Araştırma Makalesi

PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF SPATIAL SEARCH ALGORTIHMS FOR SPECIFIC DATASETS IN SMART CITIES

Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1 30 Ağustos 2020
PDF İndir
TR EN

PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF SPATIAL SEARCH ALGORTIHMS FOR SPECIFIC DATASETS IN SMART CITIES

Öz

The concept of smart city has emerged in the digital age. One of the main purposes of smart cities is to provide components that will provide time efficiency. Smart transportation and parking services are included in this concept. The basis of these services is based on real-time spatial search algorithms. We need to use performance spatial search algorithms for real-time spatial searches. Popular spatial search algorithms; k nearest neighbor, rectangle queries, r-tree and kd-tree. In the query made from a point in the spatial plane, the selection of the correct algorithm is important in terms of performance. The purpose of this study; to determine the algorithm that determines the nearest neighbor in a given dataset in the fastest way for the selected center point. The 4 spatial search algorithms written in Python language were compared with the tests and the most suitable algorithm was determined for the data set. The algorithm can be used in the city component model similar to the data set, so efficient time management is provided in the city life where time is valuable.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Cover, T., Hart, P. (1967). Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 13, 21-27.
  2. Digital in 2020. We are Social, https://wearesocial.com/digital-2020 Guttman, A. (1984). R Trees: A Dynamic Index Structure for Spatial Searching. Sigmod Record, 14, 47-57. Hou, W., Li, D., Xu, C., Zhang, H., Li, T. (2019). An Advanced k Nearest Neighbor Classification Algorithm Based on KD-tree. 2018 IEEE International Conference of Safety Produce Informatization (IICSPI), 10-12 Dec. 2018, Chongqing, China.
  3. Hu, L., Huang, M., Ke, S., Tsai, C. (2016). The distance function effect on k-nearest neighbor classification for medical datasets. SpringerPlus, 5, 1304.
  4. Li, G., Tang, J. (2010). A New K-NN Query Algorithm Based on the Traversal and Search of the Dynamic Rectangle. 2010 International Conference on E-Product E-Service and E-Entertainment, 7-9 Nov. 2010, Henan, China.
  5. Liu D, Lim E, Ng W. (2002). Efficient k nearest neighbor queries on remote spatial databases usingrange estimation. In: Proceedings of international conf. on scientific and statistical databasesmanagement (SSDMB), 2426 July 2002, pp 121–130, Edinburgh.
  6. Oliphant, T. E. (2007). Python for Scientific Computing. Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 10-20. Zhang, S., Li, X., Zong, M., Zhu, X., Wang, R. (2017). Efficient kNN Classification With Different Numbers of Nearest Neighbors. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 29, 1774-1785.
  7. Zhang, Z., Zhang, J., Yang, J., Yang, Y. (2007). A New Approach to Creating Spatial Index with R-Tree. 2007 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 19-22 Aug. 2007, Hong Kong, China.
  8. Zhu, Q., Gong, J., Zhang, Y. (2007). An efficient 3D R-tree spatial index method for virtual geographic environments. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 62, 217-224.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Bilgisayar Yazılımı

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Ağustos 2020

Gönderilme Tarihi

2 Mayıs 2020

Kabul Tarihi

21 Mayıs 2020

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2020 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Girgin, M., & Boyacı, A. (2020). PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF SPATIAL SEARCH ALGORTIHMS FOR SPECIFIC DATASETS IN SMART CITIES. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Teknoloji ve Uygulamalı Bilimler Dergisi, 3(1), 41-50. https://izlik.org/JA24GC98YU
AMA
1.Girgin M, Boyacı A. PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF SPATIAL SEARCH ALGORTIHMS FOR SPECIFIC DATASETS IN SMART CITIES. TUB. 2020;3(1):41-50. https://izlik.org/JA24GC98YU
Chicago
Girgin, Mert, ve Ali Boyacı. 2020. “PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF SPATIAL SEARCH ALGORTIHMS FOR SPECIFIC DATASETS IN SMART CITIES”. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Teknoloji ve Uygulamalı Bilimler Dergisi 3 (1): 41-50. https://izlik.org/JA24GC98YU.
EndNote
Girgin M, Boyacı A (01 Ağustos 2020) PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF SPATIAL SEARCH ALGORTIHMS FOR SPECIFIC DATASETS IN SMART CITIES. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Teknoloji ve Uygulamalı Bilimler Dergisi 3 1 41–50.
IEEE
[1]M. Girgin ve A. Boyacı, “PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF SPATIAL SEARCH ALGORTIHMS FOR SPECIFIC DATASETS IN SMART CITIES”, TUB, c. 3, sy 1, ss. 41–50, Ağu. 2020, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA24GC98YU
ISNAD
Girgin, Mert - Boyacı, Ali. “PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF SPATIAL SEARCH ALGORTIHMS FOR SPECIFIC DATASETS IN SMART CITIES”. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Teknoloji ve Uygulamalı Bilimler Dergisi 3/1 (01 Ağustos 2020): 41-50. https://izlik.org/JA24GC98YU.
JAMA
1.Girgin M, Boyacı A. PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF SPATIAL SEARCH ALGORTIHMS FOR SPECIFIC DATASETS IN SMART CITIES. TUB. 2020;3:41–50.
MLA
Girgin, Mert, ve Ali Boyacı. “PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF SPATIAL SEARCH ALGORTIHMS FOR SPECIFIC DATASETS IN SMART CITIES”. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Teknoloji ve Uygulamalı Bilimler Dergisi, c. 3, sy 1, Ağustos 2020, ss. 41-50, https://izlik.org/JA24GC98YU.
Vancouver
1.Mert Girgin, Ali Boyacı. PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF SPATIAL SEARCH ALGORTIHMS FOR SPECIFIC DATASETS IN SMART CITIES. TUB [Internet]. 01 Ağustos 2020;3(1):41-50. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA24GC98YU