Araştırma Makalesi

PARADIGMS OF FRONTIER INTERACTION: A NEW USE FOR DIGENES AKRITES

Cilt: 16 Sayı: 1 10 Şubat 2024
PDF İndir
TR EN

PARADIGMS OF FRONTIER INTERACTION: A NEW USE FOR DIGENES AKRITES

Öz

This article argues that the Byzantine romance known as Digenes Akrites has more to offer historians than is often recognized. Regardless of the fictional nature of the story or of the exact date of its composition, the Digenes tale can serve as an exemplar of the kinds of interactions which regularly took place in the frontier regions between the Byzantine and Muslim worlds and the social values and cultural mores that guided such interactions. If taken as a paradigm of otherwise invisible conditions along the frontier regions of southeastern Anatolia, Digenes can shed new light on an otherwise dark and incomplete picture. It is, in fact, a frontier world in and of itself, in which outside powers, both Muslim and Byzantine, are distant images and only occasional players.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Bartikian, Hratch, “Armenia and Armenians in the Byzantine Epic,” in Digenes Akrites: New Approaches to Byzantine Heroic Poetry, ed. Roderick Beaton and David Ricks, Ashgate, Aldershot 1993, p.86-92.
  2. Beaton, Roderick. The Medieval Greek Romance, second edition. New York: Routledge, 1996.
  3. Bekker, Immanuel, ed., Theophanes continuatus, Ioannes Caminiata, Symeon Magister, Georgius Monachus continuatus, CSHB 33, E. Weber, Bonn 1838.
  4. Bryer, Anthony. “The Historian’s Digenes Akrites.” In Digenes Akrites: New Approaches to Byzantine Heroic Poetry. Eds. Roderick Beaton and David Ricks. 93-102. Hampshire: Ashgate, 1993.
  5. Cahen, Claude, “Futuwwa,” in The Encyclopedia of Islam: New Edition, ed. R. Lewis, Ch. Pellat, and J. Schacht, Leiden: Brill, 1965.
  6. Cheynet, Jean-Claude, “Bureaucracy and Aristocracies,” in The Oxford Handbook of Byzantine Studies, ed. Elizabeth Jeffreys, with John Haldon and Robin Cormack, 518-26. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
  7. Constantine VII Porphyrogennetos, De Ceremoniis, ed. J. J. Reiske, De ceremoniis aulae Byzantinae, Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus, CSHB 9-11, E. Weber, Bonn 1829.
  8. Dadoyan, Seta. Islam and the Armenians: Paradigms of Medieval Interactions, vol. 1: The Arab Period in Armīnyah – Seventh to Eleventh Centuries, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ 2011.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Bizans Tarihi, Türk İslam Devletleri Tarihi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

10 Şubat 2024

Yayımlanma Tarihi

10 Şubat 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

2 Kasım 2023

Kabul Tarihi

6 Ocak 2024

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Leidholm, N. (2024). PARADIGMS OF FRONTIER INTERACTION: A NEW USE FOR DIGENES AKRITES. History Studies, 16(1), 111-124. https://doi.org/10.9737/historystudies.1385201
AMA
1.Leidholm N. PARADIGMS OF FRONTIER INTERACTION: A NEW USE FOR DIGENES AKRITES. History Studies. 2024;16(1):111-124. doi:10.9737/historystudies.1385201
Chicago
Leidholm, Nathan. 2024. “PARADIGMS OF FRONTIER INTERACTION: A NEW USE FOR DIGENES AKRITES”. History Studies 16 (1): 111-24. https://doi.org/10.9737/historystudies.1385201.
EndNote
Leidholm N (01 Şubat 2024) PARADIGMS OF FRONTIER INTERACTION: A NEW USE FOR DIGENES AKRITES. History Studies 16 1 111–124.
IEEE
[1]N. Leidholm, “PARADIGMS OF FRONTIER INTERACTION: A NEW USE FOR DIGENES AKRITES”, History Studies, c. 16, sy 1, ss. 111–124, Şub. 2024, doi: 10.9737/historystudies.1385201.
ISNAD
Leidholm, Nathan. “PARADIGMS OF FRONTIER INTERACTION: A NEW USE FOR DIGENES AKRITES”. History Studies 16/1 (01 Şubat 2024): 111-124. https://doi.org/10.9737/historystudies.1385201.
JAMA
1.Leidholm N. PARADIGMS OF FRONTIER INTERACTION: A NEW USE FOR DIGENES AKRITES. History Studies. 2024;16:111–124.
MLA
Leidholm, Nathan. “PARADIGMS OF FRONTIER INTERACTION: A NEW USE FOR DIGENES AKRITES”. History Studies, c. 16, sy 1, Şubat 2024, ss. 111-24, doi:10.9737/historystudies.1385201.
Vancouver
1.Nathan Leidholm. PARADIGMS OF FRONTIER INTERACTION: A NEW USE FOR DIGENES AKRITES. History Studies. 01 Şubat 2024;16(1):111-24. doi:10.9737/historystudies.1385201