A REVIEW OF STUDIES ON THE SLOSHING EFFECT OF LIQUID IN PARTIALLY FILLED TANK

Öz

A REVIEW OF STUDIES ON THE SLOSHING EFFECT OF LIQUID IN PARTIALLY FILLED TANK

Öz

Partially filled liquid tanks are exposed to dynamic loads and seismic movements of the surface. This situation causes the start of the sloshing, the fluid levels to change and additional internal pressures along with hydrostatic pressure on the tank wall. Sloshing occur in some cases, which can cause structural damage. In engineering applications, it is important to be able to determine in advance all the interactions seen during the sloshing. There are lots of numerical models that can be used to describe the sloshing. Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics, Fluid Volume Method, Boundary Element Method, Finite Difference Method and Moving Particle Method are the numerical methods used in sloshing problems. This study investigates numerical and experimental studies on tanks used to reduce sloshing effects and also it shows which method gives better results in which situations to solve the sloshing problem. The liquid sloshing in a moving partially filled rectangular tank is investigated assuming inviscid, incompressible and irrotational flows. The accuracy, simplicity and convergence of the present method are demonstrated via numerical examples, and excellent agreement with the other method is observed. The studies on the baffles used to reduce the sloshing effect in partially filled tanks have been investigated. In this paper numerical and experimental studies for the solution of sloshing problem are investigated. At the end of the research, it is explained what types of studies are appropriate

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sloshing, Free Surface Flow, Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics, Numerical and Experimental Studies

Kaynakça

1. [1] Lamb, H., 1932. Hydrodynamics: Cambridge university press.
2. [2] Euler, L., 1761. Principia motus fluidorum. Novi Commentarii Acad. Sci. Petropolitanae, 6(1756/7): p. 271-311.
3. [3] Graham, E. and A. Rodriquez, 1951. The characteristics of fuel motion which affect airplane dynamics. Douglas Aircraft Co Inc Santa Monica Ca.
4. [4] Lewison, G., 1976. Optimum design of passive roll stabilizer tanks. Naval Architect.
5. [5] Frandsen, J.B., 2004. Sloshing motions in excited tanks. Journal of Computational Physics, 196(1): p. 53-87.
6. [6] Celebi, M.S. and H. Akyildiz, 2002. Nonlinear modeling of liquid sloshing in a moving rectangular tank. Ocean Engineering, 29(12): p. 1527-1553.
7. [7] Popov, G., S. Sankar, and T. Sankar, 1993. Dynamics of liquid sloshing in baffled and compartmented road containers. Journal of fluids and structures, 7(7): p. 803-821.
8. [8] Armenio, V., A. Francescutto, and M. La Rocca, 1996. On the roll motion of a ship with partially filled unbaffled and baffled tanks-Part 1: Mathematical model and experimental setup. International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering, 6: p. 278-282.

