Araştırma Makalesi

Severity Index Analysis of Construction Labor Productivity Factors in terms of Technical Personnel and Labors

Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2 29 Ekim 2026
PDF İndir
TR EN

Severity Index Analysis of Construction Labor Productivity Factors in terms of Technical Personnel and Labors

Öz

This study aims to determine the critical factors (CFs) affecting labor productivity (LP) in terms of technical personnel and labors in building production, in a certain order of importance. As a result of a comprehensive literature study, the first five critical factors that most affect LP in the studies were determined and a total of 20 critical factors were formed. A total of 280 valid samples were collected by 150 labors and 130 technical personnel who are currently working or have worked in construction. These CFs are ranked according to their importance index (II), frequency index (FI), and severity index (SI). Also, the first five factors of studies in literature ranked according to their importance index (II). The Kruskal-Wallis test was applied to examine differences in opinion between workers and technical personnel. According to the results, it has been determined that technical personnel and laborers have similar opinions on some factors affecting LP, also they have different perspectives on many factors. In this context, knowing the factors where the groups agree and disagree will greatly increase the sustainability of the LP in the construction industry. It is hoped that this study will contribute significantly to increasing LP in building production.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Construction Management, Labor Productivity, Labor productivity factors

Kaynakça

  1. [1] I. Calik, K. Koc, and O. Şahin, “Life Cycle Risk Man-agement for Improving Labor Productivity in Construction Projects in Türkiye,” Buildings, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 484, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.3390/buildings15030484.
  2. [2] E. Ozen, “Determination of Factors Affecting Labour Productivity in Building Production,” M.S thesis, Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, Osmaniye, Turkey, 2022.
  3. [3] M. Zakeri, P. O. Olomolaiye, G. D. Holt, and F. C. Harris, “A survey of constraints on Iranian construction operatives’ productivity,” Construction Management and Economics, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 417–426, Sep. 1996, doi: 10.1080/014461996373287.
  4. [4] S. A. Ansari and D. Karthik, “Labor relation in construction industry in India,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 60, pp. 1581–1587, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.12.119.
  5. [5] F. Jian, Q. Liu, C. Feng, Q. Hu, Q. Yu, and Q. Guo, “Criti-cal Factors Affecting Construction Labor Productivity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Buildings, vol. 15, no. 14, p. 2463, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.3390/buildings15142463.
  6. [6] E. Lim and J. Alum, “Construction productivity: Issues en-countered by contractors in Singapore,” International Jour-nal of Project Management, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 51–58, Feb. 1995, doi: 10.1016/0263-7863(95)95704-H.
  7. [7] A. Enshassi, S. Mohamed, and P. E. Mayer, “Factors Affect-ing Labour Productivity in Building Projects in the Gaza Strip,” Journal of civil engineering and management, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 245–254, Dec. 2007, doi: 10.3846/13923730.2007.9636444.
  8. [8] H. Sakr, H. Naderpour, and M. K. Sharbatdar, “Critical Fac-tors Influencing the Labor Productivity of Mass Housing Construction,” J. Struct. Des. Constr., vol. 30, no. 1, p. 04024095, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1061/JSDCCC.SCENG-1546.
  9. [9] P. O. Olomolaiye and S. O. Ogunlana, “An evaluation of production outputs in key building trades in Nigeria,” Con-struction Management and Economics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 75–86, Mar. 1989, doi: 10.1080/01446198900000008.
  10. [10] M. R. Abdul Kadir, W. P. Lee, M. S. Jaafar, S. M. Sapuan, and A. A. A. Ali, “Factors affecting construction labour productivity for Malaysian residential projects,” Structural Survey, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 42–54, Feb. 2005, doi: 10.1108/02630800510586907.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Özen, E., Budak, A., & Karataş, İ. (2026). Severity Index Analysis of Construction Labor Productivity Factors in terms of Technical Personnel and Labors. Hendese Teknik Bilimler ve Mühendislik Dergisi, 3(2), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23618513
AMA
1.Özen E, Budak A, Karataş İ. Severity Index Analysis of Construction Labor Productivity Factors in terms of Technical Personnel and Labors. HENDESE. 2026;3(2):77-90. doi:10.5281/zenodo.23618513
Chicago
Özen, Emre, Abdulkadir Budak, ve İbrahim Karataş. 2026. “Severity Index Analysis of Construction Labor Productivity Factors in terms of Technical Personnel and Labors”. Hendese Teknik Bilimler ve Mühendislik Dergisi 3 (2): 77-90. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23618513.
EndNote
Özen E, Budak A, Karataş İ (01 Ekim 2026) Severity Index Analysis of Construction Labor Productivity Factors in terms of Technical Personnel and Labors. Hendese Teknik Bilimler ve Mühendislik Dergisi 3 2 77–90.
IEEE
[1]E. Özen, A. Budak, ve İ. Karataş, “Severity Index Analysis of Construction Labor Productivity Factors in terms of Technical Personnel and Labors”, HENDESE, c. 3, sy 2, ss. 77–90, Eki. 2026, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.23618513.
ISNAD
Özen, Emre - Budak, Abdulkadir - Karataş, İbrahim. “Severity Index Analysis of Construction Labor Productivity Factors in terms of Technical Personnel and Labors”. Hendese Teknik Bilimler ve Mühendislik Dergisi 3/2 (01 Ekim 2026): 77-90. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23618513.
JAMA
1.Özen E, Budak A, Karataş İ. Severity Index Analysis of Construction Labor Productivity Factors in terms of Technical Personnel and Labors. HENDESE. 2026;3:77–90.
MLA
Özen, Emre, vd. “Severity Index Analysis of Construction Labor Productivity Factors in terms of Technical Personnel and Labors”. Hendese Teknik Bilimler ve Mühendislik Dergisi, c. 3, sy 2, Ekim 2026, ss. 77-90, doi:10.5281/zenodo.23618513.
Vancouver
1.Emre Özen, Abdulkadir Budak, İbrahim Karataş. Severity Index Analysis of Construction Labor Productivity Factors in terms of Technical Personnel and Labors. HENDESE. 01 Ekim 2026;3(2):77-90. doi:10.5281/zenodo.23618513