Doğumda Empatik İletişimin Büyüsü

Öz

Ebelik, yardım temelli profesyonel bakımın yanı sıra etkili ve insana odaklı iletişim becerilerini gerektiren bir sağlık disiplinidir. Bu bağlamda empati, ebelik uygulamalarının merkezinde yer almakta ve gebelerin fiziksel, duygusal ve bilişsel gereksinimlerinin doğru şekilde değerlendirilmesini sağlayan temel bir kavram olarak önem kazanmaktadır. Literatür, empatik iletişimin doğum sürecine katılan kadınlarda güven duygusunu artırdığını, stres ve kaygıyı azalttığını ve bakım memnuniyetini belirgin şekilde yükselttiğini göstermektedir. Anne adaylarının ebelerden beklentileri incelendiğinde ise gülümseme, terapötik temas, etkin ve yargılayıcı olmayan dinleme, anlaşılır ve sade bir dilde iletişim kurma, cesaretlendirme ve yeterli bilgilendirme gibi empati temelli yaklaşımların ön plana çıktığı görülmektedir. Bu unsurlar, ebelik bakımının yalnızca teknik boyutunu değil, aynı zamanda holistik, destekleyici ve güven verici doğasını da şekillendiren kritik bileşenlerdir. Bu derleme, empatinin ebelik pratiğindeki rolünü bütüncül bir bakış açısıyla ele alarak, ebelerin iletişim becerilerinin güçlendirilmesinin anne sağlığı sonuçlarını iyileştirmede ve doğum deneyimini olumlu yönde biçimlendirmede önemli bir etkiye sahip olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ebelik
• Empati
• İletişim
• Anne Bakımı
• Destekleyici Yaklaşım
• Gebe Kadınların Beklentileri
• Empatik İletişim

The Magic of Empathic Communication in Labour

Öz

Midwifery is a health discipline grounded in professional, compassionate care and effective, person-centered communication. Within this context, empathy stands at the core of midwifery practice, serving as a fundamental concept that enables the accurate assessment of pregnant women’s physical, emotional, and cognitive needs. The literature indicates that empathic communication enhances women’s sense of safety during the childbirth process, reduces stress and anxiety, and significantly increases satisfaction with care. Expectations of pregnant women toward midwives commonly include smiling, therapeutic touch, active and nonjudgmental listening, communicating in clear and understandable language, providing encouragement, and offering adequate information—elements that reflect an empathy-based approach. These components shape not only the technical dimension of midwifery care but also its holistic, supportive, and trust-enhancing nature. This review highlights the central role of empathy in midwifery practice and demonstrates that strengthening midwives’ communication skills has a substantial impact on improving maternal health outcomes and fostering a more positive childbirth experience.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Midwifery
• Empathy
• Communication
• Maternal Care
• Supportive Approach
• Pregnant Women’s Expectations
• Empathic Communication

Kaynakça

1. Altıntaş ÜH, Mete MM. The mediating effect of personality traits on the effect of coping with stress on empathic tendency behaviour in healthcare workers. Eurasian Econometrics Statistics & Empirical Economics Journal. 2023;(23):25-36. http://doi.org/10.17740/eas.stat.2023-V23-03
2. Turkish Language Association. Main dictionary of science and art terms. Available from: https://tdk.gov.tr/ [Accessed May 23, 2025].
3. Dökmen Ü. Communication Conflicts and Empathy in Art and Daily Life. 4th ed. Istanbul: Sistem Publishing; 2019.
4. Özmen E, Yüksel E. Self-recognition of patients and relatives for health professionals. In: Yüksel E, Özmen E, editors. Special Interest Groups in Health Services and Communication with Disadvantaged Groups. Konya: Literatürk Academia; 2022. p. 37-56.
5. Bremnes HS, Wiig AK, Abeid M, Darj E. Challenges in day-to-day midwifery practice: A qualitative study from a regional referral hospital in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Global Health Action. 2018;11(1):1453333. http://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2018.1453333
6. Kartal YA, Aker S. Investigation of the relationship between midwifery students’ empathic tendencies and altruism levels. Samsun Journal of Health Sciences. 2020;5(2):97-102.
7. Deligianni A, Kyriakidou M, Kaba E, Kelesi M, Rovithis M, Fasoi G, et al. Empathy equals: The meaning of empathy as perceived by Greek nursing students: A qualitative study. Global Journal of Health Science. 2017;9(1):171-180. http://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v9n1p171
8. Papouli E. Diversity dolls: A creative teaching method for encouraging social work students to develop empathy and understanding for vulnerable populations. Social Work Education. 2018;38(2):241-260. http://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2018.1515904