9. [9] Zhong, Z., M. Falzarano, and R. Fithen., 1998. A numerical study of U-tube passive antirolling tanks. in The Eighth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers.
10. [10] Sames, P.C., D. Marcouly, and T.E. Schellin, 2002. Sloshing in rectangular and cylindrical tanks. Journal of Ship Research, 46(3): p. 186-200.
11. [11] Ma, D. C., Shin, Y. S., Brochard, D., & Fujita, K., 1994. Sloshing, fluid-structure interaction and structural response due to shock and impact loads. PVP-Vol. 272. New York, NY (United States); American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
12. [12] Yao, Y., M.P. Tulin, and A.R. Kolaini, 1994. Theoretical and experimental studies of threedimensional wavemaking in narrow tanks, including nonlinear phenomena near resonance. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 276: p. 211-232.
13. [13] Kim, J.K., H.M. Koh, and I.J. Kwahk, 1996. Dynamic response of rectangular flexible fluid containers. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 122(9): p. 807-817.
14. [14] Bagnold, R., 1939. Interim report on wave-pressure research. Excerpt from the J. of the Institution of Civil Engineers.
15. [15] Akyildiz, H. and E. Ünal, 2005. Experimental investigation of pressure distribution on a rectangular tank due to the liquid sloshing. Ocean Engineering, 32(11): p. 1503-1516.
16. [16] Rognebakke, O.F. and O.M. Faltinsen, 2003. Coupling of sloshing and ship motions. Journal of Ship Research, 47(3): p. 208-221.
17. [17] Ikeda, T. and N. Nakagawa, 1997. Non-linear vibrations of a structure caused by water sloshing in a rectangular tank. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 201(1): p. 23-41.
18. [18] Anderson, J., S. Semercigil, and Ö. Turan, 2000. A standing-wave-type sloshing absorber to control transient oscillations. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 232(5): p. 839-856.
19. [19] Frandsen, J., 2005. Numerical predictions of tuned liquid tank structural systems. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 20(3): p. 309-329.
20. [20] Kim, Y., 2001. Numerical simulation of sloshing flows with impact load. Applied Ocean Research, 23(1): p. 53-62.
21. [21] Kim, Y., 2002. A numerical study on sloshing flows coupled with ship motion—the antirolling tank problem. Journal of Ship Research, 46(1): p. 52-62.
22. [22] Kim, Y., Nam, B. W., Kim, D. W., & Kim, Y. S., 2007. Study on coupling effects of ship motion and sloshing. Ocean Engineering, 34(16): p. 2176-2187.
23. [23] Mikelis, N., J. Miller, and K. Taylor, 1984. Sloshing in partially filled liquid tanks and its effect on ship motions: numerical simulations and experimental verification. Royal institution of naval architects transactions, 126.
24. [24] Romero, J. A., Hildebrand, R., Martinez, M., Ramirez, O., & Fortanell, J. A., 2005. Natural sloshing frequencies of liquid cargo in road tankers. International journal of heavy vehicle systems, 12(2): p. 121-138.
25. [25] Bogomaz, G., 2004. Dynamics of railway tank cars [Dinamika zheleznodorozhnyh vagonovcistern]. Kiev, Naukova Dumka publ.
26. [26] Hatayama, K., 2008. Lessons from the 2003 Tokachi-oki, Japan, earthquake for prediction of long-period strong ground motions and sloshing damage to oil storage tanks. Journal of seismology, 12(2): p. 255-263.
27. [27] Abramson, H.N., 1966. The dynamic behavior of liquids in moving containers, with applications to space vehicle technology.
28. [29] Jeon, SS., Kim, HI., Park, JS., Kwon, SH., Ryu, MC., Hwang, YS., Jung, JH., 2008. Experimental investigation of scale effect in sloshing phenomenon.
29. [30] Hirt, C., B. Nichols, and N. Romero, 1975. SOLA: A numerical solution algorithm for transient fluid flows. Los Alamos Scientific Lab., N. Mex.(USA).
30. [31] Kim, Y., 2007. Experimental and numerical analyses of sloshing flows. Journal of Engineering Mathematics,. 58(1): p. 191-210.
31. [32] Gavrilyuk, I., Lukovsky, I., Trotsenko, Y., & Timokha, A., 2006. Sloshing in a vertical circular cylindrical tank with an annular baffle. Part 1. Linear fundamental solutions. Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 54(1): p. 71-88.
32. [33] Maleki, A. and M. Ziyaeifar, 2008. Sloshing damping in cylindrical liquid storage tanks with baffles. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 311(1): p. 372-385.
