Phaselis in the Mithradatic–Pirate Nexus

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 30, 135 - 142, 11.11.2025

Fatma Avcu

https://doi.org/10.37095/gephyra.1780059

Öz

This paper reassesses the role of Phaselis in the First Mithradatic War through a newly discovered inscription honouring King Mithradates VI Eupator. Found in what is called today the “South Harbour Trade Centre” and dated to 89-85 BC, the text offers the first epigraphic evidence of Mithradatic presence in the city, confirming its integration into Pontic–pirate alliances active along the eastern Lycian and western Pamphylian coasts. Drawing on literary and epigraphic sources, the study situates Phaselis within the contested maritime frontier where local powers, pirates, and Pontic forces resisted Roman authority. Although the city’s strategic harbours facilitated this co-operation for a while, it was besieged and punished by the Roman counterattack under Servilius Vatia (78-74 BC) and lost its territory for a while.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Phaselis , Mithradates VI Eupator , Pamphylia , Lycia , piracy , Rome

Etik Beyan

The excavation and research activities at the ancient city of Phaselis [Project Number CK010712(2025)] were carried out on behalf of Selçuk University by the excavation director, Prof. Dr. Erdoğan Aslan, under the authorisation of Presidential Decree No. 8883 dated 29.08.2024 and excavation permit No. 6184746 dated 06.01.2025 issued by the General Directorate of Cultural Heritage and Museums, Ministry of Culture and Tourism of the Republic of Türkiye.

Proje Numarası

CK010712(2025)

Teşekkür

I wish to express my profound gratitude to Prof. Dr. Erdoğan Aslan for kindly granting permission, and Prof. Dr. Fatih Onur for his encouragement to pursue the study of this inscription. I am also deeply thankful to Prof. Dr. Denis Rousset for his invaluable comments and insightful suggestions. Furthermore, I would like to extend my sincere thanks to the anonymous reviewers of this article for their careful reading and constructive feedback. Finally, I thank T. M. P. Duggan for polishing the English of this article.

Mithradates–Korsan İttifakı Bağlamında Phaselis

Öz

Makale, Phaselis’in Birinci Mithradates Savaşı’ndaki rolünü, Kral IV. Mithradates Eupator’u onurlandıran ve yeni bulunan bir yazıt parçası üzerinden yeniden değerlendirmektedir. Güney Liman Ticaret Merkezi'nde bulunan ve MÖ 89-85 yıllarına tarihlenen metin, kentteki Mithradates yanlılığına dair ilk epigrafik kanıtı sunmakta ve kentin doğu Likya ve batı Pamfilya kıyılarında faaliyet gösteren Pontus-korsan ittifakına entegrasyonunu doğrulamaktadır. Edebi ve epigrafik kaynaklara dayanan bu çalışma, Phaselis’i yerel güçlerin, korsanların ve Pontus güçlerinin Roma otoritesine direndiği çekişmeli deniz bölgesinin odağında konumlandırmaktadır. Kentin stratejik limanları, bu iş birliğini belli bir süre kolaylaştırmış olmakla birlikte, Roma’nın Servilius Vatia komutasındaki karşı saldırısı (MÖ 78-74) ile kuşatılmış, cezalandırılmış ve topraklarını bir süreliğine kaybetmiştir.
Parça halindeki yazıtın yaklaşık çevirisi şöyledir: [ .... Kral Mithra]dates Eupa[tor Dionoysos]’u .... Menandros’un ... (onurlandırdı).

Anahtar Kelimeler

Phaselis , Mithradates VI Eupator , Pamphylia , Likya , korsanlık , Roma

Proje Numarası

CK010712(2025)

