Preservice Teachers' Views on Students’ Negative Behaviors in the Classroom

Öz

The aim of the research is to examine the views of preservice teachers on negative student behaviors they may encounter in the classroom. In this context, the preservice teachers were asked to express the two negative student behaviors that they think will be the most challenging in their future professional lives, the reasons for these behaviors and how they can manage them. The participants were preservice teachers studying third-year in the faculty of education of a university in the Black Sea Region. Data obtained from 127 preservice teachers was collected during the fall semester of the 2023-2024 academic year, using the purposive sampling technique. Inductive and deductive approaches were used together in the analysis and the findings were supported by frequencies and direct quotations. According to the results of the research, pre-service teachers evaluated behaviors such as disrupting the lesson, making noise, aggression, peer bullying, lack of attention, disrespect towards the teacher, opposition in class, disinterest in class and not participating in activities as the most challenging negative behaviors. Family and home environment, school and classroom conditions, individual characteristics and social changes came to the fore among the reasons for these behaviors. As a solution, proactive measures such as establishing positive relationships, effective teaching methods and structuring the classroom environment; Reactive strategies such as verbal and nonverbal intervention, seeking external support, and imposing sanctions were prominent. Overall, the findings indicate that prospective teachers felt the need for preventive and sensitive classroom management skills to manage negative behaviors.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Classroom management
• Preservice teacher
• Negative behavior
• Misbehavior

Destekleyen Kurum

None

Etik Beyan

In this study, all principles and regulations stipulated in the “Directive on Scientific Research and Publication Ethics of Higher Education Institutions” were fully complied with. None of the actions defined under the section entitled “Actions Contrary to Scientific Research and Publication Ethics,” which constitutes the second chapter of the Directive, were committed. Name of the ethics committee that conducted the ethical review: Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University Human Research Ethics Committees Date of the ethics committee decision: December 26, 2023 Reference number of the ethics approval document: 01-68

Sınıfta Meydana Gelen Olumsuz Öğrenci Davranışlarına İlişkin Öğretmen Adaylarının Görüşleri

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, öğretmen adaylarının sınıfta karşılaşabilecekleri olumsuz öğrenci davranışlarına ilişkin görüşlerini incelemektir. Bu kapsamda öğretmen adaylarından gelecekteki meslek yaşamlarında en çok zorlanacaklarını düşündükleri iki olumsuz öğrenci davranışını, bu davranışların nedenlerini ve nasıl yönetebileceklerini ifade etmeleri istenmiştir. Katılımcılar, 2023-2024 akademik yılı güz döneminde Karadeniz Bölgesi’nde yer alan bir üniversitenin eğitim fakültesinin üçüncü sınıfında öğrenim gören öğretmen adaylarından oluşmuştur. Sınıf yönetimi dersine kayıtlı 127 öğretmen adayına dönem sonunda açık uçlu üç soru sorulmuş ve elde edilen yazılı yanıtlar nitel olarak analiz edilmiştir. Analizde tümevarım ve tümdengelim yaklaşımları birlikte kullanılmış olup, bulgular frekanslarla ve doğrudan alıntılarla desteklenmiştir. Araştırma bulgularına göre öğretmen adayları; dersin düzenini bozma, gürültü yapma, saldırganlık, akran zorbalığı, dikkat eksikliği, öğretmene saygısızlık, sınıf içi muhalefet, derse ilgisizlik ve etkinliklere katılmama gibi davranışları en zorlayıcı olumsuz davranışlar olarak değerlendirmişlerdir. Bu davranışların nedenleri arasında aile ve ev ortamı, okul ve sınıf koşulları, bireysel özellikler ve toplumsal değişimler ön plana çıkmıştır. Çözüm olarak ise olumlu ilişkiler kurma, etkili öğretim yöntemleri ve sınıf ortamını yapılandırma gibi proaktif; sözlü-sözsüz müdahale, dış destek arama ve yaptırım uygulama gibi reaktif stratejiler öne çıkmıştır. Genel olarak sonuçlar, öğretmen adaylarının olumsuz davranışları yönetebilmek için önleyici ve duyarlı sınıf yönetimi becerilerine ihtiyaç hissettiklerini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sınıf Yonetimi
• öğretmen adayı
• olumsuz davranış
• istenmeyen davranış

Destekleyen Kurum

Yok

Etik Beyan

Yapılan bu çalışmada “Yükseköğretim Kurumları Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etiği Yönergesi” kapsamında uyulması belirtilen tüm kurallara uyulmuştur. Yönergenin ikinci bölümü olan “Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etiğine Aykırı Eylemler” başlığı altında belirtilen eylemlerden hiçbiri gerçekleştirilmemiştir. Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi İnsan Araştırmaları Etik Kurulları Etik değerlendirme kararının tarihi: 26.12.2023 Etik değerlendirme belgesi sayı numarası: 01-68

