Physicochemical Properties and Wet-Milling Qualities of Dent Corn (Zea mays indentata L.) Hybrids Grown in Tokat and Samsun Locations of Turkey

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 35 Sayı: 2, 164 - 171, 29.08.2018

Rüveyda Erol Mercan Abdulvahit Sayaslan Sabri Gökmen Mehmet Ali Sakin

https://doi.org/10.13002/jafag4443

Öz

The aim of this research was to investigate physicochemical properties and wet-milling qualities of commonly grown dent corn (Zea mays indentata L.) hybrids (Isıdora, Helen, Shemal, Tietar and P32W86) grown in Tokat and Samsun locations of Turkey. Grain yields were much higher in Tokat (average 1577 kg da-1) than in Samsun (average 1232 kg da-1). Corn hybrids varied significantly by genotype in such physical properties as thousand-kernel weight, hectoliter weight, hardness and density, and mean values were respectively 372.8-379.3 g, 77.6-77.7 kg, 18.8-19.7 sec and 1.30-1.29 g cm-3. Chemical compositions of corns differed by hybrid and to some extent by growing location and year. All hybrids, especially Helen, Shemal and P32W86, exhibited wet-milling results (yields: starch 64.2-64.6%, gluten 13.0-14.1%, fiber 10.1-10.5%, germ 6.8-7.1% and steep-water solids 4.7-4.9%) that were comparable to industrial wet-processing. Significant correlations were determined among physical, chemical and wet-milling properties of corn hybrids. Considering higher grain yields but similar wet-milling qualities, Tokat appears to be better suited than Samsun for starch-oriented dent corn production.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dent corn; Zea mays indentata; wet-milling quality, starch yield, recovery

Kaynakça

• AACCI (2000). American Association of Cereal Chemists International (AACCI) Approved Methods of Analysis (10th edition). AACCI, St. Paul, MN, USA.
• Arora A Niu Y Tumbleson ME and Rausch KD (2008). Laboratory wet milling of corn: Milling fraction correlations and variations among crop years. Cereal Chemistry, 85:207-210.
• Eckhoff SR (2004). Maize: wet milling. In: Encyclopedia of Grain Science, Volume II, C Wrigley, H Corke and C Walker (Eds), Elsevier Ltd., Amsterdam, pp. 225-241.
• Elgün A Ertugay Z Certel M and Kotancılar G (2002). Tahıl ve Ürünlerinde Analitik Kalite Kontrolü ve Laboratuvar Uygulama Klavuzu. Atatürk Universitesi Ziraat Fakültesi, Erzurum, Turkey.
• FAO (2016). FAOSTAT Production Quantities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (http://faostat3.fao.org/browse/Q/QC/E).
• Fox SR Johnson LA Hurburgh CR Dorsey-Redding C and Bailey TB (1992). Relations of grain proximate composition and physical properties to wet-milling characteristics of maize. Cereal Chemistry, 69:191-197.
• Hellevang KJ and Wilcke WF (1996). Maintaining Corn Quality for Wet Milling (AE-1119). Agriculture and University Ext., North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND.
• Jackson DS (1996). Corn Quality for Industrial Uses. Cooperative Extension, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE.
• Jennings SD Myers DJ Johnson LA and Pollak LM (2002). Effects of maturity on grain quality and wet-milling properties of two selected corn hybrids. Cereal Chemistry, 79:697-702.
• Kırtok Y (1998). Mısır Üretimi ve Kullanımı. Kocaoluk Yayınevi, İstanbul, Turkey.
• Mbuvi S and Eckhoff SR (2002). Effect of stress cracks on corn wet-milling yields. Cereal Chemistry, 79:695-696.
• MGM (2009). İllerimize Ait İstatistik Veriler. Meteoroloji Genel Müdürlüğü. (http://www.mgm.gov.tr/ veridegerlendirme/il-ve-ilceleristatistik.aspx).
• Mistry AH Wu X Eckhoff SR and Litchfield JB (2003). Wet-milling characteristics of high-temperature, high-humidity maize. Cereal Chemistry, 70:360-361.
• Paulsen MR Watson SA and Sing M (2003). Measurement and maintenance of corn quality. In: Corn: Chemistry and Technology, PJ White and LA Johnson (Eds), American Association of Cereal Chemists International, St. Paul, MN, pp. 417-468.
• Sayaslan A 2004. Wet-milling of wheat flour: Industrial processes and small-scale test methods. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 37:499-515.
• Sayaslan A Erol Mercan R Duman A and Sakin MA (2016). Wet-milling qualities of dent corn (Zea mays indentata L.) hybrids grown as main crop in Adana and Sakarya. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi - Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpasa University, 33:167-180.
• Sezer İ ve Gülümser A (1999). Çarşamba Ovasında ana ürün olarak yetiştirilebilecek mısır çeşitlerinin (Zea mays indentata L.) belirlenmesi üzerine bir araştırma. In: Türkiye 3. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi, Adana, Turkey, pp. 1:275-280.
• Singh V Haken AE Niu YX Zou SH and Eckhoff SR (1998a). Wet-milling characteristics of selected yellow dent corn hybrids as influenced by storage conditions. Cereal Chemistry, 75:235-240.
• Singh V Haken AE Pauslen MR and Eckhoff SR (1998b). Starch yield sensitivity of maize hybrids to drying temperature and harvest moisture content. Starch/Stärke, 50:181-183.
• Vartanlı S ve Emeklier HY (2007). Ankara koşullarında hibrit mısır çeşitlerinin verim ve kalite özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi - Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 13:195-202.
• Vignaux N Fox SR and Johnson LA (2006). A 10-g laboratory wet-milling procedure for maize and comparison with larger scale laboratory procedures. Cereal Chemistry, 83:482-490.
• Wang D and Eckhoff SR (2000). Effect of broken corn levels on water absorption and steepwater characteristics. Cereal Chemistry, 77:525-528.
• Yang P Shunk RJ Haken AE Niu YX Zou SH Buriak P Eckhoff SR and Tumbleson ME (2000). Yield, protein content and viscosity of starch from wet-milled corn hybrids as influenced by environmentally induced changes in test weight. Cereal Chemistry, 77:44-47.
• Zehr BE Eckhoff SR Singh SK and Keeling PL (1995). Comparison of wet-milling properties among maize inbred lines and their hybrids. Cereal Chemistry, 72:491-497.