An Ecocritical Reading of a Hero: To Be Human or Not in Beowulf

Öz

In contemporary studies and literary works, ecocriticism is generally associated with present problems and conditions related to the interconnection between humans and nature. Likewise, the Middle Ages offer numerous fields for ecocriticism, such as the definition and treatment of animals, climatic disasters like the Little Ice Age, and reflections of these in literary works of the time, even beginning with the biblical narration of the Creation. Accordingly, this article aims to shed light on the relationship between humans and nonhumans in the Middle Ages through the analysis of Beowulf by foregrounding the differences between humans and nonhumans within the framework of medieval ecocriticism, which has become the centre of academic medieval studies in recent years. In Beowulf, the human and nonhuman relationship is interwoven within an ecocritical approach. However, as seen through a close reading of the text, an ecocritical reading of Beowulf is possible not due to an inherent ecocritical awareness of nature within the epic, but because humans, nonhumans, and nature cannot be evaluated independently of each other, despite the sharp line drawn between the human and the nonhuman.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ecocriticism
• Medieval ecocriticism
• Beowulf
• Human
• Nonhuman

Bir Kahramanın Ekoeleştirel Okuması: Beowulf'ta İnsan Olmak veya Olmamak

Öz

Çağdaş çalışmalarda ve edebî eserlerde ekoeleştiri insan ve doğa arasındaki etkileşimle ilgili sorunlarla ve konularla ilişkilendirilmektedir. Benzer şekilde, Orta Çağ, ekoeleştiri çerçevesinde, hatta İncil'deki Yaratılış anlatısından başlayarak, hayvanların tanımı ve muamelesi, Küçük Buz Çağı gibi iklim felaketleri ve bunların dönemin edebî eserlerindeki yansımaları gibi çok sayıda çalışma alanı sunmaktadır. Bu bağlamda, bu makale, son yıllarda döneme ilişkin akademik çalışmaların merkezine yerleşen Orta Çağ ekoeleştirisi çerçevesinde Beowulf destanı üzerinden insan ve insandışı varlıklar arasındaki farklılıkları ön plana çıkararak, Orta Çağ’da insan ve insandışı varlıklar arasındaki ilişkiye ışık tutmayı hedeflemektedir. Beowulf adlı eserde insan ve insandışının ilişkisi ekoeleştirel yaklaşımla iç içe geçmiştir. Ancak, Beowulf’un ekoeleştirel okuması, metnin yakın okumasında da görüleceği üzere, destanın içinde doğaya ilişkin doğal bir ekoeleştirel farkındalık bulunmasından kaynaklanmaz. Bilakis, bu okuma, insan ve insandışı varlıklar arasında çizilen keskin çizgiye rağmen, insan, insandışı varlıklar ve doğanın birbirinden bağımsız olarak değerlendirilememesi gerçeğinden ortaya çıkmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ekoeleştiri
• Orta Çağ ekoeleştirisi
• Beowulf
• İnsan
• İnsandışı

Kaynakça

1. Aberth, John. An Environmental History of the Middle Ages: The Crucible of Nature. Routledge, 2013.
2. Agibalova, Ye., and G. Donskoy. Ortaçağ Tarihi. Translated by Çağdaş Sümer, Yordam Kitap, 2017.
3. Baum, Paull F. “The Beowulf Poet.” An Anthology of Beowulf Criticism, edited by Lewis E. Nicholson, University of Notre Dame Press, 1980, pp. 353–365.
4. Bayıltmış Öğütcü, Oya. “Ortaçağ El Yazmalarında Konuşan Hayvanlar.” Doğu Batı: Faunaya Ağıt: Hayvan, vol. 82, 2017, pp. 277–295.
5. Buell, Lawrence. “Ecocriticism: Some Emerging Trends.” Qui Parle, vol. 19, 2011, pp. 87–115.
6. Cavell, Meghan. “Constructing the Monstrous Body in Beowulf.” Anglo-Saxon England, vol. 43, 2014, pp. 155–181.
7. Classen, Albrecht. “Ecocritical Readings of Medieval German and Latin Heroic Poetry.” Arts and Communication, vol. 4, no. 1, 2026, pp. 1–10. doi:10.36922/AC025170027.
8. Dragland, S. L. “Monster-Man in Beowulf." Neoplilologus, vol. 61, no. 4, 1977, pp. 606–618. doi:10.1007/BF01514528.

