BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Agreement plus Disagreement Model for Agreement Data

Yıl 2011, Cilt: 40 Sayı: 4, 609 - 616, 01.04.2011

Kaynakça

  • Agresti, A. A model for agreement between ratings on an ordinal scale, Biometrics 44, 539–548, 1988. [2] Agresti, A. Categorical Data Analysis (Wiley, New York, 2002).
  • Bangwidala, S. A graphical test for observer agreement, Proceedings of the 45thInterna- tional Statistical Institute Meeting, Amsterdam, 1, 307–308, 1985.
  • Becker, M. P. Using association models to analyse agreement data: two examples, Statistics in Medicine 8, 1199–1207, 1989.
  • Cohen, J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales, Educational and Psychological Measurement 20, 37–46, 1960.
  • Cohen, J. Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit, Psychological Bulletin 70, 213–220, 1968.
  • Fleiss, J. L., Cohen, J. and Everitt, B. S. Large sample standard errors of κ and weighted κ, Psychological Bulletin 72, 323–327, 1969.
  • Goodman L. A. Simple models for the analysis of association in cross-classifications having ordered categories, Journal of American Statistical Association 74, 537–553, 1979.
  • Landis, J. R. and Koch, G. G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, Biometrics 33, 159–174, 1977.
  • Schuster C. and Von Eye, A. Models for ordinal agreement data, Biometrical Journal 43 (7), 795–808, 2001. [11] Tanner, M. A. and Young, M. A. Modeling agreement among raters, Journal of American Statistical Association 80, 175–180, 1985.
  • Tanner, M. A. and Young, M. A. Modeling ordinal scale disagreement, Psychological Bulletin 98(2), 408–415, 1985.
  • von Eye, A. and Von Eye, M. Can one use Cohen’s kappa to examine disagreement? Methodology 1 (4), 129–142, 2005.
  • von Eye, A. An alternative to Cohen’s κ, European Psychologist 11 (1), 12–24, 2006.

Agreement plus Disagreement Model for Agreement Data

Yıl 2011, Cilt: 40 Sayı: 4, 609 - 616, 01.04.2011

Kaynakça

  • Agresti, A. A model for agreement between ratings on an ordinal scale, Biometrics 44, 539–548, 1988. [2] Agresti, A. Categorical Data Analysis (Wiley, New York, 2002).
  • Bangwidala, S. A graphical test for observer agreement, Proceedings of the 45thInterna- tional Statistical Institute Meeting, Amsterdam, 1, 307–308, 1985.
  • Becker, M. P. Using association models to analyse agreement data: two examples, Statistics in Medicine 8, 1199–1207, 1989.
  • Cohen, J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales, Educational and Psychological Measurement 20, 37–46, 1960.
  • Cohen, J. Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit, Psychological Bulletin 70, 213–220, 1968.
  • Fleiss, J. L., Cohen, J. and Everitt, B. S. Large sample standard errors of κ and weighted κ, Psychological Bulletin 72, 323–327, 1969.
  • Goodman L. A. Simple models for the analysis of association in cross-classifications having ordered categories, Journal of American Statistical Association 74, 537–553, 1979.
  • Landis, J. R. and Koch, G. G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, Biometrics 33, 159–174, 1977.
  • Schuster C. and Von Eye, A. Models for ordinal agreement data, Biometrical Journal 43 (7), 795–808, 2001. [11] Tanner, M. A. and Young, M. A. Modeling agreement among raters, Journal of American Statistical Association 80, 175–180, 1985.
  • Tanner, M. A. and Young, M. A. Modeling ordinal scale disagreement, Psychological Bulletin 98(2), 408–415, 1985.
  • von Eye, A. and Von Eye, M. Can one use Cohen’s kappa to examine disagreement? Methodology 1 (4), 129–142, 2005.
  • von Eye, A. An alternative to Cohen’s κ, European Psychologist 11 (1), 12–24, 2006.
Toplam 12 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Matematik
Yazarlar

Tülay Saraçbaşı Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Nisan 2011
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2011 Cilt: 40 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA Saraçbaşı, T. (2011). Agreement plus Disagreement Model for Agreement Data. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 40(4), 609-616.
AMA Saraçbaşı T. Agreement plus Disagreement Model for Agreement Data. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics. Nisan 2011;40(4):609-616.
Chicago Saraçbaşı, Tülay. “Agreement Plus Disagreement Model for Agreement Data”. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics 40, sy. 4 (Nisan 2011): 609-16.
EndNote Saraçbaşı T (01 Nisan 2011) Agreement plus Disagreement Model for Agreement Data. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics 40 4 609–616.
IEEE T. Saraçbaşı, “Agreement plus Disagreement Model for Agreement Data”, Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, c. 40, sy. 4, ss. 609–616, 2011.
ISNAD Saraçbaşı, Tülay. “Agreement Plus Disagreement Model for Agreement Data”. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics 40/4 (Nisan 2011), 609-616.
JAMA Saraçbaşı T. Agreement plus Disagreement Model for Agreement Data. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics. 2011;40:609–616.
MLA Saraçbaşı, Tülay. “Agreement Plus Disagreement Model for Agreement Data”. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, c. 40, sy. 4, 2011, ss. 609-16.
Vancouver Saraçbaşı T. Agreement plus Disagreement Model for Agreement Data. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics. 2011;40(4):609-16.