Geri dönüşüm işletmelerinin inşaat ve yıkım atıkları açısından performanslarının bütünleştirilmiş Swara-Edas yöntemiyle değerlendirilmesi: Türkiye örneği

Öz

Günümüzde, inşaat ve yıkım atıklarının artan miktarı nedeniyle ülke ekonomileri birçok zorlukla karşı karşıya gelmektedir. Döngüsel ekonomilerde inşaat ve yıkım atıklarının geri dönüşüm faaliyetlerinin daha önemli rol oynaması beklenmektedir. Buna paralel olarak inşaat ve yıkım atıklarının geri dönüşümü ülkelerin rekabet gücünü doğrudan etkilemektedir. Bu çalışma inşaat ve yıkım atıklarının geri dönüşüm faaliyetlerini gerçekleştiren işletmelerin performanslarını değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. İşletmelerin performanslarını değerlendirmek için kullanılan kriterler detaylı bir literatür taraması yapılarak belirlenmiştir. Çalışmanın alternatiflerini ise inşaat ve yıkım atıklarının geri dönüşüm faaliyetlerini gerçekleştiren işletmeler oluşturmaktadır. Belirlenen kriterlerin ağırlıklandırılmasında Step-Wise Weight Assesment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) kullanılmıştır. Kriter ağırlıklarının belirlenmesinin ardından inşaat ve yıkım atıklarının geri dönüşüm faaliyetlerini gerçekleştiren işletmelerin performansı Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) ile değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışmanın sonuçlarına dayalı olarak, inşaat ve yıkım atıklarının geri dönüşümünde en önemli kriter Sürdürülebilirlik olarak belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca çalışma çevresel etkiler ile inşaat ve yıkım atıklarının taşınması kriterlerinin sırasıyla diğer önemli kriterler olduğunu göstermektedir. EDAS yönteminin sonucu ise Alternatif 5 işletmesinin inşaat ve yıkım atıklarının geri dönüştürülmesi açısından en iyi performansa sahip olduğunu göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Atık Yönetimi
• ÇKKV
• EDAS
• SWARA
• İnşaat ve Yıkım

Performance evaluation of the recycling enterprises in terms of construction and demolition wastes by integrated SWARA-EDAS method: the case of Turkey

Abstract

At the present time, national economies encounter many challenges by the reason of the increasing amount of construction and demolition waste. Recycling activities of construction and demolition wastes have been anticipated to play an important role in the circular economies. Parallel to this, the recycling of construction and demolition wastes directly affects the competitiveness of countries. This study objectives to evaluate the performances of the enterprises which carry out recycling activities of the construction and demolition wastes. The criteria which are used in the evaluation of the enterprises’ performances are specified with an elaborative literature search. Enterprises which are executer of the recycling activities of construction and demolition wastes form the alternatives of the study. Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) is used to weight the determined criteria. In the wake of the weighting of the criteria, performances of the enterprises, which executer of the recycling activities of construction and demolition wastes were evaluated by way of Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS). Based on the consequences of the study, the most weighty criterion from the point of recycling of the construction and demolition wastes was specified to the sustainability. The study also indicates that the environmental effects and the transportation of construction and demolition wastes are specified as the other important criteria, respectively. As to EDAS method, consequences show that the Alternative 5 is the best firm in terms of recycling of the construction and demolition wastes performance.

