Digital Lusternik-Schnirelmann category of digital functions

Year 2020, , 1414 - 1422, 06.08.2020

Tane Vergili , Ayse Borat

https://doi.org/10.15672/hujms.559796

Cited By: 3

Abstract

Roughly speaking, the digital Lusternik-Schnirelmann category of digital images studies how far a digital image is away from being digitally contractible. The digital Lusternik-Schnirelmann category (digital LS category, for short) is defined in [A. Borat and T. Vergili, Digital Lusternik-Schnirelmann category, Turkish J. Math. 2018]. In this paper, we introduce the digital LS category of digital functions. We will give some basic properties and discuss how this new concept will behave if we change the adjacency relation in the domain and in the image of the digital function and discuss its relation with the digital LS category of a digital image.

Keywords

Lusternik-Schnirelmann category, Digital topology, digital LS category

References

• [1] J.I. Berstein and T. Ganea, The category of a map and of a cohomology class, Fund. Math. 50, 265–279, 1961.
• [2] C. Berge, Graphs and hypergraphs, 2nd edition, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1976.
• [3] A. Borat and T. Vergili, Digital Lusternik-Schnirelmann category, Turkish J. Math. 42 (4), 1845–1852, 2018.
• [4] L. Boxer, Digitally continuous functions, Pattern Recognit. Lett. 15, 833–839, 1994.
• [5] L. Boxer, A classical construction for the digital fundamental group, J. Math. Imaging Vision, 10, 51–62, 1999.
• [6] L. Boxer, Properties of digital homotopy, J. Math. Imaging Vision, 22, 19–26, 2005.
• [7] L. Boxer, Homotopy properties of sphere-like digital images, J. Math. Imaging Vision, 24, 167–175, 2006.
• [8] L. Boxer, Digital Products, Wedges, and Covering Spaces, J. Math. Imaging Vision, 25, 159–171, 2006.
• [9] L. Boxer, Continuous maps on digital simple closed curves, Appl. Math. 1, 377–386, 2010.
• [10] L. Boxer, Alternate Product Adjacencies in Digital Topology, Appl. Gen. Topol. 19 (1), 21–53, 2018.
• [11] O. Cornea, G. Lupton, J. Oprea and D. Tanre, Lusternik-Schnirelmann category, in: Mathematical Surveys and Monographs Vol. 103, American Mathematical Society, 2003.
• [12] T.T. Dieck, Algebraic Topology, European Mathematical Society, 2008.
• [13] M. Farber, Topological complexity of motion planning, Discrete Comput. Geom. 29, 211–221, 2003.
• [14] R.H. Fox, On the Lusternik-Schnirelmann category, Ann. of Math. 42, 333–370, 1941.
• [15] S.E. Han, Computer topology and its applications, Honam Math. J. 25, 153–162, 2003.
• [16] S.E. Han, Non-product property of the digital fundamental group, Inform. Sci. 171 (1-3), 73–91, 2005.
• [17] G.T. Herman, Oriented surfaces in digital spaces, CVGIP: Graphical Models and Image Processing, 55, 381–396, 1993.
• [18] I.M. James, On category in the sense of Lusternik-Schnirelmann, Topology, 17, 331– 348, 1978.
• [19] I. Karaca and M. Is, Digital topological complexity numbers, Turkish J. Math. 42 (6), 3173–3181, 2018.
• [20] E. Khalimsky, Motion, deformation, and homotopy in finite spaces, Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 227–234, 1987.
• [21] L. Lusternik and L. Schnirelmann, Methodes topologiques dans les problemes variationnels, Institute for Mathematics and Mechanics, Moscow, 1930. (In Russian)
• [22] G. Sabidussi, Graph multiplication, Math. Z. 72, 446–457, 1960.
• [23] N.A. Scoville and W. Swei, On the Lusternik-Schnirelmann category of a simplicial map, Topology Appl. 216, 116–128, 2017.
• [24] D. Stanley, On the Lusternik-Schnirelmann category of maps, Canad. J. Math. 54 (3), 608–633, 2002.