Silajlık mısır çeşitlerinde inorganik ve tavuk gübresi uygulamalarının azot ve sulama suyu kullanım randımanı üzerine etkileri

Yıl 2015, , 104 - 111, 20.03.2015

Muhammet Karasahın

https://doi.org/10.13002/jafag767

Cited By: 2

Öz

Bu araştırma Karabük-Eskipazar ekolojik koşullarında 2011 ve 2012 yıllarında farklı gübreleme uygulamalarının [organik (F1), inorganik (F2) and ½ organik + ½ inorganik (F3)] hibrit mısır çeşitlerinin [PR 31Y43 (C1), OSSK-644 (C2), and Lacasta (C3)] azot ve sulama suyu kullanım randımanı üzerine etkilerini belirlemek amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Her iki araştırma yılında gübreleme uygulamaları azot ve sulama suyu kullanım randımanı üzerine istatistiki olarak etkili olmuştur. En yüksek azot ve sulama suyu kullanım randımanı değerleri F2 ve F3 gübreleme uygulamalarından elde edilmiştir. En yüksek azot alım randımanı değerleri ise F2 gübreleme uygulamasından elde edilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre, her üç mısır çeşidinde (C1, C2 ve C3) en yüksek azot ve sulama suyu kullanım randımanı değerleri F2 ve F3 gübreleme uygulamalarından elde edilmiştir. Kimyevi ve tavuk gübrelerinin birlikte kullanımı sürdürülebilir bitkisel üretim için iyi bir yaklaşım olabilir. İnorganik gübre ithalatı için ödediğimiz miktarı ve bunların insan ve çevre sağlığı üzerine olan olumsuz etkilerini düşündüğümüzde, F3 gübreleme uygulamasının mısır yetiştirilen bölgeler için tercih edilebilir olduğu söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Tavuk gübresi, mısır, inorganik gübre, azot, sulama suyu randımanı

The effects of poultry manure and inorganic fertilizer applications on nitrogen and irrigation water use efficiency in forage corn cultivars

Öz

This research was conducted to determine the effects of different fertilizer treatments [organic (F1), inorganic (F2) and ½ organic + ½ inorganic (F3)] on nitrogen and water use efficiency of hybrid corn cultivars [PR 31Y43 (C1), OSSK-644 (C2), and Lacasta (C3)] in the years 2011 and 2012 under the ecological conditions of Eskipazar-Karabuk. In both research years, fertilizer treatments were statistically significant on nitrogen and irrigation water use efficiency. The highest irrigation water and nitrogen use efficiency values were obtained from F2 and F3 fertilizer treatments. The highest nitrogen uptake efficiency values were obtained from F2 fertilizer treatment. As a result of the research, the highest values of nitrogen and irrigation water use efficiency were obtained from F2 and F3 fertilizer treatments in all three corn cultivars (C1, C2, and C3). Integrated use of chemical fertilizer and poultry manure may be a good approach for sustainable production of crops. When we consider the sums paid for the import of inorganic fertilizers and the negative effects of these inorganic fertilizers on human and environmental health, we may see that F3 fertilizer application would be preferable in the regions where corn is grown.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Poultry manure, corn, inorganic fertilizer, nitrogen, irrigation water use efficiency

