The Effect of Crew Resource Management (CRM) Trainings and Organizational Safety Climate on the Safety Attitude and Behavior of Cabin Crew in Airlines

Öz

This study aims to statistically determine the relationships among the usefulness of Crew Resource Management (CRM) training, organisational safety climate, CRM attitudes, and safety behaviours in the airline industry. The study seeks to evaluate whether these factors can be transformed into flight safety attitudes and behaviours, thus aiming to reveal whether theoretical efforts aimed at improving human skills can be effectively transformed into flight safety practises. Additionally, another research objective is to statistically determine whether CRM attitudes mediate the effect of usefulness of CRM training and the organisational safety climate on safety behaviour. In line with these objectives, a non-probability sampling method, specifically convenience sampling, was employed within the scope of a quantitative study, and data were collected from 421 cabin crew members via surveys. The data were analysed using the SPSS and AMOS statistical software packages. The statistical analyses revealed that cabin crew members’ perceptions of the usefulness of CRM training and the organisational safety climate significantly influenced their CRM-related (cabin safety) attitudes and safety behaviours. CRM attitudes significantly mediate between the organisational safety climate, usefulness of CRM training, and safety behaviour.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• CRM
• crew resource management
• airline
• human factors
• flight safety

Hava Yollarında Ekip Kaynak Yönetimi (CRM) Eğitimleri ve Örgütsel Emniyet İkliminin Kabin Ekibinin Emniyet Tutumu ve Davranışına Etkisi

Öz

Bu çalışma hava yolu sektöründe kabin ekibi üyelerinin Ekip Kaynak Yönetimi-Crew Resource Management (CRM) eğitimlerinin faydalılığı, örgütsel emniyet iklimi, CRM tutumları ve emniyet davranışları arasındaki ilişkilerin istatistiksel olarak belirlenmesini amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma, uçuş emniyeti tutumları ve davranışlarına dönüşüp dönüşmediğini değerlendirmeyi hedeflemekte ve bu surette teorik çabaların insani becerileri geliştirmek yoluyla uçuş emniyeti pratiğine dönüşüp dönüşmediğini ortaya koymayı hedeflemektedir. Ayrıca, CRM eğitimlerinin faydalılığı ve örgütsel emniyet ikliminin emniyet davranışına etkisinde CRM tutumunun aracılık rolü bulunup bulunmadığının istatistiksel olarak tespit edilmesi araştırmanın diğer bir amacını oluşturmaktadır. Bu amaçlar doğrultusunda bir nicel araştırma kapsamında tesadüfi olmayan örnekleme yöntemine dahil olan kolayda örnekleme yöntemine başvurulmuş ve 421 kabin üyesi katılımcılardan anket yoluyla veri elde edilmiştir. Veriler SPSS ve AMOS istatistik paket programlarında çözümlenmiştir. Yapılan istatistiksel analizler sonucunda çalışmanın eriştiği bulgu, kabin ekibi üyelerinin CRM eğitiminin faydalılığına ilişkin algıları ve örgütsel emniyet ikliminin CRM’e (kabin emniyetine) ilişkin tutumları ve emniyet davranışları üzerinde etkili olduğudur. Ayrıca CRM tutumları, örgütsel emniyet iklimi ve CRM eğitiminin faydalılığı ile emniyet davranışı arasında anlamlı bir aracılık rolüne sahiptir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• CRM
• ekip kaynak yönetimi
• hava yolu
• insani faktörler
• uçuş emniyeti

Kaynakça

1. Aktaş, H., & Tekarslan, E. (2013). Uçuş ekibi kaYnak Yönetimi: Pilotların uçuş ekibi kaYnak Yönetimi tutumları ile kişilik Yapıları arasındaki ilişki. Journal of the School of Business Administration, Istanbul University, 42(2), 276-301. google scholar
2. Alvi, M. (2016). A manual for selecting sampling techniques in research. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/70218/1/MPRA_paper_70218.pdf google scholar
3. Aviation Learning. (2022). Human factors in aviation. http://aviationlearning.net/files/HumanFactors%20AAt%20booklet.pdf google scholar
4. Başdemir, M. (2020). Uçuş operasYonlarında insan faktörünün rolü ve pilot performansını arttıracak öneriler. Journal of Aviation, 4(2), 55-70. google scholar
5. BaYkın, M. S. (2021). Ekip kaynak yönetimi yaklaşımıyla uçuş emniyeti ve kokpit uygulaması (YaYımlanmamış Yüksek lisans tezi). İstanbul Arel Üniversitesi Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü. google scholar
6. Bennett, S. A. (2018). Aviation crew resource management-A critical appraisal, in the tradition of reflective practice, informed bY flight and cabin crew feedback. Journal of Risk Research, 22(11), 1357-1373. google scholar
7. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analYsis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606. google scholar
8. Bezopastnostj. (1988). Poletov letateljnüh appara tov (A. I. Starikova, Ed.). Transport. google scholar

