Poetic Inquiry Between Arts and Social Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Research and Pedagogical Tool

Öz

With the increased need for multiple methods in social sciences allowing a deeper understanding of interdisciplinarity and cross-cultural interactions in research and pedagogic contexts, scholars have started using arts based methodologies worldwide. Among these, poetic inquiry is one of the most expressive and convenient forms. This study aims to offer an extensive introduction to the field of poetic inquiry so as to introduce the concept and where it is applied, drawing upon my own studies as examples for the application of poetic inquiry as research and pedagogic methodologies. Within this framework, in the study, the collaboration between poetic inquiry and anthropology is underlined, expanding on how ethnographic poetry can be inspirational along with the poetry of other poets to gain insight and deeper meaning in their field of research. This is the means through which the artistic way of knowing can be acknowledged and honored in a field of social studies The use of ABR and poetic inquiry can radically change the pedagogy in multidisciplinary classrooms and this is observable in the ethnic poetry of anthropologists and other social science researchers beside the poetry of literary scholars.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Poetic inquiry
• art-based research
• social sciences
• poetry
• pedagogy
• Poetic inquiry
• art-based research
• poetry
• social sciences
• pedagogy

Poetic Inquiry Between Arts and Social Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Research and Pedagogical Tool

Öz

With the increased need for multiple methods in social sciences that allow a deeper understanding of interdisciplinarity and cross-cultural interactions in research and pedagogic contexts, scholars have started using arts-based methodologies worldwide. Among these, poetic inquiry is one used within art-based research studies (ABR) and is also one of the most convenient and expressive forms. This study aims to offer an extensive introduction to the field of poetic inquiry so as to introduce the concept and its areas of application by drawing upon my own studies as examples for the application of poetic inquiry as a pedagogic research methodology. Within this framework, the study will underline the collaboration between poetic inquiry and anthropology and expand on how ethnographic poetry can be inspirational alongside the poetry of other poets such as ethnographic poets in order to gain insight and deeper meaning in their fields of research. This is the means through which an artistic way of knowing can be acknowledged and honored in the field of social studies. The use of ABR and poetic inquiry can radically change the pedagogy in multidisciplinary classrooms, and this is observable in the ethnic poetry of anthropologists and other social science researchers as well as the poetry of literary scholars.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Poetic inquiry
• art-based research
• poetry
• social sciences
• pedagogy

Kaynakça

1. Baysoy, E., & Kurtulan, N. (2020, September). Poetic voice of photographs in art-based research practices: Grasping life via photography and poetry. Paper presented online at International Conference on Poetry Studies: Poetry Between Creation and Interpretation. St. Anne’s College, University of Oxford. Oxford, England. google scholar
2. Brady, I. (2000). Anthropological poetics. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.; pp. 949-979). Sage Publications. google scholar
3. Butler-Kisber, L. (2010). Qualitative inquiry: Thematic, narrative and arts informed perspectives. Sage. google scholar
4. Cahnmann-Taylor, M. M., & Zhang, K. (2020). Arts-based educational innovation and poetic inquiry. In M. A. Peters & R. Heraud (Eds.), Encyclopedia of educational innovation (pp. 1- 10). Springer. google scholar
5. Carrithers, M. (1990). Is anthropology art or science? Current Anthropology, 31(3), 263-272. google scholar
6. Faulkner, S. (2010). Poetry as method: Reporting research through verse. Left Coast Press. google scholar
7. Flores, T. (1982). Field poetry. Anthropology and Humanism Quarterly, 7(1), 16-22. google scholar
8. Furman, R. (2014). Beyond the literary uses of poetry: A class for university freshmen. Journal of Poetry Therapy, 27(4), 205-211. https://doi/10.1080/08893675.2014.949521 google scholar