Keywords

• Waste Management
• MCDM
• EDAS
• SWARA
• Construction and Demolition

Kaynakça

1. Abdelhamid, M.S. (2014). Assessment of different construction and demolition waste management approaches. HBRC Journal, 10(3), 317-326. doi:10.1016/j.hbrcj.2014.01.003
2. Aggarwal, A., Choudhary, C. ve Mehrotra, D. (2018). Evaluation of smartphones in Indian market using EDAS. Procedia Computer Science, 132, 236-243. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.193
3. Ajayi, S.O. ve Oyedele, L.O. (2018). Critical design factors for minimising waste in construction projects: A structural equation modelling approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 137, 302-313. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.06.005
4. Ajayi, S.O., Oyedele, L.O., Akinade, O.O., Bilal, M., Owolabi, H.A., Alaka, H.A. ve Kadiri, K.O. (2016). Reducing waste to landfill: A need for cultural change in the UK construction industry. Journal of Building Engineering, 5, 185-193. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2015.12.007
5. Ajayi, S.O., Oyedele, L.O., Bilal, M., Akinade, O.O, Alaka, H.A., Owolabi, H.A. ve Kadiri, K.O. (2015). Waste effectiveness of the construction industry: Understanding the impediments and requisites for improvements. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 102, 101-112. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.06.001
6. Akhanova, G., Nadeem, A., Kim, J.R. ve Azhar, S. (2020). A multi-criteria decision-making framework for building sustainability assessment in Kazakhstan. Sustainable Cities and Society, 52, 1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101842
7. Akram, M., Naz, S., Feng, F. ve Shafiq, A. (2022). Assessment of hydropower plants in Pakistan:Muirhead mean-based 2-tuple linguistic t-spherical fuzzy model combining SWARA with COPRAS. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 1-30. doi:10.1007/s13369-022-07081-0
8. Almutairi, K., Dehshiri, S.S.H., Dehshiri, S.J.H., Mostafaeipour, A., Issakhov, A. ve Techato, K. (2021a). A thorough investigation for development of hydrogen projects from wind energy: A case study. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(36), 18795-18815. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.061

9. Almutairi, K., Dehshiri, S.S.H., Dehshiri, S.J.H., Mostafaeipour, A., Jahangiri, M. ve Techato, K. (2021b). Technical, economic, carbon footprint assessment, and prioritizing stations for hydrogen production using wind energy: A case study. Energy Strategy Reviews, 36, 1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2021.100684
10. Altuncu, D. ve Kasapseçkin, M.A. (2011). Management and recycling of constructional solid waste in Turkey. Procedia Engineering, 21, 1072-1077. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2113
11. Ansari, M. ve Ehrampoush, M.H. (2018). Quantitative and qualitative analysis of construction and demolition waste in Yazd city, Iran. Data in Brief, 21, 2622-2626. doi:10.1016/j.dib.2018.10.141
12. Arshad, H., Qasim, M., Thaheem, M.J. ve Gabriel, H.F. (2017). Quantification of material wastage in construction industry of Pakistan: An analytical relationship between building types and waste generation. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 22(2), 19-34. doi: 10.21315/jcdc2017.22.2.2
13. Bania, A., Zindani, D. ve Maity, S.R. (2021). Optimization of ultrasonic machining (USM) parameters on micro hole drilling of graphene oxide/pineapple leaf filler reinforced epoxy hybrid composite using evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS) method. Materials Today: Proceedings, 46(18), 9089-9091. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.393
14. Bao, Z. ve Lu, W. (2021). A decision-support framework for planning construction waste recycling: A case study of Shenzhen, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 309, 1-12. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127449
15. Bao, Z., Lee, W.M.W. ve Lu, W. (2020). Implementing on-site construction waste recycling in Hong Kong: Barriers and facilitators. Science of the Total Environment, 747,1-11. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141091
16. Begum, R.A., Siwar, C., Joy Jacqueline Pereira, J.J. ve Jaafar, A. H. (2007). Implementation of waste management and minimisation in the construction industry of Malaysia. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 51(1), 190-202. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.09.004
17. Bi, W., Lu, W., Zhao, Z., Webster, C.J. (2022). Combinatorial optimization of construction waste collection and transportation: A case study of Hong Kong. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 179, 1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106043
18. Bilal, M., Oyedele, L.O., Akinade, O.O., Ajayi, S.O., Alaka, H.A., Owolabi, H.A., Qadir, J., Pasha, M. ve Bello, S.A. (2016). Big data architecture for construction waste analytics (CWA): A conceptual framework. Journal of Building Engineering, 6, 144-156. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2016.03.002