Kaynakça

• Belk, R. W. 1998. “Possessions and the Extended Self.” Journal of Consumer Research 15/2: 139-168.
• Bielefeld, E. 1968. Schmuck (Archaeologia Homerica IC). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck/Ruprecht.
• Blinkenberg, C. 1926. Fibules Grecques et Orientales, Andr. København: Fred. Høst & Søn.
• Brøns, C. 2014. “Representation and Realities: Fibulas and Pins in Greek and Near Eastern Iconography.” In: M. Harlow - M. L. Nosch (edd.), Greek and Roman Textiles and Dress An Interdisciplinary Anthology, Oxford: Oxbow Books, 60-94.
• Buchner, G. 1975. “Nuovi aspetti e problemi posti dagli scavi di Pithecusa con particolari considerazioni sulle oreficeri di stile orientalizzante antico.”In: C. J. Berard (ed.), Contributıon À L'étude de la Socıété et de la Colonisation Eubéennes. Naples: Publications du Centre Jean Bérard, 59-86.
• Buchner, G. 1977. “Cuma nell’VIII secolo a.C., osservata dalla prospettiva di Pithecusa.” In: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei (ed.), I Campi Flegrei nell’archeologia e nella storia (Atti dei Convegni Lincei 33), Atti del Convegno Internazionale (Roma , 4-7 maggio 1976), Roma: Accademia nazionale dei Lincei, 131–48.
• Buchner, G. 1979. Early Orientalizing Aspects of the Euboean Connection”, In: D. Ridgway - F. R. Ridgway (edd.), Italy before the Romans: the Iron Age, Orientalizing and Etruscan Period, London/New York: Academic Press, 129-144.
• Caner, E. 1983. Fibeln in Anatolien I. Munich: CH Beck.
• Coldstream, J. N. 2008. Greek Geometric Pottery: A Survey of Ten Local Styles and Their Chronology, London: Bristol Phoneix Press.
• D'acunto, M. 2017. “The Protogeometric and Geometric Necropolis of Ialysos (Rhodes): Burial Customs, Commerce and Society.” In: A. M. Ainian – A. Alexandridou – X. Charalambidou (edd.), Regional Stories towards a new Perception of the early Greek World, Acts of an International Symposium in Honour of Professor Jan Bouzek, Volos, 18-21 June, 2015, Volos: University of Thessaly Press, 437-486.
• Deger-Jalkotzy, S. 2006. “Late Mycenaean Warrior Tombs”, in: S. Deger-Jalkotzy – I. S. Lemos (edd.), Ancient Greece: from the Mycenaean palaces to the age of Homer, Edinburg: Edinburgh University Press, 151-181.
• Dominguez, A. J. 1989. La colonización Griega en Sicilia. Griegos, Indígenas y Púnicos en la Sicilia Arcaica: Interacción y aculturación, BAR InternationalSeries 549, Oxford: BAR Publishing.
• Dusenbery, E. 1998: Samothrace 11: The Necropoleis, 2 vols, Princeton: Princeton UP.
• Erdan, E. - Toprak, G. T. - Sıdal-Gökdağ, E. 2020. “Doğum ve Koruyuculuk ile İlişkili Fibula-İğne Kullanımı.” TÜBA-AR 27: 130-150.
• Erdan, E. 2019. “Su Kuşlu Fibulalar ve Aydın Arkeoloji Müzesi’nden Bir Örnek.” OLBA XXVII: 227-248.
• Fidan, E. 2020. “Fikirtepe Kültürü ve Öncesi: Bilecik Bahçelievler Kurtarma Kazısı’nın İlk Sonuçları / Fikirtepe Culture and Before: Preliminary Results from the Rescue Excavation of Bilecik Bahçelievler.” Arkeoloji ve Sanat Dergisi 163: 29-38.
• Fidan, E. - Sarıaltun, S. - Doğan, T. - Seçer-Fidan, S. - İlkmen, E. 2022. “Radiocarbon Dating Evidence and Cultural Sequencing In Chronology of Neolithic Settlement at Bilecik-Bahçelievler from Northwest Anatolia.” Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry 22/3: 133-148.
• Gallo, L. 1983. “Colonizzazione, demografia e strutture di parentela.” Publications de l'École Française de Rome 67/1: 703-728.
• Greenewalt, C. H. Jr. - Rautman, M. L. - Meriç, R. 1986. “The Sardis Campaign of 1983.” Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research Supplementary Studies 24: 1-30.
