The role of skull anatomy in sensory perception in brachycephalic dog breeds

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 88 - 93, 31.08.2025

Mehmet Kartal , Şamil Sefergil , Rıfat Mutuş

Öz

The study aims to investigate the influence of brachycephalic skull morphology on sensory perception in selected dog breeds. Brachycephalic breeds, known for their distinct cranial structure, often exhibit unique sensory capabilities, which this study seeks to understand in relation to anatomical features. English, French Bulldogs and Pugs breeds were chosen due to their distinctive brachycephalic features and their popularity in this study. Sensory perception was assessed using a series of standardized tests targeting olfactory, visual, and auditory capabilities. These assessments were correlated with detailed cranial measurements obtained through 3D imaging and MRI scans. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the relationship between specific cranial features and sensory function. Preliminary findings suggest a significant correlation between certain aspects of brachycephalic skull morphology and altered sensory perception. Notably, reduced olfactory function was observed in breeds with more pronounced cranial shortening. Visual and auditory perceptions were also found to be affected by specific anatomical traits, with variability noted across different breeds. The study concludes that brachycephalic skull morphology plays a crucial role in shaping sensory perception in these dog breeds. The findings have implications for understanding the sensory limitations and welfare concerns associated with brachycephalic breeds, guiding future breeding and care practices.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dog , brachycephalic , skull , morphology , sensory perception

Kaynakça

• Auger, M., Alexander, K., Beauchamp, G.,& Dunn, M., (2016). Use of CT to evaluate and compare intranasal features in brachycephalic and normocephalic dogs. Journal of Small Animal Practice, 57(10), 529-536.
• Buzek, A., Serwańska-Leja, K., Zaworska-Zakrzewska, A., & Kasprowicz-Potocka, M. (2022). The shape of the nasal cavity and adaptations to sniffing in the dog (Canis familiaris) compared to other domesticated mammals: a review article. Animals, 12(4), 517.
• Choi, H. I., Lee, Y., Shin, H., Lee, S., Choi, S. S., Han, C. Y.,& Kwon, S. H. (2021). The formation and invariance of canine nose pattern of beagle dogs from early puppy to young adult periods. Animals, 11(9), 2664.
• Craven, B. A., Neuberger, T., Paterson, E. G., Webb, A. G., Josephson, E. M., Morrison, E. E., & Settles, G. S. (2007). Reconstruction and Morphometric Analysis of the Nasal Airway of the Dog (Canis familiaris) and Implications Regarding Olfactory Airflow. The Anatomical Record, 290 (11), 1325-1340.
• Grützenmacher, S., Robinson, D. M., Sevecke, J., Mlynski, G., & Beule, A. G. (2011). Comparative investigations of anatomy and physiology in mammalian noses (Homo sapiens–Artiodactyla). Rhinology, 49(1) 18-23.
• Jones, B. A., Stanley, B. J., Nelson, N. C., (2020). The impact of tongue dimension on air volume in brachycephalic dogs. Veterinary Surgery, 49(3), 512-520.
• Krainer, D., Dupré, G., (2022). Brachycephalic Airway Syndrome. The Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, 52(3), 749-780.
• Künzel, W., Breit, S., & Oppel, M. (2003). Morphometric Investigations of Breed‐Specific Features in Feline Skulls and Considerations on their Functional Implications. Anatomia Histologia Embryologia, 32(4), 218-223.
• Lippert, J. P., Reinhold, P., Smith, H. J., Nather, S. Y., Schlüter, C., & Oechtering, G. U. (2010). Geometry and function of the dog nose: how does function change when form of the nose is changed?, Pneumologie, 64(7), 452-453.
• Loo, S. K. (1973). A comparative study of the nasal fossa of four nonhuman primates. Folia Primatologica. (Basel), 20(5-6), 410-422.
• Meola, S. D. (2013). Brachycephalic airway syndrome. Topics in Companion Animal Medicine, 2(3), 91-96. Metwally, M. A., Hussieni, H. B., Kassab, A. A., & Eshrah, E. A. (2019). Comparative Anatomy of the Nasal Cavity in Buffaloes, Camels and Donkeys. Journal of Advanced Veterinary Research, 9(2), 69-75.
• Mitze, S., Barrs, V. R., Beatty, J A., Hobi, S., & Bęczkowski, P. M. (2022). Brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome: much more than a Structural characteristics of the nose in brachycephalic dog breeds analysed by computed tomography. Tierarztl. Prax. Ausg. K Klientiere Heimtiere, 35(3), 177-187.
• Oshita, R., Katayose, S., Kanai, E., Takagi, S. (2022). Assessment of nasal structure using CT imaging of brachycephalic dog breeds. Animals, 12(13), 1636.
• Packer, R. M. A., Hendricks, A., Tivers, M. S.,& Burn, C. C. (2015). Impact of facial conformation on canine health: Brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrom. PloS One, 10(10), e0137496.
• Polgár, Z., Kinnunen, M., Újváry, D., Miklósi, Á., & Gácsi, M. (2016). A test of canine olfactory capacity: Comparing various dog breeds and wolves in a natural detection task. PLoS One, 11(5), e0154087.
• Ravn-Mølby, E.-M., Sindahl, L., Nielsen, S. S., Bruun, C. S., Sandøe, P., & Fredholm, M. (2019). Breeding French bulldogs so that they breathe well—A long way to go. PLoS One, 14(12), e0226280.
• Sebbag, L., & Sanchez, R. F. (2023). The pandemic of ocular surface disease in brachycephalic dogs: The brachycephalic ocular syndrome. Veterinary Ophtalmology, 26, 31-46.
• Smith, T. D., & Rossie, J. B. (2008). Nasal fossa of mouse and dwarf lemurs (Primates, Cheirogaleidae). The Anatomical Record, 291(8), 895-915.
• Torregrosa, V., Petrucci, M., Pérez-Claros, J. A., & Palmqvist, P. (2010). Nasal aperture area and body mass in felids: ecophysiological implications and paleobiological inferences. Geobios, 43(6), 653-661.
• Wagner, F., Ruf, I. (2019). Who nose the borzoi? Turbinal skeleton in a dolichocephalic dog breed (Canis lupus familiaris). Mammalian Biology, 94, 106-119.
• Yee, K. K., Craven, B. A., Wysocki, C. J., Van Valkenburgh, B., (2016). Comparative morphology and histology of the nasal fossa in four mammals: gray squirrel, bobcat, coyote, and white‐tailed deer. The Anatomical Record, 299(7), 840-852.