19. Blaisi, N.I. (2019). Construction and demolition waste management in Saudi Arabia: Current practice and roadmap for sustainable management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 221, 167-175. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.264
20. Chauhan, A., Singh, S., Dhar, A. ve Powar, S. (2021). Optimization of pineapple drying based on energy consumption, nutrient retention, and drying time through multi-criteria decision making. Journal of Cleaner Production, 292, 1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125913
21. Chen, Z., Li, H. ve Wong, T.C.C. (2002). An application of bar-code system for reducing construction wastes. Automation in Construction, 11(5), 521-533. doi:10.1016/S0926-5805(01)00063-2
22. Chethana, I.M., Illankoon, S. ve Lu, W. (2020). Cost implications of obtaining construction waste management-related credits in green building. Waste Management, 102, 722-731. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.11.024
23. Chi, B., Lu, W., Ye, M., Bao, Z. ve Zhang, X. (2020). Construction waste minimization in green building: A comparative analysis of LEED-NC 2009 certified projects in the US and China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120749
24. Chini, M., Arefi, S.L., Zolfani, S.H. ve Ustinovicius, L. (2018). Choosing a proper method for strengthening WPC beams with grooving method using SWARA-EDAS. Archives of Civil Engineering, 64(4), 161-174. doi: 10.2478/ace-2018-0050
25. Çakalı, K.R. (2022). Performance evaluation of deposit banks with financial ratios: Combined use of objective and subjective criteria weighting methods (Combined entropy-SWARA based EDAS method). Alanya Akademik Bakış, 6(2), 2351-2377. doi:10.29023/alanyaakademik.1056754
26. Çakır, E. (2018a). Bütünleşik SWARA ve EDAS yöntemi kullanarak fitness merkezlerinin değerlendirilmesi: Örnek bir uygulama. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11(3), 1907-1923. doi: 10.17218/hititsosbil.408916
27. Çakır, E. (2018b). Elektronik belge yönetim sistemi (EBYS) yazılımı seçiminde çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri: Bir belediye örneği. Business Economics and Management Research Journal, 1(15), 15-30. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/bemarej/issue/38762/434887
28. Dahlbo, H., Bacher, J., Lahtinen, K., Jouttijarvi, T., Suoheimo, P., Mattila, T., Sironen, S., Myllymaa, T. ve Saramaki, K. (2015). Construction and demolition waste management - a holistic evaluation of environmental performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 333-341. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.073
29. Davis, P., Aziz, F., Newaz, M.T., Sher, W. ve Simon, L. (2021). The classification of construction waste material using a deep convolutional neural network. Automation in Construction, 122, 1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103481
30. Dehshiri, S.S.H (2022). A new application of multi criteria decision making in energy technology in traditional buildings: A case study of Isfahan. Energy, 240, 1-16. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.122814
31. Dehshiri, S.S.H ve Firoozabadi, B. (2022). A new application of measurement of alternatives and ranking according to compromise solution (MARCOS) in solar site location for electricity and hydrogen production: A case study in the southern climate of Iran. Energy, 261(Part B), 1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125376
32. Ding, Z., Yi, G., Tam, V.W.Y. ve Huang, T. (2016). A system dynamics-based environmental performance simulation of construction waste reduction management in China. Waste Management, 51, 130-141. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.03.001
33. Esin, T. ve Cosgun, N. (2007). A study conducted to reduce construction waste generation in Turkey. Building and Environment, 42(4), 1667-1674. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.02.008
34. Gangolells, M., Casals, M., Forcada, N. ve Macarulla, M. (2014). Analysis of the implementation of effective waste management practices in construction projects and sites. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 93, 99-111. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.10.006
35. Ghorabaee, M.S., Zavadskas, E.K., Olfat, L. ve Turskis, Z. (2015). Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS). Informatica, 26(3), 435-451. doi: 10.15388/Informatica.2015.57
36. Grigoreva, L.S. ve Oleinik, P.P. (2016). Modelling of processing construction waste management system. Procedia Engineering, 153, 208-216. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.104
37. Guzman, J.S., Marrero, M., Delgado, M.V.M. ve De Arellano, A.R. (2009). A Spanish model for quantification and management of construction waste. Waste Management, 29(9), 2542-2548. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.05.009
