YouTube® Platformunda Sunulan El Yapımı Maske Videolarının COVID-19 Pandemisinde Güvenilirliği

Öz

Giriş: Bu çalışmada YouTube® üzerinden yayınlanan el yapımı maskeler ile ilgili eğitici videoların Hastalık Kontrol ve Önleme Merkezleri (CDC) ve Dünya Sağlık Örgütü (WHO) tarafından yayınlanan kriterlere uygun olup olmadığını belirlemeyi amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada, 01 Ocak 2020 - 01 Nisan 2020 tarihleri arasında YouTube®'da “DIY mask, handmade mask, fabric mask” anahtar kelimeleri ile yapılan arama sonucunda elde edilen 184 video incelenmiştir. Videolar WHO ve CDC tarafından önerilen kriterlere göre kategorilere ayrılmıştır. Toplam üye, görüntüleme, beğenme, beğenmeme, yapılan yorumlar, video kaynakları ve yükleme tarihi gibi izleyici parametreleri değerlendirildi. Bulgular: El yapımı maskelerle ilgili eğitici YouTube® videolarının %66,8'i (n=123) zanaat-kendin yap-eğitici sayfalar tarafından yüklendiği, %57.1'inin (n=105) dikiş yöntemini içerdiği, %97,3'ünün (n=179) uygun olmayan malzeme içerdiği saptandı. Videoların %98,4'ünün (n=181) CDC direktiflerine uygun olmadığı, %99,5'inde (n=183) sıvıya dayanıklı olmayan malzeme kullandığı, %78,3'ünde (n=144) ağza temas edecek şekilde yapılan maskeler içerdiği ve %95,7'sinde % (n=176) yüz ve maske arasında boşluklar içeriyordu. Sonuç: YouTube®'da yayınlanan el yapımı maskeler hakkındaki videoların güvenilir bilgi kaynağı olmadıkları saptandı.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Hastalık Kontrol ve Önleme Merkezi
• Eğitim Filmleri ve Videoları
• Maskeler
• Sosyal Medya.
• Hastalık Kontrol ve Önleme Merkezi, Eğitim Filmleri ve Videoları, Maskeler, Sosyal Medya.

The Reliability of Handmade Mask Videos Presented on YouTube® Platform in COVID-19 Pandemic

Öz

Abstract Introduction: In this study, we aimed to determine whether these instructive videos on handmade masks published on YouTube® are compatible with the criteria issued by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and World Health Organization (WHO). Material and Methods: The present study investigated 184 videos yielded by a search on YouTube® with the keywords ‘‘DIY mask, handmade mask, fabric mask’’ during the period from January 01, 2020 to April 01, 2020. The videos were categorized according to the criteria recommended by WHO and CDC. Audience interest parameters such as total members, views, likes, dislikes, comments made, video sources and upload date were evaluated. Results: 66.8% (n=123) of the instructive YouTube® videos concerning handmade masks were uploaded by craft-DIY-tutorial pages, 57.1% (n=105) included the sewing method, 97.3% (n=179) included unsuitable material usage as per CDC, 98.4% (n=181) were not compatible with CDC directives, 99.5% (n=183) used non-fluid-resistant material, 78.3% (n=144) involved masks that collapse against the mouth and 95.7% (n=176) involved gaps between the face and the mask. Conclusions: We found that the videos published on YouTube® are not reliable sources of information about handmade masks.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
• Instructional Films and Videos
• Masks
• Social Media
• Obstetrics
• Gynecology.

Kaynakça

1. [1] Wang C, Horby PW, Hayden FG, Gao GF. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. The Lancet. 2020;395:470-473. doi: 10. 1016/S0140-6736(20)30185-9.
2. [2] Singhal T. A review of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). The Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 2020;87:281-286. doi: 10.1007/s12098-020-03263-6.
3. [3] World Health Organization (WHO). Water, Sanitation, Hygiene and Waste Management for COVID-19 [WHO website].https://www.who.int/publicationsdetail/water-sanitation-hygiene-and-wastemanagement-for-covid-19. Accessed April 11, 2020.
4. [4] World Health Organization (WHO). Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Outbreak [WHO website]. https://www.who.int/westernpacific/emergencies/covid-19. Accessed April 11, 2020.
5. [5] World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Consultation on Priority Public Health Interventions Before and During an Influenza Pandemic [WHO website]. 2004. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/232425/WER7911_107-108.PDF?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed April 11, 2020.
6. [6] Yassa M, Birol P, Mutlu AM, Tekin AB, Sandal K, Tug N. Lung Ultrasound Can Influence the Clinical Treatment of Pregnant Women with COVID-19. J Ultrasound Med. 2020;9999:1–13. doi: 10.1002/jum.15367.
7. [7] Dursun P, Dervisoglu H, Daggez M, et al. Performing gynecologic cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey: A multicenter retrospective observational study. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2020 [preprint]. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13296.
8. [8] World Health Organization (WHO). Advice on the Use of Masks in the Context of COVID-19 [WHO website]. 2020. https://www.who.int/publications-detail/advice-on-the-use-of-masks-in-thecommunity-during-home-care-and-in-healthcare-settings-in-the-context-of-the-novelcoronavirus-(2019-ncov)-outbreak. Accessed April 11, 2020.

