Precipitation Water Use Efficiency and Productivity of Dryland Safflower Cultivars under Different Intra-row Spacings

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 34 Sayı: 1, 223 - 228, 02.05.2017

Ali Salek Zamanı Abolfazl Nasserı

https://doi.org/10.13002/jafag826

Öz

Safflower is grown in Iran as a traditional oilseed plant. However, up to now optimum intra-row spacing and response of new cultivars to dryland conditions have not been studied. Consequently, the present study was conducted to investigate the precipitation water use efficiency (PWUE) and production of safflower cultivars with different intra-row spacings under dryland conditions. Field experiments were conducted using three cultivars viz. Ns.1016, Isfahan and CH.65 sown with intra-row spacings 5, 10 and 15 cm in randomized complete block design with a factorial arrangement for two cropping years. Results showed that cultivars differed PWUE, seed yield, 1000-seed weight (TSW) and number of seeds in capitulum (NSC), however intra-row spacing only affected the number of capitulua in plant (NCP). The highest seed yield and PWUE were obtained from cultivar Isfahan with intra-row spacing of 5 cm.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Safflower, Intra-row spacing, Safflower cultivars, Precipitation Water Use Efficiency

Kaynakça

• Abdulhabip O, Demirbilek T, Gur MA and Copur O (2004). Effects of different sowing date intra row spacing on yield and some agronomic traits of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under Harran Plian arid condition. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 28(6):413-419.
• Abdolrahmani B (2004). Effect of plant density on grain and oil yield of safflower cv. Arak 2811 in dryland conditions. Seed and Plant Research, 20: 417-428.
• Arslan B (2007). The path analysis of yield and its components in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Journal of Biological Sciences, 7:668-672
• Doorenbos J and Kassam AH (1979). Yield response to water, Irrigation and Drainage Paper 33. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Rome, Italy.
• Duncan DB (1955). Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics, 11(1):1-42.
• Emami T, Naseri R, Falahi H and Kazemi E (2011). Response of yield, yield component and oil content of safflower (cv. Sina) to planting date and plant spacing on row in rainfed conditions of western Iran. American-Eurasian J. Agric. and Environ. Sci., 10(6): 947-953.
• FAO (2012). Statistical database. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. Accessed at: Jan. 2017.
• Ghasemi Sh, Bahrani MJ, Motalebipour SH and Kheradnam M (2006). Effect of row and plant spacing on yield and yield components of two spring safflower cultivars. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 37(1):585-591.
• Guevara JC, Estevez OR and Torres ER (1996). Utilization of the rain-use efficiency factor for determining potential cattle production in the Mendoza plain, Argentina. Journal of Arid Environments, 33(3): 347-353.
• Li S and Wu J (2016). Community assembly and functional leaf traits mediate precipitation use efficiency of alpine grasslands along environmental gradients on the Tibetan Plateau. Peer J, 4:1-20
• Mozaffari K and Asadi AA (2006). Relationships among traits using correlation, principal components, and path analysis in safflower mutants sown in irrigated and drought stress conditions. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 5(6): 977-983.
• Mündel HH, Morrison RJ, Entz T, Blackshaw R E, Roth BT, Kiehn F and Vandenberg A (1994). Row spacing and seeding rates to optimize safflower yield on the Canadian prairies. Canadian journal of plant science, 74(2):319-321.
• Nakhzari Moghadam A (2000). Effect of plant density on yield and yield components of safflower cv. Zarghan. Iranian 6th congress on Plant Breeding and Agronomy. Mazandaran University, Bablsar, Iran. pp:120
• Oad C, Samo M A, Qayyum SM, and Oad NL (2002). Inter and Intra Row Spacing Effect on the Growth, Seed Yield and Oil Content of Safflower Carthamus tinctorius L. F. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 1(1):18-19.
• Sharifmoghaddasi MR and Omidi AH (2009). Determination of optimum row-spacing and plant density in Goldasht safflower variety. Advances in Environmental Biology, 233-239.
• Yeilaghi H, Arzani A, and Ghaderian M (2015). Evaluating the contribution of ionic and agronomic components toward salinity tolerance in safflower. Agronomy Journal, 107(6): 2205-2212.
• Wang Y, Janz B, Engedal T and de Neergaard A (2017). Effect of irrigation regimes and nitrogen rates on water use efficiency and nitrogen uptake in maize. Agricultural Water Management, 179: 271-276.
• Zamani AS and Nasseri A (2008). Response of dryland wheat production and precipitation water productivity to planting date. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 7(3): 323-326.