Field Based Learning About Butterfly Diversity in School Garden-A Case Study From Puducherry, India

Abstract

Butterflies are essential components for well functioning of ecosystems due to their key roles as pollinators and as indicators of ecosystem health. Butterflies are also beloved by public as well as young students and children, who are largely unaware that many species are threatened or endangered. The main objectives of field based education for butterfly conservation were to create knowledge, interest and necessary skills to investigate and, identify the butterfly species and conserve its diversity in school gardens. For butterfly survey the census technique method was taught to the students to investigate the diversity of butterflies during the field trips. During the field trip a total of 34 butterfly species, belonging to 4 families, were recorded with standard literature and colour photographs. The Nymphalidae family was the dominant species found in school gardens. The study concluded that the young students must be given the chance to investigate, engage with and experience nature in order to appreciate and be motivated to conserve and protect these fascinating insects at local level. The conservation of our natural biological resources will be dependent upon future generations. This field based learning program inspired to identify and conserve the butterfly diversity within the school gardens.

Keywords

• Field based education, butterfly conservation, census technique, biodiversity

Kaynakça

1. Burkholder, R. E. (2003). To see things in their wholeness: Consilience, natural history, and teaching literature outdoors. In H. Crimmel (Ed.), Teaching in the field: Working with students in the outdoor classroom. (pp. 17-32). Salt Lake City, UT:The University of Utah Press.
2. Cuthbertson, B., Dyment, J., Curtnoys, L. P., Potter, T. G., & O’Connell, T. (2003).Engaging nature: A Canadian case study of learning in the outdoors. In H.Crimmel (Ed.), Teaching in the field, (pp. 77- 98). Salt Lake City, UT: The University of Utah Press.
3. Dittrick, (2003). The Value of Place-Based Education, department of environmental science, Barnard College, Broadway New York, USA
4. Elder, John, Ed. (1998). Stories in the Land: A Place-Based Environmental Education
5. Heppner J.B. (1991). Faunal regions and the diversity of Lepidoptera, tropical Lepidoptera 2 (supl 1) 1to 85
6. India & CBD. (2010). cop 10 Nagoya Japan
7. Issack Kehimer. (2008). The Book of Indian Butterflies published by Bombay Natural History Society India (BNHS), Oxford University Press
8. Jarret. C. (2000). Daniels Florida Butterfly Monitoring Centre (FBMN)

9. Kunte, K. (2000). Butterflies of peninsular India (India: A Lifescape). Hyderabad: Universities press (India) Limited. 272 p.
10. Lisowski, M., & J.F. Disinger. (1992). The effect of field based instruction on students understanding understanding on ecological concepts. Journal of environmental education 23: 19-23.
11. Orion, N., & A. Hofstein. (1994). Factors that influence learning during a scientific field trip in a natural environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 31:1097 1119.
12. Orr, D. W. (1992). Ecological literacy: Education and the transition to a postmodern world. Albany: State University of New York Press.
13. Pendharkar. (2010). Butterfly (Rhopalocera) fauna of Maharashtra Nature Park, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India, Check List Volume 6 Issue 1 2010
14. Shirley Cummins & Gloria Snively. (2000). The Effect of Instruction on Children’s Knowledge of Marine Ecology, Attitudes Toward the Ocean, and Stances Toward Marine Resource Issues Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 5, Spring 2000
15. Thomashow, M. (1995). Ecological identity: Becoming a reflective environmentalist. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
16. Thomashow, M. (2001). A biosphere natural history. ORION 20 (4): 24-37.