9. [9] Wang M, Zhou M, Ji G, et al. Mask crisis during the COVID-19 outbreak. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences. 2020;24:3397-3399. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202003_20707.
10. [10] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Use of Cloth Face Coverings to Help Slow the Spread of COVID-19 [CDC website]. 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/diy-cloth-face-coverings.html. Accessed April 11, 2020.
11. [11] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Recommendation Regarding the Use of Cloth Face Coverings, Especially in Areas of Significant Community-Based Transmission [CDC website]. 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/cloth-face-cover.html. Accessed April 11, 2020.
12. [12] Perrin A, Duggan M. Americans’ Internet Access: 2000-2015, Vol. 2019. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center [website]. 2015. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2015/06/26/americans-internet-access-2000-2015/. Accessed April 11, 2020.
13. [13] YouTube®. Statistics for YouTube® [YouTube® website]. https://www.YouTube® .com/about/press/. Accessed April 11, 2020.
14. [14] Erdem MN, Karaca S. Evaluating the accuracy and quality of the information in kyphosis videos shared on YouTube®.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43:e1334-e1339. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002691.
15. [15] World Health Organization (WHO). Personal protective equipment for use in a filovirus disease outbreak: rapid advice guideline [WHO website].2016.https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/251426. Accessed April 11, 2020.
16. [16] Van Der Sande M, Teunis P, Sabel R. Professional and homemade face masks reduce exposure to respiratory infections among the general population. Plos One. 2008;3:e2618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002618.
17. [17] Balazy A, Toivola M, Adhikari A, Sivasubramani SK., Reponen T, Grinshpun SA. Do N95 respirators provide 95% protection level against airborne viruses, and how adequate are surgical masks?. American Journal of Infection Control. 2006;34:51-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2005.08.018.
18. [18] Davies A, Thompson KA, Giri K, Kafatos G, Walker J, Bennett A. Testing the efficacy of homemade masks: would they protect in an influenza pandemic?. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparednesss. 2013;7:413-418. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2013.43.
19. [19] Cox C. The Aerobiological Pathway of Microorganisms. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 1987. doi: 10.1002/abio.370080416.
20. [20] Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. The Lancet. 2020;395:507-513. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7.
21. [21] Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020;382:727-733. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017.
22. [22] Kaya C, Usta T, Baghaki HS, Oral E. Relation between educational reliability and viewer interest in YouTube® videos depicting endometrioma cystectomy surgical techniques. Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction. 2020 [preprint]. doi:10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101808.
23. [23] Orhan A, Gokturk GG, Ozerkan K, Kasapoglu I, Aslan K, Uncu G. Mesh complications on YouTube. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2020;252:144–149. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.06.040.
24. [24] Şahin A, Şahin M, Türkcü FM. YouTube® as a source of information in retinopathy of prematurity. Ir J Med Sci. 2019;188:613-617. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1902-2.
25. [25] Brooks FM, Lawrence H, Jones A, McCarthy MJ. YouTube® ™ as a source of patient information for lumbar discectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014;96:144-146. doi: 10.1308/003588414X13814021676396.
26. [26] Madathil KC, Rivera Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube® : A systematic review. Health Informatics J. 2015;21:173-194. doi: 10.1177/1460458213512220.
27. [27] Ocak U. Evaluation of the Content, Quality, Reliability and Accuracy of YouTube® Videos Regarding Endotracheal Intubation Techniques. Niger. J Clin Pract. 2018;21:1651-1655. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_207_18.
28. [28] Bezner SK, Hodgman EI, Diesen DL, et al. Pediatric surgery on YouTube® ™: Is the truth out there?. J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49:586-589. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.08.004.
29. [29] Shires CB, Wilson CD, Sebelik M. Thyroid surgery YouTube® videos: estimating quality by surgeon characteristics and view rate. Gland Surg. 2019;8:207-211. doi: 10.21037/gs.2018.10.01.
30. [30] Lee JS, Seo HS, Hong TH. YouTube® as a source of patient information on gallstone disease. World Journal of Gastroenterology: WJG. 2014;20:4066-4070. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i14.4066.