38. Hao, J., Yuan, H., Liu, J., Chin, C.S. ve Lu, W. (2019). A model for assessing the economic performance of construction waste reduction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 232, 427-440. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.348
39. Hassan, S.H., Ahzahar, N., Fauzi, M.A. ve Eman, J. (2012). Waste management issues in the northern region of Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 42, 175-181. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.179
40. He, L. ve Yuan, H. (2020). Investigation of construction waste recycling decisions by considering consumers’ quality perceptions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 259, 1-11. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120928
41. Hu, R., Chen, K., Fang, W., Zheng, L. ve Xu, J. (2022). The technology-environment relationship revisited: Evidence from the impact of prefabrication on reducing construction waste. Journal of Cleaner Production, 341, 1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130883
42. Huang, B., Wang, X., Kua, H., Geng, Y., Bleischwitz, R. ve Ren, J. (2018). Construction and demolition waste management in China through the 3R principle. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 129, 36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.029
43. Ibrahim, M. ve Ibrahim, M. (2016). Estimating the sustainability returns of recycling construction wastefrom building projects. Sustainable Cities and Society, 23, 78-93. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2016.03.005
44. Janani, R., Ilango, T., Meenakshi, E. ve Kumar, M.J.R. (2022). Minimization of construction waste in Chennai construction industry. Materials Today: Proceedings, 52(3), 1884-1890. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.515
45. Juodagalviene, B., Turskis, Z., Saparauskas, J. ve Endriukaityte, A. (2017). Integrated multi-criteria evaluation of house’s plan shape based on the EDAS and SWARA methods. Engineering structures and technologies, 9(3), 117-125. doi:10.3846/2029882X.2017.1347528
46. Kang, K., Besklubova, S., Dai, Y. ve Zhong, R.Y. (2022). Building demolition waste management through smart BIM: A case study in Hong Kong. Waste Management, 143, 69-83. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2022.02.027
47. Kartam, N., Mutairi, N.A., Ghusain, I.A. ve Humoud, J.A. (2004). Environmental management of construction and demolition waste in Kuwait. Waste Management, 24(10), 1049-1059. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2004.06.003
48. Katz, A. ve Baum, H. (2011). A novel methodology to estimate the evolution of construction waste in construction sites. Waste Management, 31(2), 353-358. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2010.01.008
49. Kısa, A.C.G. ve Ayçin, E. (2019). OECD ülkelerinin lojistik performanslarının SWARA tabanlı EDAS yöntemi ile değerlendirilmesi. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(1), 301-325. doi: 10.18074/ckuiibfd.500320
50. Kofoworola, O. F. ve Gheewala, S. H. (2009). Estimation of construction waste generation and management in Thailand. Waste Management, 29(2), 731-738. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2008.07.004
51. Kong, L. ve Ma, B. (2020). Evaluation of environmental impact of construction waste disposal based on fuzzy set analysis. Environmental Technology and Innovation, 19, 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.eti.2020.100877
52. Lachimpadi, S. K., Pereira, J.J., Tahab, M. R. ve Mokhtara, M. (2012). Construction waste minimisation comparing conventional and precast construction (Mixed System and IBS) methods in high-rise buildings: A Malaysia case study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 68, 96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.08.011
53. Lai, Y.Y., Yeh, L.H., Chen, P.F., Sung, P.H. ve Lee, Y.M. (2016). Management and recycling of construction waste in Taiwan. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 35, 723-730. doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2016.07.077
54. Lam, P.T.I., Yu, A.T.W., Wu, Z. ve Poon, C.S. (2019). Methodology for upstream estimation of construction waste for new building projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 230, 1003-1012. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.183
55. Li, G., Liu, J. ve Giordano, A. (2022a). Robust optimization of construction waste disposal facility location considering uncertain factors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 353, 1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131455
56. Li, H., Chen, Z., Yong, L. ve Kong S.C.W. (2005). Application of integrated GPS and GIS technology for reducing construction waste and improving construction efficiency. Automation in Construction, 14(3), 323-331. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2004.08.007
