A Comparative Study on the Estimation of the Shear Strength of Rock Masses Using Rock SSPC System and Hoek-Brown Criterion

Yıl 2011, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 4, 855 - 865, 10.02.2011

Şule Tudes Nurcihan Ceryan

Öz

The shear strength of rock masses has vital importance for geotechnical projects such as slope stability, foundation and tunnels. The shear strength of the jointed rock mass can be estimated by different methods including large-scale testing, back calculation, rock mass classification system and empirical criterion. In this study, the peak and residual shear strength envelopes of jointed magmatic rock masses assessed using the Hoek-Brown criterion were compared with those assessed using the SSPC system The rocks masses evaluated in this study were outcropped at Gümüşhane-Giresun highway, NE of Turkey. The geotechnical units were separated from the rock masses using the lithological features, the weathering state and the frequency of discontinuity. It is determined that the meaningful relationships can be obtained between the values of shear strength parameters of the geotechnical units obtained by Hoek-Brown failure criterion and SSPC system

Key Words: : jointed rock masses, magmatic rocks, shear strength, SSPC, Hoek-Brown criterion.

 

Anahtar Kelimeler

jointed rock masses, magmatic rocks, shear strength, SSPC, Hoek-Brown criterion

Kaynakça

• [1] Sonmez, H., Ulusay, R., Gokceoglu, C., “A Practical Procedure for the Back Analysis of Slope Failures in Closely Jointed Rock Masses”, International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Science, 35(2): 219(1998).
• [2] Hoek, E., Carranza-Torres, C.T., Corkum, B., “Hoek-Brown failure criterion-2002 edition”, In: Proceedings of the fifth North American rock mechanics symposium, Toronto, Canada, 1: 267– 73(2002).
• [3] Hack, R., Price, D., Rengers, N., “A new approach to rock slope stability a probability classification (SSPC)”, Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 62:167-184 (2002).
• [4] Hack, R., “Slope Stability Probability Classification, SSPC”, 2nd edition. publ. ITC, Enschede, The Netherlands. ISBN 90 6164 154 3. 258(1998).
• [5] Lindsay, P., Campbell, R.N., Fergusson, D.A., Gillard, G.R.T., Moore, T.A., “CRL New Zealand Slope stability probability classification”, Waikato Coal Measures. New Zealand International Journal of Coal Geology, 45: 127-145(2001).
• [6] Hoek, E., “Strength of rock and rock masses”, ISRM News Journal, 2 (2): 4-16(1994).
• [7] Hoek, E., Brown, E.T., “Practical estimates of rock mass strength”, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 34(8):1165– 86(1997).
• [8] Hoek, E., Marinos, P., Benissi, M., “Applicability of the Geological Strength Index (GSI) classification for very weak and sheared rock masses”, The case of the Athens Schist Formation, Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environmen., 57(2): 151-160(1998).
• [9] Sonmez, H., Ulusay, R., “Modifications to the geological strength index (GSI) and their applicability to stability of slopes”, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 36: 743-760(1999).
• [10] Sonmez, H., Ulusay, R., “A discussion on the HoekBrown failure criterion and suggested modifications to the criterion verified by slope stability case studies”, Yerbilimleri, 26: 77-99(2002).
• [11] Cai, M., Kaiser, P.K, Uno, H., Tasaka, Y., Minami, M., “Estimation of rock mass strength and deformation modulus of jointed hard rock masses using the GSI system”, International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 41(1):3–19 (2004).
• [12] Szymakowski, J., Haberfield, C., “A Comparison of Jointed Rock Mass Strength Envelopes Using HoekBrown GSI and Direct Shear Test Results”, ISRM 2003–Technology roadmap for rock mechanics, South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, (2003).