9. Guler, A. (2017a). Exploring a/r/tography in an interdisciplinary way: Touching music in visual art practices. In P. Burnard, V. Ross, H. J. Minors, K. Powell, T. Dragovic, & E. Mackinlay (Eds.), BİBAC2016 International Conference. Building Interdisciplinary and Intercultural Bridges Where Practice Meets Research and Theory (pp. 158-165). Retrieved from: http://bibacc.org/wp-content/ uploads/2016/08/Building-Interdisciplinary-and-Intercultral-Bridges_compressed-updated-v_4.pdf google scholar
10. Guler, A. (2017b). A journey with music into the depths of infinity (N. Kurtulan, Tran.). Unpublished book. google scholar
11. Hanauer, D. I. (2010). Poetry as research: Exploring second language poetry writing. John Benjamins Publishing. google scholar
12. Hanauer, D. (2012). Meaningful literacy: Writing poetry in the language classroom. Language Teaching, 45(1), 105-115. https://doi/10.1017/S0261444810000522 google scholar
13. Hirschfield, J. (2010). Commentary: Three keys: Opening the gate of poetry to young writers. LEARNing Landscapes, 4(1), 43-49. https://doi/10.36510/learnland.v4i1.360 google scholar
14. Hong Chen, R. (2009). Pedagogical approaches to foreign language education: A discussion of poetic forms and culture. SFU Educational Review, 1(2009), 49-57. google scholar
15. Kurtulan, N., & Baysoy, E. (2021). Poetic voice of photographs in art based research practices: Grasping life via photography and poetry. In K. Gunesch (Ed.), Music, poetry and language: Sound, sight and speech in comparative and creative connection. google scholar
16. Kurtulan, N., & Guler, A. (2019, October 25-26). Transformative roles of music, painting and text in inspiring poetry. Paper presented at International Conference on Musical Intersections in Practice. Centre for Intercultural Musicology, Churchill College Cambridge, UK. google scholar
17. Lahman, M. K. E., Rodriguez, K. L., Richard, V. M., Geist, M. R., Schendel, R. K., & Graglia, P. E. (2011). (Re)forming research poetry. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(9), 887-896. google scholar
18. Leavy, P. (2017). Handbook of arts-based research (pp. 3-4). The Guilford Press. google scholar
19. Lebkowska, A. (2012). Between the anthropology of literature and literary anthropology. Teksty: Anthropology in Literary Studies, 2, 30-43. google scholar
20. Leggo, C. (2007). Tangled lines: The art of researching our lives. The Journal of Educational Thought, 41(2), 191-199. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.library.uvic.ca/ docview/213795563?accountid=14846 google scholar
21. Leggo, C. (2008). Astonishing silence: Knowing in poetry. In J. G. Knowles & A. L. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, methodologies, examples, and issues (pp. 166-175). SAGE Publications. https://doi/10.4135/9781452226545.n14 google scholar
22. Leggo, C. (2010). Writing a life: Representation in language and image. Transnational Curriculum Inquiry, 7(2), 47-62. Retrieved from http://nitinat.library.ubc.ca/ojs/index.php.tci google scholar
23. Leggo, C. (2011). Living love: Confessions of a fearful teacher. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 9(1), 115-145. Retrieved from http://pi.library.yorku.ca/ojs/index.php/jcacs/ issue/view/1852/showToc google scholar
24. Leggo, C. (2018a). Holding fast to H: Ruminations on the ARTS preconference. Artizein: Arts and Teaching Journal, 3(1), 15-25. Retrieved from: https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/atj/vol3/iss1/5 google scholar
25. Leggo, C. (2018b). Poetry in the academy: A language of possibility. Canadian Journal of Education, 41(1), 69-97. Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com.ezproxy.library.uvic.ca/ps/i. do?p=CPIandu=uvictoriaandid=GALE|A538858946andv=2.1andit=randsid=summon# google scholar
26. Leggo, C., Sinner, A. E., Irwin, R. L., Pantaleo, K., Gouzouasis, P., & Grauer, K. (2011). Lingering in liminal spaces: A/r/tography as living inquiry in a language arts class. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 24(2), 239-256. https://doi/10.1080/09518391003641908 google scholar
27. MacKenzie-Dawson, S. (2018). Intimate uncertainties: A mother returns to poetic inquiry. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 19 (3), 1-30. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative- research.net/index. php/fqs/article/view/2661/4267 google scholar
28. Maynard, K., & Cahnmann-Taylor, M. (2010). Anthropology at the edge of words: Where poetry and ethnography meet. Anthropology and Humanism, 35(1), 2-19. https://doi/10.1111/j.1548-1409.2010.01049.x google scholar
29. McCullis, D. (2013). Poetic inquiry and multidisciplinary qualitative research. Journal of Poetry Therapy, 26(2), 83-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08893675.2013.794536 google scholar
30. Owton, H. (2017). Introducing poetic inquiry. In Doing poetic inquiry (pp. 1-14). Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
31. Prendergast, M. (2004). ‘Shaped like a question mark’: Found poems from Herbert Blau’s The audience. Research in Drama Education, 9(1), 73-92. https://doi/abs/10.1080/1356978042000185920 google scholar
32. Prendergast, M. (2009). Introduction: The phenomena of poetry in research “Poem is what? Poetic inquiry in qualitative social science research.” In M. Prendergast, C. Leggo, & P. Sameshima (Eds), Poetic inquiry, vibrant voices in the social sciences (pp. xxiv-xxxii). Sense Publishers. google scholar
33. Prendergast, M. (2015). Poetic inquiry, 2007-2012: A surrender and catch found poem. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(8), 678-685. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414563806 google scholar
34. Prendergast, M. (2020). Dwelling in the human/posthuman entanglement of poetic inquiry: Poetic missives to and from Carl Leggo. Journal of the Canadian Association of Curriculum Studies, 17(2), 13-33. Retrieved from https://jcacs.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/jcacs/article/view/40442/36455 google scholar
35. Rajabali, A. (2017). Rhizome (re)imagined: A rhizome in the sky. Art/Research International: A Transdisciplinary Journal, 2(1), 136-152. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.18432/R2C626 google scholar
36. Richardson, L. (1992). The consequences of poetic representation. In C. Ellis & M. G. Flaherty (Eds.), Investigating subjectivity: Research on lived experience (pp. 125-137). SAGE Publications. google scholar
37. Sameshima, P., James, K., Leggo, C., & Fidyk, A. (2017). Poetic inquiry past and present abilities. In Samshima, P., James, K., Leggo, C., and Fidyk, A., (Eds). Poetic inquiry enchantment of place (pp. 11-29). Vernon Press. google scholar
38. Skoggard, I., & Waterston, A. (2015). Introduction: Toward an anthropology of affect and evocative ethnography. Anthropology of Consciousness, 26(2), 109-120. Retrieved from: Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1111/anoc.12041 google scholar
39. Vincent, A. (2018). Is there a definition? Ruminating on poetic inquiry, strawberries and the continued growth of the field. Art/Research International: A Transdisciplinary Journal, 3(2), 48-76. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.18432/ari29356 google scholar
40. Wiebe, S. Sameshima, P., Irwin, R., Leggo, C., Gouzouasis, P., & Grauer, K. (2007). Re-imagining arts integration: Rhizomatic relations of the everyday. Journal of Educational Thought, 41(3), 263-280. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/23765522 google scholar
41. Zani, L., Zia, A., Stone, N., Kusserow, A., & Elliott, D. (2019). How we review and support the art of ethnographic poetry at anthropology and humanism. Anthropology and Humanism, 44(2),182-188. google scholar