A View To Early Intervention Service Delivery: What Is Happening Now And What Are The Recommendations: Inclusion, Evaluation, And Natural Environment

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 24 - 55, 10.12.2014

Pınar Bayhan Judy Slyvia

Öz

As a concept early intervention and service delivery is one of the most talked issues today. Increasing importance and legal regulations on this area have drawn growing attraction to these subjects. The researches on these subjects have increased tremendously because it contains matters such as family-centered practice, children, service provider, natural environment, inclusion, transition, and evaluation. 20th anniversary of Part H of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990 (IDEA), questions remain about the implementation of early intervention services as specified by this law. When the law was passed in 1986, the purposes of Part H were very clear: to enhance the development of children, to reduce later educational costs to society, to maximize the likelihood of independent living for individuals with disabilities, to enhance the capacity of families to meet the needs of their children, and to build the capacity of the system to meet the needs of historically underrepresented populations. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Intervention, Service, Delivery

Kaynakça

• Able-Boone, H. B.; Sandall, S. (1990). An informed family-centered approach to public law 99- 457; parental views. Topics in early Childhood Special Education, 10, 100-111.
• Able-Boone, H. B.;Goodwin, L; Sandall, S.; Gordon, N.& Martin, D. (1992). Consumer based early intervention services. Journal of Early Intervention, 16, 201-209.
• Bailey, D. B., Jr., Winton, P., Rouse, L., & Turnbull, A. (1990). Family goals in infant intervention: Analysis and issues. Journal of Early Intervention, 14(1), 15-26.
• Bailey, D.B.;Pasha, S. A.& Simeonsson, R. J. (1991). Professional skills, concerns, and percieved importance of work with families in early intervention. Exceptional Children, 14, 156-165
• Balley, D. B.; McWilliam, R.A.; Buysse, V.; Wesley, P.W. (1998).Inclusion in the context of copmeting values in early childhood education. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 13, 1, 27-47.
• Bagnato, S. J. (2005). The Authentic alternative for assessment in early intervention: An emerging evidence-based practice. Journal of Early Intervention, 28, 17–22.
• Barnett, D. W & et al. (1999). Evaluating early intervention: Accountability methods for service delivery innovations. The Journal of Special Education, 33, 3, 177-188.
• Baysse, V.; Wesley, P. W.; Keyes, L. (1998). Implementing early childhood inclusion: Barrier and support factors. . Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 13, 1,169-184.
• Beckman, P.J.; Barnwell, D.; Horn, E.; Hanson, M. J. (1998). Communities, families and inclusion. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 13, 1, 125-150.
• Boone, H. A., Moore, S. M., & Coulter, D. K. (1995). Achieving family-centered practice in early intervention. Infant Toddler Intervention, 5, 395-404.
• Boone, H. A., & Crais, E. (1999). Strategies for achieving family-driven assessment and intervention planning. Young Exceptional Children, 3, 2-11.
• Bricker, D. (1986). Early intervention of at-risk and handicapped infants, toddlers and preschool children. Palo Alto, CA: Vort Corp.
• Briker, D. (2000).Inclusion: How the scence has changed. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20(1), 14-19.
• Bricker. D. (Ed.). (2002). Assessment, evaluation, and programming system for infants and children. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
• Bricker, D., Yovanoff, P. Capt, B., & Allen, D. (2003). Use of a curriculum-based measure 10 corroborate eligibility decisions. Journal of Early Intervention. 26(1), 20-30.
• Bricker, D. (2001). The natural environment: A useful construct? Infants and Young Children, 13(4), 21–31.
• Bruder, M. B. (1993). The Provision of early intervention and early childhood special education within community early childhood programs. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 13(1), 19-39.
• Bruder and Staff (1993),
• Bruder, M. B. (1993b). Early childhood community integration: An option for preschool special education. OSERS News, 5(3), 38-43.
• Bruder, M. B., Deiner, P., & Sachs, S. (1990). Models of integration through early intervention/child care collaboration. Zero to Three, 10(3), 14-17.
• Bruder, M. B. & Staff, I. (1997). Toddlers receiving early intervention in child care centers: A description of a service delivery system. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 17 (2), 185-209.
• Bruder, M. B. & Staff, I. (1998).A comparison of the effects of type of classroom and service characteristics on toddlers with disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, Vol. 18 (1), 26-38.
• Bruder, M. B. (2000). Family-centered early intervention clarifying our values for the new millennium. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20(2), 105-115.
