HİBRİT TAHRİK SİSTEMLERİNİN RİSK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ

Öz

Gelişen teknoloji ile birlikte denizcilik sektörü de dahil olmak üzere güç sistemleri geçmişe göre çok fazla gelişmiştir. Hibrit tahrik sistemi, düşük gürültü, düşük yakıt tüketimi, esnek güç talebi, hacim, ağırlık gibi avantajları ile günümüzde önem kazanmakta ve bu sistemler daha güvenli, daha temiz ve daha konforludur. Hibrit geminin iyimser görünümüne rağmen, hala birçok bilinmeyen vardır ve bu şekilde işletme sırasında beklenmedik riskler ve arızalar gözlemlenebilir. Bu çalışmada risk faktörlerinin hibrit tahrik sistemi üzerindeki etkisi araştırılmıştır. Bu amaçla hibrit sistemin risk değerlendirmesinde risk faktörlerini belirlemek için FAHP uygulanmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Hibrit Sevk Sistemleri
• Bulanık AHP
• Risk Değerlendirmesi

SAFETY ASSESMENT OF HYBRID PROPULSION SYSTEMS

Öz

With developing technology, power systems are improved too much in comparison with the past including the marine industry. Hybrid propulsion system is gaining importance nowadays with its own advantages such as low noise, low fuel consumption, flexible power demand, volume, weight and this systems are safer, cleaner, and more comfortable. Although the optimistic appearance of the hybrid ship, there are still many unknowns and in this way unexpected risks and failures can be observed during operation. In this study, the effect of risk factors on the hybrid drive system has been investigated. For this purpose, FAHP is applied in the risk assessment of the hybrid system to identify risk factors.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Hybrid Propulsion System
• Fuzzy AHP
• Safety Assesment

Kaynakça

1. Alarcin, F., Balin, A., & Demirel, H. (2014). Fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS integrated hybrid method for auxiliary systems of ship main engines. Journal of Marine Engineering and Technology, 13(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/20464177.2014.11020288
2. Barrett et al., (2009). United States Patent Date of Patent: System and Method for Programming a Weighing Scale Using a Key Signal To Enter a Programming Mode, 1(12), 14.
3. Bennabi, N., Charpentier, J. F., Menana, H., Billard, J. Y., & Genet, P. (2016). Hybrid propulsion systems for small ships: Context and challenges. Proceedings - 2016 22nd International Conference on Electrical Machines, ICEM 2016, October 2018, 2948–2954. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICELMACH.2016.7732943
4. Celik, M., Deha Er, I., & Ozok, A. F. (2009). Application of fuzzy extended AHP methodology on shipping registry selection: The case of Turkish maritime industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(1), 190–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.09.004
5. Examiner, P., Basinger, S., Application, F., & Data, P. (2007). ( 12 ) United States Patent. 2(12). Liu, Y., Eckert, C. M., & Earl, C. (2020). A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgments. Expert Systems with Applications, 161, 113738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113738
6. Mentes, A., & Helvacioglu, I. H. (2012). Fuzzy decision support system for spread mooring system selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 3283–3297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.09.016
7. Mentes, A., Akyildiz, H. (2019). Hi̇bri̇t tahri̇k si̇stemli̇ gemi̇lerde ri̇sk değerlendi̇rmesi̇. GiDB Dergi, 6, 33–42. https://gidbdergi.itu.edu.tr/sayilar/17/1703.pdf
8. Russo, R. D. F. S. M., & Camanho, R. (2015). Criteria in AHP: A systematic review of literature. Procedia Computer Science, 55(July), 1123–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.081

9. Tian, J., & Yan, Z. F. (2013). Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for risk assessment to general the assembling of satellite. Journal of Applied Research and Technology, 11(4), 568–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1665-6423(13)71564-5
10. Turbo, M. D. (2014). Hybrid propulsion: Flexibility and maximum efficiency optimally combined. MAN Diesel &Turbo, 1, 16. https://marine.man.eu/docs/librariesprovider6/4-Stroke-Engines/hybrid-propulsion.pdf?sfvrsn=6
11. https://www.auxilia-propulsion.com/index.php/news/a-new-marine-hybrid-kit