Araştırma Makalesi

Comparison of kinetics, energy consumption, and GHG analysis of Santa Maria variety pear chips processed by microwave and hot air-assisted microwave drying systems

Cilt: 42 Sayı: 1 30 Nisan 2025
PDF İndir
TR EN

Comparison of kinetics, energy consumption, and GHG analysis of Santa Maria variety pear chips processed by microwave and hot air-assisted microwave drying systems

Öz

This study, evaluated the effects of microwave-MD and hybrid-MACD (hot air + microwave) drying systems on drying rate (DR), moisture content (MR), effective moisture diffusion (Deff), specific moisture absorption rate (SMER), specific energy consumption (SEC), and greenhouse gas emission (GHG) properties in the production process of ‘Santa Maria’ variety pear fruit chips. Microwave method (except 360 W) dried the products in a shorter time than the hybrid method. The DR values of the MD method were higher than MACD. The Deff values of the drying processes varied between 2.54 × 10-9 and 1.01 × 10-8. The average SMER values for the MD method varied between 0.006917 - 0.002803 kg/kWh and the SEC values varied between 356.8205 - 144.5714 kWh/kg. For MACD method, the average SMER values varied between 0.0037 - 0.0016 kg/kWh and SEC values between 6261.5 - 2693.6 kWh/kg. The increase in energy consumption increased the GHG values. The lowest GHG values were determined in the drying process performed at MD - 720 W power value.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Etik Beyan

There is no need to obtain permission from the ethics committee for this study.

Kaynakça

  1. Aghbashlo, M., Kianmehr, M.H., & Samimi-Akhijahani, H. (2008). Influence of drying conditions on the effective moisture diffusivity, energy of activation and energy consumption during the thin-layer drying of berberis fruit (Berberidaceae). Energy Conversion and Management, 49(10), 2865-2871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2008.03.009.
  2. Afzal, T. M., Abe, T., & Hikida, Y. (1999). Energy and quality aspects during combined FIR-convection drying of barley. Journal of Food Engineering, 42, 177-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(99)00117-X.
  3. Aktaş, M., Şevik, S., Amini, A., & Khanlari, A. (2016). Analysis of drying of melon in a solar-heat recovery assisted infrared dryer. Solar Energy, 137: 500-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.08.036.
  4. Alibas, I., Yılmaz, A., Günaydın, S., & Arkain, B. (2021). Kurutma yöntemlerinin deveci armudunun kurutma kinetiği ve renk parametreleri üzerine etkisi. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 9(5), 897-908.
  5. Antonio, G. C., Alves, D. G., Azoubel, P. M., Murr, F. E. X., & Park, K. J. (2008). Influence of osmotic dehydration and high temperature short time processes on dried sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas Lam.). Journal of Food Engineering, 84, 375-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.05.033.
  6. Asokapandian, S., Venkatachalam, S., Swamy, G. J., & Kuppusamy, K. (2015). Optimization of foaming properties and foam mat drying of muskmelon using soy protein. Journal of Food Process Engineering, 39(6): 692-701. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.12261.
  7. Bonazzi, C., & Dumoulin, E. (2011). Quality changes in food materials as ınfluenced by drying processes. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527631667.ch1.
  8. Calín-Sánchez, A., Lipan, L., Cano-Lamadrid, M., Kharaghani, A., Masztalerz, K., Carbonell-Barrachina, Á. A., & Figiel A. (2020). Comparison of traditional and novel drying techniques and its effect on quality of fruits, vegetables and aromatic herbs, Foods 9(9): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9091261, 32916839.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Tarımsal Enerji Sistemleri

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Nisan 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

1 Mart 2025

Kabul Tarihi

14 Nisan 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2025 Cilt: 42 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Taşova, M., & Ayvalıoğlu, S. (2025). Comparison of kinetics, energy consumption, and GHG analysis of Santa Maria variety pear chips processed by microwave and hot air-assisted microwave drying systems. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University, 42(1), 80-88. https://doi.org/10.55507/gopzfd.1649321
AMA
1.Taşova M, Ayvalıoğlu S. Comparison of kinetics, energy consumption, and GHG analysis of Santa Maria variety pear chips processed by microwave and hot air-assisted microwave drying systems. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University. 2025;42(1):80-88. doi:10.55507/gopzfd.1649321
Chicago
Taşova, Muhammed, ve Süreyya Ayvalıoğlu. 2025. “Comparison of kinetics, energy consumption, and GHG analysis of Santa Maria variety pear chips processed by microwave and hot air-assisted microwave drying systems”. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University 42 (1): 80-88. https://doi.org/10.55507/gopzfd.1649321.
EndNote
Taşova M, Ayvalıoğlu S (01 Nisan 2025) Comparison of kinetics, energy consumption, and GHG analysis of Santa Maria variety pear chips processed by microwave and hot air-assisted microwave drying systems. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University 42 1 80–88.
IEEE
[1]M. Taşova ve S. Ayvalıoğlu, “Comparison of kinetics, energy consumption, and GHG analysis of Santa Maria variety pear chips processed by microwave and hot air-assisted microwave drying systems”, Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University, c. 42, sy 1, ss. 80–88, Nis. 2025, doi: 10.55507/gopzfd.1649321.
ISNAD
Taşova, Muhammed - Ayvalıoğlu, Süreyya. “Comparison of kinetics, energy consumption, and GHG analysis of Santa Maria variety pear chips processed by microwave and hot air-assisted microwave drying systems”. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University 42/1 (01 Nisan 2025): 80-88. https://doi.org/10.55507/gopzfd.1649321.
JAMA
1.Taşova M, Ayvalıoğlu S. Comparison of kinetics, energy consumption, and GHG analysis of Santa Maria variety pear chips processed by microwave and hot air-assisted microwave drying systems. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University. 2025;42:80–88.
MLA
Taşova, Muhammed, ve Süreyya Ayvalıoğlu. “Comparison of kinetics, energy consumption, and GHG analysis of Santa Maria variety pear chips processed by microwave and hot air-assisted microwave drying systems”. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University, c. 42, sy 1, Nisan 2025, ss. 80-88, doi:10.55507/gopzfd.1649321.
Vancouver
1.Muhammed Taşova, Süreyya Ayvalıoğlu. Comparison of kinetics, energy consumption, and GHG analysis of Santa Maria variety pear chips processed by microwave and hot air-assisted microwave drying systems. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University. 01 Nisan 2025;42(1):80-8. doi:10.55507/gopzfd.1649321

Cited By