• Buswell, B., & Schaffner, C.B. (1990). Families supporting inclusive schooling. In S. Stainback & W. Stainback (Eds.), Support networks for inclusive schooling (pp. 219-230). Baltimore: Brookes.
• Chai, A.Y; Zhang, C; Bisberg, M. (2006). Rethinking natural environment practice: Implications from examining various interpretations and approaches. Early Childhood Education Journal, 34 (3), 203-208.
• Childress, D.C. (2004)¸Special instruction and national environments: Best practices in early intervention. Infants and Young Children, 17( 2), 162-170.
• Dinebeil, L.A& Rule,S. (1999). Early intervention programs practices that support collaboration. Topics in early Childhood Special Education. 19(4), 225-235.
• Downs, A., & Strand, P. S. (2006). Using assessment to improve the effectiveness of early Childhood education. Journal of Child Family Study, 15, 671-680.
• Duggan, A. ; Windham, A.; McFarlane, E.;Fuddy, L; Rohde, C; Buchbinder, S.& Sia, C.(2000). Hawaii’s healthy start program of home visiting for at-risk families: evaluation of family identification, family engagement, and service delivery. Pediatrics, 105(1), 250-259..
• Dunst, C., Trivette, C., & Cross, A. (1986). Mediating influences of social support: Personal, family and child outcomes. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 90(4), 403-417.
• Dunst, C.J.; Hamby, D.; Trivette, C.M,; Raab, M. ; Bruder , M.B. (2000). Everyday family and community life and children’s naturally occurring learning opportunities. Journal of Early Intervention, 23, 151-164.
• Dunst, C.J.;, Bruder, M.B.; Trivette, C.M.: Raab, M. & McLean, M. (2001).Characteristics and consequences of everyday natural learning opportunities. Topics in early Childhood Special Education, 2 (12), 68-92.
• Dunst, C. J. (2001b). Participation of young children with disabilities in community learning activities. In Guralnick, M. J. (ed.), Early Childhood Inclusion: Focus on Change. Baltimore: Brookes, pp. 307–333.
• Foster, M., Berger, M., & McLean, M. (1981). Rethinking a good idea: A reassessment of parent involvement. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 1, 55-66.
• Gallagher, P.; Malone, D.M; Cleghorne, M.& Helms, K. A. (1997). Percieved Inservice Training needs for Early Intervention Personnel. Exceptional Children, 64, 19-26.
• Garbarino, J., & Ganzel, B. (2000). The human ecology of early risk. In S. J. Meisels & J. P. Shonkoff (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood intervention (2nd ed). New York: Cambridge University. . pp. 76-93.
• Gill, S., Greenberg, M. T., & Vazquez, A. (2002). Changes in the service delivery model and home visitors ’ job satisfaction and turnover in an Early Head Start program. Infant Mental Health Journal, 23(1-2), 182-196.
• Greenwood, C. R., Luze, G. J., Cline, G., Kuntz, S., & Leitschuh, C. (2002). Developing a general outcome measure of growth in movement for infants and toddlers. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 22, 143–157.
• Guralnick, M. J. (Ed.). (2005). The developmental systems approach to early intervention. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
• Hanft, B. E & Pilkington, K.O. (2000). Therapy in natural environments: The means or end goal for early intervention? Infants and Young Children, 12 (4), 1-13.
• Hanson, M.J.& Bruder, M.B. (2001). Early intervention: promises to keep. Infants and Young Children,13(3), 47-58.
• Hanson& Lynch, 1989; Hanson, M., & Lynch, E. (1989). Early intervention: implementing child and family services for infants and toddlers who are at-risk or disabled. Austin, TX: PRO- ED.
• Hanline, M. E (1990). A consulting model for providing integration opportunities for preschool children with disabilities. Journal of Early Intervention, 14, 360-366.
• Harbin, G., Danaher, J., & Derrick, T. (1994). Comparison of eligibility policies for infant/toddler programs and preschool special education programs. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 14, 455-471.
• Hurth, J., Shaw, E., Izeman, S., Whaley, K., & Rogers, S. (1999). Areas of agreement about effective practices serving young children with autism spectrum disorders. Infants and Young Children, 12, 17–26.
• Hume, K.; Bellini, S.; Pratt, C.( 2005). The Usage and Perceived Outcomes of Early Intervention and Early Childhood Programs for Young Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 25(:4),195-207.
• Junk,L.A.; .McCormick, K.M., & Jolivette, K. (2004). Early intervention in rural natural environments: Making the most of your time. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 87568705, Summer, 23 (3).
