Araştırma Makalesi

The impact of social capital on the agricultural production behavior: an empirical practice for Türkiye

Cilt: 42 Sayı: 2 30 Ağustos 2025
PDF İndir
EN TR

The impact of social capital on the agricultural production behavior: an empirical practice for Türkiye

Öz

The main objective of this study is to determine the impact of social capital on the production behavior of agricultural producers. The population of the study consisted of 1345 farms registered in the Farmer Registration System in Onikişubat district of Kahramanmaraş province. As a result of sampling, 225 farms were included in the sample with a confidence interval of 90% and a margin of error of 5%. To achieve this objective, the effects of environmental practices, information gathering activities, innovative practices, intellectual accumulation, neighborhood relations and cultural potential on the agricultural production behavior of producers were analyzed. The results indicated that innovative practices, information gathering activities and environmental practices have a significant positive impact on agricultural production behavior. We emphasize that the structure and characteristics of social capital should be considered and that measures to strengthen social capital should be considered necessary when developing policies related to rural and agricultural production.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Etik Beyan

There is no need to obtain permission from the ethics committee for this study.

Kaynakça

  1. Akçaöz, H., Özkan, B., & Kızılay, H. (2005). Tarımsal üretimde çiftçilerin tutum ve davranışları: Çiftçilik amaçları ölçeği (FOS). Anadolu Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 15(2), 104–125.
  2. Akinwande, M. O., Dikko, H. G., & Samson, A. (2015). Variance inflation factor: As a condition for the inclusion of suppressor variable(s) in regression analysis. Open Journal of Statistics, 5(7), 754. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2015.57075
  3. Alt, V., Чекусов, М., Balushkina, E., & Исакова, С. (2021). Problems and tasks of using digital technologies in agriculture. Sustainable Development of Mountain Territories, 58, Article 30. https://doi.org/10.25743/sdm.2021.58.30.002
  4. Arrow, K. J., Dasgupta, P., Goulder, L. H., Mumford, K. J., & Oleson, K. (2013). Sustainability and the measurement of wealth: Further reflections. Environment and Development Economics, 18, 504–516. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X13000193
  5. Avcı, Y. E., & Yaşar, M. (2014). Kültürel sermaye ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. International Journal of Social Science Research, 3(1), 66–77.
  6. Bala, K., & Kaur, P. (2024). Information and communication technology in smart agriculture: A scientometric review. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 36(18). https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.8136
  7. Berchoux, T., Watmough, G., Johnson, F., Hutton, C., & Atkinson, P. (2019). Collective influence of household and community capitals on agricultural employment as a measure of rural poverty in the Mahanadi Delta, India. Ambio, 49(1), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01150-9
  8. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Faktör analizi: Temel kavramlar ve ölçek geliştirmede kullanımı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 8(4), 470–483.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Tarım Politikaları

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Ağustos 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

11 Nisan 2025

Kabul Tarihi

13 Mayıs 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2025 Cilt: 42 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Doğan, H. G., Karakaş, G., Candemir, S., Bayramoğlu, Z., & Ağızan, K. (2025). The impact of social capital on the agricultural production behavior: an empirical practice for Türkiye. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University, 42(2), 120-132. https://doi.org/10.55507/gopzfd.1674011
AMA
1.Doğan HG, Karakaş G, Candemir S, Bayramoğlu Z, Ağızan K. The impact of social capital on the agricultural production behavior: an empirical practice for Türkiye. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University. 2025;42(2):120-132. doi:10.55507/gopzfd.1674011
Chicago
Doğan, Hasan Gökhan, Güngör Karakaş, Serhan Candemir, Zeki Bayramoğlu, ve Kemalettin Ağızan. 2025. “The impact of social capital on the agricultural production behavior: an empirical practice for Türkiye”. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University 42 (2): 120-32. https://doi.org/10.55507/gopzfd.1674011.
EndNote
Doğan HG, Karakaş G, Candemir S, Bayramoğlu Z, Ağızan K (01 Ağustos 2025) The impact of social capital on the agricultural production behavior: an empirical practice for Türkiye. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University 42 2 120–132.
IEEE
[1]H. G. Doğan, G. Karakaş, S. Candemir, Z. Bayramoğlu, ve K. Ağızan, “The impact of social capital on the agricultural production behavior: an empirical practice for Türkiye”, Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University, c. 42, sy 2, ss. 120–132, Ağu. 2025, doi: 10.55507/gopzfd.1674011.
ISNAD
Doğan, Hasan Gökhan - Karakaş, Güngör - Candemir, Serhan - Bayramoğlu, Zeki - Ağızan, Kemalettin. “The impact of social capital on the agricultural production behavior: an empirical practice for Türkiye”. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University 42/2 (01 Ağustos 2025): 120-132. https://doi.org/10.55507/gopzfd.1674011.
JAMA
1.Doğan HG, Karakaş G, Candemir S, Bayramoğlu Z, Ağızan K. The impact of social capital on the agricultural production behavior: an empirical practice for Türkiye. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University. 2025;42:120–132.
MLA
Doğan, Hasan Gökhan, vd. “The impact of social capital on the agricultural production behavior: an empirical practice for Türkiye”. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University, c. 42, sy 2, Ağustos 2025, ss. 120-32, doi:10.55507/gopzfd.1674011.
Vancouver
1.Hasan Gökhan Doğan, Güngör Karakaş, Serhan Candemir, Zeki Bayramoğlu, Kemalettin Ağızan. The impact of social capital on the agricultural production behavior: an empirical practice for Türkiye. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University. 01 Ağustos 2025;42(2):120-32. doi:10.55507/gopzfd.1674011