Kaynakça

1. Agyapong, B., G. Obuobi-Donkor, L. Burback, & Y. Wei. (2022). Stress, burnout, anxiety, and depression among teachers: A scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research Public Health, 19(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710706
2. Albin, R. W., O’Brien, M., & Horner, R. H. (1995). Analysis of an escalating sequence of problem behaviors: A case study. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 16(2), 133-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-4222(95)00005-4
3. Atici, M. (2007). A small‐scale study on student teachers’ perceptions of classroom management and methods for dealing with misbehavior. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 12(1), 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632750601135881
4. Aydın, A. (1998). Sınıf yönetimi. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
5. Aydın, B. (2023). Student misbehaviors encountered in private high school classrooms. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 12(1), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.960307
6. Ayers, W. (2004). Teaching the personal and the political: Essays on hope and justice. New York: Teachers College Press.
7. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.
8. Barton, P. E., & Coley, R. J. (2007). The family: America’s smallest school. Educational Testing Service. Policy Information Center. Princeton, NJ.

9. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
10. Burns, C. (2022). Teachers attributions of student behavior and how those relate to recommended intervention actions (Unpublished doctoral thesis). William James College, Newton, MA. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/teachers-attributions-student-behavior-how-those/docview/2697300259/se-2
11. Burroughs, N. F. (2007). A reinvestigation of the relationship of teacher nonverbal immediacy and student compliance-resistance with learning. Communication Education, 56(4), 453-475. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520701530896
12. Butler, A., & Monda-Amaya, L. (2016). Preservice teachers’ perceptions of challenging behavior. Teacher Education and Special Education, 39(4), 276-292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406416654212
13. Çakmak, M. (2008). Concerns about teaching process: Student teachers' perspective. Educational Research Quarterly, 31(3), 57-77.
14. Clunies-Ross, P., Little, E., & Kienhuis, M. (2008). Self-reported and actual use of proactive and reactive classroom management strategies and their relationship with teacher stress and student behavior. Educational Psychology, 28(6), 693-710. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410802206700
15. Coe, J. L., Davies, P. T., & Sturge-Apple, M. L. (2017). The multivariate roles of family instability and interparental conflict in predicting children’s representations of insecurity in the family system and early school adjustment problems. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 45, 211-224. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-016-0164-6
16. Croom, D. B., & Moore, G. E. (2003). Student misbehavior in agricultural education: A comparative study. Journal of Agricultural Education, 44(2), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2003.02014
17. Dalgıç, G., & Bayhan, G. (2014). A meta-analysis: Student misbehaviors that affect classroom management. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(2), 101-116.
18. Daniels, J. A., Bradley, M. C., & Hayes, M. (2007). The impact of school violence on school personnel: Implications for psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38, 652-659. http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/pro/38/6/652
19. De Jong, T. (2005). A framework of principles and best practice for managing student behaviour in the Australian education context. School Psychology International, 26(3), 353-370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034305055979
20. Déry, M., Toupin, J., Pauzé, R., & Verlaan, P. (2004). Frequency of mental health disorders in a sample of elementary school students receiving special educational services for behavioral difficulties. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 49, 769-775. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370404901108
21. Ding, M., Li, Y., Li, X., & Kulm, G. (2008). Chinese teachers' perceptions of students' classroom misbehavior. Educational Psychology, 28(3), 305-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410701537866
22. Duesund, L., & M. Ødegård. (2018). Students’ perception of reactions towards disruptive behaviour in Norwegian and American schools. Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties, 23(4), 410-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2018.1469847
23. Dutton Tillery, A., Varjas, K., Meyers, J., & Collins, A. S. (2010). General education teachers’ perceptions of behavior management and intervention strategies. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12(2), 86-102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300708330879
24. Elma, C. (2014). Sınıf içi istenmeyen davranışlar ve yönetimi. İçinde T. Argon & Ş. Sezgin Nartgün (Ed.). Sınıf yönetimi (s. 219-251). İstanbul: Maya.
25. Feldmann, L. J. (2001). Classroom civility is another of our instructor responsibilities. College Teaching, 49(4), 137-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2001.10844595
26. Finn, J. D., Fish, R. M., & Scott, L. A. (2008). Educational sequelae of high school misbehavior. The Journal of Educational Research, 101(5), 259-274. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.101.5.259-274
27. Flower, A., McKenna, J. W., & Haring, C. D. (2017). Behavior and classroom management: Are teacher preparation programs preparing our teachers? Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 61(2), 163-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2016.1231109