• Johnson-Martin, N, M., Hacker, B, J,, & Attermeier, S, M, (2004). The Carolina curriculum for preschoolers with special needs (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Paul H, Brookes.
• Kagan, S. L. (2003). Children’s readiness for school: Issues in assessment. International Journal of Early Childhood, 35, 114–120.
• Karnes & Stayton, 1988; Karnes, M., & Stayton, V. (1988). Model programs for infants and toddlers with handicaps. In J. Jordon, J. Gallagher, P. Hutinger, & M. Karnes (Eds.), Early childhood special education: Birth to three (pp. 67-108). Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
• Klass, C. S. (1996). Home visiting: Promoting healthy parent and child development. Baltimore: Brookes.
• Lieber, J., Capell, K., Sandall, S. R., Wolfberg, P., Horn, E., & Beckman, P. (1998). Inclusive preschool programs: Teachers' beliefs and practices. Early Childhood Research Quarterly.
• Linder, T. W. (1993). Transdisciplinary play-based intervention: Guidelines for developing meaningful curriculum for young children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
• Macy,M. G., Bricker, D. D., & Squires, J. K. (2005). Validity and reliability of a curriculum-based assessment approach to determine eligibility for Part C services. Journal of Early Intervention, 28, 1–16.
• Macy, M., & Hoyt-Gonzales, K. (2007). A Linked System Approach to Early Childhood Special Education Eligibility Assessment. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(3), 40-44.
• Mahoney, G. & O’Sullivan, P. (1990). Early intervention Practices with Families of Children with Handicaps. Mental Retardation, 2,169-176
• Meisels, S. J., Jablon, J. R., Marsden, D. B., Dichtelmiller, M. L., Dorfman, A. B., & Steele, D. M. (1994). The work sampling system: An overview. Ann Arbor, MI: Rebus, Inc.
• MC Collum, J. A. (2002). Influencing the Development of Young Children with Disabilities: CurrentThemes in Early Intervention. Child and Adolescent Mental Health 7, (1), 4-9.
• McCollum, J. A., Gooler, F., Appl, D.J., & Yates, T. J. (2001). PIWI: Enhancing parent–child interaction as a foundation for early intervention. Infants and Young Children, 14(1), 34–45.
• McCollum,M.& Hemmeter, M. L. (1997). Parent=child interaction intervention when children have disabilities. In. M. Guralnick (Ed.), The effectiveness of early intervention (pp 549-576). Baltire: Brookes.
• McDaniels, G. (1977). Successful programs for young handicapped children. Educational Horizons, 56, 26-33.
• McConnell, S. R., Priest, J. S., Davis, S. D., & McEvoy, M. A. (2002). Best practices in measuring growth and development for preschool children. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (Vol. 2, pp.1231–1246). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychology.
• McNamara, K., & Hollinger, C, (2003), Intervention-based assessment: Evaluation rates and eligibility findings. Exceptional Children, 69(2). 181-193.
• McWilliam, R.A & Scot, S. (2001). A Support approach to early intervention: A Three-part framework. Infants and Young Children, 13(4), 55-66.
• McWilliam, R. (2000). It's only natural to have early intervention services in the environments where it's needed. Young Exceptional Children Monograph on Natural Environments.
• Minke, P. H.& Scott, M.M. (1995). Parent-Professional relationships in early intervention: A qualitative investigation. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 15, 335-352.
• Mulvihil, B. A; Shearer, D; Van Horn, M.L. (2002). Training, experience, and child care providers’ perceptions of inclusion. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17, 197-215.
• Odom, S. L., & McEvoy, M. A. (1990). Mainstreaming at the preschool level: Potential barriers and tasks for the field. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 10, 48–61.
• Odom, S.L. &Diamond, K. E. (1998). Inclusion of young children with special needs: In early childhood education. The research base. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 13 (1), 3-25.
• Paine, S., Bellamy, T., & Wilcox, B. (1984). Human services that work: Form innovation to standard practice. Baltimore: Brookes.
• Parks. S., Furono. S., O'Reilly, K., (1994). lnatsuka. X, Hoska, C. M.. & Zeisloft-Palbey, B. Hawaii early learning profile (HFLP). Palo Alto, CA: Vort.
• Pilkington,K.O.; & Malinowski, M. (2002).The Natural Environment II: Uncovering Deeper Responsibilities within Relationship-Based Services. Infants and Young Children, October,78-82.