9. Yüksel E. My Daughter, I Tell You, I Read, You Understand. Konya: Literatürk; 2021.
10. Pohontsch NJ, Stark A, Ehrhardt M, Kötter T, Scherer M. Influences on students’ empathy in medical education: An exploratory interview study with medical students in their third and last year. BMC Medical Education. 2018;18:231. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1335-7
11. Eriksson K, Englander M. Empathy in social work. Journal of Social Work Education. 2017;53(4):607-621. http://doi.org/10.4467/24496138ZPS.20.022.12366
12. Moudatsou M, Stavropoulou A, Philalithis A, Koukouli S. The role of empathy in health and social care professionals. Healthcare. 2020;8(1):26. http://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8010026
13. Schafer J, Karlins M. The 13 Rules of Effective Communication. Peterson E, translator. Istanbul: Koridor Publishing; 2017.
14. Puff R, Seghers J. Anger Management Guide. 8th ed. Tamer T, translator. Istanbul: Olimpos Publishing; 2020.
15. Deligianni A, Kyriakidou M, Kaba E, Kelesi M, Rovithis M, Fasoi G, et al. Empathy equals: The meaning of empathy as perceived by Greek nursing students: A qualitative study. Global Journal of Health Science. 2017;9:171-180. http://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v9n1p171
16. Gökçe İG. Sustaining psychological well-being in childbirth. In: Aktaş S, Derya Y, Toker E, editors. A’dan Z’ye Temel Ebelik. Istanbul: Istanbul Tıp Kitabevleri; 2023. p. 1230-1243.
17. Olza I, Leahy-Warren P, Benyamini Y, Kazmierczak M, Karlsdottir SI, Spyridou A, et al. Women’s psychological experiences of physiological birth: A meta-synthesis. BMJ Open. 2018;8(10):e020347. http://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020347
18. Shamoradifar Z, Asghari-Jafarabadi M, Nourizadeh R, Mehbari E, Areshtanab HN, Haigan HS. The impact of effective communication-based care on the childbirth experience and satisfaction among primiparous women: An experimental study. Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association. 2022;97(1):1-9. http://doi.org/10.1186/s42506-022-00108-2
19. Turan Z, Suveren Y, Vural G. A qualitative study on the expectations and experiences of mothers during the childbirth process in Western Anatolia, Türkiye. Women & Health. 2017;62(5):444-453. http://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2021.1884517
20. Toker E, Aktaş S. The childbirth experiences of Syrian refugee mothers living in Türkiye: A qualitative study. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 2021;39(5):544-560. http://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2021.1913487
21. Aktaş S, Alemdar KD. Why mothers with midwifery-led vaginal births recommend that mode of birth: A qualitative study. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 2024:1-22. http://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2024.2328765
22. Esan DT, Thomas OC, Adedeji OA, Ogunkorode A, Owoeye ID. Tokophobia experience and its impact on birth choices among Nigerian women: A qualitative exploratory study. Pan African Medical Journal. 2021;39:282. http://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2021.39.282.27229
23. Unutkan A, Elem E, Durmaz A. Transformation of experience into knowledge: Investigation of midwifery students’ reflection reports: Qualitative research. Türkiye Klinikleri Journal of Health Sciences. 2021;7(1). http://doi.org/10.5336/healthsci.2021-83001
24. Yılmaz E, Nazik F. The correlation between perception of birth and nursing care levels of mothers. Journal of Gynecology-Obstetrics and Neonatology. 2018;15(2):52-56. http://doi.org/10.37990/medr.1287603
