ECO-POETICS OF CHARLES OLSON: AN ECOCRITICAL STUDY ON “THE KINGFISHERS”

Öz

This paper interprets Charles Olson’s poem, “The Kingfishers” (1949) through ecocritical lenses. Although not counted necessarily as an environmentalist, ecopoet or nature writer, many of Olson’s works can be scrutinized within the frame of Ecocriticism, which as a literary theory and critical approach emerging in the Western academia by the 1990s, is mainly defined as the “study of the relationship between the literature and the physical environment” (Glotfelty and Fromm, eds., 1996: xviii). Progressing towards an eco-centric universe rather than anthropocentric in alternative ways that will help continue interaction among species and lead to organic sustainability, Ecocriticism both as a method and practice aims to revitalize the literary conception and representation of human and non-human universes. On the other hand, what triggers Olson’s ecopoetics has been parallel to some of the basic tenets of Ecocriticism: Olson’s works demonstrate his critique of the Western logocentric thinking that undermines, exploits and silences nature as the non-human other. Moreover, his acknowledgement of the primordial cultures of Americas as well as his preoccupation with the fauna and flora of his hometown, Gloucester-Massachusetts serves as an example of “bio-regionalism” in connection with the larger spectrum. Thus, this paper handles the poem “The Kingfishers” with an ecocritical approach in trying to exemplify the ecological awareness in Charles Olson. The entanglement between verse and universe interpreted within Ecocritical discourse will be discussed in terms of subtitles such as “poetry as dwelling,” “bio-regionalism” and “the concept of interconnectedness and theory of rhizome” all of which render service to the ecocritical

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ecocriticism
• projective verse
• nature
• environment
• American poetry

Kaynakça

1. ADAMSON, J. & SCOTT, S. (2009). The Shoulders We Stand on: An Introduction to Ethnicity and Ecocriticism. MELUS. 34(2), Summer, http://www.jstor.org [Accessed Date: January 2021].
2. AKIMAN, O. (2012). Charles Olson’ın Maximus Şiirlerine Bakış. Journal of Faculty of Letters. 29(1), https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/articlefile/620158 [Accessed Date: January 2021].
3. ALLEN, D. & FRIEDLANDER, B., eds. (1997). Collected Prose of Charles Olson, CA: University of California Press.
4. ALTUG, Z. A. & DENİZARSLANI, Y. (2016). Fictions of Selves: Auto / Biographies of Gertrude Stein and Alice B. Toklas, Writing Women’s Lives: Auto / Biography, Life Narratives, Myths and Historiography, Birsen Talay Keşoğlu and Leyla Şimşek Rathke (eds.), İstanbul: Women’s Library and Information Center Foundation:835-840.
5. BATE, J. (2000). The Song of the Earth, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
6. BUELL, L., HEISE U., K., & THORNBER, K, (2011). Introduction: Literature and Environment. The Annual Review of Environment and Resources, No 36. 417-440, Literature and Environment | Annual Review of Environment and Resources
7. (annualreviews.org) [Accessed Date: January 2021]. .
8. CAFARO, P. (2001). Thoreau, Leopold, Carson: Toward an Environmental Virtue Ethics, Environmental Ethics. 22, Spring, [Accessed Date: January 2021].

