Gender Differentials in Accessing Forest Products as Means of Livelihood in Ondo State, Nigeria

Öz

This study examined gender differentials in accessing forest products as means of livelihood in Ondo State, Nigeria. The specific objectives are to identify socio-economic characteristics of the respondents, main forest products assessable in the area, factors influencing level of participation of the respondents in forest products and problems encountered in accessing forest products. A multistage sampling procedure was used to select 196 respondents. Descriptive statistics and truncated regression model were used to analyze the data collected. The results revealed that men (59.7%) were more than women (40.3%). Majority of the women (82.3%) engaged in Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs) while men (76.1%) that were engaged in timber forest products (TFPs) were high. The results of the truncated regression model revealed that age, source of information, non-forest income, land tenure, experience, household size and unit price of forest product were the main factors that significantly affected the level of male and female’s participation in forest products. This study, therefore, recommended that government should put in place a sustainable governance structure in the forests communities for a conducive and friendly environment that will ease the burden of the women, being the most vulnerable.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Income
• non-timber
• truncated regression model
• forest products

Kaynakça

1. Adebayo AA (2009). Attaining Sustainable Rural Development in Nigeria through Effective Management of Forest Based Resources. International Journal of Creativity and Technical Development, 1(1): 1 – 3.
2. Aruwajoye AS and Ajibefun IA (2013). Assessment of Livelihood Strategies among Households in Forest Reserve Communities in Ondo State, Nigeria. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 4(7): 1650-1655.
3. Ashimolowo OR and Otufale GA (2012). Assessment of Domestic Violence Among Women in Ogun State, Nigeria. Greener Journal of Social Sciences, 2(3): 102 – 114.
4. BRIDGE (2008). Gender and Climate Change: Mapping the Linkages. A Scoping Study on Knowledge and Gaps. Prepared for the UK Department for International Development. In: Alyson Brody, Justina Demetriades and Emily Esplen (eds), BRIDGE, Institute of Development Studies (IDS), UK.
5. Canadian International Development Association (CIDA). (undated). Gender Equality and Climate Change: Why Consider Gender Equality When Taking Action on Climate Change?
6. http://www.acdi-cida.gc.ca/INET/IMAGES.NSF/vLUImages/Climate%20change3/$file/Gender-2.pdf.
7. Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) (2005). Contributing to African Development through Forests: Strategy for Engagement in Sub-Sahara African. Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia. June. (34).
8. Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) (2008). CIFOR’s Strategy 2008-2018: making a difference for forest and people. Center for International Forest Research, Bogor, Indonesia (online) URL: http//www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/Books.CIFORstrategy0801.pdf

9. Christie ME and Giri K (2011). Challenges and Experiences of Women in the Forestry Sector in Nepal. International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 3(5): 139-146.
10. Downing TE, Sokona Y, Smith JB (2000). Action on Adaptation to Climate Change. Presentation to the UNFCCC Workshop on Article 4.8 and 4.9 of the Convention: Adverse Effects of Climate Change 9 ‐ 11 March 2000, Bonn, Germany, Oxford Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, 2000.
11. Eneji CVO, Mubi MA, Husain MA and Ogar DA (2015). Factors Influencing Gender Paricipation in Forest Resources Management in the Cross River National Park Enclave Communities, Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Protection and Sustainable Development, 1(5): 234-244.
12. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2003). Climate Change and Food Security: A Framework Document. Rome. www.FAO.org/clim.
13. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2008). Climate change and food security: A Framework Document, Rome.
14. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007). Climate Change: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. IPCC Working Group II Report, Chapter 19, IPCC,
15. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg2/ar4-wg2-chapter19.pdf.
16. Jodha NS (2006). Mountain Commons: Changing Space and Status at Community Levels in Himalayas. Sr. Research Associate (Policy Analyst) International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), Kathmandu, Nepal.
17. Kalu C and Okojie CEE (2009). Economic Contributions of Forests in Nigeria 1970 – 2000. Research Journal of Social Sciences, 4(1): 69 - 73.
18. Ogunbanjo OO and Aina AS (2013). Non-Timbers Forest Products for Poverty Reduction in Ogun Waterside Local Government, Ogun State, Nigeria. Journal of Agri. Science 4(1): 49-53.
19. Olabode SO (2003). Contributions of Selected Non-timber Forest Products to Household food Security in Osun State, Nigeria. A paper submitted to the XII World Forestry Congress, Quebec City, Canada, 21-28 September, 2003.
20. Olaleye SM and Omokhua GE (2012). Women involvement, empowerment and control of Non-Timber Managrove Forest Products in Rivers State. Nigeria Journal of Agriculture, Food and Environment. 8(3): 9 – 13.
21. Olaniyi OA, Akintonde, J.O. and Adetumbi, S.I. (2013). Contribution of Non-Timber Forest Products to Household Food Security among Rural Women in Iseyin Local Government Area of Oyo State, Nigeria. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(7):41-49.
22. Omiti J, Otieno D, Nyanamba T and Mc Cullough E (2009). Factors Influencing the Intensity of Market Participation by Smallholder farmers: A Case Study of Rural and Peri-urban Areas of Kenya. African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 3(1):57-82.
23. Oparinde LO and Daramola AG (2014). Determinants of Market Participation by Maize Farmers in ondo State, Nigeria, Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 5(1): 69-77.
24. Parikh J (2007). Gender and Climate Change Framework for Analysis, Policy and Action. Paper Prepared for International Research and Action for Development. Retrieved from: http//www. http://www.acdi-cida.gc.ca.
25. Shackleton S, Paumgarten F, Kassa H, Husselman M and Zida M (2011). Opportunities for enhancing poor women’s socioeconomic empowerment in the value chains of three African non-timber forest products (NTFPs). International Forest Review 13(2): 136-151.