57. Li, J., Ding, Z., Mi, X. ve Wang, J. (2013). A model for estimating construction waste generation index for building project in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 74, 20-26. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.02.015
58. Li, J., Wu, Q., Wang, C.C., Du, H. ve Sun, J. (2022b). Triggering factors of construction waste reduction behavior: Evidence from contractors in Wuhan, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 337, 1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130396
59. Li, M. ve Yang, J. (2014). Critical factors for waste management in office building retrofit projects in Australia. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 93, 85-98. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.10.007
60. Li, Y., Zhang, X., Ding, G. ve Feng, Z. (2016). Developing a quantitative construction waste estimation model for building construction projects. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 106, 9-20. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.11.001
61. Li, Y., Zheng, Y. ve Zhou, J. (2011). Source management policy of construction waste in Beijing. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 11(B), 880-885. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2011.12.135
62. Liu, J., Chen, Y. ve Wang, X. (2022). Factors driving waste sorting in construction projects in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 336, 1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130397
63. Liu, J., Yi, Y. ve Wang, X. (2020). Exploring factors influencing construction waste reduction: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 1-16. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123185
64. Lu, W. (2019). Big data analytics to identify illegal construction waste dumping: A Hong Kong study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 264-272. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.039
65. Lu, W., Bao, Z., Lee, W.M.W., Chi, B. ve Wang, J. (2021b). An analytical framework of ‘‘zero waste construction site”: Two case studies of Shenzhen, China. Waste Management, 121, 343-353. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.12.029
66. Lu, W., Chen, C., Peng, Y. ve Liu, X. (2018). The effects of green building on construction waste minimization: Triangulating ‘big data’ with ‘thick data’. Waste Management, 79, 142-152. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.07.030
67. Lu, W., Chen, X., Ho, D.C.W. ve Wang, H. (2016). Analysis of the construction waste management performance in Hong Kong: the public and private sectors compared using big data. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(1), 521-531. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.106
68. Lu, W., Chi, B., Bao, Z. ve Zetkulic, A. (2019). Evaluating the effects of green building on construction waste management: A comparative study of three green building rating systems. Building and Environment, 155, 247-256. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.03.050
69. Lu, W., Lou, J., Webster, C., Xue, F., Bao, Z. ve Chi, B. (2021a). Estimating construction waste generation in the Greater Bay Area, China using machine learning. Waste Management, 134, 78-88. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.08.012
70. Ma, L. ve Zhang, L. (2020). Evolutionary game analysis of construction waste recycling management in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 161, 1-10. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104863
71. Ma, M., Tam, V., Le, K.N. ve Li, W. (2020). Challenges in current construction and demolition waste recycling: a China study. Waste Management, 118, 610-625. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2020.09.030
72. Magalhaes, R.F., Danilevicz, A.M.F. ve Saurin, T.A. (2017). Reducing construction waste: A study of urban infrastructure projects. Waste Management, 67, 265-277. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2017.05.025
73. Marzouk, M. ve Azab, S. (2014). Environmental and economic impact assessment of construction and demolition waste disposal using system dynamics. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 82, 41-49. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.10.015
74. Maues, L.M.F., Nascimento, B.M.O., Lu, W. ve Xue, F. (2020). Estimating construction waste generation in residential buildings: A fuzzy set theory approach in the Brazilian Amazon. Journal of Cleaner Production, 265, 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121779
75. Menegaki, M. ve Damigos, D. (2018). A review on current situation and challenges of construction and demolition waste management. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 13, 8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.02.010
76. Mostafaeipour, A., Dehshiri, S.J.H., Dehshiri, S.S.H. ve Jahangiri, M. (2020). Prioritization of potential locations for harnessing wind energy to produce hydrogen in Afghanistan. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(58), 33169-33184. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.09.135
