3), 106-129.
32. 32. Ünlü, H. ve Aydos, L. (2007). Öğretmen görüşlerine göre; beden eğitimi derslerinde öğretmenlerin ve öğrencilerin tercih ettikleri öğretim yöntemleri. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(2), 71-81.
33. 33. Van Raan, A. (1996). Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises. Scientometrics, 36(3), 397-420.
34. 34. Wang, V. ve Torrisi-Steele, G. (2019). Transformation of higher education in China: A teaching methods perspective. In Handbook of research on challenges and opportunities in launching a technology driven international university (pp. 131-160). IGI Global.
35. 35. Xie, R. ve Jiang, J. (2022). Creativity: the effectiveness of teacher student conflict. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1628.