Kekemelik hakkında bilgi kaynağı olarak YouTube

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3, 637 - 654, 31.12.2021

Özlem Cangökçe Yaşar Namık Yücel Birol İbrahim Erensoy

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, YouTubeTM platformunda yer alan Türkçe kaynaklı kekemelik ile ilgili videoların içerik ve kalitesini değerlendirmek amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: “Kekemelik”, “kekemelik tedavisi” ve “kekemelik terapisi” anahtar sözcükleri kullanılarak YouTubeTM araması yapılmıştır. Yapılan ön elemenin ardından180 video analiz edilmiştir. Videolar, kekemelik hakkında bilgi verenler ve videoların hitap ettiği popülasyona göre gruplandırılmıştır. Videoların analizinde modifiye DISCERN, Global Quality Scale (GQS), Journal of American Medical Association Benchmark Criteria (JAMAS), Video Power Index (VPI) ve modifiye Patient Education Materials Tool (PEMAT) kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Dil ve Konuşma Terapistleri tarafından yüklenen videoların eğitsel değer, video kalitesi, bilgi güvenirliği, işitsel-görsel kalite açısından daha iyi olduğu ancak popülaritesinin düşük olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın sonuçlarından yola çıkarak, bireylerin medya kullanımına yönelik okullarda bilgilendirilmesinin, sağlık alanında doğru bilgiye ulaşma yolları hakkında eğitim verilmesinin kekemelik hakkında doğru bilgiye ulaşmada katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

YouTube, kekemelik, internet

Destekleyen Kurum

yok

Proje Numarası

yok

Teşekkür

yok

YouTube as an Information Source for Stuttering

Öz

Objective: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the content and quality of Turkish-related stuttering videos on YouTubeTM. Materials and Methods: A YouTubeTM search was conducted using the keywords "stuttering", "stuttering treatment" and "stuttering therapy". After the initial elimination totally 180 videos were analysed. Videos were grouped according to the information given and the population addressed by the videos. Modified DISCERN, Global Quality Scale (GQS), Journal of American Medical Association Benchmark Criteria (JAMAS), Video Power Index (VPI) and modified Patient Education Materials Tool (PEMAT) were used to analyze the videos. Results: It has been determined that the videos uploaded by Speech and Language Therapists are better in terms of educational value, video quality, information reliability and audio-visual quality, but low in popularity. Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, it was thought that informing individuals about the use of media in schools and providing education for the ways to reach the right information for stuttering would contribute.

Anahtar Kelimeler

stuttering, youtube, internet

Proje Numarası

yok

Kaynakça

• Bernard, A., Langille, M., Hughes, S., Rose, C., Leddin, D., & Van Zanten, S. V. (2007). A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web. Official journal of the American College of Gastroenterology| ACG, 102(9), 2070-2077. Busser, R. D., Groffi, M., Hoffbauer, K., Borght, E. V. D., & Toelen, J. (2019). Assessment of the educational quality of lumbar puncture instruction videos on YouTube.
• Carlhed C, Björck-Åkesson E, Granlund M. Parent perspectives on early intervention: the paradox of needs and rights. Br J Dev Disabil. 2012; 49(97): 69–80.
• Charnock, D., Shepperd, S., Needham, G., & Gann, R. (1999). DISCERN: An instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 53, 105–110.
• Desai, T., Shariff, A., Dhingra, V., Minhas, D., Eure, M., & Kats, M. (2013). Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public's response to medical videos on YouTube. PLoS One, 8(12), e82469
• Donaher, J., & Minkoff, C. (2014). The portrayal of stuttering on YouTube. Perspectives on Fluency and Fluency Disorders, 24(1), 20-25.
• Erdem, M. N., & Karaca, S. (2018). Evaluating the accuracy and quality of the information in kyphosis videos shared on YouTube. Spine, 43(22), E1334-E1339.
• Enver, N., Doruk, C., Kara, H., Gürol, E., Incaz, S., & Mamadova, U. (2020). YouTube™ as an information source for larynx cancer: a systematic review of video content. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 277(7), 2061-2069.
• Esen, E., Aslan, M., Sonbahar, B. Ç., & Kerimoğlu, R. S. (2019). YouTube English videos as a source of information on breast self-examination. Breast cancer research and treatment, 173(3), 629-635.
• Glogowska M, Campbell R. Investigating parental views of involvement in pre-school speech and language therapy. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2000 Jul-Sep; 35(3): 391–405.
• Hassona, Y., Taimeh, D., Marahleh, A., & Scully, C. (2016). YouTube as a source of information on mouth (oral) cancer. Oral diseases, 22(3), 202-208.
• Hegarty, E., Campbell, C., Grammatopoulos, E., DiBiase, A. T., Sherriff, M., & Cobourne, M. T. (2017). YouTube™ as an information resource for orthognathic surgery. Journal of orthodontics, 44(2), 90-96.
• Louis, K. O. S., Irani, F., Gabel, R. M., Hughes, S., Langevin, M., Rodriguez, M., ... & Weidner, M. E. (2017). Evidence-based guidelines for being supportive of people who stutter in North America. Journal of fluency disorders, 53, 1-13.
• Manning, W. H., & DiLollo, A. (2017). Clinical decision making in fluency disorders. Plural Publishing.
• Millard SK, Davis S. The Palin Parent Rating Scales: Parents’ Perspectives of Childhood Stuttering and Its Impact. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016 Oct; 59(5): 950–63.
• Nason GJ, Kelly P, Kelly ME, Burke MJ, Aslam A, Giri SK, Flood HD. YouTube as an educational tool regarding male urethral catheterization. Scand J Urol. 2015;49(2):189-192.
• Tellis, G. M., Gabel, R. M., Smith, D., & Tellis, C. M. (2002). Information about stuttering on the internet: A resource for school speech-language pathologists. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 29(Fall), 165-172.
• Raj, E. X., & Daniels, D. E. (2017). Psychosocial support for adults who stutter: Exploring the role of online communities. Speech, Language and Hearing, 20(3), 144-153.
• Shoemaker SJ, Wolf MS, Brach C. Development of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT): a new measure of understandability and actionability for print and audiovisual patient information. Patient Educ Couns 2014;96: 395e403.
• Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controling and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor—let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA. 1997;277:1244–1245.
• Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP (2012) YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis–a wakeup call? J Rheumatol 39:899–903
• Smith A, Weber C. How Stuttering Develops: The Multifactorial Dynamic Pathways Theory. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Sep; 60(9): 2483–505.
• Sorensen, J. A., Pusz, M. D., & Brietzke, S. E. (2014). YouTube as an information source for pediatric adenotonsillectomy and ear tube surgery. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 78(1), 65-70.
• Zraick, R. I., Azios, M., Handley, M. M., Bellon-Harn, M. L., & Manchaiah, V. (2021). Quality and readability of internet information about stuttering. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 67, 105824.
• https://www.youtube.com/intl/en-GB/about/press/ 30.07.21, saat 10.47