25. Aanestad M, Herstad Severinsen E. A meta-ethnographic synthesis of qualitative research on women’s experience of midwifery care. Nursing & Health Sciences. 2020;22(2):171-183. http://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12714
26. Taşkın L. Labour action. In: Obstetrics and Women’s Health Nursing. 16th ed. Ankara: Akademisyen Kitabevi; 2020. p. 281-295.
27. International Confederation of Midwives. International Definition of the Midwife. 2017. Available from: https://internationalmidwives.org/ [Accessed Aug 19, 2024].
28. Anna MA, Olga CV, Rocio CS, Isabel SP, Xavier ET, Pablo RC, et al. Midwives’ experience of the factors that facilitate normal birth among low-risk women in public hospitals in Catalonia (Spain). Midwifery. 2020;88:102752. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2020.102752
29. Lotshaw RR, Philippi JC, Buxton M, McNeill-Simaan E, Newton JM. A collaborative model of a community birth center and a tertiary care medical center. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2020;135(3):696-702. http://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003723
30. Lundgren Dencker A, Bergqvist L, Olafsdottir OA. Implementation of a midwifery model of woman-centered care in practice: Impact on oxytocin use and childbirth experience. European Journal of Midwifery. 2022;6. http://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/146084
31. Attarha M, Keshavarz Bakhtiari M, Jamilian M. The outcome of midwife-mother relationship in delivery room: A qualitative content analysis. Health. 2016;8(4):336. http://doi.org/10.4236/health.2016.84035
32. Gökşin İ, Ayaz Alkaya S. The effect of progressive muscle relaxation on the postpartum depression risk and general comfort levels in primiparas. Stress and Health. 2020;36(3):322-329. http://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2921
33. Bassah N, Nkengbeza NF, Ambe NC, Ebob-Anya BA. Postpartum mothers’ perspectives of comfort measures used by nurses and midwives during labor and delivery in a secondary level hospital maternity in Cameroon. Asian Research Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2024;3(2):31-37. Available from: https://journalarjgo.com/index.php/ARJGO/article/view/35
34. Baranowska B, Pawlicka-Kiesnowska I, Misztal A, Kajdy A, Sys D, Doroszewska A. Women’s needs and satisfaction regarding communication with doctors and midwives during labour, delivery and early postpartum. Healthcare. 2021;9(4):382. http://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9040382
35. Sipasulta N, Imamah IN, Tanihatu GE. Experiences and expectations of postpartum mothers toward psychosocial nursing services for mothers who have experienced postpartum blues in the city of Balikpapan. Pharmacognosy Journal. 2023;15(3):471-478. http://doi.org/10.5530/pj.2023.15.104
36. Finlayson K, Crossland N, Bonet M, Downe S. What matters to women in the postnatal period: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(4):e0231415. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231415
37. Malalagama AS. Lack of effective communication by the staff as a risk factor of postpartum blues in an obstetric unit of a base hospital in Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka Journal of Psychiatry. 2018;9(1):15-19. http://doi.org/10.4038/sljpsyc.v9i1.8176
38. Özkahraman Koç Ş. Psychosocial adaptation in the postnatal period. In: Yeşilçiçek Çalık K, Çoşar Çetin F, editors. Normal Birth and Postnatal Period. Ankara: Nobel Medical Bookstores; 2021. p. 299-310.
39. Asadi M, Noroozi M, Alavi M. Exploring experiences related to postpartum changes: Perspectives of mothers and healthcare providers in Iran. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2021;21(7):2-8. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03504-8