• Pretti-Frontczak, K. L.(2002). Using curriculum-based measures to promote a linked system approach. Assessment for Effective Intervention. 27(4), 15-21.
• Pretti-Frontczak. K. L. & Bricker, D, D. (2004). An activity-based approach to early intervention (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
• Pretti Frontczak, K, L,, Kowalski, K., & Brown, R. (2002), Preschool teachers' use of assessments and curricula: A statewide examination. Exceptional Children. 69(1), 109-124.
• Rous, B., Lobianco, T., Moffett, C. L., & Lund, I. (2005). Building preschool accountability systems: Guidelines resulting from a national study. Journal of Early Intervention, 28, 50– 64.
• Roberts, R. N.; Akers, A. L.& Behl, D. D. (1996). Family-level service coordination within home visiting programs. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 16, 279-301.
• Roberts, R. N.; Behl, D. D.& Akers, A. L. (1996). Community-level service integration within home visiting programs. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 16, 302-321.
• Sailor, W., Anderson, J., Halvorsen, A., Doering, K., Filler, J., & Goetz, L. (1989). The comprehensive local school. Baltimore: Brookes.
• Shannon,P.( 2004 ). Barriers to family centered services for infants and toddlers with developmental delays. Social Work, 49(2), 301-308.
• Sheehan, R., & Gradel, K. (1983). Intervention models in early childhood special education. In S. Garwood (Ed.), Educating young handicapped children: A developmental approach (pp. 475-514). Rockville, MD: Aspen.
• Sontag, J. C., & Schacht, R. (1993). Family diversity and patterns of service utilization in early intervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 17, 431-444.
• Shelden, M.L. & Rush, D.D. (2001). The ten myths about providing early intervention services in natural environments. Infants and Young Children, 14(1) , 1-13.
• Summers, J.A.; Dell’Olliver, C.; Turnbull, A.P.; Benson, H.A.; Santellis, E.; Campbell, M.& Siegel-Causey, E. (1990). Examining the Individual Family Service Plan Process: What are family and practitioner’s preferences? Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 10, 78- 99.
• Summers, J.A. & Turnbull, A.P. (1990).Examining the individualized family service plan process: What are family and practitioner preferences? Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 10 (1), 78-100.
• Stainback, S., & Stainback, W. (1990). Inclusive schooling. In S. Stainback & W. Stainback (Eds.), Support networks for inclusive schooling (pp. 3-24).
• Strully, J., & Strully, C. (1985). Friendship and our children. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 10, 223-227.
• Stoiber, K. C., Gettinger, M., & Goetz, D. (1998). Exploring factors influencing parents’ and early childhood practitioners’ beliefs about inclusion. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 13, 107–2006.
• Stoneman, Z. (1993). The effects of attitude on preschool integration. In C. A. Peck, S. L. Odom, & D. D. Bricker (Eds.), Integrating young children with disabilities into community programs: Ecological perspectives on research and implementation (pp,.223-248). Baltimore: Brookes.
• Templeman, T.P.; Fredericks, H.D.B., & Udell, T. (1989). Integration of children with moderate and severe handicaps into a day care center. Journal of Early Intervention, 13(4), 315-328.
• U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. (2002). Data analysis. Available at: http://www.ideadata.org/tables26th/ar ab1.Washington, DC: Author.
• U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. (2007). Early Intervention Program for Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities. Data analysis. Available at: http://idea.ed.gov/static/partCNprm.
• U.S. Department of Education, Office of Federal Register. (2006). Assistance to States for the Education of Children With Disabilities and Preschool Grants for Children With Disabilities; Final Rule. 34 CFR Parts 300 and 301, Part II. Data analysis. Available at: http://idea.ed.gov/download/finalregulations.pdf.
• Vanderheyden, A. M. (2005). Intervention-driven assessment practices in early childhood/early intervention: Measuring what is possible rather than what is present. Journal of Early Intervention, 28, 28–33.
• Villa, R.A., & Thousand,J.S. (1990). Administrative supports to promote inclusive schooling. In S. Stainback & W. Stainback (Eds.), Support networks for inclusive schooling (pp. 201-218). Baltimore: Brookes.
• Walsh, S., Rous, B., and Lutzer, C. (2000). The federal IDEA natural environments provisions. Young Except. Child. Monogr. Series No. 2: Nat. Environments Inclusion, 3–15.
• Zhang, C., Schwartz, B., Lee, H.. (2006). Collaborative services for infants and toddlers with disabilities: perspectives from professionals in an urban setting. Early Child Development and Care, 176(3-4), 299-311.