• [13] Li, A.J., Merifield, R.S., Alyamin, A.V., “Stability charts for rock slopes based on the Hoek–Brown failure criterion”, International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 45: 689– 700(2008.).
• [14] Cai , M., Kaiser, P.K., Tasaka, Y., Minami, M., “Determination of residual strength parameters of jointed rock masses using the GSI system”, International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 44: 247–265 (2007).
• [15] Bieniawski, T., “Rock mass classification in rock engineering”, In: Proc. Symp. On Expl. For Rock Eng. Johannesburg, South Africa, Balkema, Rotterdam, 97–106 (1976.)
• [16] Cameron-Clarke, I.S., Budavari, S., “Correlation of rock mass classification parameters obtained from borecore and in situ observations”, Engineering Geology, 17:19–53(1981).
• [17] Abad J, Caleda B, Chacon E, Gutierrez V, Hidlgo E (1984) Application of geomechanical classification to predict the convergence of coal mine galleries and to design their supports. In: 5th Inter. Cong. Rock Mech., Melbourne, pp 15–19
• [18] Kaiser, T.K., Gale, A.D., “Evaluation of Cost and Emprical Support Design at B.C. Rail Tumbler Ridge Tunnels”, Canadian Tunnelling, Tunnelling Association of Canada, Wiley, New York, 77–106 (1985).
• [19] Al-Harthi, A.A., “Application of CSIR and NGI classification systems along tunnel no. 3 at Al-Dela Descant, Asir Province, Saudi Arabia”, In: Cripps JC, Coulthard JM, Culshaw MG, Forster A, Hencher SR, Moon CF (eds) The Engineering geology of weak rock. Balkema, Rotterdam, 323–328 (1993).
• [20] Barton, N., “The influence of joint properties in modelling jointed rock masses”, Keynote Lecture. In: 8th Cong. ISRM, Tokyo(1995).
• [21] Tugrul, A., “The application of rock mass classification systems to underground excavation in weak limestone, Ataturk dam”, Turkey Engineering Geology, 50:337–345(1998).
• [22] Szymakowski, J., Haberfield, C.A., “Comparison of Jointed Rock Mass Strength Envelopes Using Hoek-Brown GSI and Direct Shear Test Results ISRM 2003–Technology roadmap for rock mechanics”, South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, (2003).
• [23] Kumar, N, Samadhiya, N.K., Anbalagan, R., “Application of rock mass classification system for tunneling in Himalaya, India Paper 3B 14, SINOROCK2004 Symposium”, International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 41(3):531(2004).
• [24] Tzamos, S., Sofianos, A.I., “A correlation of four rock mass classification systems through their fabric indices”, International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 44: 477–495 (2007).
• [25] Hashemi, M., Moghaddas, S.H., Ajalloeian, R., “Application of Rock Mass Characterization for Determining the Mechanical Properties of Rock Mass: a Comparative Study”, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 43(3):305-320(2010).
• [26] Ceryan, N., “Relationships between Excavatability of Rocks and GSI: An example study from the rock masses exposed along Gumushane-Giresun (NE Turkey) motorway”, International Congress on Advances in Civil Engineering, 27-30 September 2010 Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey, 1-6(2010).
• [27] Palmström, A., “RMi-a system for rock mass strength for use in rock engineering”, Journal of Rock Mechanics. and Tunneling Technique , India, 1 (2): 69-108(1996).
• [28] Russo,G., Kalamaras, G.S., Grasso, P., “A discussion on the concepts of geomechanical classes behavior categories and technical classes for an underground project”, Gallerie e Grandi Opere Sotterranee, 54(1998).
• [29] Johnson, R., “Elementary Statistics”, Duxbury Press, Boston, MA(1984).
• [30] Gokceoglu, C., “A fuzzy triangular chart predict the uniaxial compressive strength of Ankara agglomerates from their petrographic composition”, Engineering Geology, 66:39-51(2002).
• [31] Gokceoglu, C., Zorlu, K., “A fuzzy model to predict the uniaxial compressive strength and the modulus of elasticity of a problematic rock”, Engineering Application of Artificial Intelligence, 17: 61- 72(2004).