Obesitiy and Diagnostic Radiology

Öz

Use of medical imaging depending upon the comorbidity diseases and bariatric diseased for obese people has increased along with the increase at obesity prevalence. Due to large body structure and increased fatty tissue in obese patients, it is hard to carry out radiological studies and obtain images on diagnostic quality. Moreover, obese patients’ subjecting to more radiation dose in examinations including ionizing radiation is another disadvantage. In order to perform diagnostic imaging process in obese patients, imaging equipment in accordance with the patient weight and diameter and examination rooms should be provided; and examination parameters should be organized according to the patient in a way that can be obtained the best imaging quality.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Obesity, radiological imaging methods, diagnostic radiology

Obezite ve Tanısal Radyoloji

Öz

Obezite prevalansında artışla birlikte komorbid hastalıklara ve bariatrik cerrahi uygulamalarına bağlı obez hastalarda medikal görüntüleme kullanımıda artmaktadır. Obez hastalarda iri vücut yapısı ve artmış yağ dokusu nedeniyle radyolojik çalışmaların yapılması ve tanısal kalitede görüntüler elde edilmesi teknik olarak zordur. Aynı zamanda iyonizan radyasyon içeren tetkiklerde obez hastaların daha fazla radyasyon dozuna maruz kalmaları diğer bir dezavatajdır. Obez hastalarda tanısal kalitede görüntüleme işlemi yapılabilmesi için hasta ağırlığı ve çapına uygun görüntüleme ekipmanı ile tetkik odaları sağlanmalı; tetkik parametreleri en iyi görüntü kalitesini elde edecek şekilde hastaya göre düzenlenmelidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Obezite, radyolojk görüntüleme yöntemleri, tanısal radyoloji

Kaynakça

1. 1) Uppot RN, Sahani DV, Hahn PF, Gervais D, Mueller PR. Impact of obesity on medical imaging and imageguided intervention. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188(2):433–40.
2. 2) Carucci LR. Imaging obese patients: problems and solutions. Abdom Imaging. 2012 Sep 25. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-012-9959-2
3. 3) Modica MJ, Kanal KM, Gunn ML. The obese emergency patient: imaging challenges and solutions. Radiographics. 2011;31(3):811–23.
4. 4) Ginde AA, Foianini A, Renner DM, Valley M, Camargo CA Jr. The challenge of CT and MRI imaging of obese individuals who present to the emergency department: a national survey. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008;16(11):2549–51.
5. 5) Uppot RN, Sahani DV, Hahn PF, Kalra MK, Saini SS, Mueller PR. Effect of obesity on image quality: fifteen-year longitudinal study for evaluation of dictated radiology reports. Radiology. 2006;240(2):435–9.
6. 6) Uppot RN. Impact of obesity on radiology. Radiol Clin North Am 45(2):231–246.
7. 7) Glanc P, O'Hayon BE, Singh DK, Bokhari SA, Maxwell CV. Challenges of pelvic imaging in obese women. Radiographics. 2012;32(6):1839–62.
8. 8) Buckley O, Ward E, Ryan A, Colin W, Snow A, Torreggiani WC. European obesity and the radiology department. What can we do to help? Eur Radiol. 2009;19(2):298–309

9. 9) Yanch JC, Behrman RH, Hendricks MJ, McCall JH. Increased Radiation Dose to Overweight and Obes Patients from Radiographic Examinations. Radiology. 2009;252(1):128–39.
10. 10) Choudhry S, Gorman B, Charboneau JW, Tradup DJ, Beck RJ, Kofler JM, Groth DS. Comparison of tissue harmonic imaging with conventional US in abdominal disease. Radiographics. 2000;20(4):1127-35.
11. 11) Maxwell C, Glanc P. Imaging and obesity: a perspective during pregnancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;196(2):311–319.
12. 12) Schindera ST, Nelson RC, Lee ER, Delong DM, Ngyen G, Toncheva G, Yoshizumi TT. Abdominal multislice CT for obese patients: effect on image quality and radiation dose in a phantom study. Acad Radiol. 2007;14(4):486–94.
13. 13) Bae KT. Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches. Radiology 2010;256(1):32–61.
14. 14) Wall BF, Hart D. Revised radiation doses for typical x-ray examinations: report on a recent review of doses to patients from medical x-ray examinations in the UK by NRPB—National Radiological Protection Board. Br J Radiol 1997;70(833):437–439.
15. 15) 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication no. 103. Ann ICRP 2007;37(2–4):1–332.
16. 16) Ector J, Dragusin O, Adriaenssens B, Huybrechts W, Willems R, Ector H, Heidbüchel H. Obesity is a major determinant of radiation dose in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;17:50(3):234–42.
17. 17) Israel GM, Cicchiello L, Brink J, Huda W. Patient size and radiation exposure in thoracic, pelvic, and abdominal CT examinations performed with automatic exposure control. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195(6):1342–6.
18. 18) Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Hamberg LM, Blake MA, Shepard JA, Saini S. Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 2004;230(3):619–628.
19. 19) Cornfeld D, Israel G, Detroy E, Bokhari J, Mojibian H. Impact of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) on radiation dose and image quality in aortic dissection studies: a qualitative and quantitative analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196(3): 336– 340.
20. 20) Schindera ST, Nelson RC, Yoshizumi T, Toncheva G, Nguyen G, DeLong DM, Szucs-Farkas Z. Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study. Acad Radiol 2009;16(8):997–1002.