9. Birgören, N. (2015). Uçuş emniyeti açısından ekip kaynak yönetimi uygulamalarının kabin ekibi üzerindeki etkisine ilişkin bir araştırma (YaYımlanmamış Yüksek lisans tezi). İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi SosYal Bilimler Enstitüsü. google scholar
10. Brown, R. L., & Holmes, H. (1986). The use of a factor-analYtic procedure for assessing the validitY of an emploYee safetY climate model. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 18(6), 455-470. google scholar
11. Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). Guilford Press. google scholar
12. Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. google scholar
13. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. google scholar
14. Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge. google scholar
15. Chen, C.-F., & Chen, S.-C. (2014). Investigating the effects of job demands and job resources on cabin crew safetY behaviors. Tourism Management, 41, 45-52. google scholar
16. Cheung, G. W., & Lau, R. S. (2008). Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables: Bootstrapping with structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 296-325. google scholar
17. Cooper, M. D., & Phillips, R. A. (2004). Exploratory analysis of the safety climate and safety behavior relationship. Journal of Safety Research, 35(5), 497-512. google scholar
18. CrowleY, S. L., & Fan, X. (1997). Structural equation modeling: Basic concepts and applications in personalitY assessment research. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68(3), 508-531. google scholar
19. Çapık, C. (2014). Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarında doğrulayıcı faktör analizinin kullanımı. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 17(3), 196-205. google scholar
20. Dedobbeleer, N., & Beland, F. (1991). A safetY climate measure for construction sites. Journal of Safety Research, 22(2), 97-103. google scholar
21. Dolores, P. G. (2018). Human factor in flight safety. Hadmernök, 13(4), 381-396. google scholar
22. Durmuşçelebi, C. (2017). Kişi-örgüt uyumu ve çalışanların emniyet bilincinin, emniyet davranışı üzerindeki etkileri ve emniyet ikliminin aracılık rolü: Bir havayolu işletmesinde uygulama (YaYımlanmamış Yüksek lisans tezi). Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi SosYal Bilimler Enstitüsü. google scholar
23. Edgar, T. W., & Manz, D. O. (2017). Exploratory study. In Research methods for cyber security (pp. 95-130). SYngress. google scholar
24. Eid, J., Mearns, K., Larsson, G., Laberg, J. C., & Johnsen, B. H. (2012). Leadership, psychological capital and safetY research: Conceptual issues and future research questions. Safety Science, 50(1), 55-61. google scholar
25. Erdem, Z. (2018). Ekip kaynak yönetiminde kabin ekiplerinin iletişim, ekip çalışması ve stresle başa çıkma tutumları ile kişilik yapıları etkileşimi: Kabin ekipleri üzerinde bir çalışma (YaYımlanmamış doktora tezi). İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi SosYal Bilimler Enstitüsü. google scholar
26. ErYılmaz, İ., Dirik, D., & Odabaşoğlu, Ş. (2019). Güvenlik iklimi algısı ve iş performansı ilişkisinde genel öz Yeterliliğin düzenleYici rolü: Helikopter teknisYenleri üzerine bir araştırma. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(2), 1854-1870. google scholar
27. Evans, B., Glendon, A. I., & Creed, P. A. (2007). Development and initial validation of an aviation safety climate scale. Journal of Safety Research, 38(6), 675-682. google scholar
28. Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2009). Using ûgoodness-of-fit indexes in assessing mean structure invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(1), 54-69. google scholar
29. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analYses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149-1160. google scholar
30. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analYsis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191. google scholar
31. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. SAGE Publications. google scholar
32. Flin, R., & Martin, L. (2001). Behavioral markers for crew resource management: A review of current practice. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 11(1), 95-118. google scholar
33. Ford, J., Henderson, R., & O’Hare, D. (2014). The effects of crew resource management (CRM) training on flight attendants’ safetY attitudes. Journal of Safety Research, 48, 49-56. google scholar
34. Freeman, C. (2005). Aircrew personality and the impact of crew resource management training on hazardous attitudes (Doctoral disser-tation), Massey University. google scholar
