Use of Fish Vaccine in Aquaculture

Yıl 2008, Cilt: 2008 Sayı: 2, 29 - 35, 01.06.2008

Emine Turgut Nermin Develi Sema Akinlar Yüksel

Öz

In the past few decades, the use of vaccines for disease prevention in aquaculture has expanded. Some important disease causing bacteria such as Vibrio sp., Aeromonas sp. and Yersinşa sp. have been controlled with the use of vaccines. This is especially true with the use of adjuvant that helped in the control of Frunkulosis in Fish. There are other studies that reported positive result with the control of bacterial, viral and parasitic diseases using inactive and live inoculums as well as DNA technology. Furthermore, routes of administration by injection, immersion and oral delivery of vaccine will also be discussed in this review.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Vaccination, fish diseases, aquaculture, disease control

Su Ürünleri Yetiştiriciliğinde Kullanılan Aşılar

Öz

Son yıllarda su ürünleri yetiştiriciliğinin gelişmesiyle, su ürünleri yetiştiriciliğinde hastalıkların kontrolü amacıyla aşıların kullanımı da yaygınlaşmıştır. Vibrio sp., Aeromonas sp. ve Yersinia sp gibi patojenlerin neden olduğu önemli bakteriyel hastalıklar aşılama ile etkili bir şekilde kontrol altına alınmıştır. Özellikle adjuvanlı enjeksiyon ile aşılama Furunkulosisin kontrol edilmesinde başarılı olmuştur. Diğer bakteriyel, viral ve paraziter hastalıklar içinde inaktif, canlı ve DNA teknolojisine dayanan aşı çalışmaları yapılmakta ve olumlu sonuçlar alındığı bildirilmektedir. Bu derleme aynı zamanda enjeksiyon, daldırarak ve ağız yoluyla uygulanan aşılama metotlarını da tartışacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Aşılama, balık hastalıkları, yetiştiricilik, hastalık kontrolü

Kaynakça

• Adams, A. and Thompson, K.D. 2006. Biotechnology offers revolution to fish health management. Trends in Biotechnology, 24 (5), 201-205
• Anonim, 2002. Safer rules for feed additives-prohibition of antibiotics as grown promoters confirmed 2002_DN:IP/02/1720.(See:http://europa.ae.int/rapid/ start/cgi/)
• Anonim, 2003. Norwegian antibiotics usage reduced by 98%.http://www.intrafish.com/com/articleID=36685
• Anonim., 2006. Responsible use of vaccines and vaccination in fish production. The National Office of Animal Health (NAOH).
• Anonim, 2008. http://www.thefishsite.com/articles/156/ understanding-fish-vaccination
• Barug, D., Jong, J., Kies A. K. and Verstegen. M. W.A. 2006. Antimicrobial growth promoters. Where do w ego from here?. Wageningen Academic Publishers. 422 pp.
• Berg, A., Rodseth, O.M., Hansen, T., 2007. Fish size at vaccination influence the development of side- effects in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Aquaculture, 265, 9-15.
• Bly J.E, Quiniou SM, Clem LW. 1997. Environmental effects on fish immune mechanisms. Development of Biological Standardization, 90, 33-43.
• Bondad-Reantaso, M. G., Subasinghe, R. P., Arthur, J. R., Ogawa, K., Chinabut, S., Adlard, R., Tan, Z., Shariff, M. 2005. Disease and health management in Asian Aquaculture. Veterinary Parasitology, 132, 249-272.
• Boxaspen, K., 2006. A review of the biology and genetics of sea lice. Ices journal of Marine science, 63(7), 1304-1316.
• Bravo S., Midtlyng PJ. 2007. The use of fish vaccines in the Aquaculture, 270, 36-42. 1999-2003.
• Brown, L.A., Hunter, D. and Thorarinsson, R., 2003. Fish vaccination-methodologies and outcomes. Fish Veterinary Journal, 7, 56-66.
• Daily JG, Griffiths SG, Kew AK, Moore AR & Olivier G (2001). Renibacterium salmoninarum strains and their use as live vaccines. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, 44, 121-126. of attenuated
• Ellis, R.W., 2001. Technologies for the design, discovery, formulation and administration of vaccines. Vaccine, 19, 2681-2687.
• Gudding, R., Lillehaug, A., Evensen, Q., 1999. Recent development in fish vaccinology. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, 72, 203-212.
• Gudmundsottir, B.K., Björnsdottir, B. 2007. Vaccination against atypical furunculosis and winter ulcer disease of fish. Vaccine, 25, 5512-5523.
• Hastein, T., Gudding, R., Evensen, Q. 2005. Bacterial Vaccines for Fish-An update of the current situation worldwide. Satandardization, 121, 55-74. in Biological aquaculture. Development in
• Lan, M.Z., Peng, X., Xiamg, M.Y., Xia, Z.Y., Bo, B., Jie, L., Li, X.Y., Jun, Z.P. (2007). Construction and characterization of a live, attenuated esrB mutant of Edwardsiella tarda and its potential as a vaccine against the haemorrhagic septicaemia in turbot, Scophthamus maximus (L.). Fish and Shellfish Immunology 23, 521-530.
• Lorenzen, N. 1999. Recombinant vaccines: experimental and applied aspects. Fish and Shellfish Immunology, 9, 361-365
• Lorenzen, N., Lorenzen, E., Eıner-Jensen, K. and LaPatra, S. E. 2002. DNA vaccines as a tool for analysing the protective immune response againts rhabdoviruses in rainbow trout. Fish and Shellfish Immunology, 12, 439-453.
• Markestad, A. Grave, K. 1997. :In Gudding, R., Lillehaug, A., Midtlyng, P. J., Brown, F. (Eds.) Fish Vaccinology. Dev. Biol. Stand. Kaager Basel p. 365.
• Marsden, M. J., Vaughan, L. M., Fitzpatrick, R. M., Foster, T. J. & Secombes, C. J.(1998). Potency testing of a live, genetically attenuated vaccine for salmonids. Vaccine, 16, 1087–1094.
• Midtlyng, P.J., 1997. Vaccinated fish welfare: protection versus side-effects. Fish Vaccinology. Dev. Biol. Stand. Karger. 90, 371-379.
• Navot, N., Kimmel, E., Avtalion, R.R., 2004. Enhancement of antigen uptake and antibody production in goldfish (Carassius auratus) following bath immunization and ulktrasound treatments. Vaccine, 22, 2660-2666.
• Serrano, P. H., 2005. Reponsible use of antibiotics in aquaculture. FAO Fisheries Technical paper, 469, Rome
• Sommerset I., Krossoy B., Biering E., Frost P., 2005. Vaccines for fish in aquaculture. Expert Rev. Vaccines, 4(1), 89-101
• Traavik, T., 1997. Environmental issues of recombinant vaccines. In Fish Vaccinology (R. Gudding, A. Lillehaug, P. J. Midtlyng, & F. Brown, eds.) Developments in Biological Standardization 90, 381.
• Van Muiswinkel W. and Wiegertjes G.F., 1997. Immune responses after injection vaccination of fish. Development in Biological. Standardization, 90, 55- 7.
• Woo, P. T. K., 2001. Cryptobiosis and its control in North American Parasitology, 31 (5-6), 565-573. Journal for
• Yambot, A.V., Song, Y.L., 2006. Immunization of grouper, Epinephelus coioides, confers protection against a protozoan parasite, Cryptocaryon irritans. Aquaculture, 260, 1–9.