Effect of Humic Acid Applications on the Yield Components in Chickpea

Ali Kahraman

doi:10.13002/jafag4147

Effect of Humic Acid Applications on the Yield Components in Chickpea

Öz

Chickpea is one of the most important legumes as human food over world. Using of humic acid based fertilizers has been increased for the last decade in Turkey. Therefore, a field trial was planned according to randomized blocks design in 2013 with 3 replications under Konya ecological conditions to evaluate effect of humic acid doses (0.0-conrol, 6.0-dose 1, 9.0-dose 2 and 12 kg da-1-dose 3) on yield and yield related important characteristics of chickpea variety "Çağatay" were determined. Following ranges were obtained; 29.56 (dose 3) - 41.44 (dose 2) for pod/plant, 82.09% (control) - 89.66% (dose 3) for fertile pod, 38.33cm (control) - 54.44cm (dose 1) for plant height, 13.67cm (control) - 16.61cm (dose 1) for first pod height, 2.33 (control) - 3.00 (dose 2) for main branch/plant, 183.16 (control) - 245.53 kg da-1 (dose 2) for seed yield and 417.23g (dose 3) - 449.90g (dose 1) for thousand seed weight. Variance analysis showed significance (p<0.01) for pod/plant, plant height and seed yield. In general, present study showed an increasing tendency on the yield related parameters in Çağatay variety by application dose of 6.0 kg da-1 and 9.0 kg da-1 humic acid while increased dose caused to reduce in yield. There is a big demand for following studies still that are based on different varieties and application doses of fertilizers to improvement of yield and yield related parameters.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Akçin A (1988). Yemeklik Tane Baklagiller (Academic Press in Turkish). University of Selcuk, Publication No: 43, Faculty of Agriculture, Publication No: 8, 377pp, Konya.
Anoymous (2016a). www.faostat.org (Access date: 20.02.2016).
Anoymous (2016b). http://tr.climate-data.org/location/497828/ (Access date: 20.02.2016).
Aydoğan A (2012). Determination of yield and quality traits of normal and simple leaved kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars and lines. Ankara University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, PhD Thesis, Ankara.
Azkan N, Kaçar O, Doğangüzel E, Sincik M and Çöplü N (1999). Bursa ekolojik koşullarında farklı ekim zamanlarının nohut hat ve çeşitlerinde verim ve verim öğeleri üzerine etkisi. Türkiye 3.Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi, 15-18 Kasım 1999, 3: 318-323, Adana.
Bayrak H (2010). Determining agricultural, technological and nutritional characteristics of local populations and varieties of chickpea cultivated in Konya ecology. Selcuk University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, PhD Thesis, Konya.
Bozoglu H and Gulumser A (2000). Determination of genotype x environment interactions of some agronomic characters in dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Turk J. Agric. For., 24: 211–220.
Bozoglu H, Peksen E, Peksen A and Gulumser A (2007). Determination of the yield performance and harvesting periods of fifteen pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars sown in autumn and spring. Pak. J. Bot., 39 (6): 2017-2025.