Kaynakça

• Achieng JO, Ouma G, Odhiambo G, Muyekho F (2010). Effect of farm yard manure and inorganic fertilizers on maize production on Alfisols and Ultisols in Kakamega, western Kenya. Agric. and Biol. J. North Amer, 1: 430-39.
• Ahmad R, Habib DE, Ur-rehman A (2012). Complementary effects of organic manures on the agronomic traits of spring maize. Crop and Environment, 3: 28-31.
• Ali M, Ali A, Tahir M, Yaseen, M (2012). Growth and yield response of hybrid maize through integrated phosphorus management. Pak. J. Life and Soc. Sci., 10: 59-66.
• Anastasios S, Lithourgidis TM, Nikolaos B, Christos AD (2007). Effect of liquid cattle manure on corn yield, composition, and soil properties. Agron. J., 99: 1041-47.
• Basavaraju SD (2007). Integrated nitrogen management in maize (Zea mays L.) in a vertisol of Malaprabha command area. [Msc. Thesis] Dharwad University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad.
• Bekoko Z (2013). Improving and sustaining soil fertility by use of enriched farmyard manure and inorganic fertilizers for hybrid maize (BH-140) production at West Hararghe zone, Oromia, Eastern Ethiopia African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8: 1218-1224.
• Bozkurt S, Yazar A, Sayılıkan Mansuroglu G (2011). Effects of different drip irrigation levels on yield and some agronomic characteristics of raised bed planted corn African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6: 5291-5300.
• Cerny J, Balik J, Kulhanek M, Vasak F, Peklova L, Sedlar O (2012). The effect of mineral N fertiliser and sewage sludge on yield and nitrogen efficiency of silage maize. Plant Soil Environ, 58: 76–83.
• Cheema MA, Farhad W, Saleem MF, Khan HZ, Munir A, Wahid MA, Rasul F, Hammad HM (2010). Nitrogen management strategies for sustainable maize production. Crop and Environment, 1: 49-52.
• Cusicanqui JA, Lauer JG (1999). Plant density and hybrids influence on corn forage yield and quality. Agron. J., 91: 911-15.
• Elamin AE, Elagib MA (2001). Comparative study of organic and inorganic fertilizers on forage corn (Zea mays L.) grown on two soil types. Qatar Univ. Sci. J., 21:47-54.
• Ertek A (2014). The application for fertilizer–yield relationships of the ET–yield response factor equation. Turk J Agric For, 38: 732-738.
• FAO (2002). Deficit irrigation practices. Water Reports. Rome, Italy.
• FAO (2011). Current world fertilizer trends and outlook to 2015. Rome, Italy.
• Gencoglan C, Yazar A (1999). The effects of deficit irrigations on corn yield and water use efficiency. Turkish J. of Agric. and Forestry, 23: 233-241.
• Hirzel J, Matus I, Novoa F, Walter I (2007). Effect of poultry litter on silage maize (Zea mays L.) production and nutrient uptake. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 5: 102-109.
• Howell TA, Tolk JA, Schneider AD, Evett SR (1998). Evapotranspiration, yield and water use efficiency of corn hybrids differing in maturity. Agron. J., 90: 3-9.
• Kasım S, Ahmed OH, Abdmajid NMM (2011). Effectiveness of liquid organic nitrogen fertilizer in enhancing nutrients uptake and use efficiency in corn (Zea mays) African Journal of Biotechnology, 10: 2274-2281.
• Khaliq T, Mahmood T, Kamal J, Masood A (2004). Effectiveness of farmyard manure, poultry manure and nitrogen for corn (Zea mays L.) productivity. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 2: 260-263.
• Karasahin M (2014). Effects of cultivar and fertilization on plant and silage crude protein contents in maize. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpasa University, 31 (2): 98-104.
• Kirnak H, Gencoglan C, Degirmenci V (2003). Effect of deficit irrigation on yield and growth of second crop corn in Harran plain conditions. Atatürk University J. of Agric., 34: 117-123.
• Makinde EA, Ayoola OT (2010). Growth yield and NPK uptake by maize with complementary organic and inorganic fertilizers. African Journal of Food Agriculture Nutrition and Development, 10: 2203-2217.
• Martins AO, Campostrini E, Magalhaes PC, Guimaraes LJM, Duraes FOM, Marriel IE, Netto AT (2008). Nitrogen-use efficiency of maize genotypes in contrasting environments. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 8: 291-298.
• Mstat-C (1980). Mstat User’s Guides Statistics (Version 5 ed.). Michigan State University. Michigan, USA.
• Nasim W, Ahmad A, Khaliq T, Wajid A, Munis MHS, Chaudhry HJ, Maqbool MM, Ahmad S, Hammad HM (2012). Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizer on maize hybrids under agro-environmental conditions of Faisalabad, Pakistan. Afr. J. Agric. Res., 7: 2713-19.
• Nazli RI, Kusvuran A, Inal I, Demirbas A, Tansi V (2014). Effects of different organic materials on forage yield and quality of silage maize (Zea maysL.). Turk J Agric For, 38: 23-31. Quansah, GW (2010). Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers and their combinations on the growth and yield of maize in the semi-deciduous forest zone of Ghana. [Msc. Thesis] College of Agriculture and Natural Resources Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology. Kumasi, Ghana.
• Sade B, Soylu S (2008). Corn farming in Turkey and in the world. National Grain Symposium. Konya, Turkey.
• Salmeron-Miranda F (2008). Nitrogen use in a maize-bean rotation in Nicaragua effects of organic and mineral fertilisers. [PhD Thesis] Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
• Shah STH, Zamir MSI, Waseem M, Ali A, Tahir M, Khalid WB (2009). Growth and yield response of maize (Zea mays L.) to organic and inorganic sources of nitrogen. Pak. J. Life and Social Sci., 7: 108-11.
• Simsek M, Can A, Denek N, Tonkaz T (2011). The effects of different irrigation regimes on yield and silage quality of corn under semi-arid conditions. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10: 5869-5877.
• Unagwu BO, Asadu CLA, Ezeaku PI (2012). Maize response to organic and inorganic (poultry manure) and inorganic fertilizers (NPK 15-15-15) at different soil pH levels. Int. J. Environ. Sci., 1: 126-34.
• Verma NK (2011). Integrated nutrient management in winter maize (Zea mays L.) sown at different dates. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science, 3: 161-167.
• Yildirim YE, Kodal S (1998). Effect of irrigation water on corn grain yield in Ankara conditions. Turk. J. of Agric. and For., 22: 65-70.