Factors Affecting Awareness of Recycling Symbol; The Case of Ankara

Öz

The present study was conducted to investigate awareness of the household about recycling symbol and their attitudes towards the recycle of packaging wastes in Turkey. The research data were gathered through questionnaires filled by 272 households in Ankara Province in February-March of the year 2013. Logit model was employed and model estimations were performed. According to the research findings most of solid wastes are collected from waste repositories and streets in primitive and unhealthy manners and only the half of packaging wastes are able to be recycled. Since these wastes are most of the time mixed with organic wastes, they are not able to be fully recycled. According to logit model results; age, level of education and income were found to be significant factors affecting awareness and attitudes of the households about recycling symbol. As the households get older, awareness of recycling symbol rate decreased. Level of education had positive impacts on awareness of recycling symbol. Increasing educational levels also increased the ratio of awareness households. Increased income has a negative impact on recycling symbol awareness.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ankara
• household awareness
• Logit Model
• packaging wastes
• recycling

Kaynakça

1. Akçay H (2008). GS. Recycle of Packaging Wastes and Küçükçekmece Example. (Master Thesis) Gebze Institute of Technology. Environmental Engineering Department. Gebze.
2. Altuntop et.al. (2014). Gaining the Economics of the Household Waste TR62 (Adana, Mersin) Region. Çukurova Development Agency.
3. Amemiya T (1983). Advanced Econometrics. Cambridge MA Harvard University.
4. Armağan G and Akbay C. (2007). An Econometric Analysis of Urban Households’’ Animal Product Consumption in Turkey. Applied Economics; S:1-8.
5. Anonymous a (2014). Packaging and the Environment. Packaging Manufacturers Association, http://www.ambalaj.org.tr
6. Anonymous b (2014). Ministry of Environment and Urbanization. www.csb.gov.tr.
7. Anonymous c (2013). With Statistics Ankara, Ankara Development Agency, Ankara.
8. Anonymous d (2013). ‘Environmental Indicators 2012’, Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, Ankara.

9. Anonymous e (2008). Waste Management Action Plan 2008-2012, TC Ministry of Environment and Forestry, General Directorate of Environmental Management,
10. Apaydın Ö et al (2011). Investigation of Household Approach Separation Process in the Resources of Recoverable Solid Waste to in The Besiktas and Üsküdar District. Engineering and Science Journal; 3: 17-26.
11. Cankurt M et al (2010) A Study on Determination of Factors Affecting the Cattle Meat Preferences: The Case of Izmir Province. Animal Production. 51 (2): 16-22.
12. Ege İ and Bayrakdaroğlu A (2009). Analysis of Stock Returns the Success of the Company with Logistic Regression Technique. Zonguldak Karaelmas University Social Sciences Journals. 5(10):139-158.
13. Engindeniz S and Çukur F (2003). A Study on Technical and Economic Analysis of Peach Production in İzmir Province Kemalpaşa District. Ege University Faculty of Agriculture Journal. 40 (2): 65-72.
14. Gujarati DN (1992). Essentials of Econometrics, Mc Graw-Hill, New York.
15. Gujarati DN (1995). Basic Econometrics. (Translated by: Ü Şenesen and GG Şenesen). Literatür Publishing. Istanbul.
16. Güner Y (2008). Investigation of Domestic Solid Waste Recoverability in Pendik District. (Master Thesis), Gebze Institute of Technology. Environmental Engineering Department. Gebze.
17. Miran B (2003). Basic statistics. Ege University Press. ISBN 975-9308800 Bornova, İzmir. Norusis, M.J. (1988), SPSS/PC + Advanced Statistics V2.0 for the IBM PC/XT/AT and PC/2.SPSS Inc. Chicago Illinois, U.S.A.
18. Pazarlıoğlu et al (2007). Using Econometric Modelling to Predict Demand for Fluid and Farm Milk: A Case Study from Turkey. Food Quality and Preference. 18:416–424.
19. Ünal Z (2011). Terms of Sustainable Development Packaging Recycling Waste: A Collection Separation Plant in Linear Programming Application. Nigde University. Institute of Social Sciences. Department of Business Administration. Production Management and Marketing Department. M.Sc. Nigde.
20. Yetim A (2014). General View of Recycling Industries in the World and Situation in Turkey.Izmir Chamber of Commerce. Industry R & D Newsletter.