77. Nagapan, S., Rahman, I.A., Asmi, A. ve Adnan, N.F. (2013). Study of site's construction waste in Batu Pahat, Johor. Procedia Engineering, 53, 99-103. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.02.015
78. Ofori, G. (2015). Nature of the construction industry, its needs and its development: a review of four decades of research. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 20(2), 115-135. Erişim adresi: http://web.usm.my/jcdc/vol20_2_2015/JCDC%2020(2)%202015-Art.%207(115-135).pdf
79. Ogunmakinde, O.E., Egbelakin, T. ve Sher, W. (2022). Contributions of the circular economy to the UN sustainable development goals through sustainable construction. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 178, 1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106023
80. Oliviera, M.L.S., Izquierdo, M., Querol, X., Lieberman, R.N., Saikia, B.K. ve Silva, L.F.O. (2019). Nanoparticles from construction wastes: A problem to health and the environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 219, 236-243. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.096
81. Oluleye, B.I., Chan, D.W.M., Saka, A.B. ve Olawumi, T.O. (2022). Circular economy research on building construction and demolition waste: A review of current trends and future research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 357, 1-18. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131927
82. Ortiz, O., Pasqualino, J.C. ve Castells, F. (2010). Environmental performance of construction waste: Comparing three scenarios from a case study in Catalonia, Spain. Waste Management, 30(4), 646-654. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.11.013
83. Osmani, M. (2012). Construction waste minimization in the UK: Current pressures for change and approaches. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 37-40. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.158
84. Pajic, V., Andrejic, M. ve Kilibarda, M. (2022). Sustainable transportation mode selection from the freight forwarder’s perspective in trading with western EU countries. Sustainable Futures, 4, 1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.sftr.2022.100090
85. Pamucar, D.,Yazdani, M., Simo, M.J.M., Padilla, R.A.A. ve Mohammed, A. (2021). Multi-criteria decision analysis towards robust service quality measurement. Expert Systems with Applications, 170, 1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114508
86. Parkes, O., Lettieri, P. ve Bogle, I.D.L. (2016). Defining a quantitative framework for evaluation and optimisation of the environmental impacts of mega-event projects. Journal of Environmental Management, 167, 236-245. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.009
87. Rahman, I.A., Nagapan, S. ve Asmi, A. (2014). Initial PLS model of construction waste factors. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 129, 469-474. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.702
88. Rifai, J.A. ve Amoudi, O. (2016). Understanding the key factors of construction waste in Jordan. Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering, 10(2), 244-253. Erişim adresi: https://jjce.just.edu.jo/issues/paper.php?p=3540.pdf
89. Sapuay, S.E. (2016). Construction waste-potentials and constraints. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 35, 714-722. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2016.07.074
90. Saygın, Z.Ö. ve Kundakcı, N. (2020). Sağlık göstergeleri açısından OECD ülkelerinin EDAS ve ARAS yöntemleri ile değerlendirilmesi. Alanya Akademik Bakış, 4(3), 911-938. doi:10.29023/alanyaakademik.664883
91. Schitea, D., Deveci, M., Iordache, M., Bilgili, K., Akyurt, I.Z. ve Iordache, I. (2019). Hydrogen mobility roll-up site selection using intuitionistic fuzzy sets based WASPAS, COPRAS and EDAS. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(16), 8585-8600. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.02.011
92. Sepasgozar, S.M.E., Mair, D.F., Tahmasebinia, F., Shirowzhan, S., Li, H., Richter, A., Yang, L. ve Xu, S. (2021). Waste management and possible directions of utilising digital technologies in the construction context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 324, 1-27. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129095
93. Sobotka, A. ve Czaja, J. (2015). Analysis of the factors stimulating and conditioning application of reverse logistics in construction. Procedia Engineering, 122, 11-18. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.002
94. Su, Y. (2020). Multi-agent evolutionary game in the recycling utilization of construction waste. Science of The Total Environment, 738, 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139826
95. Swetha K.S., Tezeswi T.P. ve Kumar M.V.N.S. (2022). Implementing construction waste management in India: An extended theory of planned behaviour approach. Environmental Technology and Innovation, 27, 1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2022.102401
