Short-Term Effect of Different Doses Of Sewage Sludge on Soil Physical and Hydraulic Properties with Different Irrigation Regimes in a Silage Maize Field

Yıl 2024, , 166 - 177, 31.12.2024

Mehmet Altun , Ustun Sahin

https://doi.org/10.55507/gopzfd.1562651

Öz

Soil physical and hydraulic properties may be affected significantly from stabilized sewage sludge, and irrigation regimes may change the magnitude of these effects. Therefore, we examined the effects of different sewage sludge doses (D0: 0 t/ha, D1: 30 t/ha, D2: 60 t/ha, D3: 90 t/ha) and irrigation regimes (S1, S2, S3) on the soil physical and hydraulic properties with two-year study in a silage maize cultivated soil. The experiment was carried out in a completely random factorial design with three replications. In the S1, S2 and S3 irrigation regimes, when the sum of estimated crop evapotranspiration by FAO-Penman-Monteith approach and effective precipitation difference were 25 mm, 50 mm and 75 mm, respectively, irrigations were carried out and the moisture deficit in the soil was completed to field capacity. While moisture regimes did not have significant effects on soil physical and hydraulic properties, sewage sludge doses resulted in significant effects. Compared to D0, 3.1% lower bulk density, 1.9% lower particle density, 14.9% higher wet aggregate stability and 2.6% higher gravimetric field capacity values were determined at the D3 treatment. It was determined that these improvements were due to the high organic matter content of the sewage sludge, which increased the organic matter content in the soil with increasing doses, and it was also supported by significant linear relationships between the organic matter and these parameters. As a conclusion, although the importance of the positive effects of increasing dose can be emphasized, it can be stated that longer-term studies are needed to see more permanent and effective results.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Aggregate stability, Bulk and particle densities, Municipal sewage sludge, Water retention capacity

Destekleyen Kurum

This experiment was funded by the by Ataturk University Scientific Research Project Unit in Turkiye (Grant no: FDK-2021-8673)

Proje Numarası

FDK-2021-8673

Silajlık Mısır Tarlasında Farklı Sulama Rejimlerinde Farklı Dozlarda Arıtma Çamurunun Toprağın Fiziksel ve Hidrolik Özelliklerine Kısa Süreçte Etkisi

Öz

Stabilize arıtma çamuru, toprağın fiziksel ve hidrolik özelliklerini önemli ölçüde etkileyebilir ve sulama rejimleri bu etkilerin büyüklüğünü değiştirebilir. Bu nedenle, farklı arıtma çamuru dozlarının (D0: 0 t/ha, D1: 30 t/ha, D2: 60 t/ha, D3: 90 t/ha) ve sulama rejimlerinin (S1, S2, S3) toprak fiziksel ve hidrolik özellikleri üzerindeki etkilerini, silajlık mısır yetiştirilen bir toprakta iki yıllık bir çalışma ile incelenmiştir. Deneme, üç tekrarlamalı tamamen rastgele faktöriyel deneme düzeninde yürütülmüştür. S1, S2 ve S3 sulama rejimlerinde, FAO-Penman-Monteith yaklaşımı ile tahmini ürün evapotranspirasyonunun ve etkili yağış farkının toplamı sırasıyla 25 mm, 50 mm ve 75 mm olduğunda, sulamalar yapılmış ve topraktaki nem açığı tarla kapasitesine tamamlanmıştır. Nem rejimlerinin toprak fiziksel ve hidrolik özellikleri üzerinde önemli etkileri olmazken, arıtma çamuru dozları önemli etkilere yol açmıştır. D0 ile karşılaştırıldığında D3 uygulamasında %3.1 daha düşük kütle yoğunluğu, %1.9 daha düşük tane yoğunluğu, %14.9 daha yüksek ıslak agregat stabilitesi ve %2.6 daha yüksek gravimetrik tarla kapasitesi değerleri belirlenmiştir. Bu iyileşmelerin arıtma çamurunun yüksek organik madde içeriğinden kaynaklandığı, bu nedenle de artan dozlarla topraktaki organik madde içeriğinin arttığı belirlenmiş ve organik madde ile bu parametreler arasında önemli doğrusal ilişkiler bulunması da bunu desteklemiştir. Sonuç olarak, artan dozun olumlu etkilerinin önemi vurgulanabilse de, daha kalıcı ve etkili sonuçlar görmek için daha uzun süreli çalışmalara ihtiyaç olduğu söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Agregat stabilitesi, kütle ve tane yoğunluğu, kentsel arıtma çamuru, su tutma kapasitesi

