Biogas Potentials of Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Rumen Contents and Sewage Sludge

Öz

Sewage sludge (SS) and rumen contents (RC) are produced daily in waste stabilization ponds and abattoirs respectively as organic wastes. However, these wastes could pose a threat to the environment if not properly managed hence, this research investigated the potentials of these wastes in generating biogas. This was achieved by digesting different SS/RC ratios anaerobically for 75days and recording the biogas produced under mesophilic condition. The SS and RC were obtained from Ahmadu Bello University (ABU) waste stabilization pond and cattle (Bos indicus) respectively, while the SS/RC ratios considered are 1:0, 0:1, 1:1, 1:2 and 2:1. Results showed that co-digestion at SS/RC ratios 1:1, 1:2 and 2:1 produced more biogas compared to mono-digestions of equivalent volumes of SS (1:0) and RC (0:1). This is because the daily biogas potentials for SS/RC ratios 1:0, 0:1, 1:1, 1:2 and 2:1 are 3.59, 5.61, 6.09, 6.67 and 5.79ml per gram of TS added respective. In other words, biogas potential for SS improved by 69.64, 85.79 and 61.28% when co-digested with RC at SS/RC ratios 1:1, 1:2 and 2:1 respectively, while that of RC improved by 8.56, 18.89 and 3.21% at SS/RC ratios 1:1, 1:2 and 2:1 respective. Hence, it was concluded that co-digestion of SS and RC at SS/RC ratio 1:2 produced more biogas followed by 1:1 and 2:1 accordingly.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Biogas
• Mesophilic
• Rumen
• Sludge

Kaynakça

1. [1] Chloe, M., Fiona, C., Eva, L., Michael, R., Paul, W.O., Paul, D.C., “The Rumen Microbiome: A Crucial Consideration when Optimising Milk and Meat Production and Nitrogen Utilisation Efficiency”, Gut Microbes, vol. 10, no.2, pp. 115-132, 2019.
2. [2] Kristi, M.C., Kathleen, J.A., William, R.L., Gavin, C.C., Hannah, C.C., “Ruminant Nutrition Symposium: Tiny but Mighty: The Role of the Rumen Microbes in Livestock Production”, Journal of Animal Science, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 752-770, 2018.
3. [3] Nematollah, D., Keyvan, K., Abbas, Z., “Special Rumen Microbiology”, International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research, vol. 1, no. 11, pp. 1397-1402, 2013.
4. [4] Azilah, H., Azlina, A.A., Che, M.I., “The Impact of Renewable Energy Consumption on Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Empirical Evidence from Developing Countries in Asia”, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, vol. 9, no. 3, 135-143, 2019.
5. [5] Dolf, G., Francisco, B., Deger, S., Morgan, D.B., Nicholas, W., Richardo, G., “The Role of Renewable Energy in the Global Energy Transformation”, Energy and Strategy Reviews, vol. 24, pp. 38-50, 2019.
6. [6] Richard, A., Martina, F.B., Edward, A., “Biogas as a Potential Renewable Energy Source: A Ghanaian Case Study”, Renewable Energy, vol. 36, pp. 1510-1516, 2011.
7. [7] Balat, M and Balat, H., “Biogas as a Renewable Energy Source – A Review”, Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects, vol. 31, no. 14, pp. 1280-1293, 2009.
8. [8] Ayhan, D., Osman, T., Durmus, K., “Biogas Production from Municipal Sewage Sludge (MSS)”, Energy Source, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects, vol. 38, no. 20, pp. 3027-3033, 2016.

9. [9] Sebastian, B., Przemyslaw, K., “Co-Digestion of Pig Slaughterhouse Waste with Sewage Sludge. Waste Management, vol. 40, pp. 119-126, 2015.
10. [10] Garg, S.K., “Sewage Disposal and Air Pollution Engineering (Environmental Engineering Vol. II) 22nd Edition”, Khanna Publishers, New Delhi, India, 2009.
11. [11] APHA “Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater (22nd Edition)”, American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA), Water Pollution Control Federation (WPCF), Washington DC, 2012.
12. [12] Fares, A., Rahul, R.B., “Enhancing the Production of Biogas through Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Agricultural Waste and Chemical Pre-Treatments”, Chemosphere, vol. 225, 128605, pp. 1-13, 2020.
13. [13] Nkodi, M.T., Mulaji, K.C., Mabela, M.R., Kayembi, S.J., Bie, M.E., Ekoko, G., Taba, K.M., “Investigation of Factors Affecting Biogas Production from Cassava Peels by Fractional Factorial Design Experimental Methodology”, Journal of Applied Life Sciences International, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 49-56, 2020.
14. [14] Spyridon, A., Gerrit, J.W. “Elevated Biogas Production from the Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Farmhouse Waste: Insight into the Process Performance and Kinetics”, Waste Management & Research, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 1240-1249, 2019.