9. DONNE, J. (1624). No Man is an Island, Devotions upon Emergent Occasions. ‘No Man is an Island’ - John Donne (dal.ca) [Accessed Date: January 2021].
10. DUNNING, K. (2013). From Environmental Poetry to Eco-poetry. www. from Environmental Poetry to Ecopoetry - PDF Free Download (docplayer.net) [Accessed Date: January 2021].
11. • EMERSON, R. W. (1844a). The Nature, Essays: .
12. Chp I. EMERSON - NATURE--Web text (vcu.edu) .
13. [Accessed Date: December 2020]. .
14. EMERSON, R. W. (1844b). The Poet, Essays: Second Series. EMERSON - ESSAYS - THE POET (vcu.edu) [Accessed Date: December 2020].
15. FOSTER, E. H. (1995). Understanding the Black Mountain Poets. South Carolina: The University of South Carolina press.
16. GILIOTT, B. C. (2018). Charles Olson’s ‘Projective Verse’ and the Inscription of the Breath. Humanities 7(4):108, (PDF) Charles Olson’s ‘Projective Verse’ and the Inscription of the Breath (researchgate.net) [Accessed Date: December 2020].
17. GLOTFELTY, C., & FROMM, E., eds. (1996). The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology., Athens: University of Georgia Press.
18. KENNY, H. (1976). Charles Olson: A Memoir. 2006. www.charles olson: a memoir [Accessed Date: December 2020].
19. LEOPOLD, A. (1949). A Sand County Almanac, Oxford: Oxford UP.
20. MAUD, R. (1998a). Charles Olson’s Archaic Postmodern, www.charlesolson.org/Files/archaic1. htm [Accessed Date: December 2020].
21. MAUD, R. (1998b). What Does Not Change: The Significance of Charles Olson’s ‘The Kingfishers’. London: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press. www.charlesolson.org/Files/archaic1.htm[Accessed Date: December 2020].
22. MARLAND, P. (2013), Ecocriticism, Literature Compass, No 10/11, John Wiley and Sons.
23. MC CARTHY, J. M. (2012). Beyond Romantic Nature, Journal of Environmental Shades, No 3 (2012). (PDF) Beyond Romantic Nature: Ecocriticism’s New Shades of Green | Jeffrey Mathes McCarthy - Academia.edu [Accessed Date: December 2020].
24. MORTON, T., (2007), Ecology without Nature,Cambridge: Harvard UP.
25. MULAZIMOGLU, M. (2003). Postmodern Projections on the Black Mountain Poetry. Thesis, (MA), Izmir, Ege University. The black mountain poetry: (ege.edu.tr)
26. NEIMANN, M. Playing in the Planetary Field, Ecopoetics, Hume and Osborne eds. www.books.google.com [Accessed Date: December 2020].
27. OLSON, C. (1983). I, Maximus of Gloucester, to You, The Maximus Poems, University of California Press, https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/47496/i-maximus-of-gloucester-to-you [Accessed Date: June 2020].
28. LSON, C. (1965). Human Universe. human Universe (Charles Olson) | Paul E Nelson. http://www.paulenelson.com [Accessed Date: June 2020].
29. OLSON, C., (1949), The Kingfishers, The Kingfishers by Charles Olson | Poetry Foundation The Kingfishers by Charles Olson| Poetry Foundation [Accessed Date: June 2020].
30. OLSON, C. (1950). Projective Verse, Poetry Foundation Projective Verse by Charles Olson |Poetry Foundation [Accessed Date: June 2020].
31. OPPERMANN, S. (2011). Ecocriticism’s Theoretical Discontents. MOSAIC, 44/2, www.JSTOR.com [Accessed Date: June 2020].
32. OPPERMANN, S. (1996). Ecocriticism: Natural World in the Literary Viewfinder. Hacettepe Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Ankara: Hacettepe UP, www.dergipark.org [Accessed Date: December2020].
33. OZDAG, U. (2014). Çevreci Eleştiriye Giriş: Doğa,Kültür, Edebiyat. Ankara: Ürün Yayınları, http://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/~ozdag/Cevreci_Elestiriye_Giris_Ufuk_Ozdag.pdf [Accessed Date: December2020].
34. OZDAG, U. (2005). Edebiyat ve Toprak Etiği: Amerikan Doğa Yazınında Leopold’cu Düşünce. Ankara: Ürün Yayınları, http://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/~ozdag/Edebiyat_ve_Toprak_Etigi_Ufuk_Ozdag.pdf [Accessed Date: December 2020].
35. PEARSON, A. (2010). The Ecopoetcis of Space:How Contemporary American Poetics Can Help Posthuman Navigate a Postnatural World, Thesis, (PhD), FSU Digital Library, diginole.lib.fsu.edu [Accessed Date: Date: December 2020].
36. PETERS, M. (2002). Earthsongs: Ecopoetics, Heidegger and Dwelling, The Trumpeter, (athabascau.ca) [Accessed Date: December 2020].
37. PIPPO, A. F. (2000). The Concept of Poiesis in Heidegger’s An Introduction to Metaphysics, (iwm.at) [Accessed Date: June 2020].
38. PREE, N. F. (2017). Spatial Poetics, Proprioception and Caring for Country in Charles Olson’s The Maximus Poems. Thesis, (Phd), Microsoft Word -
39. OLSON FULL DRAFT NO SIG.docx (core.ac.uk) [Accessed Date: June 2020].
40. RIGBY, K. (2004). Earth, World, Text: On the (Im)possibility of Ecopoiesis. JSTOR, www.JSTOR.com [Accessed Date: June 2020].
41. RIGBY, K. (nd). Ecocriticism, Literary and Cultural Criticism at the Twenty-First Century, ASLE, Julian Wolfreys, ed., ECOCRITICISM (asle.org) [Accessed Date: June 2020].
42. RUECKERT, W. (1996). Literature and Ecology, (squarespace.com) [Accessed Date: June 2020].
43. SCIGAJ, L. M. (1996). Contemporary Ecological and Environmental Poetry, ISLE. 3(2). WWW.JSTOR.ORG [Accessed Date: June 2020].
44. SCIGAJ, L. M. (2016). Contemporary Ecological and Environmental Poetry: Différance or Référance? WWW.JSTOR.ORG [Accessed Date: June 2020].
45. SHOPTAW, J. (2016). What is Ecopoetry? https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poetrymagazine/articles/70299/why-ecopoetry [Accessed Date: March 2021].
46. SKINNER, J. (nd). http://jacket2.org/commentary/jonathan-skinner [Accessed Date: March 2021].
47. STARNES, J. V. (2002). Prolegomena to the Study of Spatial Translations in The Maximus Poems, Thesis, (MA) BC: Uni of British Columbia, [Accessed Date: March 2021].
48. STEFON, M. (nd). Charles Olson, Britannica. http://www.Charles Olson | American poet | Britannica,[Accessed Date: March 2021].
49. STRANG, E. (2013). Habitude: Ecology of Poetry as (Im)possible Interconnection. (PDF) Habitude: Ecological Poetry As (Im)Possible (Inter) Connection | Em Strang - Academia.edu [Accessed Date: March 2021].
50. STORMONT, C. (nd). Charles Olson and the Nature of Destructive Humanism, www.bigbridge.org, [Accessed Date: March 2021].
51. TAHA, A. (2015). Charles Olson’s Historical Vision in “The Kingfishers,” Thesis, (PhD), Arts Journal, No 111, www.iasj.net [Accessed Date: March 2021].
52. TARLO, H. (nd). Women and Ecopoetics.” How2, https://www.asu.edu/pipercwcenter/how2journal/vol_3_no_2/ecopoetics/introstatements/tarlo_intro.html [Accessed Date: March 2021].
53. WORDSWORTH, W., (1800), Preface to Lyrical Ballads, The Harvard Classics, www.bartleby.com [Accessed Date: March 2021].
54. YAVAŞ, N. (2018). Ecocriticism and Magical Realism in Karen Tei Yamashita’s Through the Arc of the Rainforest, The Journal of Awareness, www.dergiPark.org [Accessed Date: March 2021].
55. ZAPF, H. (2016). Literature as Cultural Ecology, Bloomsbury Academic 2016, [Accessed Date: March 2021].