9. Drout, Michael D. C. “‘Beowulf: The Monsters and the Critics’: Seventy-Five Years Later.” Mythlore, vol. 30, no. 1, 2011, pp. 5–22.
10. Estes, Heide. Anglo-Saxons Literary Landscapes: Ecotheory and the Environmental Imagination. Amsterdam University Press, 2017.
11. Fulk, R. D. “Old English Meter and Oral Tradition: Three Issues Bearing on Poetic Chronology.” The Journal of English and Germanic Philology, vol. 106, 2007, pp. 304–324. doi:10.2307/27712658.
12. Glotfelty, Cheryll. “Introduction: Literary Studies in an Age of Environmental Crisis.” The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology, edited by Glotfelty and Harold Fromm, The University of Georgia Press, 1996, pp. xv–xxxvii.
13. Heaney, Seamus, trans. “Beowulf.” The Norton Anthology of English Literature: The Middle Ages, edited by Stephen Greenblatt et al., vol. 1, W. W. Norton, 2000. pp. 1–213.
14. Huggan, Graham, and Helen Tiffin. Postcolonial Ecocriticism: Literature, Animals, Environment. Routledge, 2009.
15. Jordan, William Chester. The Great Famine: Northern Europe in the Early Fourteenth Century. Princeton University Press, 1996.
16. Kroll, Norma. “Beowulf: The Hero as Keeper of Human Polity.” Modern Philology, vol. 84, no. 2, 1986, pp. 117–129.
17. Langland, William. William’s Vision of Piers Plowman. Edited by Ben Byram-Wigfield, 2006.
18. Nitzsche, Jane C. “The Structural Unity of Beowulf: The Problem of Grendel's Mother.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language, vol. 22, 1980, pp. 287–303.
19. Oppermann, Serpil. “Conclusion: A Roundtable Discussion on Ecocriticism.” The Future of Ecocriticism: New Horizons, edited by Opperman, Ufuk Özdağ, Nevin Özkan, and Scott Slovic, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2011, pp. 459–480.
20. Reynolds, William. “Heroism in Beowulf: A Christian Perspective.” Christianity and Literature, vol. 27, 1978, pp. 27–42.
21. Said, Edward W. Orientalism. Penguin Books, 2003.
22. “Sir Gawain and the Green Knight.” The Norton Anthology of English Literature, edited by Stephen Greenblatt et al., vol. 1, W.W. Norton, 2006. pp. 160–213.
23. Smith, William Bradford. “Crossing the Boundaries of the Civic, the Natural, and the Supernatural in Medieval and Renaissance Europe.” The Book of Nature and Humanity in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, edited by David Hawkes, Richard G. Brebols Publishers, 2013, pp. 133–156.
24. Stanbury, Sarah. “Ecochaucer: Green Ethics and Medieval Nature.” The Chaucer Review, vol. 39, no. 1, 2004, pp. 1–16.
25. Stevick, Robert D. “Christian Elements and the Genesis of Beowulf.” Modern Philology, vol. 61, 1963, pp. 79–89.
26. Taylor, Paul Beekman. “The Traditional Language of Treasure in Beowulf.” The Journal of English and Germanic Philology, vol. 85, 1986, pp. 191–205.
27. Thomas, P. G. “Notes on the Language of Beowulf.” The Modern Language Review, vol. 1, 1906, pp. 202–207.
28. Tietjen, Mary C. Wilson. “God, Fate, and the Hero of Beowulf.” The Journal of English and Germanic Philology, vol. 74, 1975, pp. 159–171.
29. Tolkien, J. R. R. “Beowulf: The Monsters and the Critics.” An Anthology of Beowulf Criticism, edited by Lewis E. Nicholson, University of Notre Dame Press, 1980, pp. 51–103.
30. Whallon, William. “The Christianity of Beowulf.” Modern Philology, vol. 60, 1962, pp. 81–94.
31. Yıldız, Nazan. “Anglo-Saxon Cultural Memory and Identity Immortalised in Beowulf.” Memory in Western Literature, edited by Kağan Kaya, Cumhuriyet University Publishing, 2018, pp. 201–222.
32. Yıldız Çiçekçi, Nazan. “Nonhumans Ennobling Man: Wisdom and Redemption via Nature in Sir Orfeo and Sir Gawain and The Green Knight.” Forthcoming.