Opinions and Recommendations of Education Administrators on Inclusive Education Practices
Öz
Education administrators have an important role in the success of inclusive education practices. Therefore, there is a need to conduct such a study. This research was carried out to determine the opinions and suggestions of education administrators about inclusive education practices. The research was carried out with the participation of 256 education administrators working in Ankara in the spring term of the 2021-2022 academic year. Survey model, one of the quantitative research methods, was used in the research. After the literature review was conducted to collect data in the research, the Personal Information Form developed by the researcher and the Opinions and Suggestions Form of Education Administrators on Inclusion Education Applications were used. The data of the research were analyzed by descriptive analysis method. As a result of the research, education administrators stated that inclusive education practices are not functional, the level of proficiency in inclusive education is low, teachers and education administrators have in-service training needs related to inclusive education and there are problems in the social field. In the study, education administrators stated that there are problems in accepting inclusive students, the physical facilities in the school are insufficient, there is a lack of equipment, the class size is large, and there are students with more than one disability. Education administrators stated that teachers should be supported by education administrators in inclusive education, that education administrators and teachers should be provided with face-to-face practical training and in-service training on inclusive education, that teachers can organize activities to ensure the social acceptance of students and families with normal development, and that guidance teachers support in inclusive education practices made recommendations as to what should be done.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Ainscow, M., & Sandill, A. (2010). Developing inclusive education systems: The role of organizational cultures and leadership. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(4), 401-416.
- Atkın, N. (2013). Kaynaştırma. İlköğretimde Özel Eğitim kitabı içinde, 19-64.
- Babaoğlan, E. & Yılmaz, Ş. (2010). Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Kaynaştırma Eğitimindeki Yeterlikleri. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 18 (2), 345-354. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/kefdergi/issue/49063/626026
- Batmaz, G. & Çermik, H. (2019). Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Kaynaştırma Öğrencilerine Yönelik Yaptıkları Öğretimsel Düzenlemelerde Karşılaştıkları Engeller ve Aldıkları Destekler. Eğitim Kuram ve Uygulama Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5 (1), 27-38. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ekuad/issue/44939/559393
- Batu, E. S., & Kırcaali-İftar, G. (2011). Kaynaştırma Kök yayıncılık (6. Basım).
- Bolat, E. Y., & Ata, N. (2017). Kaynaştırma Eğitimiyle İlgili Okul Yöneticilerinin Görüşleri. Kilis 7 Aralık Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(14), 165-185.
- Bittner, M., Katz, H., McNamara, S., & Silliman-French, L. (2020). School Administrators' Opinions of Adapted Physical Education Services. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 33(1).
- Bulutoğlu, H. E., & Özbaş, M. (2019, October). İlk ve Ortaokullarda Kaynaştırma Eğitimi Uygulamalarına İlişkin Yöneticilerin Görüşleri1. In VIII. UMTEB International Congress on Vocational & Technical Sciences (p. 363).
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
-
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Gökhan Şengün
*
0000-0001-6304-4199
Türkiye
Yayımlanma Tarihi
31 Aralık 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi
24 Kasım 2022
Kabul Tarihi
28 Aralık 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2022 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2