35. Fugas, C. S., Silva, S. A., & Meliâ, J. L. (2012). Another look at safetY climate and safety behavior: Deepening the cognitive and social mediator mechanisms. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 45, 468-477. google scholar
36. Gatignon, H. (2003). Statistical analysis of management data. Kluwer Academic Publishers. google scholar
37. Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: A guide for non-statisticians. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 10(2), 486-489. google scholar
38. Guldenmund, F. W. (2000). The nature of safety culture: A review of theory and research. Safety Science, 34(1-3), 215-257. google scholar
39. Haller, G., Garnerin, P., Morales, M.-A., Pfister, R., Berner, M., Irion, O., Clergue, F., & Kern, C. (2008). Effect of crew resource management training in a multidisciplinarY obstetrical setting. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 20(4), 254-263. google scholar
40. HaYward, B. J. H., Lowe, A. R., & Thomas, M. J. W. (2019). The migration of crew resource management training. In Crew resource management (pp. 421-447). Academic Press. google scholar
41. Helmreich, R. L. (1984). Cockpit management attitudes. Human Factors, 26(5), 583-589. google scholar
42. Helmreich, R. L., & Merritt, A. C. (2017). SafetY and error management: The role of crew resource management. In Aviation resource management (pp. 107-119). Routledge. google scholar
43. Helmreich, R., Merritt, A. C., & Wilhelm, J. (1999). The evolution of crew resource management training in commercial aviation. Interna-tional Journal of Aviation Psychology, 9, 19-32. google scholar
44. Helmreich, R. L., Merritt, A. C., & Wilhelm, J. A. (2017). The evolution of crew resource management training in commercial aviation. In Human error in aviation (pp. 275-288). Routledge. google scholar
45. Helmreich, R. L., & Wilhelm, J. A. (1991). Outcomes of crew resource management training. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1(4), 287-300. google scholar
46. Helmreich, R. L., Wilhelm, J. A., Klinect, J. R., & Merritt, A. C. (2001). Culture, error and crew resource management. In E. Salas, C. A. Bowers, & E. Edens (Eds.), Applying resource management in organisations: A guide for professionals(pp. 107-130). Erlbaum. google scholar
47. Hofmann, D. A., & Stetzer, A. (1996). A cross-level investigation of factors influencing unsafe behaviors and accidents. Personnel Psychology, 49(2), 307-339. google scholar
48. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60. google scholar
49. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. google scholar
50. International Air Transport Association (IATA). (2016). Guidance material for improving flight crew monitoring. Montreal, Quebec, Canada. google scholar
51. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). (2018). Safety management manual (4th ed.). https://www.icao.int/safety/safetymana gement/pages/guidancematerial.aspx google scholar
52. İleri, S. (2020). The effect of crew resource management to flight safetY culture: A studY on Turkish pilots (Unpublished master’s thesis). Yeditepe UniversitY, İstanbul. google scholar
53. İnan, T. T. (2018). Development of crew resource management concept in civil aviation. Journal of Aviation, 2(1), 45-55. google scholar
54. İnan, T. T. (2019). Pilotlarda ekip kaYnak Yönetimi ölçeği: Geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 17(3), 357-373. google scholar
55. Ji, M., Liu, B., Li, H., Yang, S., & Li, Y. (2019). The effects of safetY attitude and safetY climate on flight attendants’ proactive personalitY with regard to safetY behaviors. Journal of Air Transport Management, 78, 80-86. google scholar
56. Jimenez, C., Kasper, K., Rivera, J., Talone, A. B., & Jentsch, F. (2015). Crew resource management (CRM): What aviation can learn from the application of CRM in other domains. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 946-950). SAGE Publications. google scholar
57. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36. google scholar
58. Kang, H. (2021). Sample size determination and power analYsis using the G*Power software. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 18, 1-17. google scholar
59. Kao, L. H., Stewart, M., & Lee, K. H. (2009). Using structural equation modeling to predict cabin safety outcomes among Taiwanese airlines. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 45(2), 357-365. google scholar
60. Kılıç, S. (2016). Cronbach’ın alfa güvenirlik katsaYısı. Journal of Mood Disorders, 6(1), 47-48. google scholar
61. Klampfer, B., Flin, R., Helmreich, R. L., Hausler, R., Sexton, B., Fletcher, G., Dieckmann, P., & Amacher, A. (2011). Enhancing performance in high risk environments: Recommendations for the use of behavioural markers. Daimler-Benz Shiftung. google scholar
62. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Publications. google scholar
63. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Publications. google scholar
64. Lauber, K. J. (1987). Cockpit resource management: Background studies and rationale. In H. F. Orlady & C. D. Foushee (Eds.), Cockpit resource management training (pp. 1-15). NASA Conference Publication. google scholar
65. Lee, K. H., Stewart, M., & Kao, L. H. (2006). Development of utilities to assess airline cabin safetY culture. In Proceedings of ANZSASI 2006 Regional Conference (pp. 1-18), Melbourne, Australia. google scholar
66. Lu, C.-S., & Yang, C.-S. (2011). SafetY climate and safetY behavior in the passenger ferrY context. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(1), 329-341. google scholar
67. McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64-82. google scholar
68. Mearns, K., & Flin, R. (1999). Assessing the state of organizational safetY: Culture or climate? Current Psychology, 18(1), 5-17. google scholar
69. Mearns, K., Flin, R., & O’Connor, P. (2001). Sharing “worlds of risk”: Improving communication with crew resource management. Journal of Risk Research, 4(4), 377-392. google scholar
70. Mengenci, C. (2014). Ekip kaynak Yönetimi ve sivil havayolu kazaları: Türkiye örneği. Ekonomi ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1(2), 44-61. google scholar
71. Mengenci, C., & Gündüz Topçu, Ö. (2011). Örgüt kültürünün ekip kaynak yönetimi uygulamalarına etkisi: Türk sivil havayolu firmalarında görgül bir araştırma. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 20(3), 201-232. google scholar
72. MooneY, C., & Duval, R. (1993). Bootstrapping: A nonparametric approach to statistical inference. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. google scholar
73. Moore, D. S., McCabe, G. P., Duckworth, W. M., & Sclove, S. L. (2003). Bootstrap methods and permutation tests. In The practice of business statistics: Using data for decisions. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman. google scholar
74. MoreY, J. C., Grubb, G., & Simon, R. (1997). Towards a new measurement approach for cockpit resource management attitudes. In R. S. Jensen & L. A. Rakovan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 478-483). Columbus, OH: Ohio State UniversitY. google scholar
75. Morshed, M. M., Arafin, Z., & Nafi, S. K. (2021). Measuring social license to operate the infrastructure project in Bangladesh. Journal of Engineering Science, 12(2), 1-10. google scholar
76. Munro, B. H. (2005). Statistical methods for health care research (5th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. google scholar
77. Nazlı, Z. (2018). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi ile müşteri memnuniyet analizi: Aydınlatma sektöründe bir uygulama (YaYınlanmamış Yüksek lisans tezi). Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Kırıkkale. google scholar
78. Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (2006). A studY of the lagged relationships among safetY climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. Journal of Applied PsYchologY, 91(4), 946-953. google scholar
79. Neal, A., Griffin, M. A., & Hart, P. M. (2000). The impact of organizational climate on safetY climate and individual behavior. Safety Science, 34(1-3), 99-109. google scholar
80. Niemand, T., & Mai, R. (2018). Flexible cutoff values for fit indices in the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(6), 1148-1172. google scholar
81. O’Connor, P., Campbell, J., Newton, J., Melton, J., Salas, E., & Wilson, K. A. (2008). Crew resource management training effectiveness: A meta-analYsis and some critical needs. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 18(4), 353-368. google scholar
82. O’Connor, P., Jones, D. W., McCauleY, M. E., & ButtreY, S. E. (2012). An evaluation of the effectiveness of the crew resource management programme in naval aviation. International Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 1(1), 21-40. google scholar
83. Powell, S. M., & Kimberly Hill, R. (2006). MY copilot is a nurse—Using crew resource management in the OR. AORN Journal, 83(1), 178-202. google scholar
84. Probst, T. M. (2004). SafetY and insecuritY: Exploring the moderating effect of organizational safetY climate. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 9(1), 3-10. google scholar
85. Probst, T. M., Brubaker, T. L., & Barsotti, A. (2008). Organizational injury rate underreporting: The moderating effect of organizational safetY climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1147-1154. google scholar
86. Ricci, M. A., & Brumsted, J. R. (2012). Crew resource management: Using aviation techniques to improve operating room safety. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 83(4), 441-444. google scholar