Proje Numarası

FDK-2021-8673

Kaynakça

• Abdallh, A. H. M. & Sahin, U. (2020). Saline-Sodic soil reclamation with stabilized sewage sludge and recycled wastewater. Environmental Engineering & Management Journal, 19(12), 2121-2137.
• Aksakal, E.L., & Cambaztepe, A. (2022). Influence of sewage sludge on aggregation and physical properties of different textured soils. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 21(6), 971-980. https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2022.088
• Alaboz, P. & Çakmakcı T. (2020). Effect of cocopeat application on field capacity and permanent wilting point in sandy loam and clay loam soil. Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences, 33(2), 285-290. https://doi.org/10.29136/mediterranean.660207
• Asadu, C. L. A., Ucheonye-Oliobi, C., & Agada, C. (2008). Assessment of Sewage Application in Southeastern Nigeria: Part 1: Impact on Selected Soil Morphological and Physical Properties. Outlook on Agriculture, 37(1), 57-62. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000008783883627
• Badaou, A. N. A. D., & Sahin, U. (2022). Effects of sewage sludge amendment and wetting-drying cycles of wastewater irrigation on structural improvement of clay soil. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 19(7), 6453-6466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03585-8
• Bedel, L., Legout, A., Poszwa, A., van Der Heijden, G., Court, M., Goutal-Pousse, N., & Ranger, J. (2018). Soil aggregation may be a relevant indicator of nutrient cation availability. Annals of Forest Science, 75, 103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-018-0782-y
• Biswas, S.K., Mojid, M.A., & Wyseure, G.C.L. (2017). Physicochemical properties of soil under wheat cultivation by ırrigation with municipal wastewater in Bangladesh. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 48(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2016.1253713
• Blake, G.R., & Hartge, K.H. (1986a). Particle density. In A. Klute (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part‑1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd Edition. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society America, Madison, pp. 377-381.
• Blake, G.R., & Hartge, K.H. (1986b). Bulk density. In A. Klute (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part‑1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd Edition. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society America, Madison, pp. 363-375.
• Çakır, H. N., & Çimrin, K. M. (2018). Effect of municipal sewage sludge applications: I. on some nutrient contents (N, P, K, Ca, Mg) of plant corn and soil. Journal Of Agriculture and Natur,. 21(6), 882-890.
• Cakmakci, T., & Sahin, U. (2021). Improving silage maize productivity using recycled wastewater under different irrigation methods. Agricultural Water Management, 255, 107051 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107051
• Camps-Sagué, F., Lavaquiol, Lavaquiol, B., Bosch-Serra, À.D., Molina, M.G., & Domingo-Olivé, F. (2024). Sustainability assessment after twenty years of sewage sludge application on calcareous soil following N or P criterion. Sustainability, 16(6), 2304. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062304
• Cassel, D.K., & Nielsen, D.R. (1986). Field capacity and available water capacity. In A. Klute (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part‑1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd Edition. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society America, Madison, pp. 901-925.
• Cherfouh, R., Lucas, Y., Derridj, A., & Merdy, P. (2018). Long-term, low technicality sewage sludge amendment and irrigation with treated wastewater under Mediterranean climate: impact on agronomical soil quality. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(35), 35571-35581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3463-3
• Danielson, R.E., & Sutherland, P.L. (1986). Porosity. In A. Klute (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part‑1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd Edition. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society America, Madison, pp. 443-460.
• Delibacak, S., Voronina, L., Morachevskaya, E., & Ongun, A.R. (2020). Use of sewage sludge in agricultural soils: Useful or harmful. Eurasian Joornal of Soil Science, 9(2), 126 – 139. https://doi.org/10.18393/ejss.687052
• Doğan Demir, A., & Şahin, Ü. (2019). Changes in physical and hydraulic properties of a clay soil due to the irrigation of tomatoes with recycled wastewater. Eurasian Journal of Forest Science, 7(3), 252 – 268. https://doi.org/10.31195/ejejfs.585595
• Dong, M., Wang, G., Gul Wazir, Z., Liu, J., Hou, G., Gao, X., & Liu, H. (2023). The aggregation effect of organic matter on bauxite residue particles and its improvement mechanism. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1154191. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1154191
• Gardner, W. C., Broersma, K., Naeth, A., Chanasyk, D. and Jobson, A. (2010). Influence of biosolids and fertilizer amendments on physical, chemical and microbiological properties of copper mine tailings. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 90:571-583. https://doi.org/10.4141/CJSS09067
