ABD Önderliğinde 2001 Yılında Yapılan Afganistan Müdahalesi Sonrası Orta Asya’da Güç Dengesi

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 8, 305 - 323, 04.12.2016

Selçuk Denek

Öz

Soğuk savaş sonrasında, ABD kendisine yeni bir düşman ve hedef
bulmak zorunda olduğunu hissetmiştir. ABD 11 Eylül olaylarını da
bahane ederek bu hedefini gerçekleştirmek için Afganistana
müdahalede bulunmaya başlamıştır. Bu olaylarla birlikte Afganistan
terörün yuvası olarak lanse edilmiş ve bu terörizmin yok edilmesi
gerektiği dile getirilmiştir. Fakat burada temel amacın Orta Asyayı
kontrol etmek olduğunun ifade edilmesi gerekmektedir. Bu
varsayımdan hareketle bu çalışmayı ortaya koyma ihtiyacını hissettik. Çalışmamızda 11 Eylül sonrasında gerçekleşen ABD önderliğindeki
Afganistan müdahalesini, bu müdahale sonrasında Orta Asyadaki güç
dengesini ve bu dengeyle yakından ilişkisi olduğunu düşündüğümüz
Gürcistan Savaşını ve Şangay İş Birliği Örgütünü inceleyeceğiz. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Afganistan Müdahalesi, 11 Eylül, Şangay İş Birliği Örgütü, Orta Asya, Gürcistan Savaşı, Güç Dengesi

BALANCE OF POWER IN CENTRAL ASIA AFTER THE US-LED INTERVENTION IN AFGHANISTAN 2001

Öz

After Cold War, the USA felt that a new enemy and target had to
be found. For that reason US started to invade Afghanistan by using the
9/11 as a cause to reach its goals. With these incidents, it is daclared
that Afghanistan is the house of terrorism and this terrorism had to be
destroyed. But the main reason is to control Central Asia and the
region. As a result, this study tries to explore the US-led intervention in
Afghanistan, the balance of power in Central Asia, Georgian War and
Shanghai Cooperation Organization which are related to this balance. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Afghanistan İntervention, 9/11, Shanghai Cooperation Organization, Central Asia, Georgian War and Balance of Power

