The Functions of Word Explanations in Instruction Giving Sequences

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 1 - 10, 31.05.2019

Kadriye Dilek Bacanak Tuncay Koç

Öz

Classroom interaction
research, adopting different research methodologies, has broadened our
understanding of the nature of vocabulary teaching and learning. There is also
extensive research on teachers’ word explanation practices using microanalytic
lenses of Conversation Analysis (CA) methodology. However, this paper has
particularly focused on word explanations in instruction giving sequences of
second language (L2) classroom interaction with a micro-analytic research
mentality. Based on four forty minutes of video recordings of the interaction
in an adult EFL classroom, this study seeks to uncover how word-explanation
requests are made in procedural contexts of L2 classroom interaction
(Seedhouse, 2004). As a result, the analysis of the word explanations in
instruction giving sequences has shown that word explanation requests may have
different functions depending on the interactional organization of the
sequences including (1) increasing the comprehensibility of task instruction,
(2) clearing the ground for the upcoming task instruction and (3) initiating
repair. In addition to this, it has also been found that word explanations tend
to be conducted through the use of mother tongue which is considered to be a
practical way of doing word explanation in these specific sequences.   

Anahtar Kelimeler

conversation analysis, word explanation, instruction giving sequences

Talimat Verme Dizilerindeki Kelime Açıklamalarının Fonksiyonları

Öz

Sınıf etkileşimi
çalışmaları, farklı araştırma yöntemleri kullanarak, kelime öğretimi ve
öğrenimi konusunda anlayışımızı artırmıştır. Konuşma Çözümlemesi (KÇ)
yönteminin mikro analitik lenslerini kullanarak öğretmen kelime açıklama
pratikleri üzerine yapılan kapsamlı araştırmalarda bulunmaktadır. Ancak, bu
makale konuşma analitik araştırma anlayışı ile ikinci dil (İD) sınıf
etkileşiminde özellikle talimat verme dizilimlerinde yapılan kelime
açıklamalarına odaklanmıştır. Bu çalışma, yetişkin yabancı dil sınıf
etkileşiminin dört kırk dakikalık video kayıtlarına dayanarak, ikinci dil sınıf
etkileşiminin usule ilişkin bağlamlarında (Seedhouse, 2004) sözcük açıklama
taleplerinin nasıl yapıldığını ortaya çıkarmaya çalışmaktadır. Sonuç olarak,
talimat verme dizilerindeki kelime açıklamalarının analizi kelime açıklama
isteklerinin dizilerin etkileşimsel organizasyonuna bağlı olarak farklı
fonksiyonlara sahip olabileceğini göstermiştir örneğin: (1) görev talimatının
anlaşılabilirliğini artırmak, (2) yaklaşan görev talimatı için zemin hazırlama,
ve (3) onarımı başlatma. Buna ek olarak, kelime açıklamalarının bu belirli
dizilimlerde anadil kullanılarak yapılması pratik bir yöntem olduğu tespit
edilmiştir.   

Anahtar Kelimeler

Konuşma Çözümlemesi, kelime açıklaması, talimat verme dizilimleri

Kaynakça

• Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (Eds.). (1998). Vocabulary and language teaching. New York, NY: Longman.
• Chaudron, C. (1982). Vocabulary elaboration in teachers' speech to L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 4, 170–180.
• Dobinson, T. (2001). Do learners learn from classroom interaction and does the teacher have a role to play? Language Teaching Research, 5(3), 189–211.
• Flowerdew, J. (1992). Definitions in science lecturers. Applied Linguistics, 13, 202–221.
• Heritage, J. (1984b). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In: Atkinson, J. Maxwell, John Heritage (eds), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 299-345.
• Hutchby, I., and R. Wooffitt (2008) Conversation Analysis. 2nd edn). Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Jefferson, G. (1985). An exercise in the transcription and analysis of laughter. In T.A. van Dijk (eds), Handbook of discourse analysis. London: Academic Press.Vol. 3: 25-34
• Lazaraton, A. (2004). Gesture and speech in the vocabulary explanations of one ESL teacher: A microanalytic inquiry. Language Learning, 54(1), 79–117. Special issue: Language learning, cognition, and interactional practices. Mori, J., & Markee, N. (Eds.). (2009). International review of applied linguistics in language teaching (pp. 47)
• Markee, N. (2008). Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics 29.3: 404–27.
• Mortensen, K. (2011). Doing word explanation in interaction. In G. Pallotti, J. Wagner, & G. Kasper (Eds.), L2 learning as social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives (pp. 135–162). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
• Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury House.
• Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
• Nation, I. S. P. (2008). Teaching vocabulary: Strategies and techniques. Boston: Heinle Cengage Learning.
• Seedhouse, P. (2004) The interactional architecture of the second language classroom: a conversational analysis perspective.Oxford: Blackwell.
• Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Sert, O. (2015). Social interaction and L2 classroom discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Waring, H. Z. (2008). Using explicit positive assessment in the language classroom: IRF, feedback, and learning opportunities. Modern Language Journal, 92, 577–594.
• Waring, H.Z., et al.,(2013) Explaining vocabulary in the second language classroom: A conversation analytic account, Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2013.08.001