Comparison of Some Local and Foreign Walnut Cultivars

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 35 Sayı: 3, 290 - 296, 31.12.2018

Yaşar Akça İbrahim Kürşat Özyurt Ercan Kaplan

https://doi.org/10.13002/jafag4449

Cited By: 3

Öz

The performance of 12 walnut cultivars (‘Şebin’, ‘Şen1’, ‘Kaman1’, ‘Maraş18’, ‘Maraş12’, ‘Şen 2’, ‘Fernette’, ‘Chandler’, ‘Howard’, ‘Midland’, ‘Fernor’, ve ‘Pedro’) were evaluated under the ecological conditions at Niksar. The research orchard was established planted in 2008 with 7×7 m spacing. Phenological, pomological attributes and yield of cultivars were determined, between 2012 to 2015 years. Leafing of all of Turkish walnut cultivars in this research were found earlier than foreign cultivars. The leafing time of ‘Fernor’, ‘Fernette’, and ‘Chandler’ cv. were the latest among all cultivars. The cultivars with the earliest leaf fall dates were observed as ‘Maraş12’, ‘Maraş18’ and Şen2, the latest leaf fall dates were observed as ‘Chandler’, ‘Midland’ and ‘Pedro’. Nut weight was found between 10.32 g (‘Maraş12’) - 20.15 g (‘Şen 1’), kernel weight 6.17 g (‘Maraş12’) - 10.69 g (‘Şen1’), kernel percentage between 44.92% (‘Pedro’) - 65.54 (‘Şebin’). Shell thickness was noted between 0.85 mm (‘Şebin’) – 1.97 mm (‘Fernor’). The total yield (kg/tree) of cultivars was determined between 2.29 (‘Maraş12’) and 23.56 (‘Pedro’). Later leafing cultivars seem to be more suitable for Niksar ecological region.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Walnut, late leafing, yield, pomology, phenology, Niksar

Kaynakça

• Akça Y (2016). Walnut Growing. Anıt Printing Press, ISBN:975-97498-07
• Botu M, Botu I, Achim G and Tudor M (2007). Walnut cultivars in Romanian conditions. Acta Hort., 760: 555-562.
• Bryner W (1998). Befruchtungsverhaltnisse beim walnuss baum. Schweiz Zeitschr. Für Obs-und Weinbau, 124: 271-273.
• David E.R (1998). ‘Selections varieties’ in Ramos (ed), Walnut Production Manual. University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Publications, 3373: 9-27.
• Ertürk Ü, Mert C, Soylu A, Akça Y and Okay Y (2014). Evaluation of some domestic and foreign walnut cultivars in the conditions of Bursa, Turkey. Acta Hort, 1050: 123-130.
• Germain E (1988). Main Characteristics of the populations and varieties of French walnut (Juglans regia L. International Conference on Walnuts. 19-23 September, Atatürk Cent., Hort. Res. Inst., Yalova, pp.90-94.
• Gülsoy E, Tuncay K, Şimsek M and Pehluvan M (2016). Selections of Walnut (Juglans regia L.) in Igdır District. Iğdır Univ. J. Inst. Sci. & Tech., 6: 25-30.
• Hendricks L (1998). ‘Selections varieties’, (in Ramos (ed), Walnut Production Manual University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Publications, 3373: 84-98.
• Iannamico L, Calvo P and Castro HR (2005). The Behavior of ten late sprouting walnut cultivars in the Alto Valle of Rio Negro, Patagonia (Argentina), Acta Hort,, 705: 493-497.
• Özaktan, H, Mısırlı A, Erdal, M, Akköprü, A, Aslan, E, and Bozkurt A (2011). Bacterial Diseases Of Stone Fruits And Nuts’ (Stone fruit health)” COST Project Action Number: 873 Final Report, Page:78
• Redicati L, Vergano G and Zannini P. (1990). Vegetative and productive evaluation of 19 walnut cultivars in Piemonte, Acta Hort., 284: 145-146.
• Şimsek M (2010). Selection of walnut types with high fruit bearing and quality in Sanliurfa population. International Journal of the Physical Sciences, 5: 992-996.
• Şimşek M (2015). A research on almond growing in Turkey and the state of selection studies. DUFED, 4: 95-100
• TSI (2017). Turkish Statistical Institute (TSI). https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas /?kn=92 &locale tr.
• Tulecke W and McGranahan A (1994). The walnut germplasm collection of the University of California, Davis, Walnut Report Annually, California.
• Vanhanen L.P (2010). ‘Comparison of New Zealand (South Island) and Australian (Tasmanian) walnut cultivars: An organoleptic and biochemical study’. Master Thesis pp. 69, Lincoln University.