Ceran F and Onder M (2015). Determination of some agricultural characteristics on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars that are sown at different periods. Selcuk Journal of Agricultural Sciences, in press.
Ceyhan E, Harmankaya M and Avcı MA (2008). Effects of sowing dates and cultivars on protein and mineral contents of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Asian Journal of Chemistry, 20 (7): 5601-5613.
Ceyhan E, Önder M, Kahraman A, Topak R, Ateş MK, Karadaş S and Avcı MA (2012). Effects of drought on yield and some yield components of chickpea. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, (6) 6: 33-37.
Çiftçi V and Türk Z (1998 ). Güneydoğu Anadolu koşullarında ekim zamanının nohutta verim ve verim öğelerine etkisi. Doğu Anadolu Kongresi, 14-18 Eylül 1998, 1. Cilt: 483-487.
Erdin F and Kulaz H (2014). Van–Gevaş ekolojik koşullarında bazı nohut (Cicer arietinum L.) çeşitlerinin ikinci ürün olarak yetiştirilmesi. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, Special Issue 1: 910-914.
Eser D, Geçit HH, Emeklier HY and Kavuncu O (1989). Nohut gen materyalinin zenginleştirilmesi ve değerlendirilmesi. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 13 (2): 246-253.
Güner Ü and Sepetoğlu H (1994). Nohutta yazlık ve kışlık ekim ile bitki sıklığının besin elementleri alımı, büyüme ve verime etkileri üzerine bir araştırma. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi, 25-29 Nisan 1994, Agronomi Bildirileri, 1: 105-108, İzmir.
Harmankaya M, Ceyhan E, Celik AS, Sert H, Kahraman A and Ozcan MM (2016). Some chemical properties, mineral content and aminoacid composition of cowpeas [Vigna sinensis (L.) Savi]. Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops & Foods, 8 (1): 111-116.
Jankowski KJ, Kijewski L, Krzebietke S and Budzynski WS (2015). The effect of sulphur fertilization on macronutrient concentrations in the post-harvest biomass of mustard. Plant Soil Environment, 61 (6): 266-272.
Jankowski KJ, Kijewski L, Skwierawska M, Krzebietke S and Walec EM (2014). Effect of sulfur fertilization on the concentrations of copper, zinc and manganese in the roots, straw and oil cake of rapeseed (Brassica napus L. ssp. oleifera Metzg). Journal of Elementology, 19 (2): 433-446.
Kahraman A (2017). Nutritional value and foliar fertilization in soybean. Journal of Elementology, 22 (1): 55-66, DOI: 10.5601/jelem.2016.21.1.1106.
Kahraman A, Harmankaya M and Ceyhan E (2015). Nutritional Variation and Drought Tolerance in Chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Elementology, 20 (2): 331-341, ISSN: 1644-2296, DOI: 10.5601/jelem.2014.19.2.674.
Kahraman A and Ozkan Z (2015). Ascochyta blight of chickpea. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 29 (2): 62-66.
Krzebietke SJ and Sienkiewixz S (2010). Effect of foliar application of anthracene and pyrene (PAH) on yields and chemical composition of butterhead lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) grown under varied abundance of substrate in nutrients. Journal of Elementology, 15 (3): 531-538.
Müderriszade HÖ (1996). İri ve orta taneli nohutlarda büyüme verim ve verim öğeleri ile bunlar arasındaki ilişkiler. MSc Thesis, Ege University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, İzmir, TURKEY.
Onder M and Babaoğlu M (2001). Interactions amongst grain variables in various dwarf dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars. Journal Agronomy and Crop Science, 187: 19–23.
Pekşen E (2005). Comparison of some common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes for seed yield and related characteristics under Samsun conditions. J. of Fac. of Agric., OMÜ, 20 (3): 88-95.
Saxena MC (1981). ICARDA Research Highlights, p. 27–29.
Tayyar Ş, Egesel CÖ, Gül KM and Turhan H (2008). The effect of autumn and spring planting time on seed yield and protein content of chickpea genotypes. African Journal of Biotechnology, 7 (11), 1655- 1661.
Topalak C and Ceyhan E (2015). The effects of seed yield and some agricultural characters of different sowing dates on chickpea. Selcuk Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2 (2): 128-135.
Van der Maesen LJG (1987). Origin, history and taxonomy of chickpea. In: Saxena M.C., Singh K.B. (eds.): The Chickpea. CAB Inter., Wallingford: 11–34.
Uzun F, Donmez HB and Ocak N (2015). Genetic potential of wild birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.) seeds collected from different geographical locations regarding to nutrient composition and nutritive value. Agroforest Sys., 89: 963–972.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Ali Kahraman ^* Bu kişi benim
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

2 Mayıs 2017

Gönderilme Tarihi

17 Kasım 2016

Kabul Tarihi

4 Nisan 2017

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2017 Cilt: 34 Sayı: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.13002/jafag4147

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA86ZL53ZN

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Kahraman, A. (2017). Effect of Humic Acid Applications on the Yield Components in Chickpea. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University, 34(1), 218-222. https://doi.org/10.13002/jafag4147

AMA

1.Kahraman A. Effect of Humic Acid Applications on the Yield Components in Chickpea. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University. 2017;34(1):218-222. doi:10.13002/jafag4147

Chicago

Kahraman, Ali. 2017. “Effect of Humic Acid Applications on the Yield Components in Chickpea”. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University 34 (1): 218-22. https://doi.org/10.13002/jafag4147.

EndNote

Kahraman A (01 Mayıs 2017) Effect of Humic Acid Applications on the Yield Components in Chickpea. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University 34 1 218–222.

IEEE

[1]A. Kahraman, “Effect of Humic Acid Applications on the Yield Components in Chickpea”, Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University, c. 34, sy 1, ss. 218–222, May. 2017, doi: 10.13002/jafag4147.

ISNAD

Kahraman, Ali. “Effect of Humic Acid Applications on the Yield Components in Chickpea”. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University 34/1 (01 Mayıs 2017): 218-222. https://doi.org/10.13002/jafag4147.

JAMA

1.Kahraman A. Effect of Humic Acid Applications on the Yield Components in Chickpea. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University. 2017;34:218–222.

MLA

Kahraman, Ali. “Effect of Humic Acid Applications on the Yield Components in Chickpea”. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University, c. 34, sy 1, Mayıs 2017, ss. 218-22, doi:10.13002/jafag4147.

Vancouver

1.Ali Kahraman. Effect of Humic Acid Applications on the Yield Components in Chickpea. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University. 01 Mayıs 2017;34(1):218-22. doi:10.13002/jafag4147

Defining the Molecular Impacts of Humalite Application on Field‐Grown Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Using Quantitative Proteomics

PROTEOMICS

https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.13981

Effect of Humic Acid Applications on the Yield Components in Chickpea

Effect of Humic Acid Applications on the Yield Components in Chickpea

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster

Cited By

Effect of humic acid on soil properties and crop production– A review

Bir Organik Materyal Olan Leonarditin Kahramammaraş Koşullarında Nohut Bitkisinin Gelişimi Üzerine Etkileri

The Effects of Fertilizer and Different Soil Conditioner to Yield and Yield Components in Chickpea Cultivars

Impact of humic acid on various properties of soil and crop productivity- A review

Defining the Molecular Impacts of Humalite Application on Field‐Grown Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Using Quantitative Proteomics