Kaynakça

• Amanov, Satlik. (2011). An Assessment on the Historical Characteristic of US and Central Asia Relations. Changing Geo-Politics of Eurasia in the Global Power Struggle: New Great Game, edited by Mehmet Seyfettin Erol, Baris Press, Ankara, pp.131-186.
• Ari, Tayyar and Pirincci, Ferhat. (2010). The Central Asia Policy of US in the Shadow of 9/11. From Competition to Cooperation: Central Asia and Caucasus, edited by Tayyar Ari, MKM Press, Bursa, pp.300-302.
• Atay, Mehmet. (2002). In the Beginning of 21. Century, the New GeoPolitic Position of Turkey and Central Asia. Geo-Politic (Jeopolitik), volume: 1, no: 2, pp.37-45.
• Ayhan, Veysel. (2004). The Central Asia and Caucasus Policy of US in the Framework of Oil-Politic Dynamics and the Role of Turkey. 1. National Young Scientists Symposium of Uludag University, Volume: 2, No: 7, pp. 837-864. Bursa.
• Ayub, Fatima and Kouvo, Sari. (2008). Righting the Course? Humanitarian Intervention, the War on Terror and the Future of Afghanistan. International Affairs 84: 4, pp. 641–657.
• Blagov, Sergei. (2004). With Eye on US, Russia Bolsters Central Asia Presence. Eurasia Insight. Access: http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/insight/articles/eav062204a.shtml.
• Blagov, Sergei. (2008). Medvedev Kicks Off Kazakhstan Courtship. Eurasia Insight. Access: http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/insight/articles/eav051508.shtml.
• 8.Blank, Stephen. (2007). It’s Time to Pay Attention to Russian Military Reforms. Eurasia Insight. Access: http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/insight/articles/eav010407a.shtml.
• Blank, Stephen. (2008). Russian-Indian Row over Tajik Base Suggests Moscow Caught in Diplomatic Vicious Cycle. Eurasia Insight. Access: http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/insight/articles/eav011108f.shtml.
• Buyukbas, Murat. (2006). US Intervention to Afghanistan and (Newly Emerged) Administration Structure in Afghanistan. Master Degree Dissertation. University of Suleyman Demirel, Social Sciences Institute, Isparta.
• Celikpala, Mitat. (2010). Turkey and the Caucasus: Transition from Reactive Foreign Policy to Proactive Rhythmic Diplomacy. International Relations (Uluslararasi Iliskiler), volume: 7, no: 25, pp. 93-126.
• Chang, Gordon G. (2007). How China and Russia Threaten the World. Commentary, volume: 123, no: 6.
• Cinar, Burak. (2008). Third Power in History and Energy Wars in Central Asia. Journal of Security Strategies (Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi), issue: 08, pages: 21-43.
• Degimencioglu, Ilhami B. (2007). Power which is Left with No Rival Destroys Itself: The USA Empire. Journal of Security Strategies (Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi), issue: 06, pp. 71-92.
• Dikkaya, Mehmet and Bakir, Murat. (2011). In Post-Soviet Period: The Economical Politics of the Relations of China and Russia. Changing Geo-Politics of Eurasia in the Global Power Struggle: New Great Game, edited by Mehmet Seyfettin Erol, Baris Press, Ankara, pp.309- 344.
• Efegil, Ertan. (2000). Caspian Policy of Washington D.C. and Turkey. Eurasia Folder, Volume: 6, No: 2.
• Efegil, Ertan. (2011). General Overview of Power Struggle in Central Asia. Changing Geo-Politics of Eurasia in the Global Power Struggle: New Great Game, edited by Mehmet Seyfettin Erol, Baris Press, Ankara, pp.53-96.
• Erhan, Cagri. (2004). The Central Asia Policies of US and Effects of 9/11. Uluslararasi Iliskiler Dergisi, Volume: 1, No: 3.
• Erol, Mehmet S. (2001). The Regional Effects of the Terrorist Attacks in US: Turkistan. Strategic Analysis (Stratejik Analiz), volume: 2, no: 18.
• Erol, Mehmet S. and Tunc, Cigdem. (2003). Central Asia in the Global Power Struggle of US after 9/11. Eurasia Folder, Volume: 9, No: 3.
• Eurasia Insight. (2002). US Military to Finance Renovation of Uzbek Air Base. Access: http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/business/articles/eav080502.shtml.
• Karabulut, Bilal. (2011). Russia-Georgia War (Five Days War) and Changing Balance of Caucasus. Changing Geo-Politics of Eurasia in the Global Power Struggle: New Great Game, edited by Mehmet Seyfettin Erol, Baris Press, Ankara, pp.187-206.
• Kellogg, Paul. (2003). The Geo-Economics of the New Great Game, Contemporary Politics, Volume: 9, Number: 1, pp.75-82.
• Khachatrian, Haroutiun. (2002). Security Interests in the South Caucasus Begin to Gel. Eurasia Insight. Access: http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/insight/articles/eav041802a.shtml.
• Kok, Havva. (2011). Expanding of NATO: Power Struggle Between Russia and US in Central Asia. Changing Geo-Politics of Eurasia in the Global Power Struggle: New Great Game, edited by Mehmet Seyfettin Erol, Baris Press, Ankara, pp.97-129.
• Menon, Rejan. (1995). In the Shadow of the Bear: Security in PostSoviet Central Asia. International Security, Volume: 20, No: 1, pp.149-181.
• Menon, Rejan. (2003). The New Great Game in Central Asia. The International Institute for Strategic Studies, Survival, Volume: 45, No: 2,pp.187-202.
• Öğün, Baybars. (2011). The Central Asia Policy of US. 21. Century Turkey Institute. Access: http://www.21yyte.org/tr/arastirma/amerikaarastirmalari-merkezi/2011/06/25/6210/abdnin-orta-asya-siyaseti.
• President Rossii, Vnesne Politiceskiye Kontakti. (2007), Access: http://archive.kremlin.ru/appears/2007/08/16/1231_type63377_141411.shtml
• Torbakov, Igor. (2005). Uzbekistan Emerges as Russia as New “Strategic Bridgehead” in Central Asia. Eurasia Insight. Access: http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/insight/articles/eav121415.sh tml
• Treisman, Daniel. (2011). The Return: Russia’s Journey from Gorbachev to Medvedev. Free Press, New York.
• Ulku, Irfan. (2002). The Central Asia between Islam and Moscow. Kum Saati Press. Istanbul.
• Yilmaz, Sait. (2007). The Changing Balance in the Black Sea and Turkey. Journal of Black Sea Studies, Volume: 4, No: 15, pp.45-66.