96. Tafesse, S., Girma, Y.E. ve Dessalegn, E. (2022). Analysis of the socio-economic and environmental impacts of construction waste and management practices. Heliyon, 8(3), 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09169
97. Tam, C.M., Tam, V.W.Y. ve Tsui, W.S. (2004). Green construction assessment for environmental management in the construction industry of Hong Kong. International Journal of Project Management, 22(7), 563-571. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.03.001
98. Udawatta, N., Zuo, J., Chiveralls, K. ve Zillante, G. (2015). Improving waste management in construction projects: An Australian study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 101, 73-83. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.003
99. Ulutaş, A. (2019). Entropi tabanlı EDAS yöntemi ile lojistik firmalarının performans analizi. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 23, 53-66. doi:10.18092/ulikidince.458754
100. Wahi, N., Joseph, C., Tawie, R. ve Ikzau, R. (2016). Critical review on construction waste control practices: Legislative and waste management perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 224, 276-283. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.460
101. Wang, J., Li, Z. ve Tam, V.W.Y. (2014). Critical factors in effective construction waste minimization at thedesign stage: A Shenzhen case study, China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 82, 1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.11.003
102. Wang, J., Yu, B., Tam, V.W.Y., Li, J. ve Xu, X. (2019). Critical factors affecting willingness of design units towards construction waste minimization: An empirical study in Shenzhen, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 221, 526-535. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.253
103. Wang, J., Yuan, H., Kang, X. ve Lu, W. (2010). Critical success factors for on-site sorting of construction waste: A china study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54(11), 931-936. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.01.012
104. Wu, W., Xie, L. ve Hao, J.L. (2022). An integrated trading platform for construction and demolition waste recovery in a circular economy. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, 25, 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.scp.2022.100597
105. Wu, Z., Yu, A.T.W., Shen, L. ve Liu, G. (2014). Quantifying construction and demolition waste: An analytical review. Waste Management, 34(9), 1683-1692. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2014.05.010
106. Xu, J., Lu, W., Ye, M., Xue, F., Zhang, X. ve Lee, B.F.P. (2020). Is the private sector more efficient? Big data analytics of construction waste management sectoral efficiency. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 155, 1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104674
107. Yang, Z., Xue, F. ve Lu, W. (2021). Handling missing data for construction waste management: machine learning based on aggregated waste generation behaviors. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 175, 1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105809
108. Ye, G., Yuan, H., Shend, L. ve Wange, H. (2012). Simulating effects of management measures on the improvement of the environmental performance of construction waste management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 62, 56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.01.010
109. Ying, L., Yin, Z., Guo, T. ve Zhou, J. (2011). Analysis and research of management policy of construction waste in Beijing. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 11(B), 906-911. doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2011.12.139
110. Yuan, H. (2012). A model for evaluating the social performance of construction waste management. Waste Management, 32(6), 1218-1228. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2012.01.028
111. Yuan, H. (2013). A SWOT analysis of successful construction waste management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 39, 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.016
112. Yücenur, G.N., Azakli, A.S., Bahadır, K., Tel, M.E. ve Arabacı, S.N. (2022). Prioritisation of industry 4.0 implementations in agricultural sector with SWARA/EDAS. International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Management and Informatics, 8(3), 326-344. doi:10.1504/IJSAMI.2022.125761
113. Zaharieva, R.H., Dimitrova, E. ve Bodin, F.B. (2003). Building waste management in Bulgaria: Challenges and opportunities. Waste Management, 23(8), 749-761. doi: 10.1016/S0956-053X(03)00037-0
114. Zhang, X. ve Ahmed, R.R. (2022). A queuing system for inert construction waste management on a reverse logistics network. Automation in Construction, 137, 1-14. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104221