87. Rohâcs, J., & Nemeth, M. (1997). Effects of aircraft anomalies on flight safetY. İn H. M. Soekkha (Ed.), Aviation safety (pp. 203-211). Ultrecht, The Netherland/TokYo, Japan. google scholar
88. Rose, F. (1992). Airline flight safety - A technical perspective. The Airline Pilots. https://www.theairlinepilots.com/forumarchive/ flightsafetY/aircrafttechnicalandflightsafetY.php google scholar
89. RYle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. Chicago, İL: UniversitY of Chicago Press. google scholar
90. Salas, E., Prince, C., Bowers, C. A., Stout, R. J., Oser, R. L., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1999). A methodologY for enhancing crew resource management training. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 41(1), 161-172. google scholar
91. Salas, E., Wilson, K. A., Burke, C. S., & Wightman, D. C. (2006). Does crew resource management training work? An update, an extension, and some critical needs. Human Factors, 48(2), 392-412. google scholar
92. Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. google scholar
93. Schneider, B. (1975). Organizational climates: An essay. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 447-479. google scholar
94. Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatorY factor analYsis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323-338. google scholar
95. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). TaYlor & Francis. google scholar
96. Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach. New York, NY: WileY. google scholar
97. Shappell, S. A., Detwiler, C. A., Holcomb, K. A., Hackworth, C. A., Boquet, A. J., & Wiegmann, D. A. (2006). Human error and commercial aviation accidents: A comprehensive, fine-grained analysis using HFACS. Federal Aviation Administration Washington DC Office of Aviation Medicine, USA. google scholar
98. Shelby, L. B. (2011). Beyond Cronbach’s alpha: Considering confirmatory factor analysis and segmentation. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 16(2), 142-148. google scholar
99. Shrestha, N. (2021). Factor analYsis as a tool for surveY analYsis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 9(1), 4-11. google scholar
100. Simpson, P., & Wiggins, M. (1995). Human factor attitudes. In B. J. HaYward & A. R. Lowe (Eds.), Applied aviation psychology: Achievement, change, and challenge. Proceedings of the third Australian Aviation Psychology Symposium (pp. 185-192). Aldershot, England: AveburY Aviation. google scholar
101. Şekerli, E. B. (2018). Dispeçer kaYnak Yönetimi. In E. Gerede (Ed.), Havacılık emniyeti (pp. 132-156). Eskişehir: T.C. Anadolu Üniversitesi YaYını No: 3275. google scholar
102. Şenol, M. B. (2020). Evaluation and prioritization of technical and operational airworthiness factors for flight safetY. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 92(7), 1049-1061. google scholar
103. Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş: Temel ilkeler ve LİSREL uygulamaları. Ekinoks YaYınevi. google scholar
104. Temel, E. (2021). Akış deneyimi: SOR paradigması temelinde online impulsif satın alma davranışı (YaYımlanmamış doktora tezi). AYdın Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi SosYal Bilimler Enstitüsü, AYdın. google scholar
105. Terzioğlu, M. (2018). Ekip KaYnak Yönetimi’nin uçuş emniYet kültürüne etkileri: Pilotların tutumları üzerine bir alan araştırması (YaYımlanmamış doktora tezi). İstanbul Üniversitesi SosYal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul. google scholar
106. Terzioğlu, M. (2023). The effects of crew resource management on flight safetY culture: Corporate crew resource management (CRM 7.0). The Aeronautical Journal, 1(1), 1-24. google scholar
107. Vaske, J. J. (2008). Survey research and analysis: Applications in parks, recreation and human dimensions. State College, PA: Venture Publishing Inc. google scholar
108. Wagener, F., & Ison, D. C. (2014). Crew resource management application in commercial aviation. Journal of Aviation Technology and Engineering, 3(2), 2-13. google scholar
109. Waltz, C. F., Strickland, O. L., & Lenz, E. R. (2010). Measurement in nursing and health research (4th ed.). Springer Publishing CompanY. google scholar
110. Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2019). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus. John Wiley & Sons. google scholar
111. Yamamori, H., & Mito, T. (1993). Keeping CRM is keeping the flight safe. In E. L. Wiener, B. G. Kanki, & R. L. Helmreich (Eds.), Cockpit resource management (pp. 399-420). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. google scholar
112. Zohar, D. (1980). SafetY climate in industrial organizations: Theoretical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(1), 96-102. google scholar