Effect of Increased Maximum, Minimum Temperatures and Chorbondioxde on Chickpea (Cicer Arietinum L.) Yield and Yield Parameters: A DSSAT Chickpea Simulation Study

Abstract

The probable effect of Start of irrigations in Harran Plain, effect of global warming, and development in both city and the industry on daily maximum and minimum temperatures and CO2 increase effect on chickpea was evaluated using DSSAT (Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer) simulation model. Maximum and minimum temperatures were increased with 0, 2, 4, and 6 0C while CO2 was increased with 20 ppm increment from 380 to 440 ppm. Simulation results indicated that the effect of increased minimum temperature and CO2 were limited on yield, biomass, and crop water use (ETc). However, increase in maximum temperatures was noticeable and increased yield and biomass about 35% and ETc about 10%. When new agricultural land open to irrigations, probably the calculated amount of water for the area will not be enough and needs to be increased according to increase in ETc.

Keywords

• DSSAT, Chickpea, Daily maximum and minimum temperatures, CO2, evapotranspiration

Maksimum ve Minimum Sıcaklıklar ile Karbondioksit Oranlarında Meydana Gelen Artışların Nohut (Cicer Arietinum L.) Verim ve Verim Parametrelerine Etkisi: DSSAT Simülasyon Çalışması

Öz

Harran ovasında sulamaya başlanması, küresel ısınma etkilerinin belirginleşmesi şehirleşme ve sanayileşmeye paralel olarak maksimum, minimum sıcaklıklarda ve karbondioksit (CO2) oranlarında meydana gelebilecek olası artışların nohut bitkisinde verim, biyomas ve su tüketimine olan etkilerinin araştırılması DSSAT (Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer) simülasyon programı kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Maksimum ve minimum sıcaklıklarda öngörülen sıcaklık artışları 0–6 0C arasında ve CO2 deki artışlar 380–440 ppm olarak belirlenmiştir. Simülasyon sonuçlarına göre, minimum sıcaklıklar ve CO2 te meydana artışlar verim, biyomas ve ETc de sınırlı oranda değişimlere neden olmaktadır. Diğer taraftan maksimum sıcaklıklarda meydana gelen artışlar verim, biyomas ve ETc de önemli oranda yükselmelere neden olmaktadır. Verim ve biyomas değerlerinde %35 lere varan artışlar sağlanabilirken, ETc de %10 düzeyinde artış görülmektedir. Bölgenin tamamıyla sulamaya açılması ile sulama sezonunda bölge için öngörülen sulama suyu da kullanılan katsayılar sıcaklıkların artması ile yetersiz hale gelecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Nohut, maksimum ve minimum sıcaklıklar, CO2, evapotranspirasyon

Kaynakça

1. Booker, F.L., Pursley, W.A., Stefanski, L.A., Miller, J.E., Fiscus, E.L., 2005. Comparative responses of container-versus ground-grown soybean to elevated carbon dioxide and ozone. Crop Science 45, 883- 895.
2. Boyer, J.S., Johnson, R.R., Saupe, S.G., 1980. Afternoon water deficits and grain yields in old and new soybean cultivars. Agronomy J. 72:981-985.
3. Conroy, J.P., Seneweera, S., Basra, A.S., Rogers, G., Wooller, B.N., 1994. Influence of rising atmospheric CO, concentrations and temperature on growth, yield and grain quality of cereal crops. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 21, 741-758.
4. Doorenbos, J., Kassam A.H., 1979. Yield response to water. Irrigation and drainage paper no: 33. FAO- Rome 193 pp.
5. Eck, H. V. 1986. Effect of water deficits on yield, yield components, and water use efficiency of irrigated corn. Agron. J. 78: 1035-1040.
6. Eser, D. 1981. Yemeklik Baklagiller. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Teksir no:59, Ankara.
7. Ghaffari, A., Cook, H.F., Lee, H.C., 2002. Climate change and winter wheat management: A modeling scenario for south-eastern England. Climatic Change 55, 509–533.
8. Hodges, H.F., Heatherly, L.G., 1983. Principles of water management for soybean production in Mississippi. Mississippi Agricultural Forestry Experiment Station. Bulletin no: 919.

9. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2001. Climate Change 1995: The scientific basis of climate change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
10. Jones, P.D., Wigley, T. M. L., Farmer, G., 1991. Marine and l and temperature data sets: A comparison and a look at recent trends, in: Schlesinger, M.E. (Ed.), Greenhouse gas-induced climatic change. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 1007- 1023.
11. Kanber, R. 1997. Sulama. Ç.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Genel Yayın No: 174. Ders Kitapları Yayın No: 52.
12. Karl, T.R., Kukla, G., Razuvayev, V.N., 1991. Global warming: Evidence for asymmetric diurnal temperature change. Geophysical Research Letters 18, 2253-2256.
13. Kim, H.Y., Lieffering, M., Miura, S., Kobayashi, K., Okada, M., Miura, S., 2003. Seasonal changes in the effects of elevated CO2 on rice at three levels of nitrogen supply: a free air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiment. Global Change Biology 9, 826–837.
14. Lamm, F. R., D. H. Rogers and H. L. Manges. 1994. Irrigation scheduling with planned soil water depletion. Transactions of the ASAE 37(5): 1491 - 1497.
15. Lawor, H.J., Siddique, K.H.M., Sedgley, R.H., Thurling, N. 1998. Improvement of cold tolerance and insect resistance in chickpea and the use of AFLPs for the identification of molecular markers for these traits. Acta Hortic. 461, 185-192.
16. Mahmood, R., 1998. Air temperature variations and rice productivity in Bangladesh: A comparative study of the performance of the yield and the CERES-Rice models. Ecological Modeling 106, 201–212.
17. Mati, B.M., 2000. The influence of climate change on maize production in the semi-humid semi-arid areas of Kenya. Journal of Arid Environments 46, 333–344
18. Moya, T.B., Ziska, L.H., Namuco, O.S., Olszyk, D., 1998. Growth dynamics ve genotypic variation in tropical, field-grown paddy rice (Oryza sativa L.) in response to increasing carbon dioxide and temperature. Global Change Biol. 4, 645–656.
19. Norby, R.J., Wullschleger, S.D., Gunderson, C.A., Johnson, D.W., Ceule-Mans, R., 1999. Tree responses to rising CO2 in field experiments: Implications for the future forest. Plant, Cell and Environment 22, 683–714.
20. Otavio, J.F.de S., Jose, R.N.B.F., Luis, M.A.S., 1994. Potential effects of global climate change for Brazilian agriculture applied simulation studies for wheat, maize and soybeans. in: Implications of climate change for international agriculture: Crop modeling study, U.S. Climate Change Division Report, EPA, 230-B-94-003, pp. 1-28.
21. Otter-Nacke, S., Godwin, D.C., Ritchie, J.T., 1986. Testing and validating the CERES-Wheat model in diverse environments. Agristars YM- 15-00407.
22. Öztaş,E., Bucak, B., Al, V., Kahraman, A. 2007. Evaluation of Winter Hardiness, Yield and Yield Components of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Cultivars Under Harran Plain Conditions. Harran Ünüversitesi Ziraat Fak. Dergisi. 11 (3-4). 81-86.
23. Poorter, H., Navas, M.L., 2003. Plant growth and competition at elevated CO2: On winners, losers and functional groups. New Physiology 157, 175– 198.
24. Rao, D.G., Sinha, S.K., 1994. Impact of climate change on simulated wheat production in Implications of Climate Change for International Agriculture: Crop Modeling Study, U.S. Climate Change Division Report EPA 230-B-94- 003, India, pp. 1-10. India. in:
25. Reddy, K.R., Koti, S., Davidonis, G.H., Reddy, V.R., 2004. Interactive effects of carbon dioxide and nitrogen nutrition on cotton growth, development, yield, and quality. Agronomy Journal 96(4), 1148- 1157.
26. Sadras, V.O. and Milroy, S.P. 1996. Soil water thresholds fort he responses of leaf expansion and gas exchange: a review. Field crop res. 47, 253-266.
27. Salas, J.D., Delleur, J.W., Yevjevich, V., Lane, W.L., 1980. Applied modeling of hydrologic series. Water resources publications, Littleton, Colorado, USA, 484p.
28. Saxena, N.P., 1990. Status of chickpea in the Mediterranean basin. In: Present status and future prospects of chickpea crop production and improvement in the Mediterranean countries. Seminar Zaragozo Spain. Vol. 9, 11-13 July, 17-24.
29. Siddique, K.M.H., Brinsmead, R.B., Knigth, R., Knights, E.J., Paul, J.G., and Rose, I.A., 1999. Adaptation of chickpea ( cicer arietium L.) and faba bean (Vicia faba L.) to Australia. In: Knight, R. (Eds.), cool season food legumes. Kluwer, Adelaide.
30. Silim, S.N. and Saxena, M.C. 1993. Adaptation of spring sown chickpea to the Mediterranean basin: I. Response to moisture supply. Field Crop Res. 34, 121-136.Singh, K. B., 1991. Influence of water deficit on phenology, growth and dry mater allocation in chickpea. Field Crop Res. 28, 1-15.
31. Singh, K. B., 1993. Problems and prospects of stress resistance breeding in chickpea, in breeding for stress tolerance in cool season food legumes. Eds. By. K.B. singh and M.C. Saxena. A Willey-Spayce Pub. P: 17-35.
32. Singh, K. B., 1997. Chickpea ( Cicer arietium L.). Field Crop Res. 53: 161-170.
33. Singh, K. B., Malhotra, R. S., and Saxena, M. C., 1989. Chickpea evaluation for cold tolerance under field condition. Crop Science, 29: 282-285.
34. Strain, H.H., Svec, W.A. 1966. Extraction, separation, estimation and isolation of stress degree day parameter for environmental variability. Agr. Meteor. 24: 45-55.
35. Tonkaz, T., Cetin, M., Simsek, M., 2003. Observed changes of some climatic parameters of Sanliurfa province (in Turkish with English abstract). Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Cukurova University 18, 29-38.
36. Tubiello, F.N., Rosenzweig, C., Volk, T., 1995. Interactions of CO, temperature and management practices. Simulations with a modified version of CERES-Wheat. Agricultural Systems 49, 135–152.
37. Turner, N.C. 2003. Adaptation to drought: lessons from studies with chickpea. Indian Jour. of Plant Physiology. Spec. issue, 11-17.
38. Van der Maesen, J.G.M. 1987. Origin, history an taxonomy of chickpea, p 11-34. In: M.C. Saxean and K.B. Singh (eds.). The Chickpea. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
39. Yadav, S.S., Kumar, J., Yadav, S.K., Singh, V.S., Turner, Y.C., and Redden, R. 2006. Evaluation of helicoverpa and drought resistance in desi and kabuli chickpea. Plant Genetic Resources, 4: 3, 198- 203.
40. Zhiqing, J., Ge., D., Chen, H., Fang, J., 1994. Effects of climate change on rice production and strategies for adaptation in southern China, in: Implications of Climate Change for International Agriculture: Crop Modeling Study, U.S. Climate Change Division Report EPA, 230-B-94-003, pp. 1-24.