33. [34] Hasheminejad, S.M., M. Mohammadi, and M. Jarrahi, 2014. Liquid sloshing in partly-filled laterally-excited circular tanks equipped with baffles. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 44: p. 97- 114.
34. [35] Wang, J., S. Lo, and D. Zhou, 2013. Sloshing of liquid in rigid cylindrical container with multiple rigid annular baffles: Lateral excitations. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 42: p. 421- 436.
35. [36] Liu, H., Lv, H., Wang, H., & Zhang, Y., 2016 Study on the Influence on Liquid Sloshing Caused by Baffle’s Parameter Changes in Tank. in International Conference on Green Intelligent Transportation System and Safety.
36. [37] Akyıldız, H., N.E. Ünal, and H. Aksoy, 2013. An experimental investigation of the effects of the ring baffles on liquid sloshing in a rigid cylindrical tank. Ocean Engineering, 59: p. 190- 197.
37. [38] Lu, D., Zeng, X., Dang, J., & Liu, Y., 2016. A calculation method for the sloshing impact pressure imposed on the roof of a passive water storage tank of AP1000. Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations.
38. [39] Bredmose, H., Brocchini, M., Peregrine, D. H., & Thais, L., 2003. Experimental investigation and numerical modelling of steep forced water waves. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 490: p. 217-249.
39. [40] Panigrahy, P., U. Saha, and D. Maity, 2009. Experimental studies on sloshing behavior due to horizontal movement of liquids in baffled tanks. Ocean Engineering, 36(3): p. 213-222.
40. [41] Ferziger, J.H. and M. Peric, Computational methods for fluid dynamics. 2012: Springer Science & Business Media.
41. [42] Muzaferija, S., 1998. Computation of free surface flows using interface-tracking and interface-capturing methods. Nonlinear water wave interaction.
42. [43Peric, M., Zorn, T., el Moctar, O., Schellin, T. E., & Kim, Y. S., 2009. Simulation of Sloshing in LNG-tanks. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 131(3): p. 031101.
43. [44] Solaas, F., 1997. Analytical and numerical studies of sloshing in tanks.
44. [45] Herfjord, K., 1997. A study of two-dimensional separated flow by a combination of the finite element method and Navier-Stokes equations.
45. [46] Tønnessen, R., 1999. A finite element method applied to unsteady viscous flow around 2D blunt bodies with sharp corners: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
46. [47] Gingold, R.A. and J.J. Monaghan, 1977. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: theory and application to non-spherical stars. Monthly notices of the royal astronomical society, 181(3): p. 375-389.
47. [48] Gingold, R. and J. Monaghan, 1982. Kernel estimates as a basis for general particle methods in hydrodynamics. Journal of Computational Physics, 46(3): p. 429-453.
48. [49] Monaghan, J. and R. Gingold, 1983. Shock simulation by the particle method SPH. Journal of computational physics, 52(2): p. 374-389.
49. [50] Monaghan, J., 1985. Extrapolating B splines for interpolation. Journal of Computational Physics, 60(2): p. 253-262. [51] Monaghan, J.J., 1988. An introduction to SPH. Computer physics communications, 48(1): p. 89-96.
50. [52] Monaghan, J., 1989. On the problem of penetration in particle methods. Journal of Computational physics, 82(1): p. 1-15.
51. [53] Monaghan, J.J., 1994. Simulating free surface flows with SPH. Journal of computational physics, 1994. 110(2): p. 399-406.
52. [54] Guilcher, P. M., Ducorzet, G., Alessandrini, B., & Ferrant, P., 2007 Water wave propagation using SPH models. in Proc. SPHERIC, 2nd Intl. Workshop. Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, Spain, May..
53. [55] Marrone, S., Colagrossi, A., Le Touzé, D., & Graziani, G., 2010. Fast free-surface detection and level-set function definition in SPH solvers. Journal of Computational Physics, 229(10): p. 3652-3663.
54. [56] Bai, W., X. Liu, and C. Koh, 2015. Numerical study of violent LNG sloshing induced by realistic ship motions using level set method. Ocean Engineering, 97: p. 100-113.
55. [57] Wang, W., Guo, Z., Peng, Y., & Zhang, Q., 2016. A numerical study of the effects of the Tshaped baffles on liquid sloshing in horizontal elliptical tanks. Ocean Engineering, 111: p. 543- 568.