• Greenewalt, C. H. Jr. 2010. “Afiyet Olsun! (Bon Appetit!).” In: N. D. Cahill (ed.), Lydialılar ve Dünyaları/The Lydians and Their World, Istanbul: Yapı ve Kredi Yayınları, 125-33.
• Haspels, C. H. E. 1951. “La Cité de Midas: Céramique et Trouvailles Diverses.” In: M. A Gabriel (ed.), Phrygie, Exploration Archéologique 3, Paris: E. de Borccard.
• Hodos, T. 1999. “Internarriage in the Western Greek Colonies.” Oxford Journal of Archaeology 18/1: 1-78.
• Hogarth, D. G. 1908. Excavations at Ephesus: The Archaic Artemisia. London: Printed by order of the Trustees.
• Joukowsky, M. 1986. Prehistoric Aphrodisias: an account of the excavations and artifact Studies, Vol. 1. Excavations and Studies. Providence: Brown University.
• Kaya, F. H. - Albayrak, M. - Laflı, E. - Buora, M. 2024. “Fibulae from Nicaea in Bithynia (south-eastern Marmara).” Cercetări Arheologice 31/2: 487-522.
• Klebinder-Gauß, G. 2007. Bronzefunde aus dem Artemision von Ephesos. Wien: ÖAW.
• Laurenzi, L. 1936. “Necropoli ialisie (scavi dell’anno 1934).” Clara Rhodos VIII: 8-205.
• Leighton, R. 1999. Sicily Before History An Archaeological Survey from the Paleolithic to the Iron Age. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
• Özer, B. 2000. “Erken Demir Çağ Başlarına Ait Karia Fibulaları”, In: G. Yalçın – O. Stegemeier (edd.), Metallurgica Anatolica, Festschrift für Ünsal Yalçın Anlasslich Seines 65. Geburtstags, Ünsal Yalçın 65. Yaşgünü Armağan Kitabı, İstanbul: Ege Yayınları, 225-244.
• Ramage, A. - Ramage, N. H. - Gürtekin-Demir, G. 2021. “Ordinary Lydians at Home: The Lydian Trenches of the House of Bronzes and Pactolus Cliff at Sardis: Archaeological Exploration of Sardis Report 8.” Cambridge MA: Archaeological Exploration at Sardis, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Sapouna-Sakellarakis, E. 1978. Die Fibeln der Griechischen Inseln. Munich: CH Beck.
• Sarıaltun, S. - Fidan, M. E. - Ağaç, S. 2023. “Bahçelievler Yerleşmesi Neolitik Çanak Çömleğinde Uygulanan Bezeme ve Kazı Tekniklerin Değerlendirilmesi.” Seramik Araştırmaları Dergisi The Journal of Ceramic Research SRMKA 5: 1-30.
• Sarıaltun, S. - Semiz, B. - Ağaç, S. - Fidan, E. 2024. “Preliminary result of archaeological and petrographic classification of Neolithic pottery from Bahçelievler settlement in Northwestern Anatolia.” Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 53: 1-12.
• Shepherd, G. 1999. “Fibulae and Females: Intermarriage in the Western Greek Colonies and the Evidence from the Cemeteries.” In: G. R. Testskhladze (ed.), Ancient Greeks West and East, Leiden: Brill, 267-300.
• Takaoğlu, T. - Atabay, M. 2021. Tenedos/Bozcaada: Tunç Çağı'ndan Günümüze Bir Ada Tarihi. Istanbul: Ege Yayınları.
• Takaoğlu, T. - Yaman, H. 2019. “Arkaik Dönem Kuzeydoğu Ege Kültürel Etkileşim Ağı İçinde Tenedos Adası.” In: V. Şahoğlu – M. Şevketoğlu – Y. H. Erbil (edd.), Kültürlerin Bağlantısı Başlangıcından Roma Dönemi Sonuna Kadar Eski Yakın Doğuda Ticaret ve Bölgelerarası İlişkiler/Connectıng Cultures Trade and Interconnections in the Ancient Near East from the Beginning until the End of the Roman Period. Ankara: Anatolia Supplement Series 4, 321-338.
• von Eles Masi, P. 1986. Le Fibule Dell'Italia Settentrionale, Prähistorische Bronzefunde Abteilung XIV 5, Munich: CH Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
• Waldbaum, J. C. 1983. Metalwork from Sardis. The finds through 1974. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Ziskowski, A. 2007. “Debating the Origins of Colonial Women in Sicily and South Italy.” Electronic Antiquity 11/1: 1-13.