• Gülser, C., & Candemir, F. (2015). Effects of agricultural wastes on the hydraulic properties of a loamy sand cropland in Turkey. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 61, 384–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2014.992042
• Gümüş, İ., Şeker, C., Negiş, H., Özaytekin, H. H., Karaarslan, E., & Çetin, Ü. (2016). Determination of factors affecting the aggregate stability in wheat cultivated field. Nevsehir Journal of Science and Technology, 5, 236-242. https://doi.org/10.17100/nevbiltek.210996
• Halder, M., Islam, M. U., Liu, S., Guo, Z., Zhang, Z., & Peng, X. (2024). Organic materials quality to control soil aggregation: A meta-analysis. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2, 1857-1870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-024-01815-9
• Kadıoğlu, B. & Canbolat M.Y. (2019). Hydrophysical properties of growing media prepared by addition of organic and inorganic materials to fine textured soil. Atatürk University Journal of the Agricultural Faculty, 50(2), 107-114. https://doi.org/10.17097/ataunizfd.453748
• Kemper, W.D., & Rosenau, R.C. (1986). Aggregate stability and size distribution. In A. Klute (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part‑1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd Edition. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society America, Madison, pp. 425-441.
• Klute, A. (1986). Water retention: Laboratory methods. In A. Klute (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part‑1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd Edition. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society America, Madison, pp. 635-661.
• Lal, R. (2020). Soil organic matter and water retention. Agronomy Journal, 112(5), 3265-3277. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20282
• Lu, X., Hou, E., Guo, J., Gilliam, F. S., Li, J., Tang, S., & Kuang, Y. (2021). Nitrogen addition stimulates soil aggregation and enhances carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems of China: A meta‐analysis. Global Change Biology, 27(12), 2780-2792. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15604
• Mbanjwa, V. E., Hughes, J. C., & Muchaonyerwa, P. (2022). Organic carbon and aggregate stability of three contrasting soils as affected by arable agriculture and improved pasture in northern KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 22(2), 2378-2391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-022-00815-x
• Mondal, S., Singh, R. D., Patra, A. K., & Dwivedi, B. S. (2015). Changes in soil quality in response to short-term application of municipal sewage sludge in a typic haplustept under cowpea-wheat cropping system. Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring and Management, 4, 37–41. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.enmm.2014.12.001
• Mujdeci, M., Simsek, S., & Uygur, V. (2017). The effects of organic amendments on soil water retention characteristics under conventional tillage system. Fresenius Environmental Bullet, 26, 4075-4081.
• Nahar, N., & Hossen, M.S. (2021). Influence of sewage sludge application on soil properties, carrot growth and heavy metal uptake. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 52(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2020.1836201
• Nelson, D.W., & Sommers, L.E. (1982). Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In A.L. Page, R.H. Miller, D.R. Keeney (Eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part‑2, Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd Edition. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society America, Madison, pp. 539-579.
• Norouzian, K., Abbasi, N., & Abedi Koupai, J. (2018). Use of sewage sludge ash and hydrated lime to improve the engineering properties of clayey soils. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 36, 1575-1586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0411-9
• Official Gazette. (2010). Regulation on the Use of Domestic and Urban Sewage Sludge in Soil. Turkish Official Gazette No: 27661.
• Ojeda, G., Alcañiz, J.M., & Le Bissonnais, Y. (2008). Differences in aggregate stability due to various sewage sludge treatments on a Mediterranean calcareous soil. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 125(1–4), 48-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2007.11.005
• Ors, S., Sahin, U., & Khadra, R. (2015). Reclamation of saline sodic soils with the use of mixed fy ash and sewage sludge. Arid Land Research and Management, 29, 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/15324982.2014.903314
• Özkan, R., & Bayhan, M. (2022). Potentials for hybridization and agronomic traits in maize (Zea Mays L.) pure lines grown in a greenhouse. MAS Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(4): 922–939. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7287887
• Rabbi, S. M. F., Warren, C. R., Swarbrick, B., Minasny, B., McBratney, A. B., & Young, I. M. (2024). Microbial decomposition of organic matter and wetting–drying promotes aggregation in artificial soil but porosity increases only in wet-dry condition. Geoderma, 447, 116924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.116924