28. Ford, K. (2024). Strategies, challenges, experiences, and approaches to managing high school student misbehaviors (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Walden University, Minnesota. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/15774
29. Gage, N. A., Scott, T., Hirn, R., & MacSuga-Gage, A. S. (2018). The relationship between teachers’ implementation of classroom management practices and student behavior in elementary school. Behavioral Disorders, 43(2), 302-315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742917714809
30. Gerlinger, J., Viano, S., Gardella, J. H., Fisher, B. W., Chris Curran, F., & Higgins, E. M. (2021). Exclusionary school discipline and delinquent outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50(8), 1493-1509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01459-3
31. Getachew, A., Tekle, T., & Bayisa, K. (2020). Nature and causes of students’ misbehavior as perceived by Ambo University teachers. Journal of the Social Sciences, 48(2), 762-771.
32. Glock, S. (2016). Stop talking out of turn: The influence of students' gender and ethnicity on preservice teachers' intervention strategies for student misbehavior. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 106-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.02.012
33. Glock, S., & Kleen, H. (2022). A look into preservice teachers’ responses to students’ misbehavior: What roles do students’ gender and socioeconomic status play? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 75, 101207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101207
34. Gökalp, G. & Can, I. (2022). Evolution of preservice teachers' perceptions about classroom management and student misbehavior in an inquiry-based classroom management course. Action in Teacher Education, 44(1), 70-84, https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2021.1939194
35. Hart, D. M. (2021). Teachers' perceptions of students with challenging behaviors: Knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and practices (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Immaculata University, Pennsylvania.
36. Heikonen, L., Toom, A., Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2017). Student-teachers’ strategies in classroom interaction in the context of the teaching practicum. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(5), 534-549. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2017.1355080
37. Hepburn, L., & Beamish, W. (2019). Towards implementation of evidence-based practices for classroom management in Australia: A review of research. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 44(2), 81-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v44n2.6
38. Ho, I. T. (2004). A comparison of Australian and Chinese teachers' attributions for student problem behaviors. Educational Psychology, 24(3), 375-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341042000211706
39. Humphreys, T. (2002). Disiplin nedir? Ne değildir? (Çev. Berat Çelik). İstanbul: Epsilon.
40. Jackson, P. W. (1968). Life in classrooms. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
41. Johnson, Z. D., Claus, C. J., Goldman, Z. W., & Sollitto, M. (2017). College student misbehaviors: An exploration of instructor perceptions. Communication Education, 66(1), 54-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1202995
42. Johnson, Z. D., Goldman, Z. W., & Claus, C. J. (2019). Why do students misbehave? An initial examination of antecedents to student misbehavior. Communication Quarterly, 67(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2018.1483958
43. Karaköse, T., Polat, H., Yirci, R., Tülübaş, T., Papadakis, S., Tuncay, Y. O., & Demirkol, M. (2023). Assessment of the relationships between prospective mathematics teachers’ classroom management anxiety, academic self-efficacy beliefs, academic amotivation and attitudes toward the teaching profession using structural equation modelling. Mathematics, 11(2), 449. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11020449
44. Kaufman, D., & Moss, D. M. (2010). A new look at preservice teachers' conceptions of classroom management and organization: Uncovering complexity and dissonance. The Teacher Educator, 45(2), 118-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878731003623669
45. Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., & McPherson, M. B. (2006). Student resistance. In T. P. Mottet, V. P. Richmond, & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Instructional communication: Rhetorical and relational perspectives (s. 235-252). Allyn & Bacon.
46. Kulinna, P., Cothran, D., & Regualos, R. (2006). Teachers’ reports of student misbehavior in Physical Education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 77(1), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2006.10599329
47. Kwok, A. (2019). Classroom Management Actions of Beginning Urban Teachers. Urban Education, 54(3), 339-367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085918795017
48. Levin, J., & Nolan, J. F. (2022). Principles of classroom management: A professional decision-making model (8th ed.). Pearson.
49. Lopes, J., & Santos, M. (2013). Teachers’ beliefs, teachers’ goals and teachers’ classroom management: A study with primary teachers. Revista de Psicodidáctica / Journal of Psychodidactics, 18, 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1387/RevPsicodidact.4615
50. Maulana, R., Helms-Lorenz, M., & van de Grift, W. (2016). The role of autonomous motivation for academic engagement of Indonesian secondary school students: A multilevel modelling approach. The psychology of Asian learners: A festschrift in honor of David Watkins, 237-251. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-287-576-1_15
51. Mavropoulou, S., & Padeliadu, S. (2002). Teachers' causal attributions for behaviour problems in relation to perceptions of control. Educational Psychology, 22(2), 191-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410120115256
52. McGuire, S. N., & Meadan, H. (2024). Preservice teachers' perspectives and use of behavior management strategies. Psychology in the Schools, 61(2), 475-495. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.23062