• Ramezani, N., Landi, A., Barzegar, A. R., & Sayyad, G. A. (2019). Evaluation and comparison of physical and hydraulic properties in different soil. Malaysian Journal of Soil Science, 23, 43-54.
• Ramirez, P. B., Machado, S., Singh, S., Plunkett, R., & Calderón, F. J. (2023). Addressing the effects of soil organic carbon on water retention in US Pacific Northwest wheat–soil systems. Frontiers in Soil Science, 3, 1233886. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoil.2023.1233886
• Sabtow, H. A., & Kızıloğlu, F. M. (2022). The effect of wetting-drying cycles of treated wastewater on hydraulic conductivity in stabilized sewage sludge and gypsum treated saline-sodic soils. Turkish Journal of Agriculture- Food Science and Technology, 10(9), 1741–1746. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v10i9.1741-1746.5435
• Sahin, U., Kiziloglu, F. M., Abdallh, A. H. M., Badaou, A. N. A. D., Sabtow, H. A., & Canbolat, M. Y. (2020). Use of a stabilized sewage sludge in combination with gypsum to improve saline-sodic soil properties leached by recycled wastewater under freeze-thaw conditions. Journal of Environmental Management, 274, 111171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111171
• Sarker, T. C., Incerti, G., Spaccini, R., Piccolo, A., Mazzoleni, S., & Bonanomi, G. (2018). Linking organic matter chemistry with soil aggregate stability: Insight from 13C NMR spectroscopy. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 117:175–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.11.011
• Sharma, P. (2024). Biochar application for sustainable soil erosion control: a review of current research and future perspectives. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12, 1373287. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1373287
• Simões-Mota, A., Virto, I., & Poch, R.M. (2022). Effects of long-term sewage sludge application to a calcareous soil structure. Soil Use and Management, 38(4), 1693-1704. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12838
• Soil Survey Staff. (1992). Keys to soil taxonomi, 5th ed. SMSS Technical Monograph No:19, Pocahontas Pres. Inc., Blacksburg.
• Sonsri, K., & Watanabe, A. (2023). Insights into the formation and stability of soil aggregates in relation to the structural properties of dissolved organic matter from various organic amendments. Soil and Tillage Research, 232, 105774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2023.105774
• Sort, X., & Alcañiz, J.M. (1999). Modification of soil porosity after application of sewage sludge. Soil & Tillage Research, 49, 337-345.
• Sun, J., Lu, X., Chen, G., Luo, N., Zhang, Q., and Li, X. (2023). Biochar promotes soil aggregate stability and associated organic carbon sequestration and regulates microbial community structures in Mollisols from northeast China. EGUsphere, 9(1), 261-275. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1084
• TAGEM. (2017). Evapotranspiration Guide for Irrigated Crops in Türkiye. General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policies, Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Ankara.
• Tunc, T., & Sahin U. (2015). The changes in the physical and hydraulic properties of a loamy soil under irrigation with simpler-reclaimed wastewaters. Agricultural Water Management, 158, 213-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.05.012
• U.S. EPA. (2007). Method 3051A (SW-846): Microwave Assisted Acid Digestion of Sediments, Sludges, and Oils. Revision 1. Washington, DC.
• Usman, K., Khan, S., Ghulam, S., Khan, M. U., Khan, N., Khan, M. A., & Khalil, S. K. (2012). Sewage sludge: an important biological resource for sustainable agriculture and its environmental implications. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 3(12), 1708-1721. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2012.312209
• Yao, Y., Chen, J., Li, F., Sun, M., Yang, X., Wang, G., & Sun, W. (2022). Exchangeable Ca2+ content and soil aggregate stability control the soil organic carbon content in degraded Horqin grassland. Ecological Indicators, 134, 108507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108507
• Yerli, C., Sahin, U., & Kiziloglu, F.M. (2024). Improving the soil physical and hydraulic properties by ırrigation with wastewater under different soil tillage management. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpasa University, 41(2), 72-85. https://doi.org/10.55507/gopzfd.1480116
• Yerli, C., Sahin, U., Ors, S., & Kiziloglu, F.M. (2023). Improvement of water and crop productivity of silage maize by irrigation with different levels of recycled wastewater under conventional and zero tillage conditions. Agricultural Water Management, 277, 108100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.108100
• Yuan, S. J., & Dai, X. H. (2016). Facile synthesis of sewage sludge-derived in-situ multi-doped nanoporous carbon material for electrocatalytic oxygen reduction. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 27570. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27570