53. McMahon, S. E. (2013). Mapping the epistemological journeys of five preservice teachers: The reconstruction of knowledge of challenging behaviour during professional experience. http:// ro.uow.edu.au/theses/3781
54. Meinick, S., & Meister, D. (2008). A comparison of beginning and experienced teachers’ concerns. Educational Research Quarterly, 31(3). 39-45.
55. Merriam, S. B. (2013). Nitel araştırma: Desen ve uygulama için bir rehber. (S. Turan, Çev. Ed.), Ankara: Nobel. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage.
56. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2023). PISA 2022 Türkiye Raporu. MEB
57. Nicolaides, S., Toda, Y., & Smith, P. K. (2002). Knowledge and attitudes about school bullying in trainee teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 105-18.
58. OECD (2019). TALIS 2018 Results (Volume I): Teachers and School Leaders as Lifelong Learners, TALIS, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en
59. Oliver, R. M., & D. J. Reschly. (2010). Special education teacher preparation in classroom management: Implications for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders 35(3),188-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874291003500301
60. Ozen, H., & Yildirim, R. (2020). Teacher perspectives on classroom management. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 7(1), 99-113. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.645818
61. Özaslan, H., Çalışır, M., & Ok, B. (2024). Behavioral problems observed by preschool and elementary school teachers among Syrian children and strategies teachers employed for these. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 37, 121-138. https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.37.1801
62. Özben, Ş. (2010). Teachers’ strategies to cope with student misbehavior. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 587-594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.068
63. Pennings, H. (2017). Using a complexity approach to study the interpersonal dynamics in teacher-student interactions: A case study of two teachers. An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 14(2), 88-103. https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1157228
64. Priyadharshini, E., & Robinson-Pant, A. (2003). The attractions of teaching: An investigation into why people change careers to teach. Journal of Education for Teaching, 29(2), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260747032000092639
65. Reupert, A., & Woodcock, S. (2010). Success and near misses: Preservice teachers' use, confidence, and success in various classroom management strategies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(6), 1261-1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.03.003
66. Reyna, C., & Weiner, B. (2001). Justice and utility in the classroom: An attributional analysis of the goals of teachers’ punishment and intervention strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 309 - 319. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.309
67. Ritter, J., & Hancock, D. (2007). Exploring the relationship between certification sources, experience levels, and classroom management orientations of classroom teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 23(7), 1206-1216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.013
68. Simons, H. (2009). Case study research in practice. London: Sage.
69. Simonsen, B., Fairbanks, S., Briesch, A., Myers, D., & Sugai, G. (2008). Evidence-based practices in classroom management: Considerations for research to practice. Education and Treatment of Children, 31(3), 351-380. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.0.0007
70. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. Macmillan. Stough, L., Montague, M., Landmark, L., & Williams-Diehm, K. (2015). Persistent classroom management training needs of experienced teachers. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(5), 36-48. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v15i5.13784
71. Tolan, P., Elreda, L., Bradshaw, C., Downera, J., & Ialongob, N. (2020). Randomized trial testing the integration of the good behavior game and my teaching partner: The moderating role of distress among new teachers on student outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 78, 75-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2019.12.002
72. Vidić, T. (2022). Student classroom misbehavior: Teachers' perspective. Croatian Journal of Education, 24(2), 599-639. https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v24i2.4381
73. Walker H., Ramsey E., Gresham F. (2004). Antisocial behavior in schools: Evidence-based practices (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
74. Wang, H., & Hall, N. C. (2018). A systematic review of teachers’ causal attributions: Prevalence, correlates, and consequences. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02305
75. Weiner, B. (1972). Attribution theory, achievement motivation, and the educational process. Review of Educational Research, 42(2), 203-215. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543042002203
76. Weiner, B. (1980). A cognitive (attribution)-emotion-action model of motivated behavior: An analysis of judgments of help-giving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(2), 186-200. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.2.186
77. Wilson, C.M., Douglas, K. S., & Lyon, D. R. (2010). Violence against teachers: Prevalence and consequences. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 26(12), 2353-2371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510383027
78. Woodcock, S., & Reupert, A. (2017). A tale from three countries: The classroom management practices of preservice teachers from Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Teacher Development, 21(5), 655-667. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2017.1308431
79. Yiğit, B. (2009). Sınıfta disiplin sağlama kuram ve uygulamalar. İçinde D. M. Karslı (Ed.), İlköğretimde sınıf